1
|
Benchaib M, Labrune E, Giscard d'Estaing S, Jovet C, Soignon G, Jaeger P, Salle B. ICSI using testicular spermatozoa after failure of ICSI with ejaculated spermatozoa could be a good choice: A propensity score-matched cohort study. Andrology 2024; 12:1301-1311. [PMID: 38108555 DOI: 10.1111/andr.13572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ejaculated spermatozoa are considered to possess a higher fertilisation potential than testicular spermatozoa. In selected cases, the use of testicular spermatozoa from non-azoospermic infertile men resulted in a higher implantation and pregnancy rate than the use of ejaculated spermatozoa. OBJECTIVE The primary objective was to compare the live birth rate and cumulative live birth rate between couples with failed intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure using ejaculated spermatozoa who subsequently had an intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle with testicular spermatozoa and those who subsequently had an intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle with ejaculated spermatozoa. The secondary objective was to determine the indications for the use of testicular spermatozoa after intracytoplasmic sperm injection failure with ejaculated spermatozoa. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study of matched couples using propensity score matching analysis was performed. After an intracytoplasmic sperm injection failure (cycle_1), intracytoplasmic sperm injection with either ejaculated spermatozoa (ejaculated sperm group), or testicular spermatozoa (testicular sperm group), was performed (cycle_2). The matching was on intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed in cycle_1 according to spermatozoa used (testicular or ejaculated) in cycle_2. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of sperm origin on cumulative live birth rate. Univariate analysis on parameters of cycle_1 was used to identify the prognostic factors to propose an intracytoplasmic sperm injection with testicular spermatozoa in case of cycle_1 failure. The study outcomes were live birth rate and cumulative live birth rate. RESULTS Among the 6034 couples available, 63 were selected to constitute the testicular sperm group and 63 were selected by propensity score matching to constitute the ejaculated sperm group. After matching, the DNA fragmentation index was higher in the testicular sperm group (13.43% ± 9.65% vs. 8.93% ± 4.47%, p = 0.013); no significant difference was observed for the fertilisation rate, the number of obtained embryos, blastulation rate and frozen embryo rate. In cycle_2, the live birth rate was higher in the testicular group (22.2% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001), as was the cumulative live birth rate (25.4% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.065). The prognostic factors identified for the proposal of intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure with testicular spermatozoa after intracytoplasmic sperm injection failure with ejaculated spermatozoa were: teratozoospermia, cryptozoospermia and high DNA fragmentation index. DISCUSSION According to the present study and current knowledge, the use of testicular spermatozoa after failed intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure in non-azoospermic men could be proposed instead of sperm donation in case of high sperm DNA fragmentation index, cryptozoospermia and teratozoospermia. A good oocyte response to ovarian stimulation during the previous assisted reproductive technology attempt will increase the chance of success. Although the main limitation of the current study is its retrospective nature, the use of the propensity score matching to perform causal inference study increases its reliability. CONCLUSION The present study supports that the use of testicular spermatozoa outside the classical indication of azoospermia is a good option when the indication is well established. However, before proposing a testicular biopsy, an improvement in sperm characteristics should be considered by treating the causes of sperm alteration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Benchaib
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, HFME, Biologie de la Reproduction, Cedex Bron, France
- UMR CNRS 5558, LBBE, Villeurbanne Cedex, France
- Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - Elsa Labrune
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, HFME, Biologie de la Reproduction, Cedex Bron, France
- Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
- Inserm U1208, Bron Cedex, France
| | - Sandrine Giscard d'Estaing
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, HFME, Biologie de la Reproduction, Cedex Bron, France
- Inserm U1208, Bron Cedex, France
- Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud, Université Claude Bernard, Oullins Cedex, France
| | - Cynthia Jovet
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, HFME, Biologie de la Reproduction, Cedex Bron, France
- Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - Gaëlle Soignon
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, HFME, Biologie de la Reproduction, Cedex Bron, France
| | - Pauline Jaeger
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, HFME, Biologie de la Reproduction, Cedex Bron, France
| | - Bruno Salle
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, HFME, Biologie de la Reproduction, Cedex Bron, France
- Inserm U1208, Bron Cedex, France
- Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud, Université Claude Bernard, Oullins Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sonigo C, Robin G, Boitrelle F, Fraison E, Sermondade N, Mathieu d'Argent E, Bouet PE, Dupont C, Creux H, Peigné M, Pirrello O, Trombert S, Lecorche E, Dion L, Rocher L, Arama E, Bernard V, Monnet M, Miquel L, Birsal E, Haïm-Boukobza S, Plotton I, Ravel C, Grzegorczyk-Martin V, Huyghe É, Dupuis HGA, Lefebvre T, Leperlier F, Bardet L, Lalami I, Robin C, Simon V, Dijols L, Riss J, Koch A, Bailly C, Rio C, Lebret M, Jegaden M, Fernandez H, Pouly JL, Torre A, Belaisch-Allart J, Antoine JM, Courbiere B. [First-line management of infertile couple. Guidelines for clinical practice of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2022]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2024; 52:305-335. [PMID: 38311310 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2024.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To update the 2010 CNGOF clinical practice guidelines for the first-line management of infertile couples. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five major themes (first-line assessment of the infertile woman, first-line assessment of the infertile man, prevention of exposure to environmental factors, initial management using ovulation induction regimens, first-line reproductive surgery) were identified, enabling 28 questions to be formulated using the Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) format. Each question was addressed by a working group that had carried out a systematic review of the literature since 2010, and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) methodology to assess the quality of the scientific data on which the recommendations were based. These recommendations were then validated during a national review by 40 national experts. RESULTS The fertility work-up is recommended to be prescribed according to the woman's age: after one year of infertility before the age of 35 and after 6months after the age of 35. A couple's initial infertility work-up includes a single 3D ultrasound scan with antral follicle count, assessment of tubal permeability by hysterography or HyFOSy, anti-Mullerian hormone assay prior to assisted reproduction, and vaginal swabbing for vaginosis. If the 3D ultrasound is normal, hysterosonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy are not recommended as first-line procedures. Chlamydia trachomatis serology does not have the necessary performance to predict tubal patency. Post-coital testing is no longer recommended. In men, spermogram, spermocytogram and spermoculture are recommended as first-line tests. If the spermogram is normal, it is not recommended to check the spermogram. If the spermogram is abnormal, an examination by an andrologist, an ultrasound scan of the testicles and hormonal test are recommended. Based on the data in the literature, we are unable to recommend a BMI threshold for women that would contraindicate medical management of infertility. A well-balanced Mediterranean-style diet, physical activity and the cessation of smoking and cannabis are recommended for infertile couples. For fertility concern, it is recommended to limit alcohol consumption to less than 5 glasses a week. If the infertility work-up reveals no abnormalities, ovulation induction is not recommended for normo-ovulatory women. If intrauterine insemination is indicated based on an abnormal infertility work-up, gonadotropin stimulation and ovulation monitoring are recommended to avoid multiple pregnancies. If the infertility work-up reveals no abnormality, laparoscopy is probably recommended before the age of 30 to increase natural pregnancy rates. In the case of hydrosalpinx, surgical management is recommended prior to ART, with either salpingotomy or salpingectomy depending on the tubal score. It is recommended to operate on polyps>10mm, myomas 0, 1, 2 and synechiae prior to ART. The data in the literature do not allow us to systematically recommend asymptomatic uterine septa and isthmoceles as first-line surgery. CONCLUSION Based on strong agreement between experts, we have been able to formulate updated recommendations in 28 areas concerning the initial management of infertile couples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Sonigo
- Service de médecine de la reproduction et préservation de la fertilité, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, 157, rue de la Porte-Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France; Faculté de médecine, université Paris-Sud Saclay, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Geoffroy Robin
- Service d'assistance médicale à la procréation et préservation de la fertilité, CHU de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Florence Boitrelle
- Service de biologie de la reproduction, préservation de fertilité, CECOS, CHI de Poissy, Poissy, France; INRAe, ENVA, BREED, UVSQ, université Paris Saclay, Jouy-en Josas, France
| | - Eloïse Fraison
- Département médecine de la reproduction, CHU Lyon, hôpital Femme-Mère-Enfant, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69500 Bron, France
| | - Nathalie Sermondade
- Service de biologie de la reproduction CECOS, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, 75020 Paris, France; Inserm US938, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne université, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Emmanuelle Mathieu d'Argent
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Dmu Origyne, hôpital Tenon, GHU Sorbonne université, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Bouet
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier universitaire d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49000 Angers, France
| | - Charlotte Dupont
- Service de biologie de la reproduction - CECOS, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Hélène Creux
- Centre AMP, polyclinique Saint-Roch, 550, avenue du Colonel-André-Pavelet, 34070 Montpellier cedex, France
| | - Maeliss Peigné
- Service de médecine de la reproduction et préservation de la fertilité, hôpital Jean-Verdier-Béclère, avenue du 14-Juillet, Bondy, France
| | - Olivier Pirrello
- Service d'aide médicale à la procréation, centre médicochirurgical obstétrique (CMCO), CHU de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67303 Schiltigheim, France
| | - Sabine Trombert
- Laboratoire Cerba, 6-11, rue de l'Équerre, 95310 Saint-Ouen L'Aumône, France
| | - Emmanuel Lecorche
- Laboratoire Cerba, 6-11, rue de l'Équerre, 95310 Saint-Ouen L'Aumône, France
| | - Ludivine Dion
- Département de gynécologie-obstétrique et reproduction humaine - CECOS, hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Laurence Rocher
- Service de radiologie diagnostique et interventionnelle, site Bicêtre, hôpitaux Paris Sud, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Université Paris Sud, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Service hospitalier Frédéric-Joliot, imagerie par résonance magnétique médicale et multimodalités, CNRS UMR8081, université Paris Sud, 4, place du Gal-Leclerc, 91401 Orsay cedex, France
| | - Emmanuel Arama
- Service de radiologie diagnostique et interventionnelle, site Bicêtre, hôpitaux Paris Sud, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Université Paris Sud, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Service hospitalier Frédéric-Joliot, imagerie par résonance magnétique médicale et multimodalités, CNRS UMR8081, université Paris Sud, 4, place du Gal-Leclerc, 91401 Orsay cedex, France
| | - Valérie Bernard
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, gynécologie médicale et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, CHU Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Margaux Monnet
- Département de gynécologie médicale, maternité régionale de Nancy, hôpitaux universitaires de Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Laura Miquel
- Service d'assistance médicale à la procréation, pôle Femmes-Parents-Enfants, hôpital de la Conception, AP-HM, 147, boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Eva Birsal
- Service d'assistance médicale à la procréation, pôle Femmes-Parents-Enfants, hôpital de la Conception, AP-HM, 147, boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | | | - Ingrid Plotton
- Service d'hormonologie, endocrinologie moléculaire et maladies rares, CPBE, groupement hospitalier Lyon-Est, Lyon-Bron, France; Université Claude-Bernard, Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Unité Inserm 1208, Lyon, France
| | - Célia Ravel
- Département de gynécologie-obstétrique et reproduction humaine - CECOS, hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Véronika Grzegorczyk-Martin
- Centre d'assistance médicale à la procréation et de préservation de la fertilité, clinique Mathilde, 76100 Rouen, France
| | - Éric Huyghe
- Département d'urologie, hôpital de Rangueil, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Service de médecine de la reproduction, hôpital Paule-de-Viguier, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Inserm 1203, UMR DEFE, université de Toulouse, université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Hugo G A Dupuis
- Service d'urologie et d'andrologie, CHU - hôpitaux de Rouen, CHU Charles-Nicolle, 76031 Rouen, France
| | - Tiphaine Lefebvre
- Service de médecine et biologie de la reproduction - gynécologie médicale, centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes, 38, boulevard Jean-Monnet, 44093 Nantes, France
| | - Florence Leperlier
- Service de médecine et biologie de la reproduction - gynécologie médicale, centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes, 38, boulevard Jean-Monnet, 44093 Nantes, France
| | - Léna Bardet
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Dmu Origyne, hôpital Tenon, GHU Sorbonne université, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Imane Lalami
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et de médecine de la reproduction, grand hôpital de l'Est Francilien - site de Meaux, 6-8, rue Saint-Fiacre, 77100 Meaux, France
| | - Camille Robin
- Service d'assistance médicale à la procréation et préservation de la fertilité, CHU de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Virginie Simon
- Unité fonctionnelle de gynécologie endocrinienne, service de gynécologie médicale, orthogénie et sexologie, hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandre, CHU de Lille, avenue Eugène-Avinée, 59037 Lille cedex, France
| | - Laura Dijols
- Service de médecine de la reproduction et préservation de la fertilité, hôpital Bretonneau, CHU de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Justine Riss
- Service d'aide médicale à la procréation, centre médicochirurgical obstétrique (CMCO), CHU de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67303 Schiltigheim, France
| | - Antoine Koch
- Service d'aide médicale à la procréation, centre médicochirurgical obstétrique (CMCO), CHU de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67303 Schiltigheim, France
| | - Clément Bailly
- Service de biologie de la reproduction CECOS, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, 75020 Paris, France; Inserm US938, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne université, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Constance Rio
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier universitaire d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49000 Angers, France
| | - Marine Lebret
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Charles-Nicolle, 37, boulevard Gambetta, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Margaux Jegaden
- Faculté de médecine, université Paris-Sud Saclay, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Département de chirurgie gynécologique et obstétrique, hôpital Bicêtre, GHU-Sud, AP-HP, 78, rue du Général-Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Hervé Fernandez
- Faculté de médecine, université Paris-Sud Saclay, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Département de chirurgie gynécologique et obstétrique, hôpital Bicêtre, GHU-Sud, AP-HP, 78, rue du Général-Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Jean-Luc Pouly
- Service de gynécologie chirurgicale, CHU Estaing, 1, place Lucie-et-Raymond-Aubrac, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Antoine Torre
- Centre d'assistance médicale à la procréation clinicobiologique, centre hospitalier Sud Francilien Corbeil-Essonnes, 40, avenue Serge-Dassault, 91106 Corbeil-Essonnes, France
| | - Joëlle Belaisch-Allart
- Service de médecine de la reproduction, pôle Femme-Enfant, Centre hospitalier des 4 villes, rue Charles-Lauer, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Jean-Marie Antoine
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Dmu Origyne, hôpital Tenon, GHU Sorbonne université, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Blandine Courbiere
- Service d'assistance médicale à la procréation, pôle Femmes-Parents-Enfants, hôpital de la Conception, AP-HM, 147, boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France; IMBE, CNRS, IRD, Aix-Marseille université, Avignon université, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|