Gerlach-Houck H, Rodgers NH. The good, the bad, and the ugly: Unpacking the pros and cons associated with change for adults who stutter.
JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS 2022;
73:105924. [PMID:
35947913 DOI:
10.1016/j.jfludis.2022.105924]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
The purpose of the current study was to document the pros and cons that adults who stutter may consider when deciding to change how they live with stuttering.
METHODS
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 adults who stutter and 12 speech-language pathologists who specialize in stuttering therapy. Participants were asked to identify and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of making a change to how they live with stuttering. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to generate multilevel themes.
RESULTS
Meaningful units were extracted from interview transcripts to develop 37 discrete pros and 15 discrete cons. The pros of change clustered into five organizing themes: enriching one's social relationships, feeling better in social interactions, developing a healthier sense of self, gaining autonomy, and communicating easier. The cons of change clustered into three organizing themes: experiencing discomfort, expending resources, and recognizing that some things may not change.
CONCLUSION
This study documented why adults who stutter may or may not seek change. Identifying the pros and cons of behavior change is an important step in understanding why some clients who stutter are ambivalent about, or resistant to, the therapeutic process.
Collapse