Variations in Nuss Procedure Operative Techniques and Complications: A Retrospective Review

Outcomes After Pectus Excavatum Repair: Center Volume Matters

PURPOSE

Pectus excavatum (Pectus) repair may be offered for those with significant cardiopulmonary compromise or severe cosmetic defects. The influence of hospital center volume on postoperative outcomes in children is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of children undergoing Pectus repair, stratified by hospital surgical volume.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmission Database was queried (2016-2020) for patients with Pectus (Q67.6). Patients were stratified into those who received repair at high-volume centers (HVCs; ≥20 repairs annually) versus low-volume centers (LVCs; <20 repairs annually). Demographics and outcomes were analyzed using standard statistical tests.

RESULTS

A total of 9414 patients with Pectus underwent repair during the study period, with 69% treated at HVCs and 31% at LVCs. Patients at LVCs experienced higher rates of complications during index admission, including pneumothorax (23% vs. 15%), chest tube placement (5% vs. 2%), and overall perioperative complications (28% vs. 24%) compared to those treated at HVCs, all p < 0.001. Patients treated at LVCs had higher readmission rates within 30 days (3.8% vs. 2.8% HVCs) and overall readmission (6.8% vs. 4.7% HVCs), both p < 0.010. Among readmitted patients (n = 547), the most frequent complications during readmission for those initially treated at LVCs included pneumothorax/hemothorax (21% vs. 8%), bar dislodgment (21% vs. 12%), and electrolyte disorders (15% vs. 9%) compared to those treated at HVCs.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric Pectus repair performed at high-volume centers was associated with fewer index complications and readmissions compared to lower-volume centers. Patients and surgeons should consider this hospital volume-outcome relationship.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective Comparative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Determining the Optimal Technique for Bar Fixation in the Repair of Pectus Excavatum

Introduction: Pectus bar stabilizers are routinely used for bar fixation in the repair of pectus excavatum. We aimed to determine the optimum technique for bar fixation by reviewing our institutional experience with the use of bilateral, unilateral, and no stabilizer placement. Methods: Retrospective single pediatric center review of patients who underwent minimally invasive bar placement for pectus excavatum and subsequent bar removal between December 2001 and July 2019 was performed. Demographic data, details about the surgery, the number of bars and stabilizers used, and follow-up information were collected. Stabilizer-related complications included pain requiring stabilizer removal, surgical site infections (SSIs), and bar displacement. Data are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and frequencies with percentages. Results: A total of 561 patients were included. The cohort was predominantly male (83.1%, n = 466) with a median age at the time of bar placement of 15 years (IQR 12.4, 16.3) and a median Haller index of 3.8 (IQR 3.4, 4.5). Pain attributed to the stabilizer site that required removal was observed only in the bilateral stabilizer group (2.5%, n = 13). SSI related to the stabilizer site occurred in 1.8% (n = 9) of the bilateral stabilizer cases and 2.1% (n = 1) of the unilateral stabilizer cases. Bar displacement was observed in 0.6% (n = 3) of the bilateral stabilizer cases and 2 of those patients also had an SSI. There were no complications in the no stabilizer group. Conclusion: As the trend moves toward unilateral and no stabilizer use, we observe fewer cases of pain requiring stabilizer removal with no increase in bar displacements.

Associated risk factors for patients undergoing a unique or double Nuss bar placement for pectus excavatum

Background

Pectus excavatum is the most common chest wall deformity. Surgical correction via Nuss Procedure is a common approach. Patients with long-segment sternal depression require more than one Nuss bar to be inserted. Complications of Nuss procedure include surgical site infection and bar migration which may necessitate surgical re-intervention. There has been conflicting evidence regarding the safety profile of inserting two Nuss bars. We aim to specifically review the safety profile of two Nuss bar insertion and its complications.

Method

179 consecutive patients who had undergone Nuss procedure between November 2013 and November 2021 were identified. Data analysis was performed on patient's age at time of operation, gender, height, weight, Haller index, pre-existing medical conditions, indication for surgery, duration of operation, numbers of bars placed, length of stay, post-operative pneumothorax, bar migration, superficial and deep infections, need for surgical intervention and mortality.

Result

Patients receiving two Nuss bars were at a significantly higher risk of developing infective complications. Lower weight and Haller index increase the risk of surgical site infection and infection requiring re-operation in this group of patients. A cut-off of 50 kg has a specificity of 92.1% with a sensitivity of 68.8% in regards to surgical site infection.

Conclusion

Patients receiving two Nuss bars as a part of their Nuss procedure are at a significantly higher risk of developing infective complications. Selecting patients more than 50 kg to receive two Nuss bars appear to be a reasonable measure to reduce surgical site infection.

Comparison of the Standard vs. Thoracoscopic Extrapleural Modification of the Nuss Procedure—Two Centers’ Experiences

Pectus excavatum is the most common congenital anterior chest wall deformity, with an incidence of 1:400 to 1:1000. Surgical strategy has evolved with the revolutionary idea of Donald Nuss, who was a pioneer in the operative correction of this deformity using minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this paper is to compare the preliminary results of pectus excavatum repair in two University Centers with a moderate number of patients using the standard Nuss procedure and its modification, the extrapleural thoracoscopic approach. The statistical analysis showed no significant difference for the patient’s age (14.52 ± 3.70 vs. 14.57 ± 1.86; p = 0.95) and the CT Haller index (4.17 ± 1.58 vs. 3.78 ± 0.95; p = 0.32). A statistically significant difference was noted for the duration of a pectus bar implant (2.16 ± 0.24 vs. 2.48 ± 0.68; p = 0.03) between the Maribor and Novi Sad Center. We report 14 complications (28%), including dislocation of the pectus bar (10%), pleural effusion (8%), wound inflammation (6%), pericarditis (2%) and an allergic reaction to the pectus bar (2%). Standard and thoracoscopic extrapleural Nuss procedures are both safe and effective procedures used to correct a pectus excavatum deformity. The choice of surgical procedure should be made according to a surgeon’s reliability in performing a particular procedure. Our study found no advantages of one procedure over the other.

Minimally Invasive Modified Nuss Procedure for Repair of Pectus Excavatum in Pediatric Patients: Single-Centre Retrospective Observational Study

Background: The treatment of pectus excavatum can be conservative or surgical. The aim of this study was to determine the factors influencing the outcomes of treatment after a minimally invasive Nuss corrective surgery procedure in pediatric patients. Methods: A total of 30 patient who underwent a minimally invasive Nuss corrective procedure for pectus excavatum from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 were included in thisretrospective study. The collected data included thepatient’s demographic characteristics (age, sex, height, weight, body mass index—BMI, Haller index), treatment outcomes (duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, intraoperative complications, early and late complications, postoperative analgesia), and overall patient and legal guardian satisfaction two years after the procedure. Results: A total of 22 male and 8 female patients were included in the study. The median age was 15 years (interquartile range—IQR 14, 16), and the median BMI was 18.5 kg/m2 (IQR 17.7, 20.4) and 18.2 kg/m2 (IQR 16.9, 18.6) for males and females, respectively. The median CT Haller index was 3.67 (IQR 3.48, 4.09) for male and 3.69 (IQR 3.45, 3.9) for female patients. The median surgery duration was 120 min (IQR 100, 130), and the median hospital stay length was 8.5 days (IQR 8, 9.75). Indications for surgery were psychological (47%), followed by respiratory (30%) and combined respiratory-cardiac (20%) and respiratory-psychological disorders (3%). Early complications were observed in 18 patients (60%), and late complications were observed in 7 patients (23.3%). Intraoperative complications were not recorded. The most common early complications were pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema (30%), while late complications included bar displacement (10%) and deformity recurrence (6.6%). Overall, the procedure was successful in 93.1% of patients. Upon arrival home, 22 patients (81.5%) used analgesics for at least one day, up to a maximum of six months. A total of 23 (76.7%) operated patients determined that the surgical procedure had excellent results (grade 5), 4 (13.3%) patients report a good result (grade 4), 1(3.3%) patient reported a mediocre result, and one patient (3.3%) reported a bad result (grades 3 and 2, respectively). Conclusion: The Nuss procedure is a safe and effective method for treating funnel chest in children and adolescents. It also providesexcellent cosmetic and aesthetic results as well as subjective satisfaction with the outcome of surgical treatment.