Genetic Testing in the Pediatric Nephrology Clinic: Understanding Families' Experiences

A step-by-step, multidisciplinary strategy to maximize the yield of genetic testing in pediatric patients with chronic kidney diseases

BACKGROUND

The use of genetic testing in pediatric patients with chronic kidney diseases (CKD) has increased exponentially in the past few years, particularly with the emergence of novel sequencing techniques. However, the genetic yield remains unexpectedly low in nephrology, with an impact on diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Moreover, the increasing diversity of genetic testing possibilities can be seen as an obstacle by clinicians, in the absence of a strong background in genetics. Here, we propose a step-by-step, multidisciplinary strategy for the diagnostic evaluation of pediatric patients with CKD, and appropriate genetic test selection to maximize the yield of genetic testing.

METHODS

A total of 126 pediatric patients were enrolled in a retrospective file analysis. Genetic testing techniques used included phenotype-associated next-generation panel sequencing (N = 41), Sanger and SNaPshot sequencing (N = 3) and/or whole exome sequencing (N = 2).

RESULTS

Overall genetic yield reached 63% and genetic testing significantly impacted patient management in 70%. The distribution of kidney diseases among patients was balanced and matched previously described pediatric cohorts in terms of glomerulopathies, tubulopathies and ciliopathies. Genetic analyses led to significant treatment modifications, kidney biopsy sparing and personalized nephroprotection, as well as tailored genetic counseling. Of note, the evaluation of Human Phenotype Ontology term accuracy in the cohort showed that causal mutations were precisely identified in 85% of the patients at most.

CONCLUSION

Here we suggest a step-by-step, multidisciplinary strategy to maximize the yield of genetic testing in pediatric patients with CKD. This approach optimizes patient care while avoiding unnecessary treatments or procedures.

The majority of parents of children undergoing genetic testing report preference for earlier genetic counseling appointments

In the Indiana University Health (IUH) Medical Genetics clinic, certified genetic counselors disclose genetic test results to patients by telephone. The wait-time between a result call-out and a follow-up appointment can vary from weeks to months depending on the medical geneticist's availability. Understanding the experiences that families face during these waiting periods can inform the field regarding what clinical improvements can be made to enhance patients' experiences. Our study explored three topics: the effects of wait-times on parents or patients between a result disclosure and medical genetics follow-up appointment, their anxiety levels during those wait-times, and suggestions for improving parents' and patients' experiences with genetics clinics. Patients or parents who were over 18 years old, who received an initial result call-out between May 2020 and September 2022 prior to a medical genetics follow-up appointment, and who had a diagnostic or a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) genetic test result were recruited for study participation. Individuals were surveyed on their diagnosis, wait-time following result disclosure, feelings during the wait-time, and preferences for result disclosures. The results showed that length of wait-time after a result call-out was not associated with increased anxiety; however, a background in genetics and support group involvement were associated with increased anxiety. The majority of respondents reported that if a genetic counseling-only appointment could occur closer to the time of results call-out, they would prefer to have a genetic counseling-only appointment with a second appointment for medical management with a geneticist later (58.1%). Based on these results, medical genetics clinics should consider implementing genetic counseling-only appointments to reduce wait-times for follow-up appointments.

The psychosocial impact of childhood dementia on children and their parents: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Childhood dementias are a group of rare and ultra-rare paediatric conditions clinically characterised by enduring global decline in central nervous system function, associated with a progressive loss of developmentally acquired skills, quality of life and shortened life expectancy. Traditional research, service development and advocacy efforts have been fragmented due to a focus on individual disorders, or groups classified by specific mechanisms or molecular pathogenesis. There are significant knowledge and clinician skill gaps regarding the shared psychosocial impacts of childhood dementia conditions. This systematic review integrates the existing international evidence of the collective psychosocial experiences of parents of children living with dementia.

METHODS

We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We systematically searched four databases to identify original, peer-reviewed research reporting on the psychosocial impacts of childhood dementia, from the parent perspective. We synthesised the data into three thematic categories: parents' healthcare experiences, psychosocial impacts, and information and support needs.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles met review criteria, representing 1856 parents. Parents highlighted extensive difficulties connecting with an engaged clinical team and navigating their child's rare, life-limiting, and progressive condition. Psychosocial challenges were manifold and encompassed physical, economic, social, emotional and psychological implications. Access to coordinated healthcare and community-based psychosocial supports was associated with improved parent coping, psychological resilience and reduced psychological isolation. Analysis identified a critical need to prioritize access to integrated family-centred psychosocial supports throughout distinct stages of their child's condition trajectory.

CONCLUSION

This review will encourage and guide the development of evidence-based and integrated psychosocial resources to optimise quality of life outcomes for of children with dementia and their families.

The Role of Genetic Testing in Pediatric Renal Diseases: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Social Implications

Pediatric renal diseases vary widely and are linked to high morbidity and mortality; hence, early diagnosis is vital. Presently, genetic testing is being incorporated into the standard of care for children and their families with kidney disease, primarily as a diagnostic tool. In the present review, we aim to collect all potential evidence from relevant studies that reported the role of genetic testing in pediatric renal disease diagnostic, prognostic, and social implications. We have conducted both electronic and manual searches within PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus to find relevant studies. Studies from the years 2013-2023 were included. Case reports with limited sample sizes and no descriptive statistics, along with review papers and meta-analyses, were excluded from this review. Quality assessment for all included studies was performed. The pooled diagnostic yields were calculated using the common effect and random effect models utilizing the R program (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The pooled result for the diagnostic yield as per the common effect model is a pooled proportion of 0.42 (42%) 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.39,0.44], while with the random effects model the pooled proportion is 0.43 (43%) 95% CI: [0.31,0.57]. The diagnostic yield for the included studies ranged from 78.10% to 16.8%. The spectrum of kidney diseases included nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis, glomerular diseases, cystic kidney disease, ciliopathies, tubulopathies, chronic kidney disease, and congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tracts (CAKUT), while hematuria and proteinuria were reported by two studies and autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant idiopathic kidney disease was reported by only one study. Genetic testing validates clinical diagnosis and aids in tailoring management strategies; hence, a more precise treatment plan is developed and unnecessary investigations are avoided, which is crucial in the case of children during routine nephrology clinic visits. Genetic counselling is of the utmost importance, so all ethical and social concerns related to genetic testing are addressed in addition to patient satisfaction.

What matters to parents? A scoping review of parents' service experiences and needs regarding genetic testing for rare diseases

Patient care experiences are key to promoting better outcomes and are an essential consideration for successful implementation of genomics in paediatric care. To understand parents' service experiences and needs regarding testing of their child for rare diseases, we conducted a scoping review. Five databases were searched (2000-2022), with 29 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Experiences of care wholly delivered by genetic services were most commonly reported (n = 11). Results were synthesised by mapping extracted data to adapted Picker principles of person-centred care. Parents especially valued and emphasised the importance of feeling 'cared for', continuous relationships with clinicians, empathic communication, being kept informed while awaiting genetic test results, linkage with informational and psychosocial resources following results disclosure, and follow-up. Strategies were often proposed by authors to address long-standing unmet needs but evidence from the literature regarding their potential effectiveness was rarely provided. We conclude that 'what matters' to parents regarding genetic testing is not dissimilar to other aspects of care. Paediatric medical specialists have existing skill sets, trusted relationships and can apply familiar principles of 'good' care to enhance experiences of genetic testing. The lack of evidence for service improvement strategies highlights the pressing need to undertake rigorous design and testing of interventions alongside mainstreaming of genomics into paediatric care.

Genomic testing for children with interstitial and diffuse lung disease (chILD): parent satisfaction, understanding and health-related quality of life

Objective

Research is needed to determine best practice for genomic testing in the context of child interstitial or diffuse lung disease (chILD). We explored parent’s and child’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL), parents’ perceived understanding of a genomic testing study, satisfaction with information and the study and decisional regret to undertake genomic testing.

Methods

Parents of children with diagnosed or suspected chILD who were enrolled in a genomic sequencing study were invited to complete questionnaires pretesting (T1) and after receiving the result (T2).

Results

Parents’ (T1, n=19; T2, n=17) HRQoL was lower than population norms. Study satisfaction (T1) and perceived understanding (T2) were positively correlated (r_s=0.68, p=0.014). Satisfaction with information (T1 and T2) and decisional regret (T2) were negatively correlated (T1 r_s=−0.71, p=0.01; T2 r_s=−0.56, p=0.03). Parents reported wanting more frequent communication with staff throughout the genomic sequencing study, and greater information about the confidentiality of test results.

Conclusions

Understanding of genomic testing, satisfaction with information and participation and decisional regret are inter-related. Pretest consultations are important and can allow researchers to explain confidentiality of data and the variable turnaround times for receiving a test result. Staff can also update parents when there will be delays to receiving a result.