1
|
Zsidai B, Engler ID, Narup E, Lin RT, Nazzal EM, Winkler PW, Samuelsson K, Irrgang JJ, Musahl V. Delayed multiligament PCL reconstruction is associated with a higher prevalence of intraarticular injury and may influence treatment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:502. [PMID: 37337235 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06638-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate differences in concomitant injury patterns and their treatment in patients undergoing early (≤ 12 weeks) and delayed (> 12 weeks) primary multiligament posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction (PCL-R). METHODS This study was a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing primary multiligament PCL-R at a single institution between 2008 and 2020. Multiligament PCL-R was defined as PCL-R and concurrent surgical treatment of one or more additional knee ligament(s). Exclusion criteria included isolated PCL-R, PCL repair, and missing data for any variable. Patients were dichotomized into early (≤ 12 weeks) and delayed (> 12 weeks) PCL-R groups based on the time elapsed between injury and surgery. Between-group comparison of variables were conducted with the Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and independent samples t-tests. RESULTS A total of 148 patients were eligible for analysis, with 57 (38.5%) patients in the early and 91 (61.1%) patients in the delayed multiligament PCL-R groups. Concomitant LCL/PLC reconstruction (LCL-R/PLC-R) was performed in 55 (60%) of delayed multiligament PCL-Rs and 23 (40%) of early PCL-Rs (p = 0.02). Despite similar rates of meniscus injury, concomitant meniscus surgery was significantly more prevalent in the early (n = 25, 44%) versus delayed (n = 19, 21%) multiligament PCL-R group (p = 0.003), with a significantly greater proportion of medial meniscus surgeries performed in the early (n = 16, 28%) compared to delayed (n = 13, 14%) PCL-R group (p = 0.04). The prevalence of knee cartilage injury was significantly different between the early (n = 12, 24%) and delayed (n = 41, 46%) multiligament PCL-R groups (p = 0.01), with more frequent involvement of the lateral (n = 17, 19% vs. n = 3, 5%, respectively; p = 0.04) and medial (n = 31, 34% vs. n = 6, 11%, respectively; p = 0.005) femoral condyles in the delayed compared to the early PCL-R group. CONCLUSIONS Given higher rates of chondral pathology and medial meniscus surgery seen in delayed multiligament PCL-R, early management of PCL-based multiligament knee injury is recommended to restore knee stability and potentially prevent the development of further intraarticular injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bálint Zsidai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Ian D Engler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
- Central Maine Healthcare Orthopedics, Central Maine Medical Center, Auburn, USA
| | - Eric Narup
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ryan T Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Ehab M Nazzal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Philipp W Winkler
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
- Department of Sports Orthopaedics, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kristian Samuelsson
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - James J Irrgang
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Volker Musahl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lv H, Li W, Wang Y, Chen W, Yan X, Yuwen P, Hou Z, Wang J, Zhang Y. Prediction model for tibial plateau fracture combined with meniscus injury. Front Surg 2023; 10:1095961. [PMID: 37396296 PMCID: PMC10312001 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1095961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate a prediction model of meniscus injury in patients with tibial plateau fracture. Methods This retrospective study enrolled patients with tibial plateau fractures who were treated in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2022. Patients were divided into a development cohort and a validation cohort based on the time-lapse validation method. Patients in each cohort were divided into a group with meniscus injury and a group without meniscus injury. Statistical analysis with Student's t-test for continuous variables and chi square test for categorical variables was performed for patients with and without meniscus injury in the development cohort. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen the risk factors of tibial plateau combined with meniscal injury, and a clinical prediction model was constructed. Model performance was measured by examining discrimination (Harrell's C-index), calibration (calibration plots), and utility [decision analysis curves (DCA)]. The model was validated internally using bootstrapping and externally by calculating their performance in a validation cohort. Results Five hundred patients (313 [62.6%] males, 187 [37.4%] females) with a mean age of 47.7 ± 13.8 years were eligible and were divided into development (n = 262) and validation (n = 238) cohorts. A total of 284 patients had meniscus injury, including 136 in the development cohort and 148 in the validation cohort We identified high-energy injuries as a risk factor (OR = 1.969, 95%CI 1.131-3.427). Compared with blood type A, patients with blood type B were more likely to experience tibial plateau fracture with meniscus injury (OR = 2.967, 95%CI 1.531-5.748), and office work was a protective factor (OR = 0.279, 95%CI 0.126-0.618). The C-index of the overall survival model was 0.687 (95% CI, 0.623-0.751). Similar C-indices were obtained for external validation [0.700(0.631-0.768)] and internal validation [0.639 (0.638-0.643)]. The model was adequately calibrated and its predictions correlated with the observed outcomes. The DCA curve showed that the model had the best clinical validity when the threshold probability was 0.40 and 0.82. Conclusions Patients with blood type B and high-energy injuries are more likely to have meniscal injury. This may help in clinical trial design and individual clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Juan Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, ShijiazhuangChina
| | - Yingze Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, ShijiazhuangChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Green JS, Yalcin S, Moran J, Vasavada K, Kahan JB, Li ZI, Alaia MJ, Medvecky MJ. Examining the Schenck KD I Classification in Patients With Documented Tibiofemoral Knee Dislocations: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231168892. [PMID: 37378278 PMCID: PMC10291419 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231168892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Acute tibiofemoral knee dislocations (KDs) with a single cruciate ligament remaining intact are rare and can be classified as Schenck KD I. The inclusion of multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) has contributed to a recent surge in Schenck KD I prevalence and has convoluted the original definition of the classification. Purpose To (1) report on a series of true Schenck KD I injuries with radiologically confirmed tibiofemoral dislocation and (2) introduce suffix modifications to further subclassify these injuries based on the reported cases. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods A retrospective chart review identified all Schenck KD I MLKIs at 2 separate institutions between January 2001 and June 2022. Single-cruciate tears were included if a concomitant complete disruption of a collateral injury was present or injuries to the posterolateral corner, posteromedial corner, or extensor mechanism. All knee radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging scans were retrospectively reviewed by 2 board-certified orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship-trained surgeons. Only documented cases consistent with a complete tibiofemoral dislocation were included. Results Of the 227 MLKIs, 63 (27.8%) were classified as KD I, and 12 (19.0%) of the 63 KD I injuries had a radiologically confirmed tibiofemoral dislocation. These 12 injuries were subclassified based on the following proposed suffix modifications: KD I-DA (anterior cruciate ligament [ACL] only; n = 3), KD I-DAM (ACL + medial collateral ligament [MCL]; n = 3), KD I-DPM (posterior cruciate ligament [PCL] + MCL; n = 2), KD I-DAL (ACL + lateral collateral ligament [LCL]; n = 1), and KD I-DPL (PCL + LCL; n = 3). Conclusion The Schenck classification system should only be used to describe dislocations with bicruciate injuries or with single-cruciate injuries that have clinical and/or radiological evidence of tibiofemoral dislocation. Based on the presented cases, the authors recommend the suffix modifications for subclassifying Schenck KD I injuries with the goal of improving communication, surgical management, and the design of future outcome studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S. Green
- Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sercan Yalcin
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jay Moran
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kinjal Vasavada
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Orthopedic Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joseph B. Kahan
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Zachary I. Li
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Orthopedic Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael J. Alaia
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Orthopedic Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael J. Medvecky
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vermeijden HD, Yang XA, Rademakers MV, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, van der List JP, DiFelice GS. Early and Delayed Surgery for Isolated ACL and Multiligamentous Knee Injuries Have Equivalent Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:1106-1116. [PMID: 35099334 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211069356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early surgery for acute ligamentous injuries has recently shown good clinical and functional outcomes. PURPOSE To assess the advantages of early vs delayed surgery in patients undergoing isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or multiligament-injured knee (MLIK) surgery. STUDY DESIGN Meta-analyses of Level 1, 2, and 3 studies; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS A systematic search was performed via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for studies reporting outcomes of timing of surgery after isolated ACL injury or in the MLIK setting using accelerated rehabilitation protocols. Two analyses were conducted to differentiate early and delayed treatment (3- and 6-week cutoffs). Collected outcomes included meniscal or chondral lesions, failure and reoperation rates, range of motion (ROM) deficits, other complications, muscle strength, instrumented laxity, and functional outcomes. Outcomes were reported in risk ratios (RR) or mean differences with 95% CIs. RESULTS For timing of isolated ACL surgery, 16 studies were included with 2093 patients. High-grade evidence indicated that there were no differences in meniscal or chondral lesions, failure and reoperation rates, stiffness, ROM deficits, complications, muscle strength, instrumented laxity, and functional outcomes between patients treated early and late (all P > .05). When including only studies that set no preoperative criteria for early surgery, the findings were similar. Regarding MLIK surgery, 14 studies were included with 1172 patients. Low evidence was noted for the following: patients treated early had significantly fewer meniscal injuries (RR, 0.7; P = .04) and chondral injuries (RR, 0.5; P < .001), while no differences were found in reoperation rates, complications, stiffness, ROM deficits, muscle strength, instrumented laxity, and functional outcomes between the groups. Other than higher Lysholm scores in the early group for the 3-week analysis (mean difference, 6.8; P = .01), there were no differences between cutoff analyses. CONCLUSION This systematic review with meta-analysis found no differences in clinical and functional outcomes between early and delayed surgery for isolated ACL injuries. For MLIK injuries, there were also no differences in surgical outcomes between early and delayed surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harmen D Vermeijden
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Science, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Xiuyi A Yang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maarten V Rademakers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands
| | - Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
- Amsterdam Movement Science, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Academic Center for Evidence Based Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Collaboration on Health and Safety in Sports, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P van der List
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Science, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gregory S DiFelice
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Poploski KM, Lynch AD, Burns TC, Harner CD, Levy BA, Owens BD, Richter DL, Schenck RC, Musahl V, Irrgang JJ. Presentation and Surgical Management of Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries: A Multicenter Study from the Surgical Timing and Rehabilitation (STaR) Trial for MLKIs Network. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105:607-613. [PMID: 36827383 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.02051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple ligament knee injuries (MLKIs) represent a spectrum of injury patterns that are often associated with concomitant musculoskeletal and neurovascular injuries, complex treatment, and postoperative complications. However, there has not been high-level evidence describing the presentation and treatment of MLKIs. The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to describe characteristics of MLKIs, their management, and related complications using a pathoanatomic MLKI classification system based on the Schenck Knee Dislocation classification system. METHODS This review identified and analyzed MLKIs that occurred between 2011 and 2015. Cases with an MLKI were included in this study if there was a complete tear of ≥2 ligaments and at least 1 ligament was repaired or reconstructed. Cases in which a ligament was deemed clinically incompetent due to a partial ligament tear and required surgical repair or reconstruction were considered equivalent to grade-III tears for inclusion and classification. Demographic information, the mechanism of injury, times from injury to presentation to an orthopaedic surgeon and to surgery, the ligament injury pattern, associated injuries, surgical procedures, and complications were captured. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS A total of 773 individuals from 14 centers who underwent surgery for an MLKI were reviewed. The mean age of the individuals was 30.5 ± 12.7 years, and 74.2% were male. The most common mechanism involved sports (43.2%). The median time from injury to presentation to the orthopaedic surgeon was 11 days (interquartile range [IQR], 3 to 48 days), and the time to initial ligament surgery was 64 days (IQR, 23 to 190 days). While the most common injury patterns were an anterior cruciate ligament tear combined with either a medial-sided (MLK 1-AM, 20.7%) or lateral-sided (MLK 1-AL, 23.2%) injury, one-third (34.7%) were bicruciate injuries. Associated injuries most often involved nerves (18.5%) and tendons (15.6%). The method of surgical intervention (repair versus reconstruction), external fixator use, and staging of procedures varied by MLKI classification. Loss of motion (11.4%) was the most common postoperative complication. CONCLUSIONS A better understanding of the clinical characteristics and management of the various MLKI patterns can be used to support clinical decision-making and individualized treatment of these complex injuries, and may ultimately lead to enhanced outcomes and reduced associated risks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen M Poploski
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew D Lynch
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | | | - Dustin L Richter
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Robert C Schenck
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Volker Musahl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - James J Irrgang
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|