Surgical Experience in Prevention of Postoperative CSF Leaks Using Abdominal Fat Grafts in Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas

Sinonasal Outcomes of the Combined Transseptal/Transnasal Approach with Unilateral Nasoseptal Rescue Flap in Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Objectives  The authors applied surgical techniques acquired during the use of endoscopic combined transseptal/transnasal approach to reduce approach-related morbidity and improve sinonasal outcomes. Study Design  This is a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected database. Setting  The study setting involves a tertiary referral center. Participants  A total of 86 patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for newly diagnosed pituitary adenomas from April 2018 to March 2021 were included. Patients treated via the combined transseptal/transnasal approach served as the study group ( n  = 18); those treated via the bilateral transnasal approach comprised the control group ( n  = 68). From the control group, propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was further performed to account for potential confounders and selection bias. Main Outcome Measures  Paired analysis was performed for pre- and 6-month-postoperative time points in study group, control group, and PSM control group. Olfactory function was evaluated by Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC) test, Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test (CCSIT), and sinonasal outcomes were assessed by Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22). Results  In the study group, CCCRC ( p  = 0.517) and CCSIT ( p  = 0.497) did not show any significant difference before and after surgery. There was some improvement in the symptom score of SNOT-22, but it was not statistically significant ( p  = 0.115). In the control group adjusted with PSM, a significant decrease in olfaction ( p  = 0.047) was observed using CCCRC. The CCSIT score was also decreased but not significant ( p  = 0.163). Also, there was no difference in the improvement of SNOT-22 ( p  = 0.781). Conclusion  Our new surgical method preserves olfactory function without compromising surgical outcomes.

Risk Factors Associated with Postoperative CSF Leak in Extrasellar Tumors

Objective  While postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rates of pituitary tumors have been frequently studied, there are fewer studies examining postoperative CSF leak rates for extrasellar tumors. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of postoperative CSF leak in patients undergoing endoscopic surgery for extrasellar tumors. Methods  A retrospective chart review was done for patients who underwent endoscopic resection for extrasellar tumors between 2008 and 2020. Age, gender, tumor type, tumor location, tumor size, reconstruction technique, medical comorbidities, and other potential risk factors were identified. Data was analyzed to identify significant risk factors for development of postoperative CSF leak. Results  There were 100 patients with extrasellar tumors who developed intraoperative CSF leaks. Seventeen patients (17%) developed postoperative CSF leaks. Leaks occurred at a median of 2 days following surgery (range 0-34 days). Clival tumors had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative leak than those in other sites ( p  < 0.05). There were no significant differences in other locations, body mass index, tumor size, reconstruction technique, medical comorbidities, or other factors. There were nearly twice as many intraoperative grade III leaks in those who developed postoperative CSF leak, but this was not statistically significant ( p  = 0.12). Conclusion  Extrasellar tumors, particularly clival tumors, have a higher rate of postoperative CSF leak than pituitary tumors. Prophylactic lumbar drains can be considered for patients at high risk for developing postoperative CSF leak.

Intradural fat graft packing is not indispensable in preventing postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage in endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma surgeries

Objectives

Is intradural fat graft packing indispensable in preventing postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage in endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma surgeries? This study aimed to review the methods and outcomes of our graded sellar floor reconstruction strategy without fat graft packing in endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma surgeries.

Methods

From March 2018 to December 2022, 200 patients underwent endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma resection by a single author in our institute. We applied different graded skull base reconstruction strategies in different periods. Intradural fat graft packing was used to reconstruct the skull base in the early period, from March 2018 to June 2019, but fat graft was not used in the late period, from January 2020 to December 2022. The effect of these different graded skull base reconstruction strategies and whether intradural fat graft packing is necessary were evaluated by observing the incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak.

Results

In the early period, fat graft was used to reconstruct skull base when the intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage existed. There were two patients who suffered from postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak in this group. In the late period, fat graft was not used to reconstruct the skull base, and no patient suffered from postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage in this group.

Conclusions

Intradural fat graft packing is unnecessary in the endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma resection. The outcome of our graded sellar floor reconstruction strategy is satisfactory.

Anterior Skull Base Reconstruction

Anterior skull base reconstruction requires careful preoperative planning to use the most effective technique for the expected defect. Adherence to the principles of skull base reconstruction is imperative to minimize complications and improve patient outcomes.

Fat in the Fossa and the Sphenoid Sinus: A Simple and Effective Solution to CSF Leaks in Transsphenoidal Surgery. Cohort Study and Systematic Review

Objectives  Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) remains a challenge and is associated with high morbidity. We perform a primary repair with f at in the pituitary f ossa and further fat in the s phenoid sinus (FFS). We compare the efficacy of this FFS technique with other repair methods and perform a systematic review. Design, Patients, and Methods  This is a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing standard TSS from 2009 to 2020, comparing the incidence of significant postoperative CSF rhinorrhea (requiring intervention) using the FFS technique compared with other intraoperative repair strategies. Systematic review of current repair methods described in the literature was performed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results  In all, there were 439 patients, with 276 patients undergoing multilayer repair, 68 patients FFS repair, and 95 patients no repair. No significant differences were observed in baseline demographics between the groups. Postoperative CSF leak requiring intervention was significantly lower in the FFS repair group (4.4%) compared with the multilayer (20.3%) and no repair groups (12.6%, p  < 0.01). This translated to fewer reoperations (2.9% FFS vs. 13.4% multilayer vs. 8.4% no repair, p  < 0.05), fewer lumbar drains (2.9% FFS vs. 15.6% multilayer vs. 5.3% no repair, p  < 0.01), and shorter hospital stay (median days: 4 [3-7] FFS vs. 6 (5-10) multilayer vs. 5 (3-7) no repair, p  < 0.01). Risk factors for postoperative leak included female gender, perioperative lumbar drain, and intraoperative leak. Conclusion  Autologous fat on fat graft for standard endoscopic transsphenoidal approach effectively reduces the risk of significant postoperative CSF leak with reduced reoperation and shorter hospital stay.

Closure strategy for endoscopic pituitary surgery: Experience from 3015 patients

Introduction

Effective strategies are required to ensure optimal management of the crucial closure step in endoscopic pituitary surgery. Many surgical techniques have been reported but no significant consensus has been defined.

Methods

Between January 2006 and March 2022, 3015 adult patients with pituitary adenomas were operated on by a single expert neurosurgical team, using a mononostril endoscopic endonasal approach. Based of preoperative risk factors of and operative findings, a detailed closure strategy was used. Body mass index >40, sellar floor lysis, number of surgeries>2, large skull base destruction, prior radiotherapy were considered as preoperative risk factors for closure failure. All patients treated with an expanded endonasal approach were excluded.

Results

Patients were mostly women (F/M ratio: 1.4) with a median age of 50 (range: 18 -89). Intraoperative CSF leak requiring specific surgical management was observed in 319/3015 (10.6%) of patients. If intraoperative leak occurred, patients with predictive risk factors were managed using a Foley balloon catheter in case of sellar floor lysis or BMI>40 and a multilayer repair strategy with a vascularized nasoseptal flap in other cases. Postoperative CSF leak occurred in 29/3015 (1%) of patients, while meningitis occurred in 24/3015 (0.8%) of patients. In patients with intraoperative leak, closure management failed in 11/319 (3.4%) of cases.

Conclusion

Based on our significant 16-year experience, our surgical management is reliable and easy to follow. With a planned and stepwise strategy, the closure step can be optimized and tailored to each patient with a very low failure rate.

Effects of Staged Nursing Care on Neuroendoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Adenoma Resection and Postoperative Complications

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine whether staged nursing had an impact on the outcome of neuroendoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary tumor resection and postoperative complications.

Methods

As research participants, we chose 88 individuals with pituitary adenomas who were treated at our institution between February 2020 and November 2021; all patients received endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma excision. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: the routine group (n = 44) and the stage group (n = 44). Patients in the routine group received care according to the routine nursing mode, and patients in the stage group received care according to the stage nursing mode. The staged nursing interventions included preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative nursing. Postoperative recovery-related indicators such as the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and a self-rating depression scale (SDS), contentment, comfort, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The postoperative recovery-related indexes of patients in the stage group were significantly lower than those in the routine group (P < 0.05); the SAS and SDS scores in the stage group after treatment were significantly lower than those in the routine group (P < 0.05); patients in the stage group were significantly more satisfied with their treatment after treatment than those in the routine group (P < 0.05); patients in the stage group were significantly more comfortable after treatment than those in the routine group (P < 0.05); a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications was observed in the stage group compared to the routine group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with neuroendoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary tumor excision benefit greatly from staged nursing. The nursing approach may successfully assure the procedure's smooth completion, boost patients' postoperative recovery, and reduce patients' worry, despair, and other unpleasant feelings. The nursing approach may successfully increase clinical satisfaction and comfort of patients by minimizing the likelihood of postoperative problems, and it is well-suited for practical use.