Frailty is the New Age: A Retrospective Study of Modified Frailty Index for Preoperative Risk Assessment in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Five-item modified frailty index does not outperform diabetes and hypertension alone in prediction of complications after breast reconstruction

PURPOSE

Existing literature has emphasized the utility of the five-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) in predicting postoperative outcomes after surgical procedures. However, in breast reconstruction, a primarily elective post-oncologic procedure for otherwise relatively healthy patients, several components of the index may be sparse and not strongly contribute to predictive value.

METHODS

Breast reconstruction cases were identified in the 2012-2022 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Three metrics were compared in this cohort: 1) the mFI-5, 2) a simplified two-item index comprising diabetes and/or hypertension, and 3) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class. Each metric was incorporated into three multivariate logistic regression models for occurrence of at least one postoperative complication. Predictive performance among metrics was compared over fifty iterations (p < 0.05). Performance was compared between autologous and implant-based modalities in a supplementary analysis.

RESULTS

134,983 breast reconstruction cases were identified in the final cohort. In multivariate regression, both MFI and the two-item index of diabetes and hypertension were significant predictors of postoperative complications (p < 0.001). The mFI-5 (average AUC: 0.6106) and two-item index (average AUC: 0.6105) performed without significant difference (p = 0.93). Discriminatory performance of ASA class (average AUC: 0.6115), was not significantly different from the other metrics (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of a population of mainly elective breast reconstruction procedures, the five-item modified frailty index does not outperform an index of diabetes and hypertension alone. Such findings may motivate the selection of other variables that may be more useful for prediction of postoperative outcomes.

Microvascular Free-Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction: The Utility of the Modified Frailty Five-Item Index

BACKGROUND

 Microvascular free tissue transfer is a common tool for the reconstruction of oncologic head and neck defects. Adequate preoperative assessment can aid in appropriate risk stratification and peri-operative optimization. The modified five-item frailty index (mFI-5) is a validated risk-assessment scale; however, its utility in head and neck free-flap reconstruction is unknown when compared with other common risk factors.

METHODS

 A retrospective, single-institution chart review (2017-2020) was performed. Patient demographics, defect and repair characteristics, pre- and peri-operative factors, and flap outcomes were recorded. A high mFI-5 score was defined as greater than 2. The total score, as well as other patient factors, was correlated to postoperative flap complications.

RESULTS

 A total of 214 patients were deemed appropriate for conclusion. The mean age was 63.9 ± 12.8 years. There were an even number of males (52.8%) and females (47.2%). A fifth of subjects (20.8%) underwent preoperative radiotherapy. There were 21 cases (9.8%) of complete flap loss. A total of 34 patients (29.4%) experienced any postoperative complication related to flap outcomes. An elevated mFI-5 was significantly associated with a higher overall rate of postoperative complications (39.7 vs. 29.4%, p < 0.019) and total flap loss (16.7% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.033). Preoperative radiation was found to be associated with an increased complication rate (p < 0.003).

CONCLUSION

 The mFI-5 score may be a potentially significant tool in the risk stratification of patients undergoing head and neck free-flap reconstruction as opposed to commonly utilized risk factors. Preoperative radiotherapy is significantly associated with postoperative complications. Appropriate preoperative assessment may help tailor patient care preoperatively.

Increased Patient Age as a Risk Factor Following Free Flap Reconstruction after Breast Cancer: A Single Institutional Review of 2,598 Cases

BACKGROUND

 Autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) after mastectomy is increasing due to benefits over implant-based reconstruction. However, free flap reconstruction is not universally offered to patients of advanced age due to perceived increased perioperative risk.

METHODS

 Patients undergoing free flap breast reconstruction at our institution from 2005 to 2018 were included. Risk-adjusted logistic regression models were fit while controlling for demographic and comorbid characteristics to determine the association of age with the probability of venous thromboembolism (VTE), delayed healing, skin necrosis, surgical site infection (SSI), seroma, hematoma, hernia, and flap loss. Linear predictions from risk-adjusted logistic regression models were used to create spline curves and determine the risk of outcomes associated with age.

RESULTS

 A cohort of 2,598 patients underwent free flap breast reconstruction in the period examined. The median age was 51 with approximately 9% of patients being 65 or older. Increased age was associated with a greater risk of delayed healing, skin necrosis, and hematoma after surgery. There was no increased risk of medical complications such as VTE or complications such as flap loss, seroma, or SSI.

CONCLUSION

 A set age cutoff for patients undergoing free flap breast reconstruction does not appear warranted. There is no difference in major surgical complications such as flap loss with increasing age. However, older age does predispose patients to specific wound complications such as hematoma, skin necrosis, and delayed wound healing, which should guide preoperative counseling. Further, medical complications do not increase with advanced age. Overall, however, the safety of ABR in older patients appears uncompromised.

Does Frailty Predict Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Free or Pedicled Flap Procedures for Lower Extremity Limb Salvage? An Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

BACKGROUND

 Older and frailer patients are increasingly undergoing free or pedicled tissue transfer for lower extremity (LE) limb salvage. This novel study examines the impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes in LE limb salvage patients undergoing free or pedicled tissue transfer.

METHODS

 The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2010-2020) was queried for free and pedicled tissue transfer to the LE based on Current Procedural Terminology and the International Classification of Diseases9/10 codes. Demographic and clinical variables were extracted. The five-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) was calculated using functional status, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and hypertension. Patients were stratified by mFI-5 score: no frailty (0), intermediate frailty (1), and high frailty (2 + ). Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed.

RESULTS

 In total, 5,196 patients underwent free or pedicled tissue transfer for LE limb salvage. A majority were intermediate (n = 1,977) or high (n = 1,466) frailty. High frailty patients had greater rates of comorbidities-including those not in the mFI-5 score. Higher frailty was associated with more systemic and all-cause complications. On multivariate analysis, the mFI-5 score remained the best predictor of all-cause complications-with high frailty associated with 1.74 increased adjusted odds when compared with no frailty (95% confidence interval: 1.47-2.05).

CONCLUSION

 While flap type, age, and diagnosis were independent predictors of outcomes in LE flap reconstruction, frailty (mFI-5) was the strongest predictor on adjusted analysis. This study validates the mFI-5 score for preoperative risk assessment for flap procedures in LE limb salvage. These results highlight the likely importance of prehabilitation and medical optimization prior to limb salvage.