1
|
Pacchiarotti G, Todesca A, Coppola M, Gumina S. Robotic-assisted patellofemoral arthroplasty provides excellent implant survivorship and high patient satisfaction at mid-term follow-up. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2024; 48:2055-2063. [PMID: 38819666 PMCID: PMC11246259 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06224-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Robotic adoption in knee surgery has yielded several benefits, but its application in patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) remains barely reported. The purpose of this study was to determine implant survival, patient satisfaction, and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted PFA at an intermediate follow-up. METHODS This prospective analysis targeted 18 knees of 16 consecutive patients who underwent robot-aided PFA with three-year minimum follow-up (range, 3 to 6 years). Each patient was evaluated collecting pre-operative and post-operative medical record data, including range of motion, radiographic images, and multiple scores, such as VAS, APKS, and OKS. RESULTS At surgery, the mean age was 55.4 years ± 14.4 (range, 32 to 78 years), and the mean BMI was 26.8 kg/m² ±5.2 (range, 20 to 36). Etiologies of patellofemoral osteoarthritis included idiopathic degeneration (28%), post-traumatic (33%), and dysplasia (39%). Pre-implantation scores were VAS 7.9 ± 1.4, AKPS 34.6 ± 23.3, and OKS 17.3 ± 10.3. One implant was revised with primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis progression. Clinical and radiographic follow-up showed no signs of loosening or infection. The maximum flexion reached an average of 131.1°±10.5° (range, 110° to 145°), accompanied by significantly improved score results (P-value < 0.01): VAS 1.1 ± 1.4, AKPS 90.2 ± 8.6, and OKS 46.3 ± 1.8. CONCLUSIONS At 3 years after robotic assisted patellofemoral arthroplasty, excellent implant survival and patient satisfaction rates can be expected along with significantly improved functional and pain control outcomes. Although the limitations imposed by the restricted cohort, these findings indicate that robotic assistance in PFA is both safe and effective at intermediate follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Pacchiarotti
- Department of Anatomy, Histology, Legal Medicine, and Orthopaedics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | | | - Michele Coppola
- Istituto Chirurgico Ortopedico Traumatologico (ICOT), Latina, Italy
| | - Stefano Gumina
- Department of Anatomy, Histology, Legal Medicine, and Orthopaedics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lau WH, Liu WKT, Chiu KY, Cheung MH, Cheung A, Chan PK, Chan VWK, Fu H. Reducing edge loading and alignment outliers with image-free robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a case controlled study. ARTHROPLASTY 2024; 6:33. [PMID: 38835099 DOI: 10.1186/s42836-024-00259-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivorship of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is technique-dependent. Correct femoral-tibial component positioning associates with improved survivorship. Image-free robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty enables preoperative and intraoperative planning of alignment and assessment of positioning prior to execution. This study aimed to compare the radiological outcomes between robotic-assisted UKA (R-UKA) and conventional UKA (C-UKA). METHODS This retrospective case control study involved 140 UKA (82 C-UKA and 58 R-UKA) performed at an academic institution between March 2016 to November 2020, with a mean follow-up of 3 years. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for mechanical axis and femoral-tibial component position. Component position was measured by two methods: (1) femoral-tibial component contact point with reference to four medial-to-lateral quadrants of the tibial tray and (2) femoral-tibial component contact point deviation from the center of the tibial tray as a percentage of the tibial tray width. Baseline demographics and complications were recorded. RESULTS There was a higher mean component deviation in C-UKA compared with R-UKA using method 2 (17.2% vs. 12.8%; P = 0.007), but no difference in proportion of zonal outliers using method 1 (4 outliers in C-UKA, 5.1% vs. 1 outlier in R-UKA, 1.8%; P = 0.403). R-UKA showed no difference in mean mechanical alignment (C-UKA 5° vs. R-UKA 5°; P = 0.250). 2-year survivorship was 99% for C-UKA and 97% for R-UKA. Mean operative time was 18 min longer for R-UKA (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Image-free robotic-assisted UKA had improved component medio-lateral alignment compared with conventional technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wai Hong Lau
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Division of Joint Replacement Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Wai Kiu Thomas Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Division of Joint Replacement Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kwong Yuen Chiu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Division of Joint Replacement Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Man Hong Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Division of Joint Replacement Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Amy Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Division of Joint Replacement Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Ping Keung Chan
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Division of Joint Replacement Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Vincent Wai Kwan Chan
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Division of Joint Replacement Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Henry Fu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Division of Joint Replacement Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sang W, Qiu H, Xu Y, Pan Y, Ma J, Zhu L. Malposition is main cause of failure of Oxford mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt Open 2023; 4:914-922. [PMID: 38035610 PMCID: PMC10689062 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.412.bjo-2023-0135.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is the preferred treatment for anterior medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) owing to the rapid postoperative recovery. However, the risk factors for UKA failure remain controversial. Methods The clinical data of Oxford mobile-bearing UKAs performed between 2011 and 2017 with a minimum follow-up of five years were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic, surgical, and follow-up data were collected. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the risk factors that contribute to UKA failure. Kaplan-Meier survival was used to compare the effect of the prosthesis position on UKA survival. Results A total of 407 patients who underwent UKA were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 61.8 years, and the mean follow-up period of the patients was 91.7 months. The mean Knee Society Score (KSS) preoperatively and at the last follow-up were 64.2 and 89.7, respectively (p = 0.001). Overall, 28 patients (6.9%) with UKA underwent revision due to prosthesis loosening (16 patients), dislocation (eight patients), and persistent pain (four patients). Cox proportional hazards model analysis identified malposition of the prostheses as a high-risk factor for UKA failure (p = 0.007). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the five-year survival rate of the group with malposition was 85.1%, which was significantly lower than that of the group with normal position (96.2%; p < 0.001). Conclusion UKA constitutes an effective method for treating anteromedial knee OA, with an excellent five-year survival rate. Aseptic loosening caused by prosthesis malposition was identified as the main cause of UKA failure. Surgeons should pay close attention to prevent the potential occurrence of this problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weilin Sang
- Department of Joint Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Department of Orthopaedics, Yiliang People’s Hospital, Yunnan, China
| | - Hongjiu Qiu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Yiliang People’s Hospital, Yunnan, China
| | - Ying Xu
- Shanghai International Medical Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuqin Pan
- Department of Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinzhong Ma
- Department of Joint Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Libo Zhu
- Department of Joint Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Twomey-Kozak J, Hurley E, Levin J, Anakwenze O, Klifto C. Technological innovations in shoulder replacement: current concepts and the future of robotics in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:2161-2171. [PMID: 37263482 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has been rapidly evolving over the last several decades, with innovative technological strategies being investigated and developed in order to achieve optimal component precision and joint alignment and stability, preserve implant longevity, and improve patient outcomes. Future advancements such as robotic-assisted surgeries, augmented reality, artificial intelligence, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and other peri- and preoperative planning tools will continue to revolutionize TSA. Robotic-assisted arthroplasty is a novel and increasingly popular alternative to the conventional arthroplasty procedure in the hip and knee but has not yet been investigated in the shoulder. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to conduct a narrative review of the literature on the evolution and projected trends of technological advances and robotic assistance in total shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS A narrative synthesis method was employed for this review, rather than a meta-analysis or systematic review of the literature. This decision was based on 2 primary factors: (1) the lack of eligible, peer-reviewed studies with high-quality level of evidence available for review on robotic-assisted shoulder arthroplasty, and (2) a narrative review allows for a broader scope of content analysis, including a comprehensive review of all technological advances-including robotics-within the field of TSA. A general literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. These databases were queried by 2 independent reviewers from database inception through November 11, 2022, for all articles investigating the role of robotics and technology assistance in total shoulder arthroplasty. Inclusion criteria included studies describing "shoulder arthroplasty" and "robotics." RESULTS After exclusion criteria were applied, 4 studies on robotic-assisted TSA were described in the review. Given the novelty of this technology and limited data on robotics in TSA, these studies consisted of a literature review, nonvalidated experimental biomechanical studies in sawbones models, and preclinical proof-of-concept cadaveric studies using prototype robotic technology primarily in conjunction with PSI. The remaining studies described the technological advancements in TSA, including PSI, computer-assisted navigation, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and virtual, augmented, and mixed reality. Although not yet commercially available, robotic-assisted TSA confers the theoretical advantages of precise humeral head cuts for restoration of proximal humerus anatomy, more accurate glenoid preparation, and improved soft-tissue assessment in limited early studies. CONCLUSION The evidence for the use of robotics in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty demonstrates improved component accuracy, more precise radiographic measurements, and improved early/mid-term patient-reported and functional outcomes. Although no such data currently exist for shoulder arthroplasty given that the technology has not yet been commercialized, the lessons learned from robotic hip and knee surgery in conjunction with its rapid adoption suggests robotic-assisted TSA is on the horizon of innovation. By achieving a better understanding of the past, present, and future innovations in TSA through this narrative review, orthopedic surgeons can be better prepared for future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Twomey-Kozak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Eoghan Hurley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jay Levin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Oke Anakwenze
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christopher Klifto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Innocenti M, Zanna L, Akkaya M, Huber K, Christen B, Calliess T. Setting the Tibial Component Rotation Based on Femoral Landmarks Allows Congruent Knee Kinematics in Robotic-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040632. [PMID: 37109018 PMCID: PMC10141020 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The accurate positioning of the prosthetic components is essential for achieving successful results in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA). The tibial component rotation in image-based robotic-assisted UKA is usually based on tibial bony landmarks matched to the pre-operative CT model. The study aimed to evaluate whether setting the tibial rotation on femoral CT-based landmarks allows congruent knee kinematics. We retrospectively analyzed data from 210 consecutive image-based robotic-assisted mUKA cases. In every case, we set the tibia rotation landmark parallel to the posterior condylar axis and centered it on the trochlea groove defined on the preoperative CT scan. The implant positioning was primarily set parallel to this rotation landmark and then adjusted based on tibial sizes avoiding component over- or under-hang. During surgery, we recorded the knee kinematics under valgus stress to reduce the arthritic deformity. A femoral-tibial contact point was recorded over the entire range of motion and displayed as a tracking profile on the tibia implant. The femoro-tibial tracking angle (FTTA) was then calculated based on a tangent line to the femoro-tibial tracking-points and the difference to the femur-based rotation landmark. In 48% of the cases, we could position the tibia component exactly to the femoral rotation landmark, whereas in 52% of cases, minimal adjustments were made to avoid component’s under- or over-hang. The mean tibia component rotation (TRA) with reference to our femur-based landmark was +0.24° (SD ± 2.9°). The femur-based tibia rotation landmark showed a high correspondence to the FTTA with 60% of the cases having less than 1° of deviation. Mean FTTA was +0.7° (SD ± 2.2°). The mean difference between the absolute value of the TRA and the FTTA (|TRA| − |FTTA|) was −0.18° (SD ± 2°). Setting the tibial component rotation based on CT scan femoral landmarks and not on tibial anatomical landmarks is a reliable method to obtain congruent knee kinematics during image-based robotic-assisted medial UKA with less the 2° deviations on average.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Innocenti
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Luigi Zanna
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | | | - Kim Huber
- Articon Spezialpraxis für Gelenkchirurgie, 3013 Berne, Switzerland
| | | | - Tilman Calliess
- Articon Spezialpraxis für Gelenkchirurgie, 3013 Berne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
MacAskill M, Blickenstaff B, Caughran A, Bullock M. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Robotic Arm Technology. Arthroplast Today 2021; 13:35-42. [PMID: 34917719 PMCID: PMC8666608 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly successful operation for the treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee. Increasing use of computer-assisted and robotic-assisted total joint arthroplasty has been shown to improve component position, with short-term studies demonstrating improved survivability in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Robotic-assisted technology has been shown to be helpful in revising unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA, as well as hip fusion to total hip arthroplasty, but few have described revision of a primary TKA. This case report describes the use of robotic-assisted technology in revision TKA. Robotic assistance during revision TKA may improve component alignment and increase prosthesis longevity. Future research is needed to investigate the effects on survivorship and cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micah MacAskill
- Marshall University, Joan C Edwards SOM, Department of Orthopaedics, Huntington, WV, USA
| | - Baylor Blickenstaff
- Marshall University, Joan C Edwards SOM, Department of Orthopaedics, Huntington, WV, USA
| | - Alexander Caughran
- Marshall University, Joan C Edwards SOM, Department of Orthopaedics, Huntington, WV, USA
| | - Matthew Bullock
- Marshall University, Joan C Edwards SOM, Department of Orthopaedics, Huntington, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|