Interventional Oncology Approach to Hepatic Metastases

Outcomes of repeat conventional transarterial chemoembolization in patients with liver metastases

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Although unlimited sessions of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) may be performed for liver metastases, there is no data indicating when treatment becomes ineffective. This study aimed to determine the optimal number of repeat cTACE sessions for nonresponding patients before abandoning cTACE in patients with liver metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective, single-institutional analysis, patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NET), colorectal carcinoma (CRC), and lung cancer who underwent consecutive cTACE sessions from 2001 to 2015 were studied. Quantitative European Association for Study of the Liver (qEASL) criteria were utilized for response assessment. The association between the number of cTACE and 2-year, 5-year, and overall survival was evaluated to estimate the optimal number of cTACE for each survival outcome.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients underwent a total of 186 cTACE sessions for 117 liver metastases, of which 30.7 % responded to the first cTACE. For the target lesions that did not respond to the first, second, and third cTACE sessions, response rates after the second, third, and fourth cTACE sessions were 33.3 %, 23 %, and 25 %, respectively. The fourth cTACE session was the optimal number for 2-year survival (HR 0.40; 95 %CI: 0.16-0.97; p = 0.04), 5-year survival (HR 0.31; 95 %CI: 0.11-0.87; p = 0.02), and overall survival (HR 0.35; 95 %CI: 0.13-0.89; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat cTACE in the management of liver metastases from NET, CRC, and lung cancer was associated with improved patient survival. We recommend at least four cTACE sessions before switching to another treatment for nonresponding metastatic liver lesions.

Interventional Treatments of Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Thermal Ablation and Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Single-Center Experience over 26 Years

The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term results of different locoregional treatments for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) and microwave ablation (MWA). A total of 2140 patients with CRLM treated at our department between 1993 and 2020 were included in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into the following groups: LITT (573 patients; median age: 62 years), TACE + LITT (346 patients; median age: 62 years), MWA (67 patients; median age: 59 years), TACE + MWA (152 patients; median age: 65 years), and TACE (1002 patients; median age: 62 years). Median survival was 1.9 years in the LITT group and 1.7 years in the TACE + LITT group. The median survival times in the MWA group and TACE + MWA group were 3.1 years and 2.1 years, respectively. The median survival in the TACE group was 0.8 years. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 77%, 27%, and 9% in the LITT group and 74%, 18%, and 5% in the TACE + LITT group, respectively. The corresponding survival rates were 80%, 55%, and 33% in the MWA group, 74%, 36%, and 20% in the TACE + MWA group and 37%, 3%, and 0% in the TACE group, respectively. The long-term results of this study demonstrate the efficacy of locoregional treatments in treating patients with CRLM. The longest survival was found in the MWA group, followed by the combination therapy of TACE and MWA.

Synergizing liver systemic treatments with interventional oncology: friend or foe?

Interventional radiology techniques provide excellent local tumor control for small tumors in various organs, but several limitations can hamper the oncological outcomes such as the tumor size or the number of lesions. Technical improvements, optimal patient selection and combination with systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been successfully developed to overcome these barriers.In this setting, chemotherapy and targeted therapies aim to diminish the tumor burden in addition to local treatments, while immunotherapies may have a synergistic effect in terms of mechanism of action on the tumor cell as well as the immune environment, with multiple treatment combinations being available. Finally, interventional Rrdiology treatments often increase tumor antigen exposure to the immune system, and thus stimulate a specific antitumor immune response that can act beyond the treated site. Notwithstanding their many benefits, combination treatment may also result in complications, the most feared may be auto-immune-related adverse events.In early studies, several combined therapies have shown promising levels of safety and efficacy, particularly in hepatocellular carcinoma.This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of results of combined therapies for primary and secondary liver malignancies. Recent advances and future perspectives will be discussed.

Long-Term Comparative Study on the Local Tumour Control of Different Ablation Technologies in Primary and Secondary Liver Malignancies

Purpose: To evaluate local tumour control (LTC) by local ablation techniques (LAT) in liver malignancies. Materials and methods: In patients treated with LAT between January 2013 and October 2020 target lesions were characterised by histology, dimensions in three spatial axes, volume, vascularisation and challenging (CL) location. LAT used were: Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA), Microwave Ablation (MWA), Cryoablation (CRYO), Electrochemotherapy (ECT), and Interstitial Brachytherapy (IBT). Results: 211 LAT were performed in 155 patients. Mean follow-up including MRI for all patients was 11 months. Lesions treated with ECT and IBT were significantly larger and significantly more often located in CL in comparison to RFA, MWA and CRYO. Best LTC (all data for 12 months are given below) resulted after RFA (93%), followed by ECT (81%), CRYO (70%), IBT (68%) and MWA (61%), and further, entity-related for HCC (93%), followed by CRC (83%) and BrC (72%), without statistically significant differences. LTC in hypovascular lesions was worse (64%), followed by intermediate (82% p = 0.01) and hypervascular lesions (92% p = 0.07). Neither diameter (<3 cm: 81%/3−6 cm: 74%/>6 cm: 70%), nor volume (<10 cm3: 80%/10−20 cm3: 86%/>20 cm3: 67%), nor CL (75% in CL vs. 80% in non CL) had a significant impact on LTC. In CL, best LTC resulted after ECT (76%) and IBT (76%). Conclusion: With suitable LAT, similarly good local tumour control can be achieved regardless of lesion size and location of the target.

Availability of Interventional Oncology in Germany in the Years 2018 and 2019 - Results from a Nationwide Database (DeGIR Registry Data)

OBJECTIVE

 Over the past few decades, radiology has established itself in tumor therapy through interventional oncology including innovative and efficient procedures for minimalinvasive treatment of various tumor entities besides the "classic" therapeutic options such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy.Aim of this study was to evaluate the extent to which interventional oncology can provide nationwide care using the data from the register of the German Society for Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy (DeGIR registry), which records radiological interventions as part of quality assurance.

METHODS

 The numbers of interventions of participating clinics, which were recorded as part of module D (oncological procedures including TACE or other tumor-specific embolization, ablation, percutaneous tumor therapy) and identified by the DeGIR registry between 2018 and 2019, were analyzed retrospectively. The collected intervention data were evaluated regarding federal states and 40 smaller regions (administrative districts and former administrative districts).

RESULTS

 In 2018, 11 653 oncological interventions in 187 clinics were recorded by the DeGIR registry. In 2019, the number of participating clinics rose to 216 and the number of oncological interventions increased by 6 % to 12 323. The average number of oncological interventions per clinic decreased slightly from 62.5 (2018) to 57.1 (2019). The DeGIR requirement for being certified as a training center was met by 116 clinics in 2018 including 31 clinics with more than 100 interventions and 129 clinics in 2019 including 36 with more than 100 interventions. Oncological interventions have been performed in each of the 40 regions. An average of 599 interventions per region (standard deviation of 414) was recorded in the period between 2018 and 2019.

CONCLUSION

 Based on the distribution of the documented oncological interventions at federal state level as well as the district level, the supply of interventional tumor therapy depends on the geographical location. Therefore, the demand of oncological interventions might not be sufficiently covered in some regions.

KEY POINTS

· Interventional-oncological tumor therapies are performed throughout Germany. · Looking at the notable geographical differences, the need for interventional oncological procedures does not seem to be sufficiently met.. · In order to improve the comprehensive provision of oncological interventions, the training of interventional radiologists should be promoted further..

CITATION FORMAT

· Radosa CG, Nadjiri J, Mahnken AH et al. Availability of Interventional Oncology in Germany in the Years 2018 and 2019 - Results from a Nationwide Database (DeGIR Registry Data). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1729-0951.

Metastatic disease to the liver: Locoregional therapy strategies and outcomes

Secondary cancers of the liver are more than twenty times more common than primary tumors and are incurable in most cases. While surgical resection and systemic chemotherapy are often the first-line therapy for metastatic liver disease, a majority of patients present with bilobar disease not amenable to curative local resection. Furthermore, by the time metastasis to the liver has developed, many tumors demonstrate a degree of resistance to systemic chemotherapy. Fortunately, catheter-directed and percutaneous locoregional approaches have evolved as major treatment modalities for unresectable metastatic disease. These novel techniques can be used for diverse applications ranging from curative intent for small localized tumors, downstaging of large tumors for resection, or locoregional control and palliation of advanced disease. Their use has been associated with increased tumor response, increased disease-free and overall survival, and decreased morbidity and mortality in a broad range of metastatic disease. This review explores recent advances in liver-directed therapies for metastatic liver disease from primary colorectal, neuroendocrine, breast, and lung cancer, as well as uveal melanoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and sarcoma. Therapies discussed include bland transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, radioembolization, and ablative therapies, with a focus on current treatment approaches, outcomes of locoregional therapy, and future directions in each type of metastatic disease.