Morphology at the Distal Radioulnar Joint: Identifying the Prevalence of Reverse Obliquity

Decompression corrective osteotomy of the distal radius for treatment of the DRUJ-incongruency and impingement syndrome with focus on posttraumatic cases

INTRODUCTION

Posttraumatic or congenital ulna-minus variance with altered shape of the sigmoid notch and increased tension of the distal oblique band of the interosseous membrane (DIOM) can lead to painful impingement in the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) during rotation and loading of the forearm. As an operative treatment concept, a new method was described in 2016. Its goal is to restore the osseous congruency, which is required for normal painless function. The hypothesis is based on remodelling of the joint surface and the decompression of the DRUJ by releasing the DIOM. The purpose of this study is to analyze the results of performed operations with detailed focus on posttraumatic cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The indication for the operation is the impingement and incongruency in the DRUJ with ulna-minus variance. The surgical procedure is based on shortening and closed-wedge osteotomy of the distal radius with an ulnar translation of the radial shaft. Fifty-nine operations were performed between 2011 - 2022 on 52 patients (13 men, 39 women). Twenty-four patients were operated on the right side, 21 on the left side and 7 bilaterally. In 45 cases the operation was indicated because of congenital, in 12 cases due to posttraumatic incongruency and in 2 cases because of iatrogenic impingement after previously performed excessive ulnar shortening osteotomy. Modified Mayo-Wrist-Score, patient questioning, VAS and ROM were used to evaluate the results.

RESULTS

Significant reduction of pain on VAS from 7.22 to 1.98 (p < .001) was achieved. The pre- and postoperative range of motion did not show any significant changes (mean total arc of motion 301,94° vs. 295,20°, p = .300). Specific complications we observed included a too distally performed osteotomy, DRUJ instability, de Quervain´s tenosynovitis, persistent pain and conversion into an ulna-plus variance.

CONCLUSION

Under consideration of the indication criteria and correct execution of the osteotomy, in about 90 % of the cases this operation leads to good-to-excellent results with pain reduction and improvement of weight-bearing and power. The preoperative examination, verification of the DRUJ stability and the radiological diagnostics are crucial for a good outcome.

[Treatment of Congenital Ulnar Impingement Syndrome by Corrective Osteotomy of the Distal Radius - Clinical Results]

BACKGROUND

In 2016, a new method was described to treat the painful impingement syndrome of the DRUJ: decompression corrective osteotomy of the distal radius. Clinical symptoms are based on a positive compression test; pain occurs with weight-bearing on the forearm. This phenomenon is seen in conjunction with a deformed sigmoid notch together with ulna minus-variance, which leads to increased tension in the distal oblique bundle of the interosseous membrane. The etiology of the condition can be either congenital, post-traumatic, or iatrogenic. Through the proposed osteotomy, decompression in the DRUJ is achieved. This study summarises the results of these surgical procedures performed in our hand centre exclusively in cases of congenital origin.

PATIENTS UND METHODS

Remodelling of the DRUJ is achieved through the shortening of the distal radius together with closed wedge osteotomy. Relief of the interosseous membrane is accomplished by ulnar translation of the radial shaft. This study only included patients with congenital incongruency in the DRUJ. The results were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Krimmer Wrist Score and by measuring the preoperative and postoperative range of motion as well as grip strength.

RESULTS

Within 11 years, 45 procedures were performed with our method on 38 patients, of which 17 were treated on the right side, 14 on the left side, and 7 bilaterally. In cases of bilateral incongruency, only the symptomatic side was treated. The statistical evaluation showed a significant reduction of pain on the VAS from 7.2 to 2 (p<0.001). No significant changes were seen in the range of motion (p=0.812). The Krimmer Wrist Score showed good to excellent results in almost 90% of cases.

CONCLUSION

If the indication criteria are met, contraindications are avoided and the osteotomy is correctly performed, this technique leads to an improvement of patients' functionality and quality of life. From a preventive viewpoint, the influence on the progression of the degenerative changes is yet to be demonstrated in further studies. At any rate, this is a safe procedure, which leaves the path open for other possible options.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Repair of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex

Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries are a common cause of ulnar-side wrist pain and may progress to persistent pain, instability of the distal radioulnar joint, and arthritis if left untreated. Diagnosis and management of these injuries requires a nuanced understanding of features pertinent to the clinical presentation, imaging, and arthroscopic findings for accurate management. Arthroscopic-assisted repair techniques have revolutionized surgical management, providing detailed visualization and facilitating the repair of TFCC injuries and associated pathologies with minimally invasive techniques. In this review, we discuss the anatomy of the TFCC, history and examination of ulnar-sided pathology, imaging findings, and classification schemes and review surgical techniques for the treatment of TFCC injuries. We also touch on pearls and pitfalls of the techniques, complications, and results of treatment.

Ulnar Bowing and Distal Radioulnar Joint Anatomy: A Three-Dimensional, In Situ Clinical Assessment

Purpose

Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) injuries can be devastating and challenging to manage. The multiplanar curvature exhibited by the ulna impacts the morphology of the DRUJ, making it difficult to assess through two-dimensional radiographs alone. We used full-length, three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography angiography scans to assess the relationship between ulnar bowing, DRUJ ulnar variance (UV), and sigmoid notch angle. The goal of this study was to establish normal anatomic ranges for these landmarks to improve treatment for forearm traumas and DRUJ pathologies.

Methods

Eighty-two intact upper extremity computed tomography angiography scans were examined and reconstructed into 3D models. We characterized ulnar bowing and DRUJ metrics using computer-aided design software. Measures of central tendency and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for comparative analysis.

Results

The study yielded an average ulnar length of 272.3 mm. We identified the proximal ulnar bow at 36.7% of the bone's total length, possessing a depth of 10.3 mm, a proximal angle of 6.6°, and a distal angle of 3.9°. The distal ulnar bow appeared at 75.3% of the bone's length, characterized by a depth of 4.2 mm, a proximal angle of 2°, and a distal angle of 4.3°. In the coronal plane, the proximal angle of the proximal ulnar bow correlated positively with UV (r = 0.39, P < .001), whereas the distal angle of the distal ulnar bow correlated negatively (r = -0.48, P < .001). We also found significant correlations between the depths of both proximal and distal bows with UV (r = 0.38, P < .001; r = -0.34, P < .001, respectively). Moreover, UV within the DRUJ strongly correlated with the sigmoid notch angle (r = -0.77, P = .01). In contrast, the sagittal plane metrics did not show meaningful correlations with UV.

Conclusion

Sagittal alignment and translation at the DRUJ articulation are directly related to ulna bowing at the distal ulna. A nuanced understanding of these 3D relationships can enhance preoperative planning when correcting ulnar-side pathology.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Association Between Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Distal Radial Fractures: A Prospective Cohort Study with 1-Year Follow-up in 366 Patients

BACKGROUND

Several studies of distal radial fractures have investigated final displacement and its association with clinical outcomes. There is still no consensus on the importance of radiographic outcomes, and published studies have not used the same criteria for acceptable alignment. Previous reports have involved the use of linear or dichotomized analyses.

METHODS

The present study included 438 patients who were managed with either reduction and cast immobilization or surgery for the treatment of distal radial fractures. Radiographic outcomes were determined on the basis of radiographs that were made 3 months after the injury. Clinical outcome was determined on the basis of the QuickDASH (an abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] questionnaire) score, range of motion, and grip strength at 1 year after the injury. Nonlinear relations were analyzed with cubic splines.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty-six patients (84%) had both radiographic and clinical follow-up. Seventy patients were lost to follow-up. The mean age was 57 years (range, 18 to 75 years), and 79% of the patients were female. Dorsal tilt was the radiographic parameter that was most strongly associated with the QuickDASH score, grip strength, and range of motion. We found nonlinear relations. Clinical outcomes were found to worsen with increasing dorsal tilt, with the cutoff value being approximately 5°.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that clinical outcomes following distal radial fractures have a nonlinear relationship with dorsal tilt, with worse outcomes being associated with increasing dorsal tilt. The decline in clinical outcome starts at 5°, but there is unlikely to be a noticeable difference in capability as measured with the QuickDASH until 20° of dorsal tilt (based on the minimum clinically important difference) in a population up to 75 years old.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk Factors for the Incidence of the Volar Lunate Facet Fragments in Distal Radius Fractures

Background  The volar lip of the distal radius is the key structure for wrist joint stability. Rigid fixation of the volar lunate facet (VLF) fragment is difficult because of its unique anatomy, and a high rate of postoperative displacement was demonstrated. Purposes  The aim of the study is to identify risk factors for VLF in distal radius fractures (DRFs) and to reconsider the important point for primary fixation. Patients and Methods  One hundred fifty-five patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for an DRF were included and classified into one of the following two groups: VLF(+)or VLF(-). Demographic data, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), laterality, trauma mechanism, and AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification were recorded. Several parameters were investigated using wrist radiographs of the uninjured side and computed tomography scans of the injured side. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors for VLF. Results  There were 25 patients in the VLF(+) group and 130 patients in the VLF(-) group. The incidence of VLF was 16.1%. The VLF(+) group tended to have a higher BMI and higher energy trauma mechanism. The odds ratio for the sigmoid notch angle (SNA), volar tilt (VT), and lunate facet curvature radius (LFCR) were 0.84, 1.32, and 0.70, respectively, with multivariate analysis, which was significant. A smaller SNA, larger VT, and smaller LFCR are potential risk factors for VLF. Conclusion  Over-reduction of the VT at primary fixation should be avoided because it could place an excess burden on the VLF and cause subsequent postoperative fixation failure and volar carpal subluxation. Level of Evidence  IV.

Outcome of Preoperative Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic DRUJ Arthritis after Total Wrist Arthrodesis: A Single-Institution Case Series

Background  Concomitant severe radiocarpal (RC) arthritis with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthritis can be debilitating for patients. Surgical management of these combined arthritides can pose a dilemma for surgeons and patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients with concomitant RC and DRUJ arthritides who underwent only total wrist arthrodesis (TWA) to determine the need for subsequent surgical management of preoperative asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic DRUJ arthritis. Materials and Methods  All patients who underwent TWA between 2008 and 2018 at a single institution were evaluated. Those patients who underwent TWA for degenerative, inflammatory, or posttraumatic arthritis with concomitant asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic DRUJ arthritis preoperatively were included. A retrospective review was performed for demographic variables, TWA indications, pre- versus post-TWA DRUJ symptoms, and severity of DRUJ arthritis on radiographs. Primary outcome measure was survivorship from subsequent DRUJ surgery for development of symptomatic arthritis after initial TWA. Results  One hundred and eighty-three patients underwent TWA during the study period, of which 39 wrists met inclusion criteria. Indications for TWA included posttraumatic arthritis ( n  = 22), avascular necrosis of the lunate ( n  = 10), and inflammatory arthritis ( n  = 7). The mean clinical follow-up was 5.7 years (range: 1.5-12.7 years). Four patients (10%) who underwent TWA ultimately required a subsequent procedure to address DRUJ arthritis at a mean time of 20 months (range: 3-60 months) after initial TWA. The initial indication for TWA in these patients included symptomatic posttraumatic arthritis ( n  = 3) and lunate avascular necrosis ( n  = 1). Conclusion  In patients with symptomatic RC and asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic DRUJ arthritides undergoing TWA alone, 10% in this series required subsequent surgical management for progressive DRUJ arthritis. Clinical Relevance  Surgical management of concomitant symptomatic RC and asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic DRUJ arthritides with TWA alone is a reasonable initial approach. Patients should be counseled preoperatively that subsequent surgical management of progressive DRUJ arthritis may be necessary in ∼10% of patients.