Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index in Differentiating Progressive Supranuclear Palsy from Parkinson's Disease among South Indian Population: A Retrospective Case Control Study

Planimetric and Volumetric Brainstem MRI Markers in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Multiple System Atrophy, and Corticobasal Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Various MRI markers-including midbrain and pons areas (Marea, Parea) and volumes (Mvol, Pvol), ratios (M/Parea, M/Pvol), and composite markers (magnetic resonance imaging Parkinsonism Indices 1,2; MRPI 1,2)-have been proposed as imaging markers of Richardson's syndrome (RS) and multiple system atrophy-Parkinsonism (MSA-P). A systematic review/meta-analysis of relevant studies aiming to compare the diagnostic accuracy of these imaging markers is lacking.

METHODS

Pubmed and Scopus were searched for studies with >10 patients (RS, MSA-P or CBS) and >10 controls with data on Marea, Parea, Mvol, Pvol, M/Parea, M/Pvol, MRPI 1, and MRPI 2. Cohen's d, as a measure of effect size, was calculated for all markers in RS, MSA-P, and CBS.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies on RS, five studies on MSA-P, and four studies on CBS were included. Midbrain area provided the greatest effect size for differentiating RS from controls (Cohen's d = -3.10; p < 0.001), followed by M/Parea and MRPI 1. MSA-P had decreased midbrain and pontine areas. Included studies exhibited high heterogeneity, whereas publication bias was low.

CONCLUSIONS

Midbrain area is the optimal MRI marker for RS, and pons area is optimal for MSA-P. M/Parea and MRPIs produce smaller effect sizes for differentiating RS from controls.

Computer Aided Written Character Feature Extraction in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) are neurodegenerative movement disorders associated with cognitive dysfunction. The Luria's Alternating Series Test (LAST) is a clinical tool sensitive to both graphomotor problems and perseverative tendencies that may suggest the dysfunction of prefrontal and/or frontostriatal areas and may be used in PD and PSP assessment. It requires the participant to draw a series of alternating triangles and rectangles. In the study, two clinical groups-51 patients with PD and 22 patients with PSP-were compared to 32 neurologically intact seniors. Participants underwent neuropsychological assessment. The LAST was administered in a paper and pencil version, then scanned and preprocessed. The series was automatically divided into characters, and the shapes were recognized as rectangles or triangles. In the feature extraction step, each rectangle and triangle was regarded both as an image and a two-dimensional signal, separately and as a part of the series. Standard and novel features were extracted and normalized using characters written by the examiner. Out of 71 proposed features, 51 differentiated the groups (p < 0.05). A classifier showed an accuracy of 70.5% for distinguishing three groups.