Management of Acute Anastomotic Leaks

The baseline fecal microbiome differs in patients with and without anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery

Background

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication of colorectal surgery. The risk of AL is affected by both surgery and patient factors. Gut microbiomes can be generated from the residual material from the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). We, therefore, examined if AL after colorectal cancer surgery could be associated with specific baseline microbiomes in the FIT screening sampling tubes collected weeks before surgery.

Methods

Samples from patients participating in the Danish colorectal cancer screening program were biobanked from 2016 to 2018, and samples from patients who had surgery for screening-detected cancer were included. They were matched with patients without AL in a 1:2 ratio based on age, sex, location of anastomosis (colonic/rectal), ASA classification, and smoking habits. Bacterial DNA was extracted from the sampling tubes, and the fecal microbiomes were analyzed with targeted 16S ribosomal RNA third-generation sequencing.

Results

18 patients who developed AL after surgery were matched with 36 without AL. The alpha diversity was lower in the AL group (p = 0.035), and the AL group separated from the Controls in the PCoA plot (p < 0.001). This was due to the patients undergoing rectal resections, with significant differences in alpha- and beta diversity (p = 0.025 and p = 0.002, respectively). The prevalence of bacteria with the potential to produce collagenase was higher in patients who developed AL (odds ratio 1.29 (95% CI 1.28-1.30), p < 0.001).

Conclusions

We found differences in the baseline microbiome profile associated with subsequent development of AL after surgery for screening-detected rectal cancer.

Diagnostic Modalities for Early Detection of Anastomotic Leak After Colorectal Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Anastomotic leak (AL) remains a severe complication following colorectal surgery, leading to increased morbidity and mortality, particularly in cases of delayed diagnosis. Existing diagnostic methods, including computed tomography (CT) scans, contrast enemas, endoscopic examinations, and reoperations can confirm AL but lack strong predictive value. Early detection is crucial for improving patient outcomes, yet a definitive and reliable predictive test, or "gold standard," is still lacking.

METHODS

A comprehensive PubMed review was focused on CT imaging, serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) to assess their predictive utility in detecting AL after colorectal resection. Three independent reviewers evaluated eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the studies.

RESULTS

Summarized in detailed tables, our analysis revealed the effectiveness of both CRP and PCT in the early detection of AL during the postoperative period. CT imaging, capable of identifying fluid collection, pneumoperitoneum, extraluminal contrast extravasation, abscess formation, and other early signs of leak, also proved valuable.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the variability in findings and statistics across these modalities, our study suggests a personalized, multimodal approach to predicting AL. Integrating CRP and PCT assessments with the diagnostic capabilities of CT imaging provides a nuanced, patient-specific strategy that significantly enhances early detection and management. By tailoring interventions based on individual clinical characteristics, surgeons can optimize patient outcomes, reduce morbidity, and mitigate the consequences associated with AL after colorectal surgery. This approach emphasizes the importance of personalized medicine in surgical care, paving the way for improved patient health outcomes.

Nonoperative Management Strategies for Anastomotic Leaks After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): A Literature Review

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) has gained widespread acceptance as an effective bariatric surgery due to its relative simplicity and favorable outcomes in weight loss and metabolic improvement. However, anastomotic leaks, though uncommon, present a significant complication with the potential for severe morbidity and mortality if not managed appropriately. This review examines the range of nonoperative strategies currently employed to manage anastomotic leaks and fistulae following OAGB. The focus is on endoscopic techniques, including the use of clips, stents, suturing systems, internal drainage, vacuum therapy, and tissue sealants, which have been successfully used in various gastrointestinal surgeries. Although a proportion of patients will require surgical treatments, these strategies offer less invasive alternatives to surgical intervention and can be tailored to the specific characteristics of the leak and patient condition. However, the application of these techniques specifically for OAGB-related leaks is not as well-documented. This review lists the available evidence on these nonoperative approaches, highlighting some of their potential benefits and limitations. While these methods show promise, there is a clear need for further research to establish standardized protocols and optimize their use in the context of OAGB-related leaks and fistulae.

Incidence of anastomotic leakage using powered circular staplers versus manual circular staplers for left colorectal anastomosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Colorectal anastomotic leakage causes severe consequences for patients and healthcare system as it will lead to increased consumption of hospital resources and costs. Technological improvements in anastomotic devices could reduce the incidence of leakage and its economic impact. The aim of the present study was to assess if the use of a new powered circular stapler is cost-effective.

METHOD

This observational study included patients undergoing left-sided circular stapled colorectal anastomosis between January 2018 and December 2021. Propensity score matching was carried out to create two comparable groups depending on whether the anastomosis was performed using a manual or powered circular device. The rate of anastomotic leakage, its severity, the consumption of hospital resources, and its cost were the main outcome measures. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the powered circular stapler versus manual circular staplers was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 330 patients were included in the study, 165 in each group. Anastomotic leakage rates were significantly different (p = 0.012): 22 patients (13.3%) in the manual group versus 8 patients (4.8%) in the powered group. The effectiveness of the powered stapler and manual stapler was 98.27% and 93.69%, respectively. The average cost per patient in the powered group was €6238.38, compared with €9700.12 in the manual group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was - €74,915.28 per patient without anastomotic complications.

CONCLUSION

The incremental cost of powered circular stapler compared with manual devices was offset by the savings from lowered incidence and cost of management of anastomotic leaks.

Avoiding stoma creation due to super-morbid obesity: A report of two surgical cases of colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

A stoma is commonly created in patients with a high risk of anastomotic leakage. However, patients with obesity have a higher incidence of stoma-related complications, and the decision to create a stoma should be carefully considered. We report two cases of patients with colorectal cancer and super-morbid obesity wherein stoma creation was avoided.

PRESENTATION OF CASES

Case 1 involved a 52-year-old male patient with a body mass index (BMI) of 41.8 kg/m2 who underwent a robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for lower rectal cancer. Although temporary diverting ileostomy was initially considered, stoma creation was skipped intraoperatively, considering the complication risk-benefit ratio. Case 2 involved a 42-year-old female patient with a BMI of 64 kg/m2 who underwent open partial non-curative colon resection for descending colon cancer complicated by colonic perforation and abscess formation. The patient was considered to be at high risk of stoma-related complications due to high mobility of the subcutaneous fat of abdominal wall; therefore, we decided not to create a stoma preoperatively.

DISCUSSION

Considering the high risk of stoma-associated complications, avoiding stoma creation and implementing preventive measures against potential complications are alternative options for patients with super-morbid obesity.

CONCLUSION

We present our experience two cases in which stoma creation was avoided for super-morbid obese patients with BMI over 40.

A Miraculous Save: Gangrenous Bowel and Meckle's Diverticulum With Acute Superior Mesenteric Artery Thrombosis

The superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is vital for parts of the small intestine and ascending colon. Thrombosis of this major artery is a severe and potentially fatal condition involving the occlusion of the arterial vascular supply, causing ischemia predisposing to gangrene. Meckel's diverticulum is a congenital outpouching in the lower part of the small intestine. The condition of gangrenous meckels diverticulum is, therefore, even more limited. This study presents a unique case of a 45-year-old male with coexisting features of SMA thrombus with acute small bowel intestinal obstruction. During the study, the patient was found to have sickle cell anemia with an AS pattern, which may have predisposed the formation of a thrombus. The patient underwent sequential management of active thrombus by thrombolysis first, followed by resection anastomosis for gangrenous bowel. With precise monitoring and therapeutic care, the patient made a remarkable recovery. The condition possesses a high mortality rate. Prompt recognition and timely intervention in this case are of utmost significance.

Endoscopic Salvage of Gastrointestinal Anastomosis Leaks—Past, Present, and Future—A Narrated Review

Background: Anastomotic leakage, which is defined as a defect in the integrity of a surgical join between two hollow viscera leading to communication between the intraluminal and extraluminal compartments, continues to be of high incidence and one of the most feared complications following gastrointestinal surgery, with a significant potential for a fatal outcome. Surgical options for management are limited and carry a high risk of morbidity and mortality; thus, surgeons are urged to look for alternative options which are minimally invasive, repeatable, non-operative, and do not require general anesthesia. Methods: A narrative review of the international literature took place, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, utilizing specific search terms such as “Digestive Surgery AND Anastomotic Leakage OR leak OR dehiscence”. Results: In the present review, we try to describe and analyze the pros and cons of the various endoscopic techniques: from the very first (and still available), fibrin gluing, to endoclip and over-the-scope clip positioning, stent insertion, and the latest suturing and endoluminal vacuum devices. Finally, alongside efforts to improve the existing techniques, we consider stem cell application as well as non-endoscopic, and even endoscopic, attempts at intraluminal microbiome modification, which should ultimately intervene pre-emptively, rather than therapeutically, to prevent leaks. Conclusions: In the last three decades, this search for an ideal device for closure, which must be safe, easy to deploy, inexpensive, robust, effect rapid and stable closure of even large defects, and have a low complication rate, has led to the proposal and application of a number of different endoscopic devices and techniques. However, to date, there is no consensus as to the best. The literature contains reports of only small studies and no randomized trials, failing to take into account both the heterogeneity of leaks and their different anatomical sites.

Percutaneous Drainage vs. Surgery as Definitive Treatment for Anastomotic Leak after Intestinal Resection in Patients with Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak (AL) remains one of the most relevant complications after intestinal resection for Crohn's disease (CD). While surgery has always been considered the standard treatment for perianastomotic collection, percutaneous drainage (PD) has been proposed as a potential alternative.

METHODS

Retrospective study in consecutive patients treated with either PD or surgery for AL after intestinal resection for CD between 2004 and 2022. AL was defined as a perianastomotic fluid collection confirmed by radiological findings. Patients with generalized peritonitis or clinical instability were excluded.

PRIMARY AIM

To compare the success rate of PD vs. surgery. Secondary aims: To compare the outcomes at 90 days after the procedures; to identify the variables associated with the indication for PD.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included, of which 25 (53%) underwent PD and 22 (47%) surgery. The success rate was 84% in the PD and 95% in the surgery group (p = 0.20). There were no significant differences between the PD and surgery group in postoperative medical and surgical complications, discharge, readmission or reoperation rates at 90 days. PD was more likely to be performed in patients with later diagnosis of AL (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.53, p = 0.027), undergoing ileo-colic anastomosis alone (OR 3.72, 95% CI 2.29-12.45, p = 0.034) and treated after 2016 (OR 6.36, 95% CI 1.04-39.03, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that PD is a safe and effective procedure to treat anastomotic leak and perianastomotic collection in CD patients. PD should be indicated in all eligible patients as an effective alternative to surgery.

Metal stent combined with ileus drainage tube for the treatment of delayed rectal perforation: A case report

BACKGROUND

Acute iatrogenic colorectal perforation (AICP) is a serious adverse event, and immediate AICP usually requires early endoscopic closure. Immediate surgical repair is required if the perforation is large, the endoscopic closure fails, or the patient's clinical condition deteriorates. In cases of delayed AICP (> 4 h), surgical repair or enterostomy is usually performed, but delayed rectal perforation is rare.

CASE SUMMARY

A 53-year-old male patient underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at a local hospital for the treatment of a laterally spreading tumor of the rectum, and the wound was closed by an endoscopist using a purse-string suture. Unfortunately, the patient then presented with delayed rectal perforation (6 h after ESD). The surgeons at the local hospital attempted to treat the perforation and wound surface using transrectal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM); however, the perforation worsened and became enlarged, multiple injuries to the mucosa around the perforation and partial tearing of the rectal mucosa occurred, and the internal anal sphincter was damaged. As a result, the perforation became more complicated. Due to the increased bleeding, surgical treatment with suturing could not be performed using TEM. Therefore, the patient was sent to our medical center for follow-up treatment. After a multidisciplinary discussion, we believed that the patient should undergo an enterostomy. However, the patient strongly refused this treatment plan. Because the position of the rectal perforation was relatively low and the intestine had been adequately prepared, we attempted to treat the complicated delayed rectal perforation using a self-expanding covered mental stent (SECMS) in combination with a transanal ileus drainage tube (TIDT).

CONCLUSION

For patients with complicated delayed perforation in the lower rectum and adequate intestinal preparation, a SECMS combined with a TIDT can be used and may result in very good outcomes.