1
|
Austin JA, Barras MA, Sullivan CM. Digital health and prescribing: declare the past, diagnose the present, foretell the future. Aust Prescr 2023; 46:46-47. [PMID: 38053811 PMCID: PMC10665093 DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2023.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jodie A Austin
- Queensland Digital Health Centre, Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane
- Pharmacy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Department of Health, Queensland Government, Brisbane
| | - Michael A Barras
- Queensland Digital Health Centre, Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane
- Pharmacy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Department of Health, Queensland Government, Brisbane
| | - Clair M Sullivan
- Queensland Digital Health Centre, Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane
- Pharmacy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Department of Health, Queensland Government, Brisbane
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu Y, Zheng X, Li Y, Ye X, Cheng H, Wang H, Lyu J. Exploring patient medication adherence and data mining methods in clinical big data: A contemporary review. J Evid Based Med 2023; 16:342-375. [PMID: 37718729 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasingly, patient medication adherence data are being consolidated from claims databases and electronic health records (EHRs). Such databases offer an indirect avenue to gauge medication adherence in our data-rich healthcare milieu. The surge in data accessibility, coupled with the pressing need for its conversion to actionable insights, has spotlighted data mining, with machine learning (ML) emerging as a pivotal technique. Nonadherence poses heightened health risks and escalates medical costs. This paper elucidates the synergistic interaction between medical database mining for medication adherence and the role of ML in fostering knowledge discovery. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive review of EHR applications in the realm of medication adherence, leveraging ML techniques. We expounded on the evolution and structure of medical databases pertinent to medication adherence and harnessed both supervised and unsupervised ML paradigms to delve into adherence and its ramifications. RESULTS Our study underscores the applications of medical databases and ML, encompassing both supervised and unsupervised learning, for medication adherence in clinical big data. Databases like SEER and NHANES, often underutilized due to their intricacies, have gained prominence. Employing ML to excavate patient medication logs from these databases facilitates adherence analysis. Such findings are pivotal for clinical decision-making, risk stratification, and scholarly pursuits, aiming to elevate healthcare quality. CONCLUSION Advanced data mining in the era of big data has revolutionized medication adherence research, thereby enhancing patient care. Emphasizing bespoke interventions and research could herald transformative shifts in therapeutic modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixian Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinkai Zheng
- Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuanjie Li
- Planning & Discipline Construction Office, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinmiao Ye
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongtao Cheng
- School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Lyu
- Department of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Informatization, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Allen KS, Danielson EC, Downs SM, Mazurenko O, Diiulio J, Salloum RG, Mamlin BW, Harle CA. Evaluating a Prototype Clinical Decision Support Tool for Chronic Pain Treatment in Primary Care. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13:602-611. [PMID: 35649500 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Chronic Pain Treatment Tracker (Tx Tracker) is a prototype decision support tool to aid primary care clinicians when caring for patients with chronic noncancer pain. This study evaluated clinicians' perceived utility of Tx Tracker in meeting information needs and identifying treatment options, and preferences for visual design. METHODS We conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with primary care clinicians from four health systems in Indiana. The interviews were conducted in two waves, with prototype and interview guide revisions after the first six interviews. The interviews included exploration of Tx Tracker using a think-aloud approach and a clinical scenario. Clinicians were presented with a patient scenario and asked to use Tx Tracker to make a treatment recommendation. Last, participants answered several evaluation questions. Detailed field notes were collected, coded, and thematically analyzed by four analysts. RESULTS We identified several themes: the need for clinicians to be presented with a comprehensive patient history, the usefulness of Tx Tracker in patient discussions about treatment planning, potential usefulness of Tx Tracker for patients with high uncertainty or risk, potential usefulness of Tx Tracker in aggregating scattered information, variability in expectations about workflows, skepticism about underlying electronic health record data quality, interest in using Tx Tracker to annotate or update information, interest in using Tx Tracker to translate information to clinical action, desire for interface with visual cues for risks, warnings, or treatment options, and desire for interactive functionality. CONCLUSION Tools like Tx Tracker, by aggregating key information about past, current, and potential future treatments, may help clinicians collaborate with their patients in choosing the best pain treatments. Still, the use and usefulness of Tx Tracker likely relies on continued improvement of its functionality, accurate and complete underlying data, and tailored integration with varying workflows, care team roles, and user preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie S Allen
- Health Policy and Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, IUPUI, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.,Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Elizabeth C Danielson
- Center for Education in Health Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Sarah M Downs
- Division of Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Olena Mazurenko
- Health Policy and Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, IUPUI, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Julie Diiulio
- Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, Applied Decision Science, LLC, Dayton, Ohio, United States
| | | | - Burke W Mamlin
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.,Division of Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Christopher A Harle
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.,University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kiessling KA, Iott BE, Pater JA, Toscos TR, Wagner SR, Gottlieb LM, Veinot TC. Health informatics interventions to minimize out-of-pocket medication costs for patients: what providers want. JAMIA Open 2022; 5:ooac007. [PMID: 35274083 PMCID: PMC8903137 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore diverse provider perspectives on: strategies for addressing patient medication cost barriers; patient medication cost information gaps; current medication cost-related informatics tools; and design features for future tool development. Materials and Methods We conducted 38 semistructured interviews with providers (physicians, nurses, pharmacists, social workers, and administrators) in a Midwestern health system in the United States. We used 3 rounds of qualitative coding to identify themes. Results Providers lacked access to information about: patients’ ability to pay for medications; true costs of full medication regimens; and cost impacts of patient insurance changes. Some providers said that while existing cost-related tools were helpful, they contained unclear insurance information and several questioned the information’s quality. Cost-related information was not available to everyone who needed it and was not always available when needed. Fragmentation of information across sources made cost-alleviation information difficult to access. Providers desired future tools to compare medication costs more directly; provide quick references on costs to facilitate clinical conversations; streamline medication resource referrals; and provide centrally accessible visual summaries of patient affordability challenges. Discussion These findings can inform the next generation of informatics tools for minimizing patients’ out-of-pocket costs. Future tools should support the work of a wider range of providers and situations and use cases than current tools do. Such tools would have the potential to improve prescribing decisions and better link patients to resources. Conclusion Results identified opportunities to fill multidisciplinary providers’ information gaps and ways in which new tools could better support medication affordability for patients. Almost a quarter of Americans taking prescription medications have difficulty affording them. We asked 38 healthcare providers what they do to help patients get affordable medications. They try to reduce the number of medications that patients take, choose more affordable medication options, and connect them to free medications or financial help. But it is hard for providers to do these things because they don’t always know which patients have financial challenges, and they may not know how much medications cost patients. Healthcare providers use digital tools like ordering systems to pick medications for patients, but they do not always have clear price information and they do not help outside of healthcare visits with prescribers. It is also hard for healthcare providers to get information about what patients have difficulty affording medications, and about resources to help them. Healthcare providers want new and improved digital tools to help them choose medications, and to be able to compare exact medication price differences. They also want a visual sign for patients with financial challenges, and centralized information about cost reduction resources. Finally, they desire tools to help them talk to patients about mediation prices, and medication price reports for patients themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bradley E Iott
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jessica A Pater
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research & Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Tammy R Toscos
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research & Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Shauna R Wagner
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research & Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Laura M Gottlieb
- Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Tiffany C Veinot
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Benson NM, Belisle C, Bates DW, Salmasian H. Low Efficacy of Medication Shortage Clinical Decision Support Alerts. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12:1144-1149. [PMID: 34852390 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We examined clinical decision support (CDS) alerts designed specifically for medication shortages to characterize and assess provider behavior in response to these short-term clinical situations. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of the usage of medication shortage alerts (MSAs) that included at least one alternative medication suggestion and were active for 60 or more days during the 2-year study period, January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019, in a large health care system. We characterized ordering provider behavior in response to inpatient MSAs. We then developed a linear regression model to predict provider response to alerts using the characteristics of the ordering provider and alert frequency groupings. RESULTS During the study period, there were 67 MSAs in use that focused on 42 distinct medications in shortage. The MSAs suggested an average of 3.9 alternative medications. Adjusting for the different alerts, fellows (p = 0.004), residents (p = 0.03), and physician assistants (p = 0.02) were less likely to accept alerts on average compared with attending physicians. Further, female ordering clinicians (p < 0.001) were more likely to accept alerts on average compared with male ordering clinicians. CONCLUSION Our findings demonstrate that providers tended to reject MSAs, even those who were sometimes flexible about their responses. The low overall acceptance rate supports the theory that alerts appearing at the time of order entry may have limited value, as they may be presented too late in the decision-making process. Though MSAs are designed to be attention-grabbing and higher impact than traditional CDS, our findings suggest that providers rarely change their clinical decisions when presented with these alerts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Benson
- McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Caryn Belisle
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - David W Bates
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Hojjat Salmasian
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Human factors and ergonomics (HF/E) frameworks and methods are becoming embedded in the health informatics community. There is now broad recognition that health informatics tools must account for the diverse needs, characteristics, and abilities of end users, as well as their context of use. The objective of this review is to synthesize the current nature and scope of HF/E integration into the health informatics community. METHODS Because the focus of this synthesis is on understanding the current integration of the HF/E and health informatics research communities, we manually reviewed all manuscripts published in primary HF/E and health informatics journals during 2020. RESULTS HF/E-focused health informatics studies included in this synthesis focused heavily on EHR customizations, specifically clinical decision support customizations and customized data displays, and on mobile health innovations. While HF/E methods aimed to jointly improve end user safety, performance, and satisfaction, most HF/E-focused health informatics studies measured only end user satisfaction. CONCLUSION HF/E-focused health informatics researchers need to identify and communicate methodological standards specific to health informatics, to better synthesize findings across resource intensive HF/E-focused health informatics studies. Important gaps in the HF/E design and evaluation process should be addressed in future work, including support for technology development platforms and training programs so that health informatics designers are as diverse as end users.
Collapse
|
7
|
Trinkley KE, Pell JM, Martinez DD, Maude NR, Hale G, Rosenberg MA. Assessing Prescriber Behavior with a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Prevent Drug-Induced Long QT Syndrome. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12:190-197. [PMID: 33694143 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1724043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clinical decision support (CDS) alerts built into the electronic health record (EHR) have the potential to reduce the risk of drug-induced long QT syndrome (diLQTS) in susceptible patients. However, the degree to which providers incorporate this information into prescription behavior and the impact on patient outcomes is often unknown. METHODS We examined provider response data over a period from October 8, 2016 until November 8, 2018 for a CDS alert deployed within the EHR from a 13-hospital integrated health care system that fires when a patient with a QTc ≥ 500 ms within the past 14 days is prescribed a known QT-prolonging medication. We used multivariate generalized estimating equations to analyze the impact of therapeutic alternatives, relative risk of diLQTS for specific medications, and patient characteristics on provider response to the CDS and overall patient mortality. RESULTS The CDS alert fired 15,002 times for 7,510 patients for which the most common response (51.0%) was to override the alert and order the culprit medication. In multivariate models, we found that patient age, relative risk of diLQTS, and presence of alternative agents were significant predictors of adherence to the CDS alerts and that nonadherence itself was a predictor of mortality. Risk of diLQTS and presence of an alternative agent are major factors in provider adherence to a CDS to prevent diLQTS; however, provider nonadherence was associated with a decreased risk of mortality. CONCLUSION Surrogate endpoints, such as provider adherence, can be useful measures of CDS value but attention to hard outcomes, such as mortality, is likely needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katy E Trinkley
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado, United States.,Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.,Department of Clinical Informatics, University of Colorado Health, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Jonathan M Pell
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.,Department of Clinical Informatics, University of Colorado Health, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Dario D Martinez
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Nicola R Maude
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Gary Hale
- Department of Clinical Informatics, University of Colorado Health, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Michael A Rosenberg
- Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.,Division of Biomedical Informatics and Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Friebe MP, LeGrand JR, Shepherd BE, Breeden EA, Nelson SD. Reducing Inappropriate Outpatient Medication Prescribing in Older Adults across Electronic Health Record Systems. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11:865-872. [PMID: 33378781 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Geriatrics Society recommends against the use of certain potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older adults. Prescribing of these medications correlates with higher rates of hospital readmissions, morbidity, and mortality. Vanderbilt University Medical Center previously deployed clinical decision support (CDS) to decrease PIM prescribing rates, but recently transitioned to a new electronic health record (EHR). OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to evaluate PIM prescribing rates for older adults before and after migration to the new EHR system. METHODS We reviewed prescribing rates of PIMs in adults 65 years and older, normalized per 100 total prescriptions from the legacy and new EHR systems between July 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019. The PIM prescribing rates before and after EHR migration during November 2017 were compared using a U-chart and Poisson regression model. Secondary analysis descriptively evaluated the frequency of prescriber acceptance rates in the new EHR. RESULTS Prescribing rates of PIMs decreased 5.2% (13.5 per 100 prescriptions to 12.8 per 100 prescriptions; p < 0.0001) corresponding to the implementation of alternatives CDS in the legacy EHR. After migration of the alternative CDS from the legacy to the new EHR system, PIM prescribing rates dropped an additional 18.8% (10.4 per 100 prescriptions; p < 0.0001). Acceptance rates of the alternative recommendations for PIMs was low overall at 11.1%. CONCLUSION The prescribing rate of PIMs in adults aged 65 years and older was successfully decreased with the implementation of prescribing CDS. This decrease was not only maintained but strengthened by the transition to a new EHR system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Friebe
- Lipscomb University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Joseph R LeGrand
- HealthIT, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Bryan E Shepherd
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Elizabeth A Breeden
- Lipscomb University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Scott D Nelson
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| |
Collapse
|