Semi-solid feeds may reduce the risk of aspiration pneumonia and shorten postoperative length of stay after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)

Clinical effects and safety of semi-solid feeds in tube-fed patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Enteral nutrition is a very important form of treatment for critically ill patients. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical effects and safety of semi-solid feeds in tube-fed patients.

Methods

Two researchers searched PubMed, clinical trials, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and Weipu databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the clinical effects and safety of semi-solid feeds in tube-fed patients until 10 October 2023. The quality evaluation tool recommended by the Cochrane Library was used to evaluate the quality of included RCTs. RevMan 5.4 software was used for data analysis.

Results

A total of eight RCTs involving 823 tube-fed patients were included in this meta-analysis. A synthesized outcome indicated that semi-solid feeds reduced the incidence of diarrhea (RR = 0.32, 95%CI:0.20-0.50, P < 0.001), vomiting (RR = 0.31, 95%CI:0.15-0.64, P = 0.002), abdominal distension (RR = 0.41, 95%CI:0.22-0.76, P = 0.005), length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (MD = -3.61, 95%CI: -6.74 to -0.48, P = 0.02), and length of hospital stay (MD = -7.14, 95%CI: -10.31 to -3.97, P < 0.01) in tube-fed patients. Enteric feeding had no effect on the 30-day mortality (RR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.19-1.56, P = 0.26). No publication bias was detected by the Egger's test results (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Semi-solid feeds are beneficial in reducing the incidence of diarrhea, abdominal distension, vomiting, and hospital stay. More high-quality studies are needed in the future to verify the effects of semi-solid feeds on mortality.

Efficacy of semi-solidification of enteral nutrients for postoperative nutritional management with a nasogastric tube

Postoperative nutritional management with a nasogastric tube is often used to prevent malnutrition after oral and maxillofacial surgery. However, enteral nutrients (EN) may cause various complications due to their liquid formulation. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of semi-solid EN with a xanthan gum thickener through a nasogastric tube and examined patients' complications, nutritional status, and quality of life. We established two groups: an L group (n=20) to which we administered liquid EN, and an SS group (n=20) to which we administered semi-solidified EN. The primary outcome was the occurrence of gastrointestinal complications. The secondary outcome was a change in nutritional status based on body weight and controlling nutritional status. The other outcome was the improvement in the patients' quality of life, assessed by the administration time. During nutritional management with a nasogastric tube, the median daily administration time in the L group was 9.0 hours, and 9 patients experienced diarrhea. In the SS group, the median daily feeding time was 2.3 hours, and only 2 patients experienced diarrhea. Both groups exhibited a decrease in body weight while controlling nutritional status scores were maintained. Semi-solidification of EN may be useful for postoperative nutritional management after oral and maxillofacial surgery by reducing complications, maintaining nutritional status, and shortening administration time.

Procedure-Related Complications and Survival after Gastrostomy: Results from a Japanese Cohort

INTRODUCTION

In 2010, a large-scale multi-institutional study in Japan showed a good prognosis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). However, the function and efficacy of PEG are not fully understood by patients, families, and health-care professionals; thus, the number of PEG treatments in Japan has declined. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the safety of the PEG procedure and subsequent survival after PEG.

METHODS

In total, 249 PEGs were performed at Juzenkai Hospital from 2005 to 2017. PEG was originally performed using the pull method and then by a modified introducer method from mid-2011. We examined procedure-related complications and survival rates after PEG.

RESULTS

Fifty-one (20.5%) procedure-related complications occurred; emergency surgery was required in 4 cases. Infections accounted for 76.5% (39/51) of complications. More infections occurred with the pull method than with the modified introducer method. The 1-year survival rate was 66.8%; the median survival time was 678 days. Nine patients (3.6%) died within 30 days; no deaths were directly related to PEG. Sex, age, and albumin level before surgery significantly influenced the prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Due to changes in the PEG insertion method and other factors, PEG has become a safer treatment method. Additionally, PEG-based nutritional supplementation is associated with adequate survival.

Semi-Solid Nutrients for Prevention of Enteral Tube Feeding-Related Complications in Japanese Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the best available evidence on semi-solid nutrients for prevention of complications associated with enteral tube feeding (ETF). PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, Ichushi-web, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases were searched for relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs, and crossover trials comparing the effects of semi-solid nutrients with those of control interventions in patients on ETF were included in the review. The primary outcome was development of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Eight RCTs and five crossover trials involving 889 study participants in total were examined via meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that semi-solid nutrients significantly decreased the risk of GER (risk ratio 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 0.73) and the GER index (mean difference −2.93; 95% CI −5.18 to −0.68). Dwell time in the stomach was significantly shortened (standardized mean difference (SMD) −0.50; 95% CI −0.99 to −0.02), as was care time defined as the time needed to prepare and administer the nutrient solution (SMD −8.02; 95% CI −10.94 to −5.10). Semi-solid nutrients significantly decrease the risk of GER and the dwell time in the stomach in adult patients.

Semisolid vs Liquid Nutrients and 30-Day Readmission in Gastrostomy Tube-Fed Patients: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Semisolid nutrients have been widely used to prevent complications related to enteral nutrition (EN) in Japan. However, there are few data on the effect of feeding semisolid nutrient preparations. We compared 30-day readmission rates of gastrostomy tube-fed patients who had been prescribed semisolid vs liquid nutrients on discharge.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study using a Japanese nationwide inpatient database of data entered between June 2014 and March 2018. We identified patients aged ≥18 years who had received EN through gastrostomy during hospitalization. Patients were classified as having been prescribed semisolid vs liquid EN on discharge. After one-to-one propensity score matching, all-cause 30-day readmission rates were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

In total, 5331 patients were identified, including a semisolid-nutrients group (n = 2089) and a liquid-nutrients group (n = 3242). Propensity score matching created 1912 pairs. The 30-day readmission rates were 15.6% and 13.9% in the semisolid-nutrients and liquid-nutrients groups, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the groups (risk difference, 1.7%; 95% CI, -0.6 to 4.0%; P = .14).

CONCLUSION

All-cause 30-day readmission of patients receiving gastrostomy tube feeding did not differ between those prescribed semisolid vs liquid nutrients on discharge. Randomized controlled trials are needed to accurately determine the effect of semisolid nutrients on clinical outcomes.

Evaluation of a Semi-Solidifying Liquid Formula for Nasogastric Tube Feeding After Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate a semi-solidifying liquid formula for nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding after oral and maxillofacial surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 42 patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery for malignant tumors, benign tumors, jaw reconstruction, or jaw fractures received postoperative NGT feeding for nutritional control between 2013 and 2019. Of these patients, 21 received a liquid diet (liquid group; administration rate, 100 mL/hour) and 21 received a semi-solidifying liquid formula (semisolid group [SSG]; administration rate, 400 mL/hour; Mermed Plus; Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). We retrospectively evaluated the complications of NGT feeding in both groups.

RESULTS

During the course of NGT feeding, the incidence of abdominal pain (P = .022), rate of probiotic prescription for diarrhea (P = .012), and Bristol stool form scale score (P = .014) were significantly lower in the SSG than in the liquid group. The maximum defecation frequency per day was also lower in the SSG, although the difference was not significant (P = .069).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the semi-solidifying formula was associated with a higher administration rate and a lower incidence of gastrointestinal complications. These findings will help oral and maxillofacial surgeons in the selection of appropriate diets for postoperative NGT feeding.

A case of tracheal obstruction caused by reflux and aspiration of semi-solid nutrients via the nasogastric tube

•

There are not sufficient data on viscosity of semi-solid nutrients via the nasogastric tube in vivo.

•

Tracheal obstruction occurred by reflux and aspiration of semi-solid nutrients through the nasogastric tube

•

Reflux of semi-solid nutrients is rare, but once it occurs, it can be fatal.

Introduction

Semi-solid nutrients have several advantages, including reduced cases of diarrhea and aspiration pneumonia, and are usually administered via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy owing to its high viscosity. Administering semi-solid nutrients via a nasogastric tube was recently introduced in clinical practice; however, its safety has not been well confirmed.

Presentation of case

An 82-year-old man with a right occipital hemorrhage and severe diarrhea consulted the nutritional support team. Administrations of semi-solid nutrients (HINE E-GEL®) via the nasogastric tube was initiated, which gradually alleviated his symptoms. Fourteen days after initiation, he suddenly had pulmonary failure owing to a tracheal obstruction caused by the reflux and aspiration of semi-solid nutrients. Intubation and subsequent reflex cough expectorated sputum with gel-form particles, which quickly stabilized his pulmonary condition. After this, his hospital course was stable, and he was referred to another hospital for further rehabilitation.

Discussion

Semi-solid nutrients administered via the nasogastric tube have different ingredients compared with those administered via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. HINE E-GEL®, for example, contains pectin and calcium phosphate that changes from liquid to semi-solid inside the stomach via chemical reactions under acidic conditions. Data on the viscosity of HINE E-GEL® in vivo are insufficient. Uncertainty regarding the form and viscosity of HINE E-GEL® inside the stomach complicates clinical practice.

Conclusions

Although semi-solid nutrients have several advantages, including reduced diarrhea and gastroesophageal reflux, evidence on semi-solid nutrients via the nasogastric tube is insufficient. It should be noted that semi-solid nutrient reflux can be more fatal than liquid nutrients.

Gastric Emptying of Elemental Liquid Diets Versus Semisolid Diets in Bedridden Gastrostomy-fed Patients

BACKGROUND

Aspiration is a common problem in bedridden gastrostomy-fed patients. We compared gastric emptying of an elemental liquid diet and a commercial semisolid diet in bedridden gastrostomy-fed patients.

METHODS

Study 1: from January 2013 to December 2016, consecutive bedridden patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) semisolid feeding hospitalized due to aspiration pneumonia were switched to elemental liquid diet feedings. The frequency of defecation, tube feed contents aspirated from the trachea, and aspiration pneumonia during hospitalization were retrospectively reviewed. Study 2 was a randomized, crossover trial comparing C sodium acetate gastric emptying of a commercial elemental liquid or a commercial semisolid diet in bedridden PEG patients and controls.

RESULTS

Study 1: 18 patients were enrolled. Elemental liquid diet was aspirated from the trachea in 1 (5.6%) (once in 24 observations); neither aspiration pneumonia nor diarrhea developed during elemental liquid diet feeding over 2 weeks observation. Study 2: 8 PEG patients and 8 healthy subjects were separately randomized to assess gastric emptying of the commercial elemental and semisolid diets. The elemental liquid diet was associated with a significant decrease of the 10%, 30%, or 50% emptying (excretion) time (P<0.05) and an increased the area under the curve (% dose/h) compared with the commercial semisolid diet (P<0.05). In healthy subjects there was no significant difference in gastric empting between the 2 diets.

CONCLUSIONS

Elemental liquid diets emptied more rapidly from the stomach than semisolid diets in bedridden PEG patients. They may prevent or reduce aspiration pneumonia compared with semisolid diets.

Differences in the incidence of postoperative pneumonia after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy between liquid and semi-solid nutrient administration

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This historical control study examined the differences in the incidence of postoperative pneumonia between patients administered liquid and semi-solid nutrients after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).

SUBJECTS/METHODS

The medical records of adult patients who underwent PEG between March 1999 and March 2014 were investigated. The patients were administered either liquid or semi-solid nutrient and examined for gastroesophageal reflux via radiography after PEG. The study period was divided into periods I (liquid nutrient to all patients), II (semi-solid nutrient to patients with reflux and liquid nutrient to those without), and III (semi-solid nutrient to all patients). The patient characteristics and incidence of postoperative pneumonia were stratified by the periods. To assess the relationship between postoperative pneumonia and the periods, a logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of 370 patients enrolled, 149 were in period I, 64 in period II, and 157 in period III. Postoperative pneumonia was more frequently observed in period I (20.8%) than in periods II (7.8%) and III (10.2%). The odds ratios were higher in period I (period I vs. II: 3.10 [95% confidence intervals: 1.15-8.38]; period I vs. III: 2.32 [1.21-4.44]). The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux did not greatly differ between periods II (25.0%) and III (35.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of postoperative pneumonia after PEG was lower in the patients administered semi-solid nutrient than in those administered liquid nutrient, suggesting that semi-solid nutrient administration to patients with PEG tubes is preferable to prevent postoperative pneumonia. Furthermore, it may be favored especially in those with gastroesophageal reflux.

Comparison of Complications With Semisolid Versus Liquid Diet Via Nasogastric Feeding Tube After Orthognathic Surgery

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the effectiveness of nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding of a semisolid diet versus a liquid diet after orthognathic surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The orthognathic surgery patients were relatively young and generally healthy, without severe medical disease. Of the patients, 26 received liquid feeding (liquid diet group [LG], with an administration rate of 100 mL/hour), 30 received semisolid feeding at a high administration rate (semisolid diet-rapid administration group [SSRAG], 200 to 500 mL/hour), and 33 received semisolid feeding at a slower rate (semisolid diet-slow administration group [SSSAG], 100 mL/hour). We retrospectively investigated the complications of NGT feeding in each group.

RESULTS

The incidence of diarrhea was clearly lower in the SSRAG than in the LG. Among patients with lower-gastrointestinal tract symptoms, stool form scale scores and maximum defecation frequency per day were significantly lower in the SSRAG than in the LG (P = .001 for both). Rapid administration of a semisolid diet via an NGT resulted in fewer complications and shorter feeding times for orthognathic surgery patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The rapid administration of a semisolid diet via an NGT should decrease the complications of NGT feeding and improve the quality of the perioperative period for patients. The findings of this study will help clinicians select NGT diets for relatively young, healthy patients, such as orthognathic surgery patients.

A novel semi-solidifying liquid formula via the nasogastric route to maintain enteral nutrition in the event of recurrent aspiration pneumonia: A case report

Recurrent aspiration pneumonia can impede the continuation of enteral nutrition. Semi-solid feeds have been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of aspiration pneumonia but are difficult to administer via the nasogastric tube. A novel semi-solidifying enteral formula may be used instead to avoid the occurrence of severe gastroesophageal reflux.