Analgesic Effectiveness and Improvement in Quality of Life after Using Topical Sevoflurane for an Extremely Painful Anal Fissure

At-home Topical Sevoflurane Added to the Conventional Analgesic Treatment for Painful leg Ulcers Greatly Improved the Analgesic Effectiveness and Reduced Opioid Consumption in a Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Study with one-Year Follow-up

The general anesthetic sevoflurane is being repurposed as a topical analgesic for painful chronic wounds. This study was aimed to compare the analgesic effectiveness and safety of systemic analgesics alone or plus at-home topical sevoflurane for the management of patients with painful nonrevascularizable leg ulcers who were referred to a Pain Clinic by their attending vascular surgeons. We reviewed charts of patients treated in a single Pain Clinic with analgesic Standard of Care either alone (group SoC) or plus at-home topical sevoflurane (group SoC + Sevo), according to safety criteria. The area under the curve of pain over a year (AUC-Pain) was the primary outcome for analgesic effectiveness. Opioids were converted into Oral Morphine Milligram Equivalents. Groups SoC (n = 26) and SoC + Sevo (n = 38) were similar in baseline characteristics. Compared to SoC, median values [interquartile range] of area under the curve of pain for one-year follow-up were markedly lower for SoC + Sevo (54 [35-65] vs. 15 [11-23]; p < 0.000001, U Mann-Whitney test). Oral Morphine Milligram Equivalents were similar at baseline (SoC: 78.5 [22.5-135] vs. SoC + Sevo: 101.3 [30-160]; p = 0.753), but significantly lower for SoC + Sevo at three (120 [22.5-202.5] vs. 30 [0-80]; p = 0.005), six (120 [11.3-160] vs. 20 [0-67.5]; p = 0.004), nine (114.4 [0-154] vs. 0 [0-37]; p = 0.018), and 12 months (114.4 [0-154] vs. 0 [0-20]; p = 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed the addition of sevoflurane to be the most likely variable to explain this difference in outcome (ß:-33.408; p < 0.000001). Nine patients (24%) in SoC + Sevo had adverse effects attributed to sevoflurane, but only one patient needed to stop using sevoflurane due severe dermatitis. In conclusion, the addition of topical sevoflurane to the analgesic standard of care in patients with painful nonrevascularizable leg ulcers was a well-tolerated therapy that significantly improved pain control and allowed for a significant reduction in opioid consumption.

In vitro assessment of the direct hemolytic effect of the volatile halogenated anesthetics sevoflurane, isoflurane, and desflurane

Sevoflurane is being repurposed as a topical analgesic for painful wounds. Providing pre-charged sevoflurane syringes to irrigate wounds implies a potential risk of accidental intravenous injections. We assessed the potential of two concentrations (33% and 50% v/v) of three anesthetics, isoflurane, desflurane and sevoflurane, to produce hemolysis in vitro. Spectrophotometric absorbance was read at 576 nm. For both concentrations, the percentage of hemolysis (mean ± SD) was higher for isoflurane (29.7 ± 3.4% and 39.5 ± 5.3%), mild for desflurane (8.0 ± 0.5% and 6.5 ± 0.9%) and negligible for sevoflurane (0.7 ± 0.0% and 0.6 ± 0.1%), respectively. In conclusion, in contrast to isoflurane and desflurane, sevoflurane did not display hemolytic potential in vitro. However, the use of syringes preloaded with sevoflurane may still be problematic if it increases the possibility of inadvertent intravenous administration through increased risk of gas embolism and severe central nervous system depression.

Clinical and histological safety assessment of repeated intra-articular sevoflurane injections into knee joints of Sprague-Dawley rats

Objectives

We investigated the effects of repeated intra-articular injections of liquid sevoflurane to articular structures, as this inhalational anesthetic is being repurposed as an antimicrobial agent, which would make sevoflurane a novel alternative for the treatment of septic arthritis.

Methods

The left knees of nine Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with 150 μL of liquid sevoflurane for five consecutive days, whereas the right knees were injected with the same volume of saline to serve as controls. Animals were examined daily for clinical signs of local and systemic toxic effects attributable to sevoflurane. Rats were euthanized in groups of three at days 7, 14, and 35 after the first injection, and left and right knees were sent for histological assessment.

Results

Local signs on knees consisted of transient bilateral scabs, and an unexpected subcutaneous emphysema affecting only left knees, which was attributed to sevoflurane. No rat presented with limp, and animal welfare was good during the study period. Two out of the three left knees from rats sacrificed at day 7 showed mild histological changes, specifically a mild infiltration of lymphocytes. All other seven left knees as well as all nine right knees were completely normal at histological examination.

Conclusion

We concluded that repeated intra-articular injections of sevoflurane seemed safe for articular structures in noninfected knees. Further studies focused on the safety of intra-articular sevoflurane in infected knees, as well as on its effectiveness for the treatment of septic arthritis are warranted.