Imaging of Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Associated Bone Marrow Contusion Patterns

Bone Bruises and Concomitant Meniscus and Cartilage Damage in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: Bone bruises in acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are closely linked to the occurrence of simultaneous meniscal and cartilage damage. Despite the frequent occurrence of associated injuries including bone bruises, meniscus, and cartilage damage in patients with ACL injuries, a systematic review of the relationships between the presence of bone bruises and the extent of meniscus and cartilage injuries has yet to be conducted. (2) Methods: Multiple comprehensive databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were searched for studies that evaluated the relationship between bone bruises and meniscus or cartilage injuries following ACL injuries. Study selection, data extraction, and meta-analysis were performed. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for quality assessments, and Review Manager 5.3 was used for data analysis. (3) Results: Data were extracted from 22 studies encompassing a total of 2891 patients with ACL injuries. Among the included studies, six studies investigated the relationships between bone bruises and medial meniscus (MM) or lateral meniscus (LM) injuries, while three studies investigated the relationships between bone bruises and cartilage injuries. There were no significant correlations between the presence of bone bruises and MM injuries (relative risk (RR) = 1.32; p = 0.61). A quantitative analysis indicated that individuals with bone bruises had a 2.71-fold higher likelihood of sustaining LM injuries than those without bone bruises (RR = 2.71; p = 0.0003). The analysis confirmed a significant relationship between bone bruises and cartilage injuries (RR = 6.18; p = 0.003). (4) Conclusions: Bone bruises occur most frequently in the lateral compartment. Bone bruises resulting from ACL injuries are related to accompanying LM injuries and cartilage injuries. Knowing these associations and the frequency of injuries may allow orthopedic surgeons to promptly address ACL-related meniscus and cartilage injuries on MRI results and in future clinical practice.

A Systematic Review of Bone Bruise Patterns following Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: Insights into the Mechanism of Injury

(1) Background: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the prevalence of bone bruises in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and the location of the bruises relative to the tibia and femur. Understanding the relative positions of these bone bruises could enhance our comprehension of the knee loading patterns that occur during an ACL injury. (2) Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies that evaluated the presence of bone bruises following ACL injuries. Study selection, data extraction, and a systematic review were performed. (3) Results: Bone bruises were observed in 3207 cases (82.8%) at the lateral tibia plateau (LTP), 1608 cases (41.5%) at the medial tibia plateau (MTP), 2765 cases (71.4%) at the lateral femoral condyle (LFC), and 1257 cases (32.4%) at the medial femoral condyle (MFC). Of the 30 studies, 11 were able to assess the anterior to posterior direction. The posterior LTP and center LFC were the most common areas of bone bruises. Among the 30 studies, 14 documented bone bruises across all four sites (LTP, MTP, LFC, and MFC). The most common pattern was bone bruises appearing at the LTP and LFC. (4) Conclusions: The most frequently observed pattern of bone bruises was restricted to the lateral aspects of both the tibia and femur. In cases where bone bruises were present on both the lateral and medial sides, those on the lateral side exhibited greater severity. The positioning of bone bruises along the front-back axis indicated a forward shift of the tibia in relation to the femur during ACL injuries.

Greater Knee Rotatory Instability After Posterior Meniscocapsular Injury Versus Anterolateral Ligament Injury: A Proposed Mechanism of High-Grade Pivot Shift

Background

For anterolateral rotatory instability as a result of secondary soft tissue injuries in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees, there is increasing interest in secondary stabilizers to prevent internal rotation (IR) of the tibia.

Purpose

To determine which secondary stabilizer is more important in anterolateral rotatory instability in ACL-deficient knees.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

The lower extremities of 10 fresh-frozen cadavers (20 extremities) without anterior-posterior or rotational instability were included. Matched-pair randomization was performed, with each side per specimen assigned to 1 of 2 groups. In group 1, the ACL was sectioned, followed by the anterolateral ligament (ALL); in group 2, the ACL was sectioned, followed by sequential sectioning of the posterolateral meniscocapsular complex (PLMCC) and posteromedial meniscocapsular complex (PMMCC). The primary outcome was the change in relative tibial IR during a simulated pivot-shift test with 5 N·m of IR torque and 8.9 N of valgus force. The secondary outcomes were the International Knee Documentation Committee grade in the pivot-shift test and the incidence of the grade 3 pivot shift.

Results

In group 1, compared with baseline, the change in relative tibial IR at 0° of knee flexion was 1.4° (95% CI, -0.1° to 2.9°; P = .052) after ALL release. In group 2, it was 2.5° (95% CI, 0.4° to 4.8°; P = .007) after PLMCC release and 4.1° (95% CI, 0.5° to 7.8°; P = .017) after combined PLMCC and PMMCC release. Combined PLMCC and PMMCC release resulted in greater change of tibial IR with statistical significance at 0°, 15°, and 30° of knee flexion (P = .008, .057, and .004, respectively) compared with ALL release. The incidence of grade 3 pivot shifts was 10% in group 1 and 90% in group 2.

Conclusion

Posterior meniscocapsular laxity caused an increase in relative tibial IR as much as ALL injury in ACL-deficient knees in our simulated laboratory test, and greater anterolateral rotatory instability occurred with posterior meniscocapsular injury compared with ALL injury.

Clinical Relevance

Repair of the injured posterior meniscocapsular complex may be an important treatment option for reducing anterolateral rotatory instability in the ACL-deficient knee.

The coronal lateral collateral ligament sign in the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees was observed regardless of the knee laxity based on the quantitative measurements

PURPOSE

The coronal lateral collateral ligament (LCL) sign has been reported to be associated with deviated position of the tibia on MRI due to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. However, the relationships between LCL sign and clinical knee laxity evaluations are still unclear. The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between the coronal LCL sign and knee laxity measurements.

METHODS

A retrospective review of unilateral ACL injured patients who underwent ACL reconstruction was performed. The coronal LCL sign was determined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical grading of the pivot-shift test, KT-1000 measurements, and quantitative measurements of the Lachman test and the pivot-shift test using an electromagnetic system, were compared between patients with positive and negative coronal LCL sign. A subgroup analysis of different age groups was then performed, dividing patients to adolescent (age ≤ 18 years) and adult (age > 18 years) groups.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients were enrolled, of which 45 patients had coronal LCL signs. The coronal LCL sign was not associated with the pivot-shift test clinical grading (n.s), KT-1000 measurement (n.s), the tibial translation during the Lachman test (n.s), or with tibia acceleration (n.s) and translation (n.s) during the pivot-shift test. The subgroup analysis also showed that the aforementioned parameters were not associated with the coronal LCL sign in either adolescent or adult subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of coronal LCL sign in MRI did not imply greater clinical knee laxity evaluations in patients with ACL tears. The knee laxity should routinely be evaluated regardless the coronal LCL sign.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.