No Microscope? No Problem: A Systematic Review of Microscope-Free Microsurgery Training Models

A simple, novel technique to create silicone vessels for microsurgical training

Background and objectives

Effective microsurgical training necessitates dedicated practice, prompting the development of simulation models that mitigate the hygiene risks, regulatory challenges, and storage difficulties associated with conventional biological models. This study aims to evaluate the preferences of microsurgeons and medical students regarding self-made silicone simulation vessels, comparing them to standard biological models.

Methods

A three-part jig, comprising of a two-part metal clamp component and a transparent acrylic block with 4x4 channels, was designed. This assembly produced 16 vessels with a 1 ​mm inner diameter. Liquid silicone (Ecoflex 00-30), readily accessible from online distributors, was injected into the channels using a syringe. After tightening the clamp component and inserting 16 1 ​mm k-wires, the vessels were left to set for approximately 24 ​h 20 medical students with no prior microsurgical experience and 10 microsurgery-trained surgeons then evaluated these silicone vessels against a commonly used biological model (chicken brachial artery for surgeons or chicken aorta for students). Participants were then surveyed about their preference for a specific model for frequent practice using a 10-point Likert scale.

Results and conclusion

In assessing ideal microsurgical training models, all participants highlighted the importance of realism. Surgeons' main practical considerations were hygiene, availability, and setup and storage ease, while medical students were primarily concerned with cost-effectiveness. Both surgeons and medical students perceived the biological model as more realistic, yet less hygienic and harder to set up and store. Conversely, the silicone model, though deemed less realistic, offered advantages in hygiene, availability, cost-effectiveness, and setup and storage simplicity. The silicone model emerged as the overall favorite amongst all participants for frequent practice. Silicone vessels may serve as a complementary adjunct to biological models, allowing surgeons-in-training to practice their skills outside of the operating room and lab settings.

Innovative Clinical Scenario Simulator for Step-by-Step Microsurgical Training

BACKGROUND

 Microsurgical training should be implemented with consideration of operative difficulties that occur in actual clinical situations. We evaluated the effectiveness of a novel clinical scenario simulator for step-by-step microsurgical training that progressed from conventional training to escalated training with additional obstacles.

METHODS

 A training device was designed according to multiple and intricate clinical microsurgery scenarios. Twenty surgical residents with no experience in microsurgery were randomly assigned to either the control group (conventional training curricula, n = 10) or the experimental group (step-by-step training courses, n = 10). After 4 weeks of laboratory practice, the participants were scheduled to perform their first microvascular anastomoses on patients in an operating room. The Global Rating Scale (GRS) scores and operative duration were used to compare microsurgical skills between the two groups.

RESULTS

 There were no significant differences in the participants' baseline characteristics before microsurgical training between the groups with respect to age, sex, postgraduate year, surgical specialty, or mean GRS score (p < 0.05). There were also no significant differences in recipient sites between the two groups (p = 0.735). After training, the GRS scores in both groups were significantly improved (p = 0.000). However, in the actual microsurgical situations, the GRS scores were significantly higher in the experimental than control group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the operative duration between the two groups (p < 0.13).

CONCLUSION

 Compared with a traditional training program, this step-by-step microsurgical curriculum based on our clinical scenario simulator results in significant improvement in acquisition of microsurgical skills.

A Microsurgical Skills Curriculum to Develop Unconscious Competence

The attainment of microsurgical competency is an important milestone for plastic surgery trainees. Technical skill and a practiced disposition are required to successfully perform microsurgical procedures. Microsurgical skills curricula may foster both proficiency with technical movements and facilitate performance with minimal cognitive burden while using the operating microscope. The microsurgical skills curriculum presented in this article focuses on three fundamental principles: intrinsic muscle strength, accuracy and precision of movement, and supervised practice. Progressive operative entrustment of trainees is earned through successful completion of deliberate microsurgical exercises rather than timed anastomosis trials. The overarching goal of this curriculum is to develop unconscious competence in microsurgery.

A Comparison of Commercially Available Digital Microscopes for Their Use in Bench-Model Simulation of Microsurgery

INTRODUCTION

 Surgical education has seen a transition in the delivery of training, with increased use of online platforms to facilitate remote learning. Simulation training can increase access to education and reduce cost implications, while reducing patient risk. This study aims to compare commercially available digital microscopes, alongside a standard binocular surgical microscope, and determine whether they can be used as an alternative tool for remote microsurgery simulation.

METHODS

 Data were collected for a total of four microscopes, including three commercially available digital microscopes, smartphone, and a binocular table microscope. Product characteristics were collated, and a subjective assessment was conducted using an 11-criteria questionnaire, graded with a 5-point scale. Results of digital microscopes were compared with the table binocular microscope.The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the performance of digital microscopes to the standard binocular microscope RESULTS:  The questionnaire was completed by 31 participants: two consultants, nine surgical registrars, fourteen junior trainees, and six medical students. Digital microscopes were found to be significantly more affordable and convenient for trainees; however, the cost of the smartphone was significant. Overall, the Pancellant Digital Microscope performed the poorest, with trainees commenting on its unsuitability for surgical practice; the Plugable USB Digital Microscope (PLDM) was rated overall most like the binocular table microscope. The Depth of field was shallow in all digital microscopes.

CONCLUSION

 With the increasing role of remote learning and simulation training in surgical education, the PLDM can provide a cheaper, more accessible alternative for junior trainees, in their pursuit of microsurgical skill acquisition.

From Augmented to Virtual Reality in Plastic Surgery: Blazing the Trail to a New Frontier

BACKGROUND

 Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR)-termed mixed reality-have shown promise in the care of operative patients. Currently, AR and VR have well-known applications for craniofacial surgery, specifically in preoperative planning. However, the application of AR/VR technology to other reconstructive challenges has not been widely adopted. Thus, the purpose of this investigation is to outline the current applications of AR and VR in the operative setting.

METHODS

 The literature pertaining to the use of AR/VR technology in the operative setting was examined. Emphasis was placed on the use of mixed reality technology in surgical subspecialities, including plastic surgery, oral and maxillofacial surgery, colorectal surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, neurosurgery, and orthopaedic surgery.

RESULTS

 Presently, mixed reality is widely used in the care of patients requiring complex reconstruction of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton for pre- and intraoperative planning. For upper extremity amputees, there is evidence that VR may be efficacious in the treatment of phantom limb pain. Furthermore, VR has untapped potential as a cost-effective tool for microsurgical education and for training residents on techniques in surgical and nonsurgical aesthetic treatment. There is utility for mixed reality in breast reconstruction for preoperative planning, mapping perforators, and decreasing operative time. VR has well- documented applications in the planning of deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps by creating three-dimensional immersive simulations based on a patient's preoperative computed tomography angiogram.

CONCLUSION

 The benefits of AR and VR are numerous for both patients and surgeons. VR has been shown to increase surgical precision and decrease operative time. Furthermore, it is effective for patient-specific rehearsal which uses the patient's exact anatomical data to rehearse the procedure before performing it on the actual patient. Taken together, AR/VR technology can improve patient outcomes, decrease operative times, and lower the burden of care on both patients and health care institutions.

Impact of High-Fidelity Microvascular Surgery Simulation on Resident Training

BACKGROUND

 Microsurgery requires a high level of skill achieved only through repeated practice. With duty-hour restrictions and supervision requirements, trainees require more opportunities for practice outside the operating room. Studies show simulation training improves knowledge and skills. While numerous microvascular simulation models exist, virtually all lack the combination of human tissue and pulsatile flow.

METHODS

 The authors utilized a novel simulation platform incorporating cryopreserved human vein and a pulsatile flow circuit for microsurgery training at two academic centers. Subjects performed a standardized simulated microvascular anastomosis and repeated this task at subsequent training sessions. Each session was evaluated using pre- and postsimulation surveys, standardized assessment forms, and the time required to complete each anastomosis. Outcomes of interest include change in self-reported confidence scores, skill assessment scores, and time to complete the task.

RESULTS

 In total, 36 simulation sessions were recorded including 21 first attempts and 15 second attempts. Pre- and postsimulation survey data across multiple attempts demonstrated a statistically significant increase in self-reported confidence scores. Time to complete the simulation and skill assessment scores improved with multiple attempts; however, these findings were not statistically significant. Subjects unanimously reported on postsimulation surveys that the simulation was beneficial in improving their skills and confidence.

CONCLUSION

 The combination of human tissue and pulsatile flow results in a simulation experience that approaches the level of realism achieved with live animal models. This allows plastic surgery residents to improve microsurgical skills and increase confidence without the need for expensive animal laboratories or any undue risk to patients.

Evaluation of a Microsurgery Training Curriculum

BACKGROUND

 Microsurgery is one of the most challenging areas of surgery with a steep learning curve. To address this educational need, microsurgery curricula have been developed and validated, with the majority focus on technical skills only. The aim of this study was to report on the evaluation of a well-established curriculum using the Kirkpatrick model.

METHODS

 A training curriculum was delivered over 5 days between 2017 and 2020 focusing on (1) microscopic field manipulation, (2) knot tying, nondominant hand usage, (3) 3-D models/anastomosis, and (4) tissue experience. The Kirkpatrick model was applied to evaluate the curriculum at four levels: (1) participants' feedback (2) skills development using a validated, objective assessment tool (Global Assessment Score form) and CUSUM charts were constructed to model proficiency gain (3) and (4) assessing skill retention/long-term impact.

RESULTS

 In total, 155 participants undertook the curriculum, totaling 5,425 hours of training. More than 75% of students reported the course as excellent, with the remaining voting for "good." All participants agreed that the curriculum met expectations and would recommend it. Significant improvement in anastomosis attainment scores between days 1 and 3 (median score 4) and days 4 and 5 (median score 5) (W = 494.5, p = 0.00170). The frequency of errors reduced with successive attempts (chi square = 9.81, p = 0.00174). The steepest learning curve was in anastomosis and patency domains, requiring 11 attempts on average to reach proficiency. In total, 88.5% survey respondents could apply the skills learnt and 76.9% applied the skills learnt within 6 months. Key areas of improvement were identified from this evaluation, and actions to address them were implemented in the following programs.

CONCLUSION

 Robust evaluation of curriculum can be applied to microsurgery training demonstrating its efficacy in reducing surgical errors with an improvement in overall technical skills that can extend to impact clinical practice. It allows the identification of areas of improvement, driving the refinement of training programs.

Fundamentals of Microsurgery: A Novel Simulation Curriculum Based on Validated Laparoscopic Education Approaches

BACKGROUND

 Microsurgical techniques have a steep learning curve. We adapted validated surgical approaches to develop a novel, competency-based microsurgical simulation curriculum called Fundamentals of Microsurgery (FMS). The purpose of this study is to present our experience with FMS and quantify the effect of the curriculum on resident performance in the operating room.

METHODS

 Trainees underwent the FMS curriculum requiring task progression: (1) rubber band transfer, (2) coupler tine grasping, (3) glove laceration repair, (4) synthetic vessel anastomosis, and (5) vessel anastomosis in a deep cavity. Resident anastomoses were also evaluated in the operative room with the Stanford Microsurgery and Resident Training (SMaRT) tool to evaluate technical performance. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) and Short-Form Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6) quantified learner anxiety and workload.

RESULTS

 A total of 62 anastomoses were performed by residents in the operating room during patient care. Higher FMS task completion showed an increased mean SMaRT score (p = 0.05), and a lower mean STAI-6 score (performance anxiety) (p = 0.03). Regression analysis demonstrated residents with higher SMaRT score had lower NASA-TLX score (mental workload) (p < 0.01) and STAI-6 scores (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

 A novel microsurgical simulation program FMS was implemented. We found progression of trainees through the program translated to better technique (higher SMaRT scores) in the operating room and lower performance anxiety on STAI-6 surveys. This suggests that the FMS curriculum improves proficiency in basic microsurgical skills, reduces trainee mental workload, anxiety, and improves intraoperative clinical proficiency.

Video-Based Microsurgical Education versus Stationary Basic Microsurgical Course: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

 Repetitive training is essential for microsurgical performance. This study aimed to compare the improvement in basic microsurgical skills using two learning methods: stationary microsurgical course with tutor supervision and self-learning based on digital instructional materials. We hypothesized that video-based training provides noninferior improvement in basic microsurgical skills.

METHODS

 In this prospective study, 80 participants with no prior microsurgical experience were randomly divided into two groups: the control group, trained under the supervision of a microsurgical tutor, and the intervention group, where knowledge was based on commonly available online instructional videos without tutor supervision. Three blinded expert microsurgeons evaluated the improvement in basic microsurgical skills in both groups. The evaluation included an end-to-end anastomosis test using the Ten-Point Microsurgical Anastomosis Rating Scale (MARS10) and a six-stitch test on a latex glove. Statistically significant differences between groups were identified using standard noninferiority analysis, chi-square, and t-tests.

RESULTS

 Seventy-seven participants completed the course. Baseline test scores did not differ significantly between groups. After the 4-day microsurgical course, both groups showed statistically significant improvement in microsurgical skills measured using the MARS10. The performed tests showed that data for self-learning using digital resources provides noninferior data for course with surpervision on the initial stage of microsurgical training (7.84; standard deviation [SD], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.25-8.44) to (7.72; SD, 2.09; 95% CI, 7.07-8.36).

CONCLUSION

 Video-based microsurgical training on its initial step provides noninferior improvement in microsurgical skills to training with a dedicated instructor.