Nodal and Pedal MR Lymphangiography of the Central Lymphatic System: Techniques and Applications

MR Lymphangiography: Congenital Lymphatic Flow Disorders

ABSTRACT

Congenital lymphatic flow disorders collectively refer to a heterogeneous group of diseases that manifest as chylothorax, chylous ascites, intestinal lymphangiectasia, protein-losing enteropathy, and peripheral extremity or genital lymphedema, all in the absence of identifiable injury to the lymphatic system. We have only recently begun to understand congenital lymphatic flow disorders through the ability to image lymph flow dynamically. Intranodal dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (DCMRL) is a crucial technique for imaging lymphatic flow in pediatric patients with congenital lymphatic flow disorders. However, as lymphatic imaging is still a nascent discipline with many uncertainties regarding optimal imaging and treatment, effective patient management requires a comprehensive understanding of imaging techniques, disease pathophysiology, and multidisciplinary treatment approaches. Above all, a fundamental understanding of the physiological lymphatic flow of the central conducting lymphatics is essential for the correct interpretation of DCMRL images. This knowledge helps to avoid unnecessary examinations, erroneous diagnoses, and potentially harmful treatment approaches. This review provides an overview of the methods, advantages, and precautions for interpreting the DCMRL examination, a state-of-the-art lymphatic system imaging technique, and shares various case studies.

MR Lymphangiography in Lymphatic Disorders: Clinical Applications, Institutional Experience, and Practice Development

Lymphatic flow and anatomy can be challenging to study, owing to variable lymphatic anatomy in patients with diverse primary or secondary lymphatic pathologic conditions and the fact that lymphatic imaging is rarely performed in healthy individuals. The primary components of the lymphatic system outside the head and neck are the peripheral, retroperitoneal, mesenteric, hepatic, and pulmonary lymphatic systems and the thoracic duct. Multiple techniques have been developed for imaging components of the lymphatic system over the past century, with trade-offs in spatial, temporal, and contrast resolution; invasiveness; exposure to ionizing radiation; and the ability to obtain information on dynamic lymphatic flow. More recently, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR lymphangiography (MRL) has emerged as a valuable tool for imaging both lymphatic flow and anatomy in a variety of congenital and acquired primary or secondary lymphatic disorders. The authors provide a brief overview of lymphatic physiology, anatomy, and imaging techniques. Next, an overview of DCE MRL and the development of an MRL practice and workflow in a hybrid interventional MRI suite incorporating cart-based in-room US is provided, with an emphasis on multidisciplinary collaboration. The spectrum of congenital and acquired lymphatic disorders encountered early in an MRL practice is provided, with emphasis on the diversity of imaging findings and how DCE MRL can aid in diagnosis and treatment of these patients. Methods such as DCE MRL for assessing the hepatic and mesenteric lymphatic systems and emerging technologies that may further expand DCE MRL use such as three-dimensional printing are introduced. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Advances in lymphedema: An under-recognized disease with a hopeful future for patients

Lymphedema has traditionally been underappreciated by the healthcare community. Understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and treatments beyond compression have been limited until recently. Increased investigation has demonstrated the key role of inflammation and resultant fibrosis and adipose deposition leading to the clinical sequelae and associated reduction in quality of life with lymphedema. New imaging techniques including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), indocyanine green lymphography, and high-frequency ultrasound offer improved resolution and understanding of lymphatic anatomy and flow. Nonsurgical therapy with compression, exercise, and weight loss remains the mainstay of therapy, but growing surgical options show promise. Physiologic procedures (lymphovenous anastomosis and vascularized lymph node transfers) improve lymphatic flow in the diseased limb and may reduce edema and the burden of compression. Debulking, primarily with liposuction to remove the adipose deposition that has accumulated, results in a dramatic decrease in limb girth in appropriately selected patients. Though early, there are also exciting developments of potential therapeutic targets tackling the underlying drivers of the disease. Multidisciplinary teams have developed to offer the full breadth of evaluation and current management, but the development of a greater understanding and availability of therapies is needed to ensure patients with lymphedema have greater opportunity for optimal care.

Back to the Future II-A Comprehensive Update on the Rapidly Evolving Field of Lymphatic Imaging and Interventions

ABSTRACT

Lymphatic imaging and interventional therapies of disorders affecting the lymphatic vascular system have evolved rapidly in recent years. Although x-ray lymphangiography had been all but replaced by the advent of cross-sectional imaging and the scientific focus shifted to lymph node imaging (eg, for detection of metastatic disease), interest in lymph vessel imaging was rekindled by the introduction of lymphatic interventional treatments in the late 1990s. Although x-ray lymphangiography is still the mainstay imaging technique to guide interventional procedures, several other, often less invasive, techniques have been developed more recently to evaluate the lymphatic vascular system and associated pathologies. Especially the introduction of magnetic resonance, and even more recently computed tomography, lymphangiography with water-soluble iodinated contrast agent has furthered our understanding of complex pathophysiological backgrounds of lymphatic diseases. This has led to an improvement of treatment approaches, especially of nontraumatic disorders caused by lymphatic flow abnormalities including plastic bronchitis, protein-losing enteropathy, and nontraumatic chylolymphatic leakages. The therapeutic armamentarium has also constantly grown and diversified in recent years with the introduction of more complex catheter-based and interstitial embolization techniques, lymph vessel stenting, lymphovenous anastomoses, as well as (targeted) medical treatment options. The aim of this article is to review the relevant spectrum of lymphatic disorders with currently available radiological imaging and interventional techniques, as well as the application of these methods in specific, individual clinical situations.

Imaging and Interventions for Lymphatic and Lymphatic-related Disorders

The lymphatic system is critical in fluid balance homeostasis. Yet, until recently, lymphatic imaging has been outside of mainstream medicine due to a lack of robust imaging and interventional options. However, during the last 20 years, both clinical lymphatic imaging and interventions have shown dramatic advancement. The key to imaging advancement has been the interstitial delivery of contrast agents through lymphatic-rich tissues. These techniques include intranodal lymphangiography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography. These methods provide the ability to image and recognize lymphatic anatomy and pathologic conditions. Percutaneous thoracic duct catheterization and embolization became the first widely accepted interventional technique for the management of chyle leaks. Advances in interstitial lymphatic embolization, as well as liver and mesenteric lymphatic interventions, have broadened the scope of possible lymphatic interventions. Also, recent techniques of lymphatic decompression allow for the treatment of a variety of lymphatic disorders. Finally, immunologic studies of central lymphatic fluid reveal the potential of lymphatic interventions on immunity. These advances herald an exciting new chapter for lymphatic imaging and interventions in the coming years.

MRI of Lymphedema

Lymphedema is a devastating disease that has no cure. Management of lymphedema has evolved rapidly over the past two decades with the advent of surgeries that can ameliorate symptoms. MRI has played an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and evaluation of lymphedema, as it provides high spatial resolution of the distribution and severity of soft tissue edema, characterizes diseased lymphatic channels, and assesses secondary effects such as fat hypertrophy. Many different MR techniques have been developed for the evaluation of lymphedema, and the modality can be tailored to suit the needs of a lymphatic clinic. In this review article we provide an overview of lymphedema, current management options, and the current role of MRI in lymphedema diagnosis and management. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Deep learning for standardized, MRI-based quantification of subcutaneous and subfascial tissue volume for patients with lipedema and lymphedema

OBJECTIVES

To contribute to a more in-depth assessment of shape, volume, and asymmetry of the lower extremities in patients with lipedema or lymphedema utilizing volume information from MR imaging.

METHODS

A deep learning (DL) pipeline was developed including (i) localization of anatomical landmarks (femoral heads, symphysis, knees, ankles) and (ii) quality-assured tissue segmentation to enable standardized quantification of subcutaneous (SCT) and subfascial tissue (SFT) volumes. The retrospectively derived dataset for method development consisted of 45 patients (42 female, 44.2 ± 14.8 years) who underwent clinical 3D DIXON MR-lymphangiography examinations of the lower extremities. Five-fold cross-validated training was performed on 16,573 axial slices from 40 patients and testing on 2187 axial slices from 5 patients. For landmark detection, two EfficientNet-B1 convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were applied in an ensemble. One determines the relative foot-head position of each axial slice with respect to the landmarks by regression, the other identifies all landmarks in coronal reconstructed slices using keypoint detection. After landmark detection, segmentation of SCT and SFT was performed on axial slices employing a U-Net architecture with EfficientNet-B1 as encoder. Finally, the determined landmarks were used for standardized analysis and visualization of tissue volume, distribution, and symmetry, independent of leg length, slice thickness, and patient position.

RESULTS

Excellent test results were observed for landmark detection (z-deviation = 4.5 ± 3.1 mm) and segmentation (Dice score: SCT = 0.989 ± 0.004, SFT = 0.994 ± 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed DL pipeline allows for standardized analysis of tissue volume and distribution and may assist in diagnosis of lipedema and lymphedema or monitoring of conservative and surgical treatments.

KEY POINTS

• Efficient use of volume information that MRI inherently provides can be extracted automatically by deep learning and enables in-depth assessment of tissue volumes in lipedema and lymphedema. • The deep learning pipeline consisting of body part regression, keypoint detection, and quality-assured tissue segmentation provides detailed information about the volume, distribution, and asymmetry of lower extremity tissues, independent of leg length, slice thickness, and patient position.

Interventional Management of Acquired Lymphatic Disorders

The lymphatic system is a complex network of tissues, vessels, and channels found throughout the body that assists in fluid balance and immunologic function. When the lymphatic system is disrupted related to idiopathic, iatrogenic, or traumatic disorders, lymphatic leaks can result in substantial morbidity and/or mortality. The diagnosis and management of these leaks is challenging. Modern advances in lymphatic imaging and interventional techniques have made radiology critical in the multidisciplinary management of these disorders. The authors provide a review of conventional and clinically relevant variant lymphatic anatomy and recent advances in diagnostic techniques such as MR lymphangiography. A detailed summary of technical factors related to percutaneous lymphangiography and lymphatic intervention is presented, including transpedal and transnodal lymphangiography. Traditional transabdominal access and retrograde access to the central lymph nodes and thoracic duct embolization techniques are outlined. Newer techniques including transhepatic lymphangiography and thoracic duct stent placement are also detailed. For both diagnostic and interventional radiologists, an understanding of lymphatic anatomy and modern diagnostic and interventional techniques is vital to the appropriate treatment of patients with acquired lymphatic disorders. ^©RSNA, 2022.

MR-lymphangiography identifies lymphatic pathologies in patients with idiopathic recurrent cervical swelling

Background

Idiopathic recurrent cervical swelling may be caused by lymphatic abnormalities.

Methods

Ten patients (9 females, mean age 51.2 ± 7) with idiopathic recurrent cervical swelling underwent MR-lymphangiography (MRL). MR-lymphangiograms were evaluated regarding lymphatic anatomy and flow. Individualized treatment was recommended according to MRL-findings.

Results

8/10 patients presented with left-sided, 2/10 with right-sided swelling. Pathological lymph-flow was identified in all cases: thoracic duct dilatation in patients with left-sided and right lymphatic duct dilatation in right-sided swelling, accessory thoracic lymphatics in 7/10 and reflux in 8/10 cases. In two cases, a lymphatic thrombus was identified.After treatment, symptoms resolved completely in 6/10 cases and partially in 1/10 cases. The remaining three patients have intermittent swellings but have no treatment wish.

Conclusion

Idiopathic recurrent cervical swelling can be caused by lymphatic anomalies. MRL displays impaired lymphatic drainage, lymphatic vessel dilatation, and chylolymphatic reflux as hallmarks of this condition and may aid in targeted treatment planning.

MR lymphangiography of lymphatic abnormalities in children and adults with Noonan syndrome

Noonan syndrome is associated with complex lymphatic abnormalities. We report dynamic-contrast enhanced MR lymphangiography (DCMRL) findings in children and adults with Noonan syndrome to further elucidate this complex disease spectrum. A retrospective evaluation of patients with confirmed Noonan syndrome and clinical signs of lymphatic dysfunction undergoing DCMRL between 01/2019 and 04/2021 was performed. MRL included T2-weighted imaging (T2w) and DCMRL. Clinical history/presentation and genetic variants were recorded. T2w-imaging was evaluated for central lymphatic abnormalities and edema distribution. DCMRL was evaluated regarding the presence of cisterna chyli/thoracic duct, lymphatic leakages, pathological lymphatic reflux and abnormal lymphatic perfusion. The time from start of contrast-injection to initial enhancement of the thoracic duct venous junction was measured to calculate the speed of contrast propagation. Eleven patients with Noonan syndrome with lymphatic abnormalities (5 female, 6 male; 7 infants, 4 adults; mean age 10.8 ± 16.4 years) were identified (PTPN11 n = 5/11 [45.5%], RIT1 n = 5/11 [45.5%], KRAS n = 1/11 [9%]). Patients had a chylothorax (n = 10/11 [91%]) and/or pulmonary lymphangiectasia [dilated pulmonary lymph vessels] (n = 9/11 [82%]). Mediastinal/pulmonary edema was depicted in 9/11 (82%) patients. The thoracic duct (TD) was (partially) absent in 10/11 (91%) cases. DCMRL showed lymphatic reflux into intercostal (n = 11/11 [100%]), mediastinal (n = 9/11 [82%]), peribronchial (n = 8/11 [73%]), peripheral (n = 5/11 [45.5%]) and genital lymphatics (n = 4/11 [36%]). Abnormal pulmonary/pleural lymphatic perfusion was seen in 8/11 patients (73%). At infancy peripheral/genital edema was more prevalent in patients with RIT1 than PTPN11 (n = 3/5 vs. n = 0/5). Compared to patients with PTPN11 who had fast lymphatic enhancement in 4/5 patients, enhancement took markedly longer in 4/5 patients with RIT1-mutations. Thoracic duct dysplasia, intercostal reflux and pulmonary/pleural lymphatic perfusion are characteristic findings in patients with Noonan syndrome presenting with chylothorax and/or pulmonary lymphangiectasia. Central lymphatic flow abnormalities show possible phenotypical differences between PTPN11 and RIT1-mutations.

Ultrasound-guided needle positioning for nodal dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography

The aim of the study was to assess injection needle positioning for contrast-enhanced MR-lymphangiography (MRL) by ultrasound-guided injection of saline-solution. 80 patients (33 male, mean age 43.1 years) were referred for MRL. The injection needle position was assessed by injection of saline-solution. Consecutive lymph node distension was observed on sonography followed by MRL. Transpedal MRL was performed when no inguinal lymph nodes could be identified. The inguinal lymph node detection rate was recorded. MR-lymphangiograms were assessed regarding primary (i.e. enhancement of draining lymph vessels) and secondary technical success (i.e. lymph vessel enhancement after repositioning of the needle). MRL was considered as clinically successful if enhancement of the central lymphatic system and/or a lymphatic pathologies were observed. For a total of 92 MRLs 177 groins were evaluated sonographically. In 171/177 groins (96.6%) lymph nodes were identified. After needle placement lymph node distension was observed in 171/171 cases (100%) on saline injection. MR-contrast injection demonstrated enhancement of draining lymph vessels in 163/171 cases (95.3%). In 6/171 cases (3.5%) in-bore needle retraction lead to lymphatic enhancement. In one patient [2/171 nodes (1.1%)] no lymphatic enhancement was seen despite repeated needle repositioning. Overall contrast application was technically successful in 169/171 cases (98.8%). In the 6 groins in which no nodes were identifiable, transpedal MRL was successful. So overall 91/92 MRLs (98.9%) were clinically successful. No complications were recorded. Confirmation of the needle position for nodal MRL by sonographically controlled saline injection is a reliable technique with a high success rate of MRL.

Clinical Uses and Short-Term Safety Profile of Ethiodized Poppy Seed Oil Contrast Agent in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Vascular Anomalies and Tumors

Background: There is a sparsity of data on the use of ethiodized poppy seed oil (EPO) contrast agent (Lipiodol) in patients. We investigated the safety of EPO in children, adolescents, and some adults for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Methods: All patients who underwent procedures with EPO between 1995 and 2014 were retrospectively included. Demographic characteristics, diagnosis, dose, route of administration, preparation of EPO in combination with other agents, and complications were recorded. Results: In 1422 procedures, EPO was used for diagnostic or treatment purposes performed in 683 patients. The mean patient age was 13.4 years (range: 2 months–50 years); 58% of patients were female. Venous malformations (n = 402, 58.9%) and arteriovenous malformations (n = 60, 8.8%) were the most common diagnosis. Combined vascular anomalies included capillary–lymphatic–venous malformations, fibroadipose vascular anomalies (n = 54, 7.9%), central conducting lymphatic anomalies (n = 31, 4.5%), lymphatic malformations (n = 24, 3.5%), aneurysmal bone cysts (n = 22, 3.2%), and vascularized tumors (n = 11, 1.6%). In 1384 procedures (96%), EPO was used in various combinations with sclerosing and embolization agents, including sodium tetradecyl sulfate, ethanol, and glue. The mean volume of EPO used in interventions was 3.85 mL (range: 0.1–25 mL) per procedure with a mean patient weight of 45.9 kg (range: 3.7–122.6 kg) and a weight-adjusted dose of 0.12 mL/kg (range: 0.001–1.73 mL/kg). In 56 procedures (4%), EPO was used as a single agent for diagnostic lymphangiography. The mean volume was 4.8 mL (range: 0.3–13 mL) per procedure with a mean patient weight of 27.4 kg (range: 2.4–79.3 kg) and a weight-adjusted dose of 0.2 mL/kg (range: 0.04–0.54 mL/kg). Procedural-related complications occurred in 25 (1.8%) procedures. The 20 minor and 5 major complications were related to the primary treatment agents. None of them were directly related to EPO. No allergic reactions were noted. Conclusion: The use of an ethiodized poppy seed oil contrast agent in children, adolescents, and adults for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes is safe.

Impact of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation on the central lymphatic system in liver cirrhosis

The puropse of this study was to evaluate associations of cisterna chyli (CCh) diameter with portal hemodynamics and the influence of TIPS-creation in cirrhotic patients. 93 cirrhotic patients (57 male, mean age 59 years) received CT prior to TIPS-creation. 38/93 additionally underwent post-interventional CT. CCh-diameter was measured. After categorization into patients with and without large venous collaterals (i.e. > 6 mm), data were analyzed regarding associations between CCh-diameter, clinical and portal-hemodynamic parameters and diameter-changes after TIPS-creation. Patient survival post-TIPS was analyzed. Median portosystemic pressure-gradient decreased from 20 to 9 mmHg after TIPS-creation. Large venous collaterals were observed in 59 patients. In 69/93 patients (74.2%) the CCh was detectable. Mean pre-interventional diameter was 9.4 ± 2.7 mm (large collaterals: 8.7 ± 2.0 mm, no large collaterals: 10.7 ± 3.2 mm, p = 0.003). CCh-diameter correlated strongly with pre-TIPS portal-pressure (Rs = 0.685, p = 0.0001), moderately with portosystemic-gradient (Rs = 0.524, p = 0.006), liver shear-wave-elastography (Rs = 0.597, p = 0.004) and spleen size (Rs = 0.501, p = 0.01) in patients without large collaterals, but not in patients with large collaterals. Post-TIPS CCh-diameter decreased significantly from 10.2 ± 2.8 mm to 8.3 ± 3.0 mm (p < 0.001). Patients without a detectable CCh on CT survived significantly shorter. The diameter of the CCh is associated with portal-pressure and decreases after TIPS-creation in cirrhotic patients, reflecting a portal decompression mechanism via the lymphatic system. Lack of larger central lymphatics detectable on CT may be associated with shorter survival.

Techniken und klinische Anwendungen der MR-Lymphangiografie in Diagnostik und Therapie von Lymphgefäßerkrankungen

Neue Methoden der Lymphgefäßbildgebung werden zunehmend in Diagnostik und Therapie von Lymphgefäßerkrankungen eingesetzt. Die Magnetresonanz-Lymphangiografie nimmt dabei als strahlungsfreies und non- bzw. minimalinvasives Verfahren eine zentrale Rolle ein. Es stehen verschiedene Techniken zur Verfügung, die Informationen sowohl über Anatomie als auch Funktion des peripheren und zentralen Lymphgefäßsystems liefern können. Damit trägt die Magnetresonanz-Lymphangiografie insbesondere in der Differenzialdiagnostik und in der Therapieplanung von Patienten mit Lymphödemen, Lymphgefäßleckagen und komplexen Lymphgefäßanomalien zur Ermöglichung einer zielgerichteten, minimalinvasiven und insbesondere individualisierten Therapie betroffener Patienten bei. Im Folgenden soll ein Überblick über den aktuellen Stand der MR-Lymphangiografie als neue Methode zur Untersuchung von Patienten mit Lymphgefäßerkrankungen gegeben werden, diese in das Spektrum anderer verfügbarer Bildgebungsmethoden eingeordnet und mögliche klinische Indikationen aufgezeigt werden.