Detection of Colistin Resistance in Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae by Reference Broth Microdilution and Comparative Evaluation of Three Other Methods

Intermethod comparability analyses of gepotidacin antimicrobial susceptibility tests using a large collection of globally collected Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus saprophyticus clinical isolates

Gepotidacin (GSK2140944) is a novel, bactericidal, first in class triazaacenaphthylene bacterial type II topoisomerase inhibitor in development for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections and gonorrhea. The performance of several antimicrobial susceptibility methods (broth microdilution, gradient diffusion, and disk diffusion) for gepotidacin were evaluated using over 5800 recent Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus saprophyticus clinical isolates. Reference broth microdilution gepotidacin MICs showed an essential agreement of 95.9 % and 98.1 % with MICs by gradient diffusion for E. coli and S. saprophyticus isolates, respectively. Gepotidacin susceptibility using disks produced by 2 manufacturers had good agreement with an R2 values of 0.95 and 99.2 % of overall zone diameters agreeing within 3 mm. A correlation with an overall R2 value of 0.72 between MICs by broth microdilution and zone diameters by disk diffusion was observed. This data should assist in the clinical development of gepotidacin and provide reliable susceptibility methods to evaluate its activity.

Evaluation of different methods for in vitro susceptibility testing of colistin in carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacilli

Introduction

The increasing antibiotic resistance like the advent of carbapenem resistant Enterobactarales (CRE), Carbapenem Resistant Acinetobacter baumanii (CRAB), and Carbapenem Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) has led to to the use of toxic and older drugs like colistin for these organisms. But worldwide there is an increase in resistance even to colistin mediated both by chromosomes and plasmids. This necessitates accurate detection of resistance. This is impeded by the unavailability of a user-friendly phenotypic methods for use in routine clinical microbiology practice. The present study attempts to evaluate two different methods - colistin broth disc elution and MIC detection by Vitek two in comparison to CLSI approved broth microdilution (BMD) for colistin for Enterobactarales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Acinetobacter baumanii clinical isolates.

Methods

Colistin susceptibility of 6013 carbapenem resistant isolates was determined by BMD, Colistin Broth Disc Elution (CBDE), and Vitek two methods and was interpreted as per CLSI guidelines. The MIC results of CBDE, Vitek two were compared with that of BMD and essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), sensitivity, specificity, very major error (VME), major error (ME) and Cohen's kappa (CK) was calculated. The presence of any plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr-1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) was evaluated in all colistin-resistant isolates by conventional polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Colistin resistance was found in 778 (12.9 %) strains among the carbapenem resistant isolates. Klebsiella pneumoniae had the highest (18.9 %) colistin resistance by the BMD method. MIC of Vitek two had sensitivity ranging from 78.2-84.8% and specificity of >92 %. There were 171 VMEs and 323 MEs by Vitek two method, much more than CLSI acceptable range. The highest percentage of errors was committed for Acinetobacter baumanii (27.8 % of VME and 7.9 % ME). On the other hand, the CBDE method performed well with EA, CA, VME and ME within acceptable range for all the organisms. The sensitivity of the CBDE method compared to gold standard BMD varied from 97.5-98.8 % for different strains with a specificity of more than 97.6 %. None of the isolated colistin resistant organisms harboured mcr plasmids.

Conclusion

As BMD has many technical complexities, CBDE is the best viable alternative available for countries like India. A sensitive MIC reported by Vitek two needs to be carefully considered due high propensity for VMEs particularly for Klebsiella spp.

Evaluating the drop test method in measuring colistin susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Introduction. Colistin is an antibiotic used to treat Gram-negative bacterial infections, particularly those caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. The broth microdilution (BMD) reference method is the recommended protocol for detecting colistin susceptibility; however, it is laborious and expensive and cannot be performed in all laboratories.Aim. To evaluate the colistin susceptibility in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa using an alternative method, which has been referred to as the drop test.Methodology. A 16 µg ml^-1 colistin solution was deposited on a Mueller-Hinton agar plate previously swabbed with the strain and incubated overnight, and the presence or absence of an inhibition zone was observed.Results. The categorical agreement (CA) of the drop test with respect to BMD was 100 % when 190 Enterobacterales (19 E. coli and 171 K. pneumoniae) were used, and no major errors (MEs) or very major errors (VMEs) were detected. The CA of the drop test with respect to the BMD was 99.2 % for 119 P. aeruginosa isolates, while no ME was detected and only 1 VME (6.7%) was observed.Conclusion. The drop test is an alternative method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin against K. pneumoniae and E. coli. It is an adequate method for detecting resistant strains of P. aeruginosa, but susceptible isolates should be confirmed using BMD. The drop test is a simpler alternative to the BMD that does not require additional equipment and allows for the testing of numerous isolates in a short period of time.

Rapid ResaCeftazidime-Avibactam Enterobacterales NP Test: Rapid Detection of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility in Enterobacterales

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, has good antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) producing class A and C and some class D carbapenemases, but in recent years, the emergence of CZA-resistant Enterobacterales bacteria is growing. Therefore, rapid, accurate, and timely detection of CZA is necessary for clinical anti-infection treatment. In this study, the rapid ResaCeftazidime-avibactam Enterobacterales NP test was developed; its principle is that metabolically active bacteria (CZA-resistant strains) can change resazurin-PrestoBlue, a viability colorant, from blue to purple or pink in the presence of CZA, whereas CZA-susceptible strains cannot. We used 178 Enterobacterales isolates to evaluate the performance of this test. This test allowed the susceptibility of Enterobacterales to CZA to be detected within 4.5 h with an overall performance of 96% category agreement (CA), 7% major errors (MEs), and 0% very major errors (VMEs). Performance for Escherichia coli included 100% CA and 0% MEs and VMEs. Performance for Klebsiella pneumoniae included 99% CA and 2% MEs and 0% VMEs. Performance for Enterobacter cloacae included 87% CA, 25% MEs, and 0% VMEs. Moreover, this test is both economical ($1.0106 per isolate) and convenient, as it only requires basic laboratory equipment. In a word, the rapid ResaCeftazidime-avibactam Enterobacterales NP test is rapid and feasible, which may provide certain backing for the rapid screening and timely treatment of CZA-resistant strains in the clinic.