Utilization of Telestroke Prior to and Following the COVID-19 Pandemic

Statewide availability of acute stroke treatment, services, and programs: A survey of North Carolina Hospitals

INTRODUCTION

We conducted a statewide assessment of the availability of stroke treatment, services, and programs in North Carolina (NC) hospitals. We also examined differences in stroke care capabilities between urban, suburban, and rural hospitals and trends over the past 2 decades.

METHODS

An electronic survey was distributed to all 111 licensed hospitals in NC. Survey questions asked about stroke center certification status (i.e., standardized levels of stroke care capabilities), diagnostic testing, acute treatments and protocols, and post-acute management. Responses were collected from October 2020-April 2021. Select characteristics were compared to those from prior NC surveys in 1998, 2003, and 2008.

RESULTS

All 111 hospitals responded to the survey (100% response rate). Among 108 hospitals providing acute stroke care, 12 (11%) were Comprehensive Stroke Centers or Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Centers, which were all located in urban or suburban areas. While 38% of urban/suburban hospitals were non-certified, 48% of rural hospitals were non-certified. Non-contrast computed tomography (CT), CT angiography, and alteplase treatment were widely available (100%, 95%, and 99%, respectively). Endovascular thrombectomy was solely available in urban/suburban hospitals (29%). Of non-tertiary hospitals, 81% were using telestroke for treatment and transfer decisions. Compared to prior survey results, the availability of CT angiography (76% in 2008 to 95% in 2020-2021), alteplase treatment (69% in 2008 to 99% in 2020-2021), and acute stroke clinical pathways (47% in 2008 to 90% in 2020-2021) increased. However, having an in-house neurologist on staff dropped from approximately 55% in prior surveys to 21% in the current survey.

CONCLUSIONS

Rural NC hospitals were less likely to have advanced diagnostic imaging and treatment capabilities for acute stroke. Temporal trends in staffing with an in-house neurologist and use of telestroke services should be further examined.

Telestroke’s Role Through the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond

Purpose of review

The goal of this paper is to discuss the role and utilization of telestroke services through the COVID-19 pandemic and to suggest future directions to sustain and increase patients’ access to stroke expertise.

Recent findings

Telestroke is an innovative and effective tool that has been shown to improve access, quality of care, and outcomes of patients with acute stroke syndromes in resource-limited areas for the last two decades. The COVID-19 pandemic posed a significant challenge and strained healthcare systems worldwide, but it created novel and unique opportunities to expand and increase the utilization of telehealth and telestroke services to deliver personalized healthcare across the continuum of stroke care outside of traditional settings. This rapid and widespread increase in telestroke use was facilitated by the removal of many legislative and regulatory barriers which have limited patients’ access to stroke expertise for many years.

Summary

As the public health emergency ends, there exists a unique opportunity to optimize and expand upon the pandemic-related rapid growth of telestroke care. Optimal utilization of telehealth and telestroke services will depend on maintaining and improving required infrastructure, laws, and regulations, particularly those governing reimbursement and licensing.