3
|
Zhang N, Xiang Y, Shao Q, Wu J, Liu Y, Long H, Tao D, Zeng X. Different risk and prognostic factors for liver metastasis of breast cancer patients with de novo and relapsed distant metastasis in a Chinese population. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1102853. [PMID: 37124528 PMCID: PMC10146248 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1102853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The present study aimed to identify clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) as well as to characterize the risk and prognostic factors for the liver metastasis (LM) of breast cancer patients with de novo and relapsed distant metastasis in a Chinese population. Materials and methods Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who were hospitalized in the Breast Cancer Center at Chongqing University between January 2011 and December 2019 were included in the present study. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for the presence of BCLM. Cox proportional hazard regression models were performed to determine the prognostic factors for the survival of BCLM patients. The correlation between LM and overall survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results In total, 1,228 eligible MBC patients, including 325 cases (26.5%) with de novo metastasis (cohort A) and 903 cases (73.5%) with relapsed metastasis (cohort B), were enrolled in the present study. In cohort A and cohort B, 81 (24.9%) and 226 (25.0%) patients had BCLM, respectively. Patients in these two cohorts had different clinicopathological features. Logistic regression analysis identified that the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in cohort A as well as the HER2 status and invasive ductal carcinoma histology in cohort B were risk factors for BCLM. The median OS of patients with LM was inferior to that of non-LM patients (17.1 vs. 37.7 months, P = 0.0004 and 47.6 vs. 84.0 months, P < 0.0001, respectively). Cox analysis identified that the primary T stage, Ki67 level, and breast surgery history were independent prognostic factors for cohorts A and B, respectively. Conclusions De novo and relapsed MBC patients have different risk and prognostic factors for LM. Patients with BCLM have an unfavorable prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ningning Zhang
- Department of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Yimei Xiang
- Department of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Qing Shao
- Department of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Jing Wu
- Department of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Yumin Liu
- Department of Medical Record, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Hua Long
- Department of Medical Record, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Dan Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
- *Correspondence: Dan Tao, ; Xiaohua Zeng,
| | - Xiaohua Zeng
- Department of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
- Department of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory for Intelligent Oncology in Breast Cancer (iCQBC), Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
- *Correspondence: Dan Tao, ; Xiaohua Zeng,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deipolyi AR, Johnson CB, Riedl CC, Kunin H, Solomon SB, Oklu R, Hsu M, Moskowitz CS, Kombak FE, Bhanot U, Erinjeri JP. Prospective Evaluation of Immune Activation Associated with Response to Radioembolization Assessed with PET/CT in Women with Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis. Radiology 2023; 306:279-287. [PMID: 35972356 PMCID: PMC9772064 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.220158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background The impact of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) of breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) on antitumor immunity is unknown, which hinders the optimal selection of candidates for TARE. Purpose To determine whether response to TARE at PET/CT in participants with BCLM is associated with specific immune markers (cytokines and immune cell populations). Materials and Methods This prospective pilot study enrolled 23 women with BCLM who planned to undergo TARE (June 2018 to February 2020). Peripheral blood and liver tumor biopsies were collected at baseline and 1-2 months after TARE. Monocyte, myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC), interleukin (IL), and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels were assessed with use of gene expression studies and flow cytometry, and immune checkpoint and cell surface marker levels with immunohistochemistry. Modified PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors was used to determine complete response (CR) in treated tissue. After log-transformation, immune marker levels before and after TARE were compared using paired t tests. Association with CR was assessed with Wilcoxon rank-sum or unpaired t tests. Results Twenty women were included. After TARE, peripheral IL-6 (geometric mean, 1.0 vs 1.6 pg/mL; P = .02), IL-10 (0.2 vs 0.4 pg/mL; P = .001), and IL-15 (1.9 vs 2.4 pg/mL; P = .01) increased. In biopsy tissue, lymphocyte activation gene 3-positive CD4+ TILs (15% vs 31%; P < .001) increased. Eight of 20 participants (40% [exact 95% CI: 19, 64]) achieved CR. Participants with CR had lower baseline peripheral monocytes (10% vs 29%; P < .001) and MDSCs (1% vs 5%; P < .001) and higher programmed cell death protein (PD) 1-positive CD4+ TILs (59% vs 26%; P = .006) at flow cytometry and higher PD-1+ staining in tumor (2% vs 1%; P = .046). Conclusion Complete response to transarterial radioembolization was associated with lower baseline cytokine, monocyte, and myeloid-derived suppressor cell levels and higher programmed cell death protein 1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy R. Deipolyi
- From the Department of Surgery, West Virginia University/Charleston
Division, Charleston Area Medical Center, 3200 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV
25304 (A.R.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute,
Fairfax, Va (C.B.J.); imagingwest, Hawthorne, NY (C.C.R.); Interventional
Radiology Service (H.K., S.B.S., J.P.E.), Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Precision Pathology
Center (F.E.K., U.B.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Patient Inspired
Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (R.O.)
| | - C. Bryce Johnson
- From the Department of Surgery, West Virginia University/Charleston
Division, Charleston Area Medical Center, 3200 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV
25304 (A.R.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute,
Fairfax, Va (C.B.J.); imagingwest, Hawthorne, NY (C.C.R.); Interventional
Radiology Service (H.K., S.B.S., J.P.E.), Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Precision Pathology
Center (F.E.K., U.B.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Patient Inspired
Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (R.O.)
| | - Christopher C. Riedl
- From the Department of Surgery, West Virginia University/Charleston
Division, Charleston Area Medical Center, 3200 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV
25304 (A.R.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute,
Fairfax, Va (C.B.J.); imagingwest, Hawthorne, NY (C.C.R.); Interventional
Radiology Service (H.K., S.B.S., J.P.E.), Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Precision Pathology
Center (F.E.K., U.B.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Patient Inspired
Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (R.O.)
| | - Henry Kunin
- From the Department of Surgery, West Virginia University/Charleston
Division, Charleston Area Medical Center, 3200 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV
25304 (A.R.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute,
Fairfax, Va (C.B.J.); imagingwest, Hawthorne, NY (C.C.R.); Interventional
Radiology Service (H.K., S.B.S., J.P.E.), Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Precision Pathology
Center (F.E.K., U.B.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Patient Inspired
Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (R.O.)
| | - Stephen B. Solomon
- From the Department of Surgery, West Virginia University/Charleston
Division, Charleston Area Medical Center, 3200 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV
25304 (A.R.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute,
Fairfax, Va (C.B.J.); imagingwest, Hawthorne, NY (C.C.R.); Interventional
Radiology Service (H.K., S.B.S., J.P.E.), Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Precision Pathology
Center (F.E.K., U.B.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Patient Inspired
Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (R.O.)
| | - Rahmi Oklu
- From the Department of Surgery, West Virginia University/Charleston
Division, Charleston Area Medical Center, 3200 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV
25304 (A.R.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute,
Fairfax, Va (C.B.J.); imagingwest, Hawthorne, NY (C.C.R.); Interventional
Radiology Service (H.K., S.B.S., J.P.E.), Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Precision Pathology
Center (F.E.K., U.B.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Patient Inspired
Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (R.O.)
| | - Meier Hsu
- From the Department of Surgery, West Virginia University/Charleston
Division, Charleston Area Medical Center, 3200 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV
25304 (A.R.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute,
Fairfax, Va (C.B.J.); imagingwest, Hawthorne, NY (C.C.R.); Interventional
Radiology Service (H.K., S.B.S., J.P.E.), Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Precision Pathology
Center (F.E.K., U.B.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Patient Inspired
Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (R.O.)
| | - Chaya S. Moskowitz
- From the Department of Surgery, West Virginia University/Charleston
Division, Charleston Area Medical Center, 3200 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV
25304 (A.R.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute,
Fairfax, Va (C.B.J.); imagingwest, Hawthorne, NY (C.C.R.); Interventional
Radiology Service (H.K., S.B.S., J.P.E.), Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Precision Pathology
Center (F.E.K., U.B.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Patient Inspired
Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (R.O.)
| | - Faruk E. Kombak
- From the Department of Surgery, West Virginia University/Charleston
Division, Charleston Area Medical Center, 3200 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV
25304 (A.R.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute,
Fairfax, Va (C.B.J.); imagingwest, Hawthorne, NY (C.C.R.); Interventional
Radiology Service (H.K., S.B.S., J.P.E.), Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Precision Pathology
Center (F.E.K., U.B.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Patient Inspired
Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (R.O.)
| | - Umesh Bhanot
- From the Department of Surgery, West Virginia University/Charleston
Division, Charleston Area Medical Center, 3200 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV
25304 (A.R.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute,
Fairfax, Va (C.B.J.); imagingwest, Hawthorne, NY (C.C.R.); Interventional
Radiology Service (H.K., S.B.S., J.P.E.), Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Precision Pathology
Center (F.E.K., U.B.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Patient Inspired
Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (R.O.)
| | - Joseph P. Erinjeri
- From the Department of Surgery, West Virginia University/Charleston
Division, Charleston Area Medical Center, 3200 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV
25304 (A.R.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute,
Fairfax, Va (C.B.J.); imagingwest, Hawthorne, NY (C.C.R.); Interventional
Radiology Service (H.K., S.B.S., J.P.E.), Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Precision Pathology
Center (F.E.K., U.B.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Patient Inspired
Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (R.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Manchec B, Kokabi N, Narayanan G, Niekamp A, Peña C, Powell A, Schiro B, Gandhi R. Radioembolization of Secondary Hepatic Malignancies. Semin Intervent Radiol 2021; 38:445-452. [PMID: 34629712 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Cancer has become the leading cause of mortality in America, and the majority of patients eventually develop hepatic metastasis. As liver metastases are frequently unresectable, the value of liver-directed therapies, such as transarterial radioembolization (TARE), has become increasingly recognized as an integral component of patient management. Outcomes after radioembolization of hepatic malignancies vary not only by location of primary malignancy but also by tumor histopathology. This article reviews the outcomes of TARE for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, metastatic breast cancer, and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, as well as special considerations when treating metastatic disease with TARE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Manchec
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Govindarajan Narayanan
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Andrew Niekamp
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Constantino Peña
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Alex Powell
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Brian Schiro
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Ripal Gandhi
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zane KE, Cloyd JM, Mumtaz KS, Wadhwa V, Makary MS. Metastatic disease to the liver: Locoregional therapy strategies and outcomes. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12:725-745. [PMID: 34631439 PMCID: PMC8479345 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Secondary cancers of the liver are more than twenty times more common than primary tumors and are incurable in most cases. While surgical resection and systemic chemotherapy are often the first-line therapy for metastatic liver disease, a majority of patients present with bilobar disease not amenable to curative local resection. Furthermore, by the time metastasis to the liver has developed, many tumors demonstrate a degree of resistance to systemic chemotherapy. Fortunately, catheter-directed and percutaneous locoregional approaches have evolved as major treatment modalities for unresectable metastatic disease. These novel techniques can be used for diverse applications ranging from curative intent for small localized tumors, downstaging of large tumors for resection, or locoregional control and palliation of advanced disease. Their use has been associated with increased tumor response, increased disease-free and overall survival, and decreased morbidity and mortality in a broad range of metastatic disease. This review explores recent advances in liver-directed therapies for metastatic liver disease from primary colorectal, neuroendocrine, breast, and lung cancer, as well as uveal melanoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and sarcoma. Therapies discussed include bland transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, radioembolization, and ablative therapies, with a focus on current treatment approaches, outcomes of locoregional therapy, and future directions in each type of metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie E Zane
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Khalid S Mumtaz
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Vibhor Wadhwa
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York City, NY 10065, United States
| | - Mina S Makary
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| |
Collapse
|