Use of Indocyanine Green Imaging for Perforator Identification in Preexpanded Brachial Artery Perforator Flaps

Anatomy, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes for the medial arm flap: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The medial arm flap (MAF) has been used as a pedicle flap and free flap to reconstruct various deformities, including those of the head and neck, axilla, elbow, chest, and hand. This study reviews the anatomy of the flap, the technique of flap harvest, its clinical applications, and a systematic review of the current published literature.

METHODS

An online systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and The Cochrane Library from inception to September 30, 2023, was completed. Studies that investigate the anatomy, technique or clinical outcomes of medial arm flaps were included. Clinical data extracted includes patient, defect, flap characteristics, complications, and take-back procedures. Anatomic data extracted includes anatomical variations, and vascular characteristics and patterns.

RESULTS

Between 1980 and 2023, 50 papers were published outlining the medial arm flap. Anatomic studies detail the anatomy of 384 medial arms, and outcomes are reported for 283 MAFs (75 free flaps and 208 pedicle flaps). The superior ulnar collateral artery is most commonly cited as the dominant arterial supply to the middle third of the medial arm. The majority of patients required reconstruction post-burn (39.2%), trauma (17.7%), and tumor excision (12.4%). MAFs were mostly used to reconstruct defects of the head and neck (41.7%), the hand and wrist (21.9%), and the elbow (16.3%). Eleven flaps (4.1%) suffered partial flap failure, and two flaps (0.7%) suffered total flap failure.

CONCLUSION

This manuscript demonstrates that the MAF is a reliable and underutilized flap option with a well-hidden donor scar and a low complication rate.

Utilization of two methods assisting perforator identification for brachial artery perforator propeller flap application

The brachial artery perforator propeller (BAPP) flap has the advantages of both local and perforator propeller flaps, and it remains relatively underused partly because of the anatomical variations of perforators in the medial arm. We aimed to review our preliminary experience using two different methods for perforator localization of a BAPP flap, including the application of a refined coordinate system (the ABC system) in the medial arm and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). We evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of these methods and selected the optimal examination mode depending on detailed clinical settings. The perforator was identified for each patient using the ABC system and/or ICGA, depending on the clinical setting. Twenty-two patients underwent soft-tissue reconstructions with 22 BAPP flaps, and perforator localization for all the flaps was performed before surgery using the ABC system. Thirty-one perforators were localized before surgery and marked accordingly, all of which were visualized during surgery, except two, which were not found during the surgery. ICGA was used in six pre-expanded flaps at both stages of surgeries. Twenty-seven perforators were detected before surgery, and all of them were identified during surgery; the previously localized perforators found using the ABC system in the six patients were all reidentified using ICGA. Both the ABC system and ICGA were found to be useful for preoperative perforator localization in BAPP flap transfers. Each method has its unique downsides; however, they can supplement each other to facilitate safe and effective flap elevation. Therefore, selection of the optimal method based on the clinical settings is recommended.

Cutaneous perforators of the arm and anatomical landmarks for defining the flap donor sites

PURPOSE

There are few studies searching for possible perforator flap donor sites on the arm. This study aimed to identify the locations of cutaneous perforators of the arm according to anatomical landmarks.

METHODS

Thirteen Thiel-fixed and latex-filled upper extremities of bodies donated to science were used. The distance between the acromion and medial or lateral epicondyle of the humerus was defined as the Y-axis, and the axis that cut the Y-axis perpendicularly through the epicondyles of the humerus was identified as the X-axis. The Y-axis was then divided into three parts Cutaneous arterial perforators were found using surgical dissection. The locations of the perforators were determined according to the defined lines and regions.

RESULTS

On the lateral side, there were 6.00 ± 2.08 perforators per arm, of which 56.4% were septocutaneous and 43.6% muscular. In all extremities, with in the distal 1/3 of the lateral arm, there were 1-4 radial collateral artery-based perforators. The mean distance of these perforators to the Y-axis was 1.16 ± 0.53 cm. On the medial side, there were 5.05 ± 1.44 perforators per arm, which were all septocutaneous perforators. In 85% of the extremities, within the middle 1/3 of the medial arms, there were 1-2 superior ulnar collateral artery-based perforators. The mean distance of these perforators to the Y-axis was 1.53 ± 0.61 cm.

CONCLUSION

There are always perforators from the radial collateral artery with in the distal third of the lateral arm. Within the middle third of the medial arm, it is usually possible to find a perforator from the superior ulnar collateral artery.

Imaging for thinned perforator flap harvest: current status and future perspectives

With advances in anatomical knowledge and technology, increased interest has been directed towards reconstruction with enhanced aesthetic and functional outcomes. A myriad of thinned perforator flap harvest approaches have been developed for this purpose; however, concerns about jeopardizing their vascularity remain. To ensure optimum reconstructive outcome without hampering the flap's microcirculation, it is important to make good use of the existing advanced imaging modalities that can provide clear visualization of perforator branches, particularly in the adipose layer, and an accurate assessment of flap perfusion. Therefore, this review will highlight the imaging modalities that have been utilized for harvesting a thinned perforator flap from these two perspectives, along with future insights into creating both functionally and aesthetically satisfying, yet simultaneously safe, thinned perforator flaps for the best reconstructive outcomes for patients.

Periorbital and Perioral Defect Reconstruction Using the Split Pre-Expanded Medial Arm Flap Aided by Using Indocyanine Green Angiography

ABSTRACT

The pre-expanded medial arm flap provides suitable skin for the resurfacing of a periorbital or perioral defect. However, the flap must be intraoperatively split to imitate the appearance of the oral or ophthalmic fissure, which can compromise flap perfusion. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of splitting pre-expanded medial arm flaps with the aid of indocyanine green angiography. All 8 patients underwent periorbital or perioral soft tissue reconstruction using a split pre-expanded medial arm flap. Flap splitting was aided by indocyanine green angiography. It was used during 2 stages of the procedure, tissue expander placement and flap transfer. The pedicle was divided 3 weeks later, and the flaps were used to resurface the defect. The distal portion of the flap was split into a fishmouth pattern in 5 patients and a window pattern in 3 patients. The donor sites were closed directly or by using a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. There were no perioperative complications or flap necrosis. A pre-expanded split medial arm flap could be an option for the reconstruction of periorbital and perioral defects. With the assistance of indocyanine green angiography, vessel distribution and distal flap perfusion can be reliably evaluated, facilitating the safe splitting of the flap for the reconstruction of defects.