Sagittal Plane Alignment and Functional Outcomes Following Surgery for Scheuermann Kyphosis

An evidence based conceptual framework for the multifactorial understanding of proximal junctional kyphosis

Introduction

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a debilitating pathology that arises from a variety of etiologies. Spinal fusion surgery is the mainstay of treatment for those who do not achieve symptom relief with conservative interventions. Fusion surgery can be complicated by a secondary deformity termed proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).

Research question

This scoping review evaluates the modern body of literature analyzing risk factors for PJK development and organizes these factors according to a multifactorial framework based on mechanical, tissue or demographic components.

Materials and methods

An extensive search of the literature was performed in PubMed and Embase back to the year 2010. Articles were assessed for quality. All risk factors that were evaluated and those that significantly predicted the development of PJK were compiled. The frequency that a risk factor was predictive compared to the number of times it was evaluated was calculated.

Results

150 articles were reviewed. 57.3% of papers were of low quality. 76% of risk factors analyzed were focusing on the mechanical contribution to development of PJK versus only 5% were focusing on the tissue-based contribution. Risk factors that were most frequently predictive compared to how often they were analyzed were Hounsfield Units of vertebrae, UIV disc degeneration, paraspinal muscle cross sectional area and fatty infiltration, ligament augmentation, instrument characteristics, postoperative hip and lower extremity radiographic metrics, and postoperative teriparatide supplementation.

Discussion and conclusion

This review finds a multifactorial framework accounting for mechanical, patient and tissue-based risk factors will improve the understanding of PJK development.

Surgical Procedures Used for Correction of Scheuermann's Kyphosis: A Meta-Analysis

Objectives

Scheuermann's kyphosis can cause severe back pain and cosmetic disorders to patients. Previous studies on surgical procedure selection for correction of Scheuermann's kyphosis have drawn controversial conclusions. Here, a meta-analysis was performed to figure out a better way between anterior-posterior (AP) combined procedures and posterior-only (PO) procedures.

Methods

We searched PubMed database and Ovid database, as well as Cochrane Library (between January 2009 and December 2020, around recent ten years), for studies reporting Scheuermann's kyphosis correction in an anterior way or a posterior way. Random effects meta-analysis regarding correction degrees and incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) was performed.

Results

Finally, 13 unique studies including 586 patients (AP: 300; PO: 286) were identified and included for this meta-analysis. Overall, 6 AP cohorts and 10 PO cohorts were pooled regarding the correction degrees of kyphosis in the analysis, respectively. Pooled correction degrees in AP cohorts were 33.31 (95% CI: 27.48–39.15; I² = 86%, P < 0.001) and in PO cohorts were 31.16 (95% CI: 26.97–35.35; I² = 81.1%, P < 0.001). Comparison of correction between AP and PO cohorts did not indicate any significant difference. Likewise, postoperative PJK incidence showed no difference. Back pain can be caused by both AP and PO procedures, but which causes less pain remains to be conclusive. The PO approach showed less blood loss and shorter surgical duration as compared to the AP approach.

Conclusions

In summary, this meta-analysis shows similar treatment effects between AP and PO procedures in correcting Scheuermann's kyphosis, suggesting the advantage of PO procedures due to less blood loss and surgical duration. However, the postoperative complications PJK and distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) cannot be well concluded due to the limitation of existing data.