1
|
Patel V, Dabek RJ, Araim F, Patel S, Kang TJ. Delayed Pneumoperitoneum After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Tube Placement: A Case Report. Cureus 2024; 16:e57134. [PMID: 38681402 PMCID: PMC11055601 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
When used for a selected patient population, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) can provide enteral nutrition percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) safely. PEG tubes generally possess a very low chance of life-threatening complications but due to the patient population that requires PEG tubes, a delayed diagnosis of minor complications could be fatal. In this study, we present a case of delayed pneumoperitoneum, discovered weeks after our patient underwent PEG placement for enteral nutritional needs. The patient recovered without the need for operative intervention. The development of a pneumoperitoneum in the setting of recent PEG needs a thorough clinical evaluation, and caution must be taken before immediately proceeding to operative exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaidehi Patel
- General Surgery, Ascension Saint Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, USA
| | - Robert J Dabek
- General Surgery, Ascension Saint Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, USA
| | - Fawaz Araim
- General Surgery, Ascension Saint Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, USA
| | - Shirali Patel
- General Surgery, Ascension Saint Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, USA
| | - Thomas J Kang
- General Surgery, Ascension Saint Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tae CH, Lee JY, Joo MK, Park CH, Gong EJ, Shin CM, Lim H, Choi HS, Choi M, Kim SH, Lim CH, Byeon JS, Shim KN, Song GA, Lee MS, Park JJ, Lee OY. Clinical Practice Guideline for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. Gut Liver 2024; 18:10-26. [PMID: 37850251 PMCID: PMC10791499 DOI: 10.5009/gnl230146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
With an aging population, the number of patients with difficulty swallowing due to medical conditions is gradually increasing. In such cases, enteral nutrition is administered through a temporary nasogastric tube. Long-term use of a nasogastric tube leads to various complications and a decreased quality of life. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the percutaneous placement of a tube into the stomach, aided endoscopically, which may be an alternative to a nasogastric tube when enteral nutritional is required for 4 weeks or more. This paper is the first Korean clinical guideline for PEG. It was developed jointly by the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research and led by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. These guidelines aimed to provide physicians, including endoscopists, with the indications, use of prophylactic antibiotics, timing of enteric nutrition, tube placement methods, complications, replacement, and tubes removal for PEG based on the currently available clinical evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chung Hyun Tae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju Yup Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Moon Kyung Joo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Hyuk Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
| | - Eun Jeong Gong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Cheol Min Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hyun Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea
| | - Hyuk Soon Choi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hoon Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
- Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research–Metabolism, Obesity & Nutrition Research Group, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul-Hyun Lim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy–The Research Group for Endoscopes and Devices, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Nam Shim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Geun Am Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University College of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Moon Sung Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Jong-Jae Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Oh Young Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rajan A, Wangrattanapranee P, Kessler J, Kidambi TD, Tabibian JH. Gastrostomy tubes: Fundamentals, periprocedural considerations, and best practices. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:286-303. [PMID: 35664365 PMCID: PMC9131834 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i4.286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastrostomy tube placement is a procedure that achieves enteral access for nutrition, decompression, and medication administration. Preprocedural evaluation and selection of patients is necessary to provide optimal benefit and reduce the risk of adverse events (AEs). Appropriate indications, contraindications, ethical considerations, and comorbidities of patients referred for gastrostomy placement should be weighed and balanced. Additionally, endoscopist should consider either a transoral or transabdominal approach is appropriate, and radiologic or surgical gastrostomy tube placement is needed. However, medical history, physical examination, and imaging prior to the procedure should be considered to tailor the appropriate approach and reduce the risk of AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Rajan
- Department ofGastroenterology, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA 91342, United States
- Department ofGastroenterology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, United States
| | | | - Jonathan Kessler
- Department ofInterventional Radiology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, United States
| | - Trilokesh Dey Kidambi
- Department ofGastroenterology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, United States
| | - James H Tabibian
- Department ofGastroenterology, UCLA-Olive View Medical Center, Sylmar, CA 91342, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Symptomatic Pneumoperitoneum After Gastrostomy Tube Placement Managed by Pneumocentesis. ACG Case Rep J 2021; 8:e00700. [PMID: 34820468 PMCID: PMC8608257 DOI: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Pneumoperitoneum is a known complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement that typically resolves spontaneously with conservative management. We describe the case of a 72-year-old man who developed abdominal pain and distention after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement who was subsequently found to have a moderate-sized pneumoperitoneum. Despite supportive care, his abdominal pain failed to improve. We report paracentesis with air aspiration as an intervention for benign pneumoperitoneum resulting in rapid and durable resolution of abdominal complaints.
Collapse
|
5
|
Boeykens K, Duysburgh I. Prevention and management of major complications in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021; 8:bmjgast-2021-000628. [PMID: 33947711 PMCID: PMC8098978 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is a commonly used endoscopic technique where a tube is placed through the abdominal wall mainly to administer fluids, drugs and/or enteral nutrition. Several placement techniques are described in the literature with the ‘pull’ technique (Ponsky-Gardener) as the most popular one. Independent of the method used, placement includes a ‘blind’ perforation of the stomach through a small acute surgical abdominal wound. It is a generally safe technique with only few major complications. Nevertheless these complications can be sometimes life-threatening or generate serious morbidity. Method A narrative review of the literature of major complications in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Results This review was written from a clinical viewpoint focusing on prevention and management of major complications and documented scientific evidence with real cases from more than 20 years of clinical practice. Conclusions Major complications are rare but prevention, early recognition and popper management are important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt Boeykens
- AZ Nikolaas, Nutrition Support Team, Sint-Niklaas, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
| | - Ivo Duysburgh
- AZ Nikolaas, Nutrition Support Team, Sint-Niklaas, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Garrido Durán C, Khorrami Minaei S, Sendra Rumbeu P, Fernández García J, García Hernández M, Legarda Ramírez I. Endoscopic management of duodenal levodopa-carbidopa therapy of advanced Parkinson's disease. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2019; 111:828-832. [PMID: 31566412 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6311/2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND treatment of intraduodenal levodopa using percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is an alternative therapy in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. There are few studies that have evaluated the endoscopic aspects of this technique. OBJECTIVES to describe our experience and adverse events regarding this technique in advanced Parkinson's disease. METHOD a retrospective study was performed from January 2007 to January 2019 in a tertiary healthcare center. RESULTS thirty-seven patients aged 65.1 ± 10.3 years were included in the study, 21 were male and the disease duration was ten years (1-26). The median follow-up was 16 months (1-144). The device was successfully placed in all cases. The persistence rate with the PEG-D at the end of follow-up was 62.2%. The system was removed in 14 patients, seven due to neurological impairment, four because of the decision of the patient and three due to related events. Fifty-nine adverse events occurred in 23 patients (62.2%, 0.63 per patient-year), four of which were severe (8.1%, 0.05 per patient-year). Minor adverse events included 14 (37.8%) related to the stoma, six (16.2%) to the gastric tube and 15 (40.5%) to the duodenal tube. Forty-four system replacements were performed in 20 patients (54.1%, 0.52 per patient-year). Male sex, age over 70 and a higher comorbidity index were associated with a greater likelihood of persistence of the system (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03-0.62; OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.32-0.86; OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.99, respectively). No predictors of adverse events associated with PEG-D were identified. CONCLUSIONS percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for the continuous delivery of duodenal levodopa is a highly effective technique. Adverse events are common, although most are resolved by endoscopy.
Collapse
|