Propeller Flaps for Reconstruction around the Foot and Ankle

Lateral supramalleolar flap for soft-tissue coverage of ankle and foot defects

The reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the foot and ankle remains a big challenge due to the anatomical characteristics of this area. This study evaluated the long-term effectiveness of covering by lateral supramalleolar flap in patients with soft tissue defects around the ankle and foot. We conducted a retrospective study from January 2017 to December 2020 at the Hospital for Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Data about patients' characteristics, detailed injuries, perioperative information, intraprocedural dossier, and complications of this method were recorded and analyzed. There were 31 male and 17 female patients, with an average age of 39.8 (ranging from 11 to 77) years. The skin defects ranged from 8 cm² to 120 cm². The blood supply for the flap included a mixed-flow pattern (n = 30) and retrograde flow (n = 18). The success rate was 94%. Forty-two patients had been successfully covered, five patients had partial flap necrosis (in which two cases needed skin graft afterwards and three cases got spontaneous healing), only one patient had total flap necrosis. In conclusion, the lateral supramalleolar flap can cover the soft tissue of ankle and foot defects in both mixed-blood supply pattern or retrograde pattern with high success rates. However, the risk of venous congestion should be considered, particularly when using the retrograde pattern flap.

Use of Propeller Flaps for the Reconstruction of Defects around the Ankle

Background This article describes the clinical results of the use of propeller flaps during reconstruction of coverage defects around the ankle.

Methods A retrospective study of all patients with bone and soft tissue defects around the ankle reconstruction using propeller flap between January 2021 and December 2022 was conducted. Flap survival rate and complications were the outcomes variables.

Results A total of 14 reconstructions in 13 patients (mean age: 45.8 ± 16.7 years) using propeller flaps were performed in the study period. The medial malleolus was the most affected area (n = 5) and the defect size ranged from 12 to 33.7 cm2. The posterior tibial artery was used as a perforator in 11 flaps. Complications were identified in five flaps, four developed venous congestion and one case, reactivation of infection. Only one propeller flap presented complete failure associated with necrosis. Good soft tissue coverage was achieved in 13 of 14 flaps.

Conclusion Propeller flaps proved to be a valid management option during reconstruction of bone and soft tissue defects around the ankle, offering adequate coverage in most cases. Adequate patient selection is important to decrease the risk of complications.

Evaluating Resource Utilization with Free or Pedicled Perforator Flaps in Distal Leg Reconstruction

Background The decision between local and free tissue coverage for distal lower leg defects has long been dictated by the location and size of defects. Recent reports of distal defects treated successfully with pedicled perforator flaps demonstrate equivalent clinical outcomes; however, the complication rate can be high. The goal of this study was to evaluate the cost equivalence of free versus pedicled perforator flap to assist decision-making and guide clinical care.

Methods The institutional database was searched for patients with acute injury over the distal lower extremity requiring free or pedicled perforator flap. Demographic, clinical, and total resource cost was gathered. Patients were matched to Gustilo–Anderson or Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen classification as well as size of defect and outcomes, and cost compared.

Results We have included 108 free flaps and 22 pedicled perforator flaps in the study. There was no difference in complication rate between groups. Free flaps had significantly more reoperations, required longer operative time, and had longer intensive care unit (ICU) care with higher cost of surgery and overall cost than pedicled flaps. When controlling for size of defect, surgical cost remained significantly different between groups (p = 0.013), but overall cost did not. Multivariable regression analysis indicated flap type to be the primary driver of cost of surgery, while body mass index elevated the total cost.

Conclusion Pedicled perforator flap coverage for small to medium-sized defects (< 70 cm2) is a viable and cost-effective option for distal lower leg soft tissue reconstruction after acute traumatic injury with similar clinical outcomes and shorter operative duration and ICU stay.

Flap monitoring with incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in diabetic foot patients

Various types of flaps are considered as reconstructive options for patients with diabetic foot ulcer. However, flap reconstruction for diabetic foot ulcer treatment is particularly challenging because of the relatively limited collateral perfusion in the distal lower extremity. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel postoperative monitoring procedure implemented in conjunction with negative pressure wound therapy immediately after flap operations for treating diabetic foot. A retrospective analysis was performed on diabetic foot patients who underwent free flaps and perforator flaps from March 2019 through August 2021. The surgical outcomes of interest were the rates of survival and complications. On the third postoperative day, patients underwent computed tomography angiography to check for pedicle compression or fluid collection in the sub-flap plane. Monitoring time, as well as comparisons between NPWT and conventional methods, were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed between the two groups. This study included 26 patients. Among patients, the negative pressure wound Therapy treated group included 14 flaps and the conventional monitoring group included 12 flaps. There was no significant intergroup difference in flap survival rate (p = 0.83). In addition, there was no significant intergroup difference in the diameters of perforators or anastomosed vessels before and after negative pressure wound therapy (p = 0.97). Compared with conventional monitoring, flap monitoring with incisional negative pressure wound therapy was associated with a significantly lower mean monitoring time per flap up to postoperative day 5. Although conventional monitoring is widely recommended, especially for diabetic foot ulcer management, the novel incisional negative pressure wound therapy investigated in this study enabled effortless serial flap monitoring without increasing complication risks. The novel flap monitoring technique is efficient and safe for diabetic foot patients and is a promising candidate for future recognition as the gold standard for flap monitoring.

Coverage of exposed ankle and foot with the conjoined lower abdomen and groin flaps

BACKGROUND

Extensive soft-tissue defects around the ankle and foot pose a difficult challenge to surgeons. Considering that natural contour, the ideal solution should match a thin and pliable skin flap to allow shoe fitting and provide a functional move. As the conjoined flaps were increasingly utilized in covering various defects, we present our experience using the bipedicle conjoined flap on the lower abdomen and groin site.

METHODS

From May 2018 to September 2020, 36 patients (27 male and 9 female) with a mean age of 32 years (ranged, 21-54 years) underwent the one-stage coverage of ankle and foot defects with the bipedicle conjoined flap. A suitable "Y" bifurcation was dissected to enlarge vessel size or participated in intra-flap anastomosis. The mean dimension of the defect was 30 × 12 cm² (ranged, 20 × 8 cm² to 38 × 16 cm²). Primary donor-site closure was accomplished in all patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-six flaps survived completely without significant complications, and mild venous congestion was observed in one flap. The average flap size was 35 × 15 cm² (ranged, 22 × 10 cm² to 42 × 18 cm²). All flaps were available for a mean follow-up of 18 months (ranged, 12 to 24 months). Natural shape and walking function were successfully achieved with restored protective sensation.

CONCLUSIONS

Bipedicle conjoined flap harvested from the lower abdomen and groin is a great alternative, in selected patients seeking one-stage coverage for the exposed ankle and foot. Compared to single-pedicle flaps, the increased skin allows the wider coverage for the large defect with less morbidity and better outcomes.

Perforator-Based Flap Reconstruction after Melanoma Resection: Evaluation of Oncological, Aesthetic, and Functional Outcomes

BACKGROUND

 Evidence in literature about the best reconstructive approach after melanoma resection is controversial, with some authors advocating that tissue rearrangement flap techniques might hinder the early detection of local relapses. The aim of the present study is to evaluate oncological, aesthetic, and functional outcomes following melanoma reconstruction using pedicled perforator-based flaps.

METHODS

 The authors reviewed all patients affected by melanoma treated during a 6-year period. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, and operative variables were evaluated. Locoregional recurrence was assessed with clinical and radiological follow-up. One-year postoperatively patients rated on a 5-point Likert scale the aesthetic and functional outcomes of the procedure. Three blind observers examined preoperative and 1-year postoperative photographs and rated the aesthetic outcome of the reconstructive procedure.

RESULTS

 One-hundred sixty-five patients were treated with wide excision and delayed reconstruction, including pedicled perforator-based flaps in 70 patients (group A) and primary closure in 95 patients (group B). Mean Breslow thickness was 2.972 and 2.189 mm in group A and B, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in locoregional recurrence (chi-squared test, p = 0.8333; Fisher's exact test, p > 0.9999) between the two groups. Group A reported a higher satisfaction with both the aesthetic (mean rating 4.390 in group A and 4.094 in group B) and functional (mean rating 4.732 in group A and 4.170 in group B) outcomes of the procedure, the latter being statistically significant (p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSION

 This series suggests that pedicled perforator-based flaps provide optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes in melanoma reconstruction without impairing the locoregional control of the disease.