1
|
Sui Y, Chen X, Ma T, Lu J, Xiao T, Wang Z, Wen Q, Wang G, Jia H, Cao F, Wu X, Zhang Y, Hao J, Wang N. Comparison of three sedation models for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 37:1603-1609. [PMID: 35618650 PMCID: PMC9543240 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM We investigated the most beneficial propofol sedation model for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy (BDE). METHODS Asymptomatic participants scheduled for same-day painless BDE examination from October 2020 to September 2021 were randomized to three groups: sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy (Group A); sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated colonoscopy (Group B); and sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated insertion colonoscopy (Group C). Patient discomfort, colonoscopy performance, doses of propofol, cardiovascular stress, anesthesia resuscitation, and sedation-related adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 3200 participants were analyzed. Baseline demographics, patient discomfort, cecal intubation rate, adenoma detection rate and sedation-related adverse events were similar in the three groups. Propofol dose was the lowest in Group A (137.65 ± 36.865 mg) compared with Group B (177.71 ± 40.112 mg, P < 0.05) and Group C (161.63 ± 31.789 mg, P < 0.05). Decline in vital signs was most obvious in Group B during the procedure (P < 0.05). Recovery time was the shortest in Group A (5.01 ± 1.404 min) compared with Group B (9.51 ± 2.870 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (5.83 ± 2.594 min, P < 0.05); discharge time was the shortest in Group A (3.53 ± 1.685 min) compared with Group B (11.29 ± 5.172 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (6.47 ± 2.338 min, P < 0.05). Adenomas per positive patient of Group A (2.29 ± 1.055) and Group C (2.28 ± 0.931) were more than that in Group B (2.11 ± 0.946, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy is the superior model for same-day painless BDE with the benefits of satisfactory patient comfort, reduced sedation dose, less cardiovascular stress, faster recovery, shorter discharge time and high colonoscopy quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Sui
- Shanxi Medical UniversityTaiyuanChina
| | - Xing Chen
- Shanxi Medical UniversityTaiyuanChina,The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical UniversityTaiyuanChina
| | - Ting Ma
- Shanxi Medical UniversityTaiyuanChina
| | - Junhui Lu
- Shanxi Medical UniversityTaiyuanChina
| | - Tao Xiao
- Shanxi Cancer HospitalTaiyuanChina
| | | | - Qing Wen
- The Second People's Hospital of DatongDatongChina
| | | | - Hui Jia
- Erdos Kangning Physical Examination CenterErdosChina
| | - Fengzhen Cao
- Erdos Kangning Physical Examination CenterErdosChina
| | - Xiaopeng Wu
- Lvliang Traditional Chinese Medicine HospitalLvliangChina
| | - Yiping Zhang
- Datong Shoujia Digestive Disease HospitalDatongChina
| | - Junlian Hao
- Xiaoyi Traditional Chinese Medicine HospitalXiaoyiChina
| | - Naping Wang
- The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical UniversityYunchengChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou S, Zhu Z, Dai W, Qi S, Tian W, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Huang L, Tian J, Yu W, Su D. National survey on sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in 2758 Chinese hospitals. Br J Anaesth 2021; 127:56-64. [PMID: 33685636 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy is widely used in China, the characteristics of sedation use, including regional distribution, personnel composition, equipment used, and drug selection, remain unclear. The present study aimed to provide insights into the current practice and regional distribution of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in China. METHODS A questionnaire consisting of 19 items was distributed to directors of anaesthesiology departments and anaesthesiologists in charge of endoscopic sedation units in mainland China through WeChat. RESULTS The results from 2758 participating hospitals (36.7% of the total) showed that 9 808 182 gastroscopies (69.3%) and 4 353 950 colonoscopies (30.7%), with a gastroscopy-to-colonoscopy ratio of 2.3, were conducted from January to December 2016. Sedation was used with 4 696 648 gastroscopies (47.9%) and 2 148 316 colonoscopies (49.3%), for a ratio of 2.2. The most commonly used sedative was propofol (61.0% for gastroscopies and 60.4% for colonoscopies). Haemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2) was monitored in most patients (96.1%). Supplemental oxygen was routinely administered, but the availability of other equipment was variable (anaesthesia machine in 64.9%, physiological monitor in 84.4%, suction device in 72.3%, airway equipment in 75.5%, defibrillator in 32.7%, emergency kit in 57.0%, and difficult airway kit in 20.8% of centres responding). CONCLUSIONS The sedation rate for gastrointestinal endoscopy is much lower in China than in the USA and in Europe. The most commonly used combination of sedatives was propofol plus an opioid (either fentanyl or sufentanil). Emergency support devices, such as difficult airway devices and defibrillators, were not usually available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shujing Zhou
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ziyu Zhu
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wanbing Dai
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Siyi Qi
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Weitian Tian
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yizhe Zhang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Zhang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lili Huang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Tian
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Weifeng Yu
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Diansan Su
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hypoxemia during procedural sedation in adult patients: a retrospective observational study. Can J Anaesth 2021; 68:1349-1357. [PMID: 33880728 PMCID: PMC8376691 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-021-01992-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Since 2010, new guidelines for procedural sedation and the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety have increased patient safety, comfort, and acceptance considerably. Nevertheless, the administration of sedatives and opioids during sedation procedures may put the patient at risk of hypoxemia. However, data on hypoxemia during procedural sedation are scarce. Here, we studied the incidence and severity of hypoxemia during procedural sedations in our hospital. METHODS A historical, single-centre cohort study was performed at the University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU), a tertiary centre in the Netherlands. Data from procedural sedation in our hospital between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2018 (3,459 males and 2,534 females; total, 5,993) were extracted from our Anesthesia Information Management System. Hypoxemia was defined as peripheral oxygen saturation < 90% lasting at least two consecutive minutes. The severity of hypoxemia was calculated as area under the curve. The relationship between the severity of hypoxemia and body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification, and duration of the procedure was investigated. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. RESULTS Twenty-nine percent of moderately to deeply sedated patients developed hypoxemia. A high incidence of hypoxemia was found in patients undergoing procedures in the heart catheterization room (54%) and in patients undergoing bronchoscopy procedures (56%). Hypoxemia primarily occurred in longer lasting procedures (> 120 min) and especially in the latter phases of the procedures. There was no relationship between severity of hypoxemia and BMI or ASA Physical Status. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that a considerable number of patients are at risk of hypoxemia during procedural sedation with a positive correlation shown with increasing duration of medical procedures. Additional prospective research is needed to investigate the clinical consequences of this cumulative hypoxemia.
Collapse
|
4
|
Feng LL, Ding WX, Sun YY, Zhang YY, Yuan NP, Zhang LJ, Han WJ, Xi HJ. Risk factors for hypoxemia during routine anesthesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2019; 27:427-434. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v27.i7.427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal endoscopy under anesthesia has been carried out as a routine procedure in China. Hypoxemia is still an adverse event with a high incidence in routine anesthesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy, but the incidence of hypoxemia varies greatly across countries (< 1% to 85%), and there is a lack of relevant high-quality reports in China. Propofol, as a sedative for anesthetic gastroscopy in outpatients, has been recognized for its safety and effectiveness and is recommended by the expert consensus on Sedation/Anesthesia for Digestive Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment in China (2014). However, there are still some debate over its safety in foreign countries. In this study, we used propofol as a sedative for gastroscopy in outpatients to observe its effect on the incidence of hypoxemia.
AIM To observe and analyze the incidence of and risk factors for hypoxemia in anesthesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy.
METHODS A total of 580 outpatients who were sedated with propofol from September 1, 2018 to November 30, 2018 in Digestive Endoscopy Center of Shanghai Changhai Hospital were included in the study. These patients were divided into either a hypoxemia (n = 110) group or a non-hypoxemia group (n = 470). The basic information, anesthesia procedure, and endoscopic operation related information of the two groups were recorded.
RESULTS The information of patients in the two groups was compared and analyzed. It was found that there were significantly differences between the two groups in snoring history, biopsy, age, body mass index, abdominal circumference, endoscopic operation time, propofol dosage, ASA classification, and endoscopic physician classification (P < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that age (>5 years, OR = 8.955, 95 %CI: 2.070-38.746) and propofol dosage (>197 mg, OR = 2.360, 95 %CI: 1.320-4.219) were independent risk factors for hypoxemia.
CONCLUSION Intervention is needed for elderly patients (especially patients over 75 years old) and patients requiring large amounts of propofol (especially > 197 mg) to prevent the occurrence of hypoxemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Li Feng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Wen-Xia Ding
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Yuan-Yuan Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Ying-Ying Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Ning-Ping Yuan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Li-Jun Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Wen-Jun Han
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Hui-Jun Xi
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Qin Y, Li LZ, Zhang XQ, Wei Y, Wang YL, Wei HF, Wang XR, Yu WF, Su DS. Supraglottic jet oxygenation and ventilation enhances oxygenation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients sedated with propofol: a randomized multicentre clinical trial. Br J Anaesth 2018; 119:158-166. [PMID: 28974061 DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hypoventilation is the main reason for hypoxia during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures with sedation. The key to preventing hypoxia is to maintain normal ventilation during the procedure. We introduced supraglottic jet oxygenation and ventilation (SJOV) through a new Wei nasal jet tube (WNJ) to reduce the incidence of hypoxia in patients sedated with propofol during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures. Methods In a multicentre, prospective randomized single-blinded study, 1781 outpatients undergoing routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy who were sedated with propofol by an anaesthetist were randomized into the following three groups: the supplementary oxygen via nasal cannula group [nasal cannula oxygen: O 2 (2 litres min -1 ) was administered via a nasal cannula]; the supplementary oxygen via WNJ group [WNJ oxygen: O 2 (2 litres min -1 ) was administered through a WNJ]; and the SJOV via WNJ group (WNJ SJOV: SJOV was administered via WNJ) at three centres from March 2015 to July 2016. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of hypoxia (peripheral oxygen saturation of 75-89%). Other adverse events were also recorded. Results Supraglottic jet oxygenation and ventilation decreased the incidence of hypoxia from 9 to 3% ( P <0.0001). No severe hypoxia occurred in the WNJ SJOV group, one instance occurred in the WNJ oxygen group, and two instances were observed in the nasal cannula oxygen supply control group. Supraglottic jet oxygenation and ventilation-related minor adverse events increased significantly within 1 min after the procedure but decreased 30 min later. Conclusions The use of SJOV during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for patients who are sedated with propofol reduces the incidence of hypoxia, with minor and tolerable adverse events. Supraglottic jet oxygenation and ventilation has a favourable risk-to-benefit ratio and may improve patient safety. Clinical trial registration NCT02436018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Qin
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - L Z Li
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai 201200, China
| | - X Q Zhang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Shanghai 200065, China
| | - Y Wei
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai 201200, China
| | - Y L Wang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Shanghai 200065, China
| | - H F Wei
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - X R Wang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - W F Yu
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - D S Su
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| |
Collapse
|