Planned versus Unplanned Delivery for Placenta Accreta Spectrum

Evidence-based surgery for cesarean hysterectomy secondary to placenta accreta spectrum: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review, we aim to propose evidence-based management for perioperative care to improve outcomes at the time of planned cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum, a procedure associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a literature search for studies published in MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane/CENTRAL up until February 25, 2022. The search included free-text and controlled-vocabulary terms for cesarean section, cesarean delivery, and hysterectomy.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, and case-control studies published in English that reported on a perioperative intervention in the performance of a planned CH for PAS. Studies must have included a comparator group. Of the 8,907 studies screened in this systematic review, 79 met the inclusion criteria.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Articles examining each step or intervention of the CH were grouped together and reviewed qualitatively as a group. Evidence levels and recommendations were made by consensus of all authors according to the terminology of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). We synthesized the results of 79 articles, and provided 28 recommendations.

RESULTS

Based on USPSTF criteria, 21.4 % of the recommendations were level B (n = 6), 39.3 % were C (n = 11), 10.7 % were D (n = 3) and 28.6 % were I (n = 8). The interventions with the highest level of recommendation included delivery at a hospital with high cesarean hysterectomy volume, implementation of a standardized hospital protocol, delivery via a planned procedure, neuraxial anesthesia, and transverse skin incision (all level B recommendations by USPSTF criteria).

CONCLUSIONS

Development of a standardized hospital protocol, delivery at a center with high CH surgical volume, and utilization of neuraxial anesthesia garnered B evidence levels. Recommendations were limited due to the lack of prospective trials. Further research into the technical aspects of this high-risk procedure is warranted.

Evaluation of fetal growth and birth weight in pregnancies with placenta previa with and without placenta accreta spectrum

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated fetal growth and birthweight in pregnancies with placenta previa with and without placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied pregnant patients with placenta previa with or without PAS diagnosed at 20-37 weeks' gestation. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) percentile and fetal growth rate were calculated based on ultrasound at two timepoints: 20-24 and 30-34-weeks' gestation. Fetuses were small (SGA) or large for gestational age (LGA) when EFW or abdominal circumference was <10th or >90th percentile for gestational age, respectively. Fetal growth rate was estimated by subtracting EFW percentiles from the two ultrasounds. Birthweight in grams and percentiles were estimated via Anderson and INTERGROWTH-21 standards adjusted for neonatal sex. EFW percentiles, fetal growth rate, birth weight and birthweight percentiles were compared between patients with placenta previa with and without PAS.

RESULTS

We studied 171 patients with and 146 patients without PAS. SGA rates did not differ between groups on first (PAS n=3, no-PAS n=3, p=0.8) or second ultrasound (PAS n=10, no-PAS n=8, p=0.8). LGA rates were similar between groups on first (PAS n=11, no-PAS n=9, p=0.8) and second ultrasound (PAS n=20, no-PAS n=12, p=0.6). The growth rate was higher in fetuses with PAS than placenta previa (1.22 ± 22.3 vs. -4.1 ± 18.1, p=0.07), but not significantly. The birthweight percentile was higher in the PAS than the placenta previa group (74 vs. 67, p=0.01). On multi-linear regression, birthweight percentile remained higher in the PAS group, but not significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Placenta previa with or without PAS is not associated with SGA, LGA or lower birthweight.

Emergency delivery in pregnancies at high probability of placenta accreta spectrum on prenatal imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Placenta accreta spectrum disorders are associated with a high risk of maternal morbidity, particularly when surgery is performed under emergency conditions. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of emergency cesarean delivery in patients with a high probability of placenta accreta spectrum disorders on prenatal imaging and to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes between patients requiring emergency cesarean delivery and those not requiring emergency cesarean delivery.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

This study included case-control studies reporting the outcomes of pregnancies with a high probability of placenta accreta spectrum on prenatal imaging confirmed at birth delivered via unplanned emergency cesarean delivery vs those delivered via planned elective cesarean delivery for maternal or fetal indications. The outcomes observed were the occurrence of emergency cesarean delivery; incidence of placenta accreta and placenta increta/placenta percreta; preterm birth at <34 weeks of gestation; and indications for emergency delivery. This study analyzed and compared the outcomes between patients who underwent emergency cesarean delivery and those who underwent elective cesarean delivery, including estimated blood loss; number of packed red blood cell units transfused and blood products transfused; transfusion of more than 4 units of packed red blood cell; ureteral, bladder, or bowel injury; disseminated intravascular coagulation; relaparotomy after the primary surgery; maternal infection or fever; wound infection; vesicouterine or vesicovaginal fistula; admission to the neonatal intensive care unit; maternal death; composite neonatal morbidity; fetal or neonatal loss; Apgar score of <7 at 5 minutes; and neonatal birthweight.

METHODS

Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case-control and cohort studies. Random-effect meta-analyses of proportions, risks, and mean differences were used to combine the data.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies with 1290 pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta spectrum were included in the systematic review. Emergency cesarean delivery was reported in 36.2% of pregnancies (95% confidence interval, 28.1-44.9) with placenta accreta spectrum at birth, of which 80.3% of cases (95% confidence interval, 36.5-100.0) occurred before 34 weeks of gestation. The main indication for emergency cesarean delivery was antepartum bleeding, which complicated 61.8% of the cases (95% confidence interval, 32.1-87.4). Patients who underwent emergent cesarean delivery had higher estimated blood loss during surgery (pooled mean difference, 595 mL; 95% confidence interval, 116.10-1073.90; P<.001), higher number of packed red blood cells transfused (pooled mean difference, 2.3 units; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-3.60; P<.001), and higher number of blood products transfused (pooled mean difference, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-4.90; P=.002) than patients who underwent scheduled cesarean delivery. Patients who underwent emergency cesarean delivery had a higher risk of requiring transfusion of more than 4 units of packed red blood cell (odds ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-4.9; P=.002), bladder injury (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.0; P=.003), disseminated intravascular coagulation (odds ratio, 6.1; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-13.1; P<.001), and admission to the intensive care unit (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-3.3; P<.001). Newborns delivered via emergency cesarean delivery had a higher risk of adverse composite neonatal outcomes (odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.7; P=.019), admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-5.6; P=.029), Apgar score of <7 at 5 minutes (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-4.9; P=.002), and fetal or neonatal loss (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.5-27.4; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Emergency cesarean delivery complicates approximately 35% of pregnancies affected by placenta accreta spectrum disorders and is associated with a higher risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Large prospective studies are needed to evaluate the clinical and imaging signs that can identify patients with a high probability of placenta accreta spectrum at birth, patients at risk of requiring emergency cesarean delivery or peripartum hysterectomy, and patients at high risk of experiencing intrapartum hemorrhage.

Complex obstetrical surgery: building a team and defining roles

As the number of placenta accreta spectrum cases continues to rise, the gap in surgical skills in labor and delivery units becomes more apparent. Recent scholarly work has highlighted the diminishing advanced surgical skills among obstetrician-gynecologists, particularly among new graduates. Therefore, it has become a practice in many institutions to refer complex cesarean deliveries and obstetrical hysterectomies to subspecialists, specifically gynecologic oncologists. Hence, in this commentary, we propose a process through which key personnel within departments of obstetrics and gynecology are identified and their appropriate level of involvement in cases of complex obstetrical surgery is delineated. In doing so, we describe the surgical skills expected from each provider level so that the cesarean delivery complexity level can be matched with specific surgical expertise. Through this process, an obstetrician-led complex obstetrical surgery team is formed. Ultimately, the goal of this process is 2-fold; first, to return cases with higher levels of surgical complexity back to obstetricians and, second, to reduce the surgical back-up burden from gynecology subspecialists such as gynecologic oncologists.

Neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta- a matched cohort study

PURPOSE

Pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) are associated with severe maternal morbidities. The aim of this study is to describe the neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated with PAS compared with pregnancies not complicated by PAS.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary center between 03/2011 and 01/2022, comparing women with PAS who underwent cesarean delivery (CD) to a matched control group of women without PAS who underwent CD. We evaluated the following adverse neonatal outcomes: umbilical artery pH < 7.0, umbilical artery base excess ≤ - 12, APGAR score < 7 at 5 min, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, seizures and neonatal death. We also evaluated a composite adverse neonatal outcome, defined as the occurrence of at least one of the adverse neonatal outcomes described above. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine which adverse neonatal outcome were independently associated with the presence of PAS.

RESULTS

265 women with PAS were included in the study group and were matched to 1382 controls. In the PAS group compared with controls, the rate of composite adverse neonatal outcomes was significantly higher (33.6% vs. 18.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, NICU admission and composite adverse neonatal outcome were independently associated with PAS.

CONCLUSION

Neonates in PAS pregnancies had higher rates of adverse outcomes. Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, NICU admission and composite adverse neonatal outcome were independently associated with PAS.

Obstetric and haematological management and outcomes of women with placenta accreta spectrum by planned or urgent delivery: Secondary data analysis of a public referral hospital in Lebanon

BACKGROUND

Lebanon has a high caesarean section use and consequently, placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is becoming more common.

OBJECTIVES

To compare maternal characteristics, management, and outcomes of women with PAS by planned or urgent delivery at a major public referral hospital in Lebanon.

DESIGN

Secondary data analysis of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Rafik Hariri University Hospital (public referral hospital), Beirut, Lebanon.

PARTICIPANTS

159 pregnant and postpartum women with confirmed PAS between 2007-2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Maternal characteristics, management, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of the 159 women with PAS included, 107 (67.3%) underwent planned caesarean delivery and 52 (32.7%) had urgent delivery. Women who underwent urgent delivery for PAS management were more likely to experience antenatal vaginal bleeding compared to those in the planned group (55.8% vs 28.0%, p<0.001). Median gestational age at delivery was significantly lower for the urgent group compared to the planned (34 vs. 36 weeks, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of blood transfusion rates and major maternal morbidity between the two groups; however, median estimated blood loss was significantly higher for women with urgent delivery (1500ml vs. 1200ml, p = 0.011). Furthermore, the urgent delivery group had a significantly lower birth weight (2177.5g vs. 2560g, p<0.001) with higher rates of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (53.7% vs 23.8%, p<0.001) and perinatal mortality (18.5% vs 3.8%, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Urgent delivery among women with PAS is associated with worse maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to the planned approach. Therefore, early referral of women with known or suspected PAS to specialized centres is highly desirable to maximise optimal outcomes for both women and infants.

Neonatal outcomes in the surgical management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: a retrospective single-center observational study from 468 Vietnamese pregnancies beyond 28 weeks of gestation

BACKGROUND

Placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PASDs) increase the mortality rate for mothers and newborns over a decade. Thus, the purpose of the study is to evaluate the neonatal outcomes in emergency cesarean section (CS) and planned surgery as well as in Cesarean hysterectomy and the modified one-step conservative uterine surgery (MOSCUS). The secondary aim is to reveal the factors relating to poor neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study conducted between 2019 and 2020 at Tu Du Hospital, in the southern region of Vietnam. A total of 497 pregnant women involved in PASDs beyond 28 weeks of gestation were enrolled. The clinical outcomes concerning gestational age, birth weight, APGAR score, neonatal intervention, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and NICU length of stay (LOS) were compared between emergency and planned surgery, between the Cesarean hysterectomy and the MOSCUS. The univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to assess the adverse neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 468 intraoperatively diagnosed PASD cases who underwent CS under general anesthesia, neonatal outcomes in the emergency CS (n = 65) were significantly poorer than in planned delivery (n = 403). Emergency CS increased the odds ratio (OR) for earlier gestational age, lower birthweight, lower APGAR score at 5 min, higher rate of neonatal intervention, NICU admission, and longer NICU LOS ≥ 7 days with OR, 95% confidence interval (CI) were 10.743 (5.675-20.338), 3.823 (2.197-6.651), 5.215 (2.277-11.942), 2.256 (1.318-3.861), 2.177 (1.262-3.756), 3.613 (2.052-6.363), and 2.298 (1.140-4.630), respectively, p < 0.05. Conversely, there was no statistically significant difference between the neonatal outcomes in Cesarean hysterectomy (n = 79) and the MOSCUS method (n = 217). Using the multivariable logistic regression, factors independently associated with the 5-min-APGAR score of less than 7 points were time duration from the skin incision to fetal delivery (min) and gestational age (week). One minute-decreased time duration from skin incision to fetal delivery contributed to reduce the risk of adverse neonatal outcome by 2.2% with adjusted OR, 95% CI: 0.978 (0.962-0.993), p = 0.006. Meanwhile, one week-decreased gestational age increased approximately two fold odds of the adverse neonatal outcome with adjusted OR, 95% CI: 1.983 (1.600-2.456), p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

Among pregnancies with PASDs, the neonatal outcomes are worse in the emergency group compared to planned group of cesarean section. Additionally, the neonatal comorbidities in the conservative surgery using the MOSCUS method are similar to Cesarean hysterectomy. Time duration from the skin incision to fetal delivery and gestational age may be considered in PASD surgery. Further data is required to strengthen these findings.

Impact of planned versus emergency cesarean delivery on neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by abnormal placentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although planned cesarean delivery (PCD) is the mainstay of management for abnormal placentation, some patients still require emergency cesarean delivery (ECD). We aimed to systematically analyze the impact of various modes of delivery on neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

This study was complied with the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in the PROSPERO (code: CRD42022379487). A systematic search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE and Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane databases. Data extracted included gestational age at delivery, birth weight, the Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes, numbers of newborns with low Apgar score (<7) at 5 minutes, the rates of neonatal intensive care unit admission, and the rates of neonatal mortality.

RESULTS

Fifteen cohort studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 2565 women (2567 neonates) who underwent PCD (n = 1483) or ECD (n = 1082) for prenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and/or placenta previa (PP). Compared with the ECD group, neonates in the PCD group had significantly higher gestational ages (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 2.20; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-3.15; P < .001), birth weights (SMD: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.00-2.27; P < .001), and Apgar scores at 1 minute (SMD: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.29-0.73; P < .001) and 5 minutes (SMD: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.25-0.70; P < .001). Additionally, the PCD group had significantly lower rates of neonatal intensive care unit admission (odds ratio [OR]: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.14-0.29; P < .001), low Apgar score at 5 minutes (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.11-0.69; P = .01), and neonatal mortality (OR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.05-0.33; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

When pregnancies are complicated by abnormal placentation, PCD is linked to noticeably better neonatal outcomes than emergent delivery.

Is conservative management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders practical in the United States?

This commentary discusses the issues related to conservative management (also called leaving the placenta in situ or intentional retention of the placenta) of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Considerations related to placenta accreta spectrum disorder management in the United States are compared with France, where conservative management is a well-accepted management option. The history of placenta accreta spectrum disorder treatment is reviewed, finding that since 1937, the most common treatment in the United States been cesarean-hysterectomy without placental removal. Although definitive studies have yet to be conducted, a growing body of evidence suggests that conservative management is able to reduce maternal morbidity, compared with cesarean-hysterectomy. International and national guidelines from several countries are examined. Comparisons between the United States and France that are addressed in the commentary include population and geography, structure of the healthcare system, physician training and acceptability, and patient acceptability. Considering the differences between the countries, conservative management is feasible in the United States. Different options for placenta accreta spectrum disorder management should be rigorously researched in multicenter international collaborations. Conservative management should be considered as an option for women with placenta accreta spectrum disorders in the United States, especially for those desiring fertility preservation.

Expected Versus Unexpected Delivery for Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorders with Same Team in Single Tertiary Center

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of expected and unexpected pathologically proven placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) cases in a single multidisciplinary center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 92 PAS cases from January 2011 until September 2021. Only cases with histopathologically invasive placentation were included in the study. The cases diagnosed at the time of delivery were defined as unexpected PAS (uPAS) and those diagnosed antenatally as expected PAS (ePAS). Maternal and neonatal outcomes of both groups were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-five (38%) of 92 cases were in the uPAS group. Placenta previa and high-grade PAS (percreata) were significantly higher in the ePAS group (p=0.028, p<0.001; respectively). The mean packed red blood cell transfusion was significantly higher in the uPAS group (p=0.030) but transfusions of other blood products were similar in the two groups. There was no significant difference in intraoperative complication rates between the two groups. Preterm delivery (<37 weeks) was significantly higher in the ePAS group (p<0.001), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of adverse neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our single center data show that although ePAS cases include more highly invasive PAS cases, maternal hemorrhagic morbidity is lower than uPAS cases. Reducing maternal morbidity in PAS cases can be achieved by increasing antenatal diagnosis.

Placenta Accreta Spectrum Part II: hemostatic considerations based on an extended review of the literature

"Placenta accreta spectrum" (PAS) is a rare but serious pregnancy condition where the placenta abnormally adheres to the uterine wall and fails to spontaneously release after delivery. When it occurs, PAS is associated with high maternal morbidity and mortality-as PAS management can be particularly challenging. This two-part review summarizes current evidence in PAS management, identifies its most challenging aspects, and offers evidence-based recommendations to improve management strategies and PAS outcomes. The first part of this two-part review highlighted the general anesthetic approach, surgical and interventional management strategies, specialized "centers of excellence," and multidisciplinary PAS treatment teams. The high rates of PAS morbidity and mortality are often provoked by PAS-associated coagulopathies and peripartal hemorrhage (PPH). Anesthesiologists need to be prepared for massive blood loss, transfusion, and to manage potential coagulopathies. In this second part of this two-part review, we specifically reviewed the current literature pertaining to hemostatic changes, blood loss, transfusion management, and postpartum venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in PAS patients. Taken together, the two parts of this review provide a comprehensive survey of challenging aspects in PAS management for anesthesiologists.

Placenta accreta spectrum part I: anesthesia considerations based on an extended review of the literature

"Placenta accreta spectrum" (PAS) describes abnormal placental adherence to the uterine wall without spontaneous separation at delivery. Though relatively rare, PAS presents a particular challenge to anesthesiologists, as it is associated with massive peripartum hemorrhage and high maternal morbidity and mortality. Standardized evidence-based PAS management strategies are currently evolving and emphasize: "PAS centers of excellence", multidisciplinary teams, novel diagnostics/pharmaceuticals (especially regarding hemostasis, hemostatic agents, point-of-care diagnostics), and novel operative/interventional approaches (expectant management, balloon occlusion, embolization). Though available data are heterogeneous, these developments affect anesthetic management and must be considered in planed anesthetic approaches. This two-part review provides a critical overview of the current evidence and offers structured evidence-based recommendations to help anesthesiologists improve outcomes for women with PAS. This first part discusses PAS management in centers of excellence, multidisciplinary care team, anesthetic approach and monitoring, surgical approaches, patient safety checklists, temperature management, interventional radiology, postoperative care and pain therapy. The diagnosis and treatment of hemostatic disturbances and preoperative prepartum anemia, blood loss, transfusion management and postpartum venous thromboembolism will be addressed in the second part of this series.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes After Planned or Emergency Delivery for Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes for women with placenta accreta syndrome (PAS) delivering via a planned or emergent approach.

Methods: A systematic search for relevant studies was conducted by screening the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar electronic databases. Included studies should have been retrospective record-based or prospective in design. They must have compared maternal and/or neonatal outcomes for PAS patients delivering via planned and emergency procedures. Strength of association was presented as pooled adjusted relative risk (RR) for categorical outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes. Statistical analysis was done using STATA version 16.0.

Results: Nine articles were included in the meta-analysis. PAS patients undergoing planned deliveries had increased gestational ages, required fewer units of transfused blood, experienced shorter hospital stay durations, and presented reduced risks for maternal ICU admission and severe maternal morbidity. Neonates born to mothers undergoing planned deliveries had increased birth weights and decreased NICU admission risk.

Conclusion: These findings indicate a planned approach for delivery is better for maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to urgent/emergency delivery for PAS patients.