1
|
Motiwala A, Tanwir H, Duarte A, Gilani S, DeAnda A, Zaidan MF, Jneid H. Multidisciplinary Approach to Pulmonary Embolism and the Role of the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team. Curr Cardiol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11886-024-02084-9. [PMID: 38963612 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-024-02084-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular death and morbidity, and presents a major burden to healthcare systems. The field has seen rapid growth with development of innovative clot reduction technologies, as well as ongoing multicenter trials that may completely revolutionize care of PE patients. However, current paucity of robust clinical trials and guidelines often leave individual physicians managing patients with acute PE in a dilemma. RECENT FINDINGS The pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) was developed as a platform to rapidly engage multiple specialists to deliver evidence-based, organized and efficient care and help address some of the gaps in knowledge. Several centers investigating outcomes following implementation of PERT have demonstrated shorter hospital and intensive-care unit stays, lower use of inferior vena cava filters, and in some instances improved mortality. Since the advent of PERT, early findings demonstrate promise with improved outcomes after implementation of PERT. Incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into PERT has also shown promise with more streamlined care and reducing response times. Further clinical trials are needed to examine the impact of PERT model on care delivery and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afaq Motiwala
- University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
| | - Hira Tanwir
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Alexander Duarte
- University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA
| | - Syed Gilani
- University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA
| | - Abe DeAnda
- University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA
| | | | - Hani Jneid
- University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Glazier MM, Glazier JJ. Diagnostic Strategies in Pulmonary Embolism. Int J Angiol 2024; 33:89-94. [PMID: 38846998 PMCID: PMC11152624 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Key to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) is a careful bedside evaluation. After this, there are three further diagnostic steps. In all patients, estimation of the clinical probability of PE is performed. The other two steps are measurement of D-dimer when indicated and chest imaging when indicated. The clinical probability of PE is estimated at low, moderate, or high. The prevalence of PE is less than 15% among patients with low clinical probability, 15 to 40% with moderate clinical probability, and >40% in patients with high clinical probability. Clinical gestalt has been found to be very useful in estimating probability of PE. However, clinical prediction rules, such as Wells criteria, the modified Geneva score, and the PE rule out criteria have been advocated as adjuncts. In patients with high clinical probability, the high prevalence of PE can lower the D-dimer negative predictive value, which could increase the risk of diagnostic failure. Consequently, patients with high probability for PE need to proceed directly to chest imaging, without prior measurement of D-dimer level. Key studies in determining which low to moderate probability patients require chest imaging are the Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism (ADJUST-PE), the Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (YEARS), and the Pulmonary Embolism Graduated D-Dimer trials. In patients with low clinical probability, PE can be excluded without imaging studies if D-dimer is less than 1,000 ng/mL. In patients in whom there is not a low likelihood for PE, this can be excluded without imaging studies if the D-dimer is below the age-adjusted threshold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James J. Glazier
- Department of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- Department of Cardiology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Glazier HA, Kaki A. Role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Treatment of Massive Pulmonary Embolism. Int J Angiol 2024; 33:107-111. [PMID: 38846997 PMCID: PMC11152616 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1782658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Massive/high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with a 30-day mortality rate of approximately 65%. In searching for strategies that may make a dent on this dismal mortality rate, investigators have, over the last decade, shown renewed interest in the potential beneficial role of venoarterial (V-A) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the treatment of patients with high-risk PE. There is a dearth of high-quality evidence regarding the value of ECMO in the treatment of massive PE. Studies examining this issue have generally been retrospective, often single center and frequently with small patient numbers. Moreover, these reported studies are not matched with appropriate controls, and, accordingly, it is difficult to regulate for inherent treatment bias. Not surprisingly, there are no randomized controlled trials examining the value of ECMO in the treatment of massive PE, as such trials would pose formidable feasibility challenges. Over the past several years, there has been increasing support for upfront use of V-A ECMO in the treatment of massive PE, when it is complicated by cardiac arrest. In those patients without cardiac arrest, but who have contraindications for thrombolysis, V-A ECMO combined with anticoagulation may be used to stabilize the patient. If after 3 to 5 days, such patients demonstrate persistent right ventricular dysfunction, embolectomy (either surgical or catheter based) should be performed. Well-designed, multicenter, prospective studies are urgently needed to better define the role of V-A ECMO in the treatment of patients with massive PE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh A. Glazier
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Amir Kaki
- Division of Cardiology, St. John University Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
- Department of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Andò G, Pelliccia F, Saia F, Tarantini G, Fraccaro C, D'Ascenzo F, Zimarino M, Di Marino M, Niccoli G, Porto I, Calabrò P, Gragnano F, De Rosa S, Piccolo R, Moscarella E, Fabris E, Montone RA, Spaccarotella C, Indolfi C, Sinagra G, Perrone Filardi P. Management of high and intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism: A position paper of the Interventional Cardiology Working Group of the Italian Society of Cardiology. Int J Cardiol 2024; 400:131694. [PMID: 38160911 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition that remains a major global health concern. Noteworthy, patients with high- and intermediate-high-risk PE pose unique challenges because they often display clinical and hemodynamic instability, thus requiring rapid intervention to mitigate the risk of clinical deterioration and death. Importantly, recovery from PE is associated with long-term complications such as recurrences, bleeding with oral anticoagulant treatment, pulmonary hypertension, and psychological distress. Several novel strategies to improve risk factor characterization and management of patients with PE have recently been introduced. Accordingly, this position paper of the Working Group of Interventional Cardiology of the Italian Society of Cardiology deals with the landscape of high- and intermediate-high risk PE, with a focus on bridging the gap between the evolving standards of care and the current clinical practice. Specifically, the growing importance of catheter-directed therapies as part of the therapeutic armamentarium is highlighted. These interventions have been shown to be effective strategies in unstable patients since they offer, as compared with thrombolysis, faster and more effective restoration of hemodynamic stability with a consistent reduction in the risk of bleeding. Evolving standards of care underscore the need for continuous re-assessment of patient risk stratification. To this end, a multidisciplinary approach is paramount in refining selection criteria to deliver the most effective treatment to patients with unstable hemodynamics. In conclusion, the current management of unstable patients with PE should prioritize tailored treatment in a patient-oriented approach in which transcatheter therapies play a central role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Andò
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, AOU Policlinico "Gaetano Martino", Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Pelliccia
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, "La Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
| | - Francesco Saia
- Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tarantini
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Chiara Fraccaro
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Zimarino
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "Gabriele D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy; Department of Cardiology, "SS. Annunziata Hospital", ASL 2 Abruzzo, Chieti, Italy
| | - Mario Di Marino
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "Gabriele D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Niccoli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Italo Porto
- Chair of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine and Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Cardiology Unit, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department (DICATOV) IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Calabrò
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy; Division of Clinical Cardiology, AORN "Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano", Caserta, Italy
| | - Felice Gragnano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy; Division of Clinical Cardiology, AORN "Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano", Caserta, Italy
| | - Salvatore De Rosa
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Raffaele Piccolo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Moscarella
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy; Division of Clinical Cardiology, AORN "Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano", Caserta, Italy
| | - Enrico Fabris
- Cardio-thoraco-vascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Rocco Antonio Montone
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmen Spaccarotella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ciro Indolfi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Sinagra
- Cardio-thoraco-vascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|