Improving the Timely Delivery of Antihypertensive Medication for Severe Perinatal Hypertension in Pregnancy and Postpartum

Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy: Progress Made and Future Directions for Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, and Implementation of a Patient Safety Bundle

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy account for approximately 5% of pregnancy-related deaths in the United States and are one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity. Focus on improving patient outcomes in the setting of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy has increased in recent years, and quality improvement initiatives have been implemented across the United States. This paper discusses patient safety and quality initiatives for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, with an emphasis on progress made and a patient safety tool: the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health's Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy patient safety bundle. Future patient safety and quality directions for the treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy will be reviewed.

Reducing severe maternal morbidity for birthing persons with severe hypertension through a statewide quality improvement initiative

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a leading preventable cause of severe maternal morbidity and maternal mortality worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the improvement in hospital care processes and patient outcomes associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy after introduction of a statewide Severe Maternal Hypertension Quality Improvement Initiative.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort design comparing outcomes before and after introduction of the Illinois Perinatal Quality Collaborative statewide hypertension quality improvement initiative among 108 hospitals across Illinois. Participating hospitals recorded data for all cases of new-onset severe hypertension (>160 mm Hg systolic or >110 mm Hg diastolic) during pregnancy through 6 weeks postpartum from May 2016 to December 2017. Introduction of the statewide quality improvement initiative included implementation of severe maternal hypertension protocols, standardized patient education and discharge planning, rapid access to medications and standardized treatment order sets, and provider and nurse education. The main outcome measure was the reduction of severe maternal morbidity for pregnant/postpartum patients with severe hypertension. Key process measures include time to treatment of severe hypertension, frequency of provider/nurse debriefs, appropriate patient education, and early postpartum follow-up.

RESULTS

Data were reported for 8073 cases of severe maternal hypertension. The frequency of patients with new-onset severe hypertension treated within 60 minutes increased from 41% baseline to 87% (P<.001) at the end of the initiative. The initiative was associated with increased proportion of patients receiving preeclampsia education at discharge (41% to 89%; P<.001), scheduling follow-up appointments within 10 days of discharge (68% to 83%; P<.001), and having a care team debrief after severe hypertension was diagnosed (17% to 59%; P<.001). Conversely, severe maternal morbidity was reduced from 11.5% baseline to 8.4% (P<.002) at the end of the study period. Illinois hospitals have achieved time to treatment goal regardless of hospital characteristics including geography, birth volume, and patient mix.

CONCLUSION

Introduction of a statewide quality improvement effort was associated with improved time to treatment of severe hypertension and increased frequency of provider/nurse debriefs, appropriate patient education, and early postpartum follow-up scheduled at discharge, and reduced severe maternal morbidity.

Statewide Perinatal Quality Improvement, Teamwork, and Communication Activities in Oklahoma and Texas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe statewide perinatal quality improvement (QI) activities, specifically implementation of Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health (AIM) patient safety bundles and use of teamwork and communication tools in obstetric units in Oklahoma and Texas.

METHODS

In January-February 2020, we conducted a survey of AIM-enrolled hospitals in Oklahoma (n = 35) and Texas (n = 120) to gather data on obstetric unit organization and QI processes. Data were linked to hospital characteristics information from the 2019 American Hospital Association survey and hospitals' maternity levels of care from state agencies. We generated descriptive statistics for each state and created an index to summarize adoption of QI processes. We fitted linear regression models to examine how this index varied by hospital characteristics and self-reported ratings for patient safety and AIM bundle implementation.

RESULTS

Most obstetric units had standardized clinical processes for obstetric hemorrhage (94% Oklahoma; 97% Texas), massive transfusion (94% Oklahoma; 97% Texas), and severe hypertension in pregnancy (97% Oklahoma; 80% Texas); regularly conducted simulation drills for obstetric emergencies (89% Oklahoma; 92% Texas); had multidisciplinary QI committees (61% Oklahoma; 83% Texas); and conducted debriefs after major obstetric complications (45% Oklahoma; 86% Texas). Few obstetric units offered recent staff training on teamwork and communication to their staff (6% Oklahoma; 22% Texas); those who did were more likely to employ specific strategies to facilitate communication, escalate concerns, and manage staff conflicts. Overall, adoption of QI processes was significantly higher in hospitals in urban than rural areas, teaching than nonteaching, offering higher levels of maternity care, with more staff per shift, and greater delivery volume (all P < .05). The QI adoption index scores were strongly associated with respondents' ratings for patient safety and implementation of maternal safety bundles (both P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adoption of QI processes varies across obstetric units in Oklahoma and Texas, with implications for implementing future perinatal QI initiatives. Notably, findings highlight the need to reinforce support for rural obstetric units, which often face greater barriers to implementing patient safety and QI processes than urban units.

Best Practices for Managing Postpartum Hypertension

Purpose of Review

Patients remain at risk for persistent and de novo postpartum hypertension related to pregnancy. This review aims to summarize the current definitions, clinical practices, and novel systems innovations and therapies for postpartum hypertension.

Recent Findings

Recent changes to the definitions of hypertension outside of pregnancy have not yet impacted definitions or management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), though research examining the implications of these new definitions on risks of developing HDP and the resultant sequelae is ongoing. The administration of diuretics has been shown to reduce postpartum hypertension among women with HDP. Widespread implementation of telemedicine models and remote assessment of ambulatory blood pressures has increased data available on postpartum blood pressure trajectories, which may impact clinical management. Additionally, policy changes such as postpartum Medicaid extension and an increasing emphasis on building bridges to primary care in the postpartum period may improve long-term outcomes for women with postpartum hypertension. Prediction models utilizing machine learning are an area of ongoing research to assist with risk assessment in the postpartum period.

Summary

The clinical management of postpartum hypertension remains focused on blood pressure control and primary care transition for cardiovascular disease risk reduction. In recent years, systemic innovations have improved access through implementation of new care delivery models. However, the implications of changing definitions of hypertension outside of pregnancy, increased data assessing blood pressure trajectories in the postpartum period, and the creation of new risk prediction models utilizing machine learning remain areas of ongoing research.

Perinatal quality collaboratives and birth equity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to discuss how state perinatal quality collaboratives are addressing birth equity to reduce disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality.

RECENT FINDING

Perinatal quality collaboratives are adopting core practices to advance birth equity, reduce disparities and confront racism and bias in obstetric care including securing leadership commitments to equity, providing education on the causes of inequities and mitigation strategies, collecting accurate race/ethnicity data, addressing social determinants of health, and integrating patient and community knowledge, experiences, and narratives in the quality improvement work.

SUMMARY

Inequities in maternal morbidity and mortality particularly affecting Black birthing people are driven by racism, inequities in the social determinants of health, and variations in care practices and quality. Perinatal quality collaboratives are an important resource for driving improvement changes to mitigate these factors and improve outcomes.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

Mason CL, Collier CH, Penny SC. Perinatal Quality Collaboratives and Birth Equity. Produced by CLMB Productions for use in this publication. January 10, 2022, http://links.lww.com/COAN/A86.