Postoperative Pain Is Correlated with Scaphoid Dorsal Translation following Scapholunate Interosseous Ligament Reconstruction

Open Volar STT Ligament Reconstruction to Augment the Mathoulin's Arthroscopic Dorsal Capsuloligamentous Reconstruction: Technique Description and Case Reports

Background  The results of Mathoulin's arthroscopic dorsal capsuloligamentous reconstruction (ADCLR) are excellent in many patients with scapholunate instability, though less consistently good in higher grade instabilities. The purpose of this article is to describe a novel technique of volar scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) reconstruction which may be used to augment rotational control of the scaphoid, in conjunction with the ADCLR, for use in European Wrist Arthroscopy Society (EWAS) grade IV/V instabilities. Description of Technique  Following completion of ADCLR, the STT joint is approached through the flexor carpi radialis sheath. The palmaris longus tendon is harvested. Fluoroscopy is used to site guide wires for tunnel placement in the distal scaphoid and the proximal trapezium; 3.5-mm tunnels are overdrilled in both bones, to a depth of 8 mm. The palmaris graft is then anchored in the scaphoid tunnel with a mini-DX SwiveLock anchor. The graft is tensioned, then anchored in the trapezium tunnel with another anchor. Patients and Methods  We retrospectively selected two young men heavy manual workers who had this procedure more than 12 months previously for scapholunate instability, with static radiographic abnormalities and a drive through sign (EWAS grade V). The patients were reviewed after 12 months, for assessment of visual analog scale, quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation scores, range of motion, and grip strength. Results  Both patients had marked improvements of wrist comfort and function at 1 year, and were able to return to their normal duties at work and complete all activities of daily living with minimal symptoms. Conclusion  This volar STT reconstruction may expand the success of the Mathoulin's ADCLR into higher grade instabilities.

Anatomical front and back reconstruction sustains radiographic alignment: a comparison to three-ligament tenodesis

Multiple techniques exist to reconstruct the scapholunate interosseous ligament, though none have demonstrated superiority. This study compares 1-year radiographic outcomes of the three-ligament tenodesis and the anatomical front and back reconstruction. All patients who underwent reconstruction of their scapholunate interosseous ligament at one institution with either anatomical front and back reconstruction or three-ligament tenodesis between 2011 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. At 52-week follow-up, anatomical front and back reconstruction maintained a statistically significant improvement in scapholunate gap, corrected radiolunate angle and dorsal scaphoid translation, while three-ligament tenodesis demonstrated no sustained improvement in any parameter. The improvement in dorsal scaphoid translation was significantly greater for patients undergoing anatomical front and back reconstruction compared with three-ligament tenodesis at the 16-weeks postoperative timepoint (-1.0 mm, -0.3 mm). Anatomical front and back reconstruction demonstrates sustained improvement in radiographic outcomes at 1 year when compared with three-ligament tenodesis. By addressing both volar and dorsal critical ligament restraints, adoption of anatomical front and back reconstruction for advanced stage scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries should be considered.Level of evidence: IV.

Did implementation of three ligament tenodesis improve patient outcome after chronic scapholunate instability? A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Scapholunate instability frequently leads to chronic pain or even severe osteoarthritis of the wrist. Most favored reconstruction techniques of chronic SL-ligament injuries are based on the usage of a tendon, although there is still a lack of consensus which technique is superior.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective cohort analysis we compared 9 patients who underwent SL-ligament repair according to Van den Abbeele and 12 patients who underwent modified three ligament tenodesis according to Garcia-Elias, performed at a single institution.

RESULTS

Follow-up of Van den Abbeele group was 36-120 months and 13-39 months in the Garcia Elias cohort. Although both techniques showed good functional outcome in most cases, modified three ligament tenodesis seemed to be advantageous regarding wrist range of motion (162°) compared to Van den Abbeele cohort (87°). Moreover, pain score showed significant differences between the two cohorts during follow up (VAS Van den Abbeele 4.2; VAS Garcia Elias 1.7). Interestingly, DASH-score (16.1 Van den Abbeele; 16.8 Garcia Elias) and modified mayo wrist score (72 Van den Abbeele; 69 Garcia-Elias) did not show any differences between the two patient cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Via implementation of modified three ligament tenodesis as a standard of care for our patients we could improve the functional outcome after SL-ligament injuries and effectively decrease postoperative pain.