Revisional Techniques for Secondary Cleft Lip Deformities

Use of Hyaluronic Acid Filler in Patients with Secondary Cleft Lip Deformity

METHODS

Retrospective case note review was undertaken of all patients treated in the clinic over a two-year period.

RESULTS

20 patients underwent HA filler injections to the upper lip 26 times. Most were female (F:M = 3:1) and patients were aged 18-58 years. Most patients had a unilateral cleft lip +/- palate (n = 13, 65%). The most common indication was to address upper lip volume (n = 13, 65%). Other indications included vermillion notch (n = 5, 25%), cupid bow peak height asymmetry (n = 4, 20%), scar asymmetry (n = 1, 5%) and nasal sill flattening (n = 1, 5%). Small volumes of filler were used with an average of 0.34 ml (range 0.05-1.2 ml). There were no complications and one patient reported pruritis post procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

HA filler is a safe and reliable treatment for certain aspects of asymmetry following cleft lip repair. It can be used to address volume deficiency and asymmetry, cupid bow peak height discrepancies and a vermillion notch for patients who do not want surgery. Injection of HA to the lips can be performed easily, with appropriate training, in the outpatient setting.

The Fisher Subunit Anatomical Approach for Cleft Lip Revisions: An Evolution and Case Series

ABSTRACT

Many techniques exist to reapproximate a cleft lip but can leave unsatisfactory results with nonanatomic scars and a short upper lip, creating a need for revision. Many revisions focus on adjacent tissue transfers and realignment of landmarks, but in the senior authors' experience, recreating the defect and utilizing the Fisher repair for revision have led to aesthetically pleasing results and less noticeable scars. A database was collected that included all cleft lip revisions performed at a large, comprehensive children's hospital from October 2018 to July 2021. Inclusion criteria included any cleft patient with a cleft lip revision performed by two craniofacial surgeons. Data collected included sex, characteristics of the cleft lip, age at initial and index repair, type of initial repair, previous revisions, type of revision with any additional tissue rearrangement, and any nose repair. Sixty-five patients were included in the study for analysis. The type of initial repair was known in sixty-four cases (98%), and fifty-four were Millard repairs (83%). Twenty-two patients (33%) had a previous revision prior to their index revision. Sixty patients (92%) underwent the Fisher repair technique for their index revision and forty-six patients (70%) underwent nasal revision. In follow-up, all patients demonstrated an improvement in lip aesthetics. This study demonstrates a large subset of patients that have undergone cleft lip revision using the Fisher technique. In the senior surgeons' experience, the Fisher repair technique in the setting of cleft lip revision is an ideal way to address the shortcomings of historical repair techniques.

A New Algorithm for Secondary Repair of Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity

OBJECTIVES

Following primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip palate (UCLP), cleft lip nasal deformities (CLNDs) (nasal asymmetry, collapsed nasal alae, and a widened alar base) are generally inevitable and often require secondary rhinoplasty. However, reconstructing a cleft nose with an alar tissue deficiency remains challenging for rhinoplasty surgeons.

METHODS

The manifestations of common deformities are described herein, and a secondary rhinoplasty technique for unilateral CLNDs using a nasolabial flap (NLF) has been proposed for patients with alar tissue deficiency. Secondary rhinoplasties were performed in 12 patients with unilateral CLNDs between 2020 and 2021 using a NLF. Photogrammetric measurements were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 12 flaps were successfully transferred. Ten patients were followed up for >1 year.

RESULTS

Significant postoperative decreases in nasal alar width were measured in both the base view (p < 0.050) and the frontal view (p < 0.050). Despite the additional facial scars that occurred in some cases, all patients were satisfied with the aesthetic effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The NLF achieved satisfactory results in secondary rhinoplasty of unilateral CLND for patients with nasal tissue deficiencies in whom the surgeon weighed the potential benefits over postoperative scarring.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:1648-1655, 2024.

A Modified and Refined Classification System for Secondary Cleft Nasolabial Deformities

Secondary cleft lip (CL) deformities are commonly encountered in cleft management. Various attempts have been made to create a classification system that can comprehensively encapsulate residual CL deformities after primary repair. The aim of this study is to reinforce valid classification systems and to introduce a new classification subtype (Type V Revision). A longitudinal retrospective analysis was done in 35 outreach programs in 4 countries (Ecuador, Lebanon, Peru, and El Salvador) between 2015 and 2023. Two hundred sixty-nine patients, between the ages of 9 months and 45 years, with residual CL deformities after primary lip repair, were classified into one of the 5 classification types. Patients with syndromes were excluded from the study. Patients received one of 5 revision types depending on their initial preoperative evaluation and intraoperative analysis of anatomic involvement. The mean age at surgery was 12.86 years. Twenty-five patients received type I revision, 29 patients received type II revision, 81 patients received type III revision, 106 patients received type IV revision, and 28 patients received type V revision. As the surgical complexity advanced from type I to V, there was a gradual increase in the average surgical time. The Congruence between preoperative and postoperative revision types was substantial. Residual CL defects cause a significant burden on both the patient and cleft care provider. This classification system, with the newly introduced type V revision, enhances and eases the categorization and management of secondary CL deformities.

Aesthetic evaluation of nasolabial reconstruction using abbe flap in bilateral cleft lip patients with secondary deformities

BACKGROUND

The Abbe flap is a common technique frequently utilized in secondary surgery for bilateral cleft lip deformities, but objective indications for the Abbe flap remain unclear, and postoperative aesthetic evaluations are limited.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 92 bilateral cleft lip patients with secondary deformities aged 7-39 years, and the control group consisted of 33 people aged 19-35 years. Thirteen objective nasolabial aesthetic parameters were selected to evaluate patients' nasolabial aesthetics.

RESULTS

Minor secondary deformities were characterized by a smaller lip height index than severe deformities, as well as a smaller columellar angle compared with moderate and severe deformities (P < 0.05). For all patients, significant differences were found between preoperative and postoperative values of intercanthal distance/medial upper vermilion height ratio, intercanthal distance/medial upper lip height ratio, lip height index, lip vermilion height index, lip protrusion angle, columellar-labial angle, and nasal tip angle (P < 0.05). For patients with minor deformity, intercanthal distance/philtrum width ratio and intercanthal distance/medial cutaneous upper lip height ratio showed no significant change postoperatively (P > 0.05), and labial protrusion angle was smaller than the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing secondary surgery using an Abbe flap achieved good nasolabial aesthetics. Intercanthal distance/medial upper vermilion height ratio, intercanthal distance/medial upper lip height ratio, lip height index, columellar-labial angle, nasolabial angle, nasal tip angle, and columellar angle are the objective aesthetic indicators for Abbe flap selection. Intercanthal distance/philtrum width ratio, intercanthal distance/medial cutaneous upper lip height ratio, and labial protrusion angle are reference parameters for choosing an Abbe flap for secondary bilateral cleft lip revision.

Use of Biologic Agents for Lip and Cheek Reconstruction

The unique requirements of reconstructing cheek defects, often with its proximity to the mobile elements of the face including the lip and the eyelid, have been met very handily with the directed and thoughtful use of biologic wound healing agents. One of the key advantages of these agents is their ability to provide coverage for the mobile elements of the cheek and the lip in patients with multiple co-morbidities. These agents are successfully used where the standard cheek closure techniques including cervicofacial advancement flap are contraindicated due to its anesthetic requirement. Additionally, lip reconstruction involves examining the lip's three anatomic layers: mucosa, muscle, and skin. The defects must be planned for reconstruction based on the involvement of these layers. This paper serves to introduce the use of biologic wound healing agents depending on the involvement of these layers. The authors provide specific illustrations of these agents based on defect location, tissue involvement, and severity of the defect to help with procedural planning to reconstruct a very aesthetically involved part of the face.

Use of Biologic Agents for Lip and Cheek Reconstruction

The unique requirements of reconstructing cheek defects, often with its proximity to the mobile elements of the face including the lip and the eyelid, have been met very handily with the directed and thoughtful use of biologic wound healing agents. One of the key advantages of these agents is their ability to provide coverage for the mobile elements of the cheek and the lip in patients with multiple co-morbidities. These agents are successfully used where the standard cheek closure techniques including cervicofacial advancement flap are contraindicated due to its anesthetic requirement. Additionally, lip reconstruction involves examining the lip's three anatomic layers: mucosa, muscle, and skin. The defects must be planned for reconstruction based on the involvement of these layers. This paper serves to introduce the use of biologic wound healing agents depending on the involvement of these layers. The authors provide specific illustrations of these agents based on defect location, tissue involvement, and severity of the defect to help with procedural planning to reconstruct a very aesthetically involved part of the face.