Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study

Risk factors and a nomogram for prediction of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome for superficial colorectal lesions

BACKGROUND

Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) is an uncommon complication after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This study aimed to explore the risk factors of PEECS for superficial colorectal lesions based on the latest and consistent diagnostic criteria and to establish a predictive nomogram model.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients with superficial colorectal lesions who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) between June 2008 and December 2021 in our center. The independent risk factors of PEECS for superficial colorectal lesions were identified using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression analysis, as well as univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression, and derived predictive nomogram model was constructed.

RESULTS

Among the 555 patients with superficial colorectal lesions enrolled, PEECS occurred in 45 (8.1%) patients. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that female sex (OR 3.94, P < 0.001), age > 50 years (OR 4.28, P = 0.02), injury to muscle layer (OR 10.38, P < 0.001), non-lifting sign (OR 2.20, P = 0.04) and inadequate bowel preparation (OR 5.61, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors of PEECS for superficial colorectal lesions. A predictive nomogram model was constructed based on the above five predictors. For this model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.855, the calibration curve exhibited good consistency between the prediction and the actual observation, and the C-index was confirmed as 0.843 by bootstrap method.

CONCLUSION

Female sex, age > 50 years, injury to muscle layer, non-lifting sign and inadequate bowel preparation were independent risk factors of PEECS for superficial colorectal lesions. The proposed nomogram could accurately predict the risk of PEECS for superficial colorectal lesions.

Effectiveness of Strategy-Focused Training in Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal ESD, an advanced minimally invasive treatment, presents technical challenges, with globally varying training methods. We analyzed the learning curve of ESD training, emphasizing preoperative strategies, notably gravity traction, to guide ESD instructors and trainee programs.

METHOD

This retrospective study included 881 cases guided by an experienced supervisor. Six trainees received "strategy-focused" instruction. To evaluate the number of ESD experiences in steps, the following phases were classified based on ESD experiences of each trainees: Phase 0 (0-50 ESD), Phase 1 (51-100 ESD), Phase 2 (101-150 ESD), and Phase 3 (151-200 ESD). Lesion background, outcomes, and safety were compared across phases. Factors contributing to technical difficulty in early (Phase 0 and 1) and late phases (Phase 2 and 3) were identified, along with the utility of traction ESD with device assistance.

RESULT

Treatment outcomes were favorable, with 99.8% and 94.7% en bloc resection and curative resection rates, respectively. Approximately 90% self-completion rate could be achieved after experiencing about 50 cases (92.7% in Phase 1), signifying proficiency growth despite increased case difficulty. In early phases, factors such as left-sided colon, LST-NG morphology, and severe fibrosis pose challenges. In late phases, LST-NG morphology, mild and severe fibrosis remained significant. Traction-assisted ESD, utilized in 3% of cases, comprised planned (1.1%) and rescue (1.9%) methods. Planned traction aided specific lesions, while rescue traction was common in the right colon.

CONCLUSION

"Strategy-focused" ESD training consistently yields successful outcomes, effectively adapting to varying difficulty factors in different proficient stages.

Outcomes in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for large protruded lesions: A retrospective multicenter study

Background and study aims Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly used for treating early-stage colorectal cancer, including large, protruded lesions (LPL). However, the challenges posed by LPLs, especially those accompanied by severe fibrosis or muscle-retracting sign (MRS), remain unclear. This study aims to investigate ESD outcomes for LPL, focusing on factors such as tumor size and, submucosal fibrosis. Patients and methods In a multicenter retrospective study (June 2012 to May 2023), data from 526 patients with 542 LPL lesions (≥ 2 cm) were analyzed. Parameters included lesion size, procedure time, dissection speed, physician experience, submucosal fibrosis, and adverse events. The tunnel method, including the double tunnel method, was used for cases with severe fibrosis or MRS. Multivariate analysis assessed factors affecting procedure difficulty, particularly LPLs ≥ 4 cm. Results The study revealed an impressive en bloc resection rate of 97.8% and a curative resection rate of 78.6% for LPLs. Notably, fibrosis and MRS were present in 25% and 18% of 4-cm LPLs, respectively, and their frequency tended to increase as the tumor diameter increased. One treatment strategy for LPLs was the tunneling method, which was used most frequently (41 cases, 7.6%). Factors affecting dissection speed included larger tumor size, submucosal fibrosis, MRS, and physician experience. Conclusions Treating LPLs through colorectal ESD presents significant challenges, especially in patients with fibrosis and MRS. This study highlights the importance of recognizing these complexities, and that more reliable resection strategy must be established for accurate pathological evaluation.

Nomogram for predicting electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal tumors

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was widely used for the removal of esophageal tumors, and post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) was one of the postoperative adverse events. The aim of this research was to develop and validate a model to predict electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent esophageal ESD in our hospital were retrospectively included. A predictive nomogram was established based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis, and bootstrapping resampling was used for internal validation. Besides, the clinical usefulness of the nomogram was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve.

RESULTS

A total of 552 patients who underwent esophageal ESD were included in the study, and the incidence of PPECS was 12.5% (69/552). Risk factors associated with PEECS (p < 0.1) were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the final model included four variables, namely gender, diabetes, tumor size and operation time. The predictive nomogram was constructed based on the above four variables, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.811 (95% CI 0.767-0.855). The calibration curve of the nomogram presented good agreement between the predicted and actual probabilities. DCA showed that the model improved patient outcomes by helping to assess the risk of PEECS in patients compared to an all-or-no treatment strategy. In addition, the clinical impact curve of the model also indicates that the nomogram has a high clinical net benefit.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we have developed a predictive nomogram for PEECS after ESD for esophageal tumors with good predictive accuracy and discrimination. This predictive nomogram can be effectively used to identify high-risk patients with PEECS, which will help clinicians in clinical decision-making and early intervention.

A prospective cohort study of a new electrosurgical unit for preventing colorectal post-endoscopic submucosal dissection coagulation syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection coagulation syndrome (PECS) is a recognized complication of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); however, there is a lack of interventions for preventing PECS. We therefore conducted a prospective study to evaluate the utility of maXium, a novel electrosurgical unit, for preventing PECS.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective cohort study prospectively enrolled patients undergoing colorectal ESD. The voltage and power of the electrosurgical units were measured. PECS was defined as a visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 30 mm, an increase of VAS ≥ 20 mm from baseline, body temperature ≥ 37.5°C, or white blood cell count ≥ 10 000/μL after ESD. PECS was classified into type I (without extra-luminal air) and type II (with peri-luminal air). The primary endpoint was the incidence of PECS. A sample size of 92 patients was required to ensure the upper limit of the 90% CI for the incidence of PECS was less than 15%.

RESULTS

At resistances greater than 400 Ω, the maXium unit allowed submucosal dissection with lower power than with the VIO300D unit. Ninety-one patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the final study analysis. The incidence of PECS was 16% (90% CI, 10-23%), comprising type I (11%) and type II (5%) PECS. Simple extra-luminal air without PECS was observed in 7% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Use of the maXium electrosurgical unit did not reduce the incidence of PECS after colorectal ESD; however, the maXium unit had equivalent performance to a conventional electrosurgical unit used for colorectal ESD.

Analysis of Predictors and Risk Factors of Postpolypectomy Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Postpolypectomy syndrome (PPS) is a relevant adverse event that can appear after polypectomy. Several publications mention postpolypectomy syndrome using different criteria to define it. The aim of this study is to detect potential risk factors and predictors for developing PPS and to define the main criteria of PPS.

METHODS

In this retrospective monocentric study, 475 out of 966 patients who underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy from October 2015 to June 2020 were included. The main criterion of PPS is defined as the development of postinterventional abdominal pain lasting more than six hours.

RESULTS

A total of 9.7% of the patients developed PPS, which was defined as local abdominal pain around the polypectomy area after six hours. A total of 8.6% of the study population had abdominal pain within six hours postintervention. A total of 3.7% had an isolated triad of fever, leukocytosis, and increased CRP in the absence of abdominal pain. Increased CRP combined with an elevated temperature over 37.5 °C seems to be a positive predictor for developing PPS. Four independent risk factors could be detected: serrated polyp morphology, polypoid configurated adenomas, polyp localization in the cecum, and the absence of intraepithelial neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Four independent risk factors for developing PPS were detected. The combination of increased CRP levels with elevated temperature seems to be a predictor for this pathology. As expected, the increasing use of cold snare polypectomies will reduce the incidence of this syndrome. Key summary: Our monocentric study on 966 patients detected four independent risk factors for developing PPS: pedunculated polyp, resected polyps in the cecum, absence of IEN, and serrated polyp morphology. The combination of increased CRP levels with elevated temperature seems to be a predictor for this pathology.

Prospective cross-organ analysis for the causes of fever and increased inflammatory response after endoscopic resection

OBJECTIVES

Fever and increased inflammatory responses sometimes occur following endoscopic resection (ER). However, the differences in causes according to the organ are scarcely understood, and several modified ER techniques have been proposed. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive prospective study to investigate the cause of fever and increased inflammatory response across multiple organs after ER.

METHODS

We included patients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection at our hospital between January 2020 and April 2022. Primary endpoints were fever and increased C-reactive protein (CRP) levels following ER. The secondary endpoints were risk factors for aspiration pneumonia. Blood tests and radiography were performed on the day after ER, and computed tomography was performed if the cause was unknown.

RESULTS

Among the 822 patients included, aspiration pneumonia was the most common cause of fever and increased CRP levels after ER of the upper gastrointestinal tract (esophagus, 53%; stomach, 48%; and duodenum, 71%). Post-ER coagulation syndrome was most common after colorectal ESD (38%). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, lesions located in the esophagus (odds ratio [OR] 3.57; P < 0.001) and an amount of irrigation liquid of ≥1 L (OR 3.71; P = 0.003) were independent risk factors for aspiration pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspiration pneumonia was the most common cause of fever after upper gastrointestinal ER and post-ER coagulation syndrome following colorectal ESD. Lesions in the esophagus and an amount of irrigation liquid of ≥1 L were independent risk factors for aspiration pneumonia.

Underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors decreases the incidence of post-electrocoagulation syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection (U-ESD) is a recently developed procedure that has the potential to prevent post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS) owing to its heat-sink effect. We aimed to clarify whether U-ESD decreases the incidence of PECS compared with conventional ESD (C-ESD).

METHODS

A total of 205 patients who underwent colorectal ESD (C-ESD: 125; U-ESD: 80) were analyzed. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for patient backgrounds. Ten C-ESD and two U-ESD patients with muscle damage or perforation during ESD were excluded when comparing PECS. The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of PECS between the U-ESD and C-ESD groups (54 matched pairs). Secondary outcomes were to compare procedural outcomes between the C-ESD and U-ESD groups (62 matched pairs).

RESULTS

Among the 78 patients who underwent U-ESD, PECS occurred in only one patient (1.3%). Adjusted comparisons between the U-ESD and C-ESD groups demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of PECS in the U-ESD group (0% vs 11.1%; P = 0.027). Median dissection speed was significantly faster in the U-ESD than in the C-ESD group (10.9 mm2 /min vs 6.9 mm2 /min; P < 0.001). En bloc and complete resection rates were 100% in the U-ESD group. Although perforation and delayed bleeding occurred in one patient each (1.6%) as adverse events in the U-ESD group, there were no differences compared with the C-ESD group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that U-ESD effectively decreases the incidence of PECS and is a faster and safer method for colorectal ESD.

Management of complications related to colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Compared to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), colonoscopic endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) has the advantages of higher en bloc resection rates and lower recurrence rates of colorectal neoplasms. Therefore, C-ESD is considered an effective treatment method for laterally spread tumors and early colorectal cancer. However, C-ESD is technically more difficult and requires a longer procedure time than EMR. In addition to therapeutic efficacy and procedural difficulty, safety concerns should always be considered when performing C-ESD in clinical practice. Bleeding and perforation are the main adverse events associated with C-ESD and can occur during C-ESD or after the completion of the procedure. Most bleeding associated with C-ESD can be managed endoscopically, even if it occurs during or after the procedure. More recently, most perforations identified during C-ESD can also be managed endoscopically, unless the mural defect is too large to be sutured with endoscopic devices or the patient is hemodynamically unstable. Delayed perforations are quite rare, but they require surgical treatment more frequently than endoscopically identified intraprocedural perforations or radiologically identified immediate postprocedural perforations. Post-ESD coagulation syndrome is a relatively underestimated adverse event, which can mimic localized peritonitis from perforation. Here, we classify and characterize the complications associated with C-ESD and recommend management options for them.

Complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer (Review)

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a gastrointestinal malignancy that seriously threatens human life and health, resulting in a heavy disease burden. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used in clinical practice and is an effective treatment for early CRC (ECC). Colorectal ESD is a challenging operation, and the incidence of postoperative complications is relatively high because of the thin intestinal wall and limited space for endoscopic operations. Systematic reports on the postoperative complications of colorectal ESD, such as fever, bleeding and perforation, from both China and elsewhere are lacking. In the present review, progress in research on postoperative complications after ESD for ECC is summarized.

Multicenter randomized control study of the efficacy of SO clip in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). (SO clip study in colorectal ESD): Randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows the en bloc resection of colorectal epithelial tumors regardless of size. Although ESD is minimally invasive and yields favorable outcomes, it is technically difficult and requires a long procedure time. In addition, colorectal ESD is associated with a particularly high risk of complications, due to the thin bowel wall, bowel flexion, and peristalsis.Direct visualization of the submucosal layer by traction of the lesion after mucosal dissection would make ESD performance easier. S-O clips traction lesions toward the lumen, facilitating direct visualization of the submucosal layer, resulting in efficient dissection due to the traction effect and adequate dissection depth. Use of this traction device can contribute to shortening the procedure time and reducing the risk of complications. This multicenter randomized controlled trial will evaluate the usefulness of the S-O clip in colorectal ESD and assess the procedure time and frequency of complications associated with the procedure.

METHODS/DESIGN

This multicenter, randomized control trial will enroll 200 patients at 4 hospitals in Japan undergoing ESD for colorectal epithelial tumors. Patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to undergo ESD using S-O clips or conventional ESD. Patients will be randomized by a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by operator experience (trainee or expert), tumor location (colon/rectum), and institution. The primary endpoint will be ESD procedure time, defined as the time from the start of the local injection into the submucosal layer to the end of dissection. Other outcomes will include the rates of procedural complications, en bloc resection and cure.

DISCUSSION

ESD using the S-O clip is expected to shorten procedure time, reduce the incidence of adverse events, and standardize the procedure. This study may resolve clinical questions about whether ESD using the S-O clip traction device is more effective and safer than conventional ESD.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review

ESGE suggests conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; marking and mucosal incision followed by circumferential incision and stepwise submucosal dissection) for most esophageal and gastric lesions. ESGE suggests tunneling ESD for esophageal lesions involving more than two-thirds of the esophageal circumference. ESGE recommends the pocket-creation method for colorectal ESD, at least if traction devices are not used. The use of dedicated ESD knives with size adequate to the location/thickness of the gastrointestinal wall is recommended. It is suggested that isotonic saline or viscous solutions can be used for submucosal injection. ESGE recommends traction methods in esophageal and colorectal ESD and in selected gastric lesions. After gastric ESD, coagulation of visible vessels is recommended, and post-procedural high dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (or vonoprazan). ESGE recommends against routine closure of the ESD defect, except in duodenal ESD. ESGE recommends corticosteroids after resection of  > 50 % of the esophageal circumference. The use of carbon dioxide when performing ESD is recommended. ESGE recommends against the performance of second-look endoscopy after ESD. ESGE recommends endoscopy/colonoscopy in the case of significant bleeding (hemodynamic instability, drop in hemoglobin > 2 g/dL, severe ongoing bleeding) to perform endoscopic hemostasis with thermal methods or clipping; hemostatic powders represent rescue therapies. ESGE recommends closure of immediate perforations with clips (through-the-scope or cap-mounted, depending on the size and shape of the perforation), as soon as possible but ideally after securing a good plane for further dissection.

Repeated bleeding caused by acquired hemophilia A after endoscopic submucosal dissection: A case report and literature review

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal tract lesions, and hemorrhage is one of the most common complications. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of hemorrhage after ESD in patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA). Firstly, a case of AHA with multiple bleeding events after ESD is reported. Colonoscopy was used to perform ESD treatment of the submucosal tumor, and immunohistochemical analysis was used to analyze the tumor properties. Secondly, literature relevant to postoperative hemorrhage caused by AHA was researched and analyzed, with the changes in activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) before and after operation, coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) activity, FVIII inhibitor value and treatment plan noted. The majority of patients with AHA had no history of coagulation disorder or genetic disease and showed a normal APTT. However, it was found that the APTT value gradually increased after bleeding. In addition, the APTT correction test did not correct for prolonged APTT and FVIII antibody positivity in AHA. There was no bleeding or bleeding tendency prior to surgery in patients with AHA. The study concludes that when repeated bleeding and a poor hemostatic effect occurs, it is necessary to be alerted to the possibility of AHA, as an early diagnosis is essential for effective hemostasis.

Clinical and technical outcomes of endoscopic closure of postendoscopic submucosal dissection defects: Literature review over one decade

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), which enables curative en bloc resection of early gastrointestinal neoplasms, has been an attractive minimally invasive surgery during the past two decades. Large post-ESD defects must be carefully managed to prevent adverse events (AEs). The major AEs comprise delayed bleeding (DB) and delayed perforation (DP), and overall AEs comprise DB plus DP. This review aimed to clarify the clinical efficacy and technical outcomes of endoscopic prophylactic closure for post-ESD defects. We identified studies involving ≥10 patients up to March 2022 in which endoscopic closure was applied for gastric, duodenal, and colorectal post-ESD defects. In the stomach, total rates of overall AEs and DB were significantly lower in the closure than non-closure group. In the duodenum, total rates of overall AEs, DB, and DP were significantly lower in the closure group. In the colorectum, total rates of overall AEs and DB were significantly lower in the closure group. Closure techniques, categorized into three groups (clip-based techniques, mechanical clipping, and surgical stitch-based techniques), were illustrated. Endoscopic closure demonstrated a certain ability to reduce DB after gastric, duodenal, and colorectal ESD as well as DP after duodenal ESD. Considering closure-associated costs, the indications and limitations of closure techniques should be further investigated.

Injury to the muscle layer, increasing the risk of post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS) has been recognized as one of the major complications. There are no reports on the relationships between ESD findings and PECS. This study aims to evaluate the risk factors for PECS, including ESD findings such as muscularis propria exposure.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent colorectal ESD between January 2017 and December 2021 in Japan. The grade of injury to the muscle layer caused by ESD was categorized as follows: Grade 0, no exposure of muscularis propria; Grade 1, muscularis propria exposure; Grade 2, torn muscularis propria; and Grade 3, colon perforation. The risk factors for PECS, including injury to the muscle layer, were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Out of 314 patients who underwent colorectal ESD, PECS occurred in 28 patients (8.9%). The multivariate analysis showed that female sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.233; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.264-8.265, P = 0.014), large specimen size (≥ 40 mm) (OR 6.138; 95% CI: 1.317-28.596, P = 0.021), long procedure time (≥ 90 min) (OR 2.664; 95% CI: 1.053-6.742, P = 0.039), and Grade 1 or 2 injury to the muscle layer (OR 3.850; 95% CI: 1.090-13.61, P = 0.036) were independent risk factors for PECS.

CONCLUSIONS

Injury to the muscle layer, such as exposure or tear, was identified as a novel independent risk factor for PECS. We should perform colorectal ESD carefully to avoid injuring the muscle layers.

Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome: a clinical overview

INTRODUCTION

Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) is a rare complication following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, many aspects of PEECS are still controversial and there is a lack of up-to-date review. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review on PEECS.

AREAS COVERED

The English-language literature was searched for articles on PEECS, with a focus on its pathogenesis, definition, and diagnosis, incidence rate, risk factors, prevention, management, and prognosis.

EXPERT OPINION

Many aspects of PEECS are still controversial such as etiology, diagnostic criteria, prevention and management. The recent studies tend to agree on the diagnostic criteria for PEECS, defined as localized abdominal tenderness and fever or inflammatory response without delayed perforation. Most patients with PEECS have a favorable prognosis with conservative treatment and more high-quality studies are needed in the controversial aspects mentioned above.

Efficacy of endoscopic clip closure for nonperforated muscle layer exposure during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Exposure of the muscle layer during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the esophagus can lead to complications such as fever and pain. Although closure with endoscopic clips is widely used when perforation is a major complication, its value when the exposed muscle layer is not perforated is unclear. Data for 104 lesions in 104 patients who underwent esophageal ESD between 2008 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with multiple tumors, those who experienced procedure-related adverse events such as aspiration pneumonitis, perforation during ESD, or delayed bleeding, and those in whom the muscle layer was not exposed were excluded. The clinical course of inflammation after ESD in patients in whom the muscle layer was exposed was examined according to whether endoscopic clips were used for closure. A significantly greater number of patients had a temperature ≤ 37.5°C in the clip closure group than in the nonclip closure group (≤37.5°C/≥37.6°C, 47/14 vs. 25/18, respectively, P = 0.040). Furthermore, significantly more patients in the clip closure group had a white blood cell count ≤10,000/μL (≤10,000/μL/>10,000/μL, 51/10 vs. 21/22, P < 0.001) and a C-reactive protein level < 1.0 mg/dL (<1.0 mg/dL/≥1.0 mg/dL, 40/21 vs. 36/7, P = 0.040) in the 24 hour post-ESD. The results were not changed after propensity score matching. Closure with endoscopic clips reduces inflammation after esophageal ESD with nonperforated muscle layer exposure. Even if there is no obvious perforation during ESD, closure of the exposed muscle layer with endoscopic clips may contribute to the clinical course post-ESD.

Post-polypectomy syndrome—a rare complication in colonoscopy procedures: a case report

Post-polypectomy syndrome (PPS) is a complication that may arise after some colonoscopy procedures that require electrocoagulation, due to a transmural burn, which irritates the serous membrane. Its clinical presentation is similar to the one of intestinal perforation, but it has a favorable prognosis, and does not require surgical treatment. We report the case of a 55-year-old woman diagnosed with a polyp in the ascending colon, who was admitted for an endoscopic resection. After the procedure, she complained of nausea, emesis and abdominal pain in the right iliac fossa. She was transferred to the emergency department. An abdominal tomography showed cecal wall thickening without pneumoperitoneum. Therefore, the diagnosis of PPS was made and was managed with bowel rest, parenteral fluids and antibiotics, with full recovery. Despite of its low incidence, it is important to suspect this syndrome to avoid unnecessary surgical treatment and initiate medical management right away.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for removal of large colorectal neoplasias in an outpatient setting: a single-center series of 660 procedures in Sweden

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique developed in Japan for the removal of large lesions in the GI tract. Because of the complexity of the technique, implementation in Western health care has been slow. An ESD procedure is usually followed by hospital admission. Our aim was to investigate if ESD of colorectal lesions can be performed in an outpatient setting.

METHODS

Six hundred sixty colorectal ESD procedures between 2014 and 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. All patients referred to the unit with an early colorectal neoplasm >20 mm without signs of deep invasion were considered eligible for an ESD procedure.

RESULTS

Of 660 lesions, 323 (48.9%) were localized in the proximal colon, 102 (15.5%) in the distal colon, and 235 (35.6%) in the rectum. Median lesion size was 38 mm (interquartile range, 30-50) and median procedure duration 70 minutes (interquartile range, 45-115). En-bloc resection was achieved in 620 cases (93.9%). R0 resection was achieved in 492 en-bloc resections (79.4%), whereas the number of Rx and R1 resections was 124 (20.0%) and 4 (.6%), respectively. Low-grade dysplasia was found in 473 cases (71.7%), high-grade dysplasia in 144 (21.8%), and adenocarcinoma in 34 (5.1%). Six hundred twelve procedures (92.7%) were scheduled as outpatient, and 33 of these underwent unplanned admission. Forty-eight cases (7.3%) were planned as inpatient procedures. The rate of full wall perforation was 38 (5.8%), in which 35 (92.1%) were managed endoscopically and 3 patients (7.9%) required emergency surgery. Forty-six patients (7.0%) sought medical attention within 30 days because of bleeding (21 [3.2%]), abdominal tenderness (16 [2.4%]), and other reasons (9 [1.4%]). Twenty-four of these patients were admitted for observation for a median of 2 days (range, 1-7). Ten of these patients were treated with antibiotics, and 6 patients required blood transfusion. None required additional surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD of colorectal lesions can be safely performed in an outpatient setting in a well-selected patient.

[Research Progress in Delayed Bleeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early-Stage Gastrointestinal Cancer]

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely used in the clinical treatment of early-stage and precancerous lesions of the digestive tract. Compared with traditional open surgery, the procedure has a number of advantages, including low postprocedural recurrence rate, the location and scope of lesions not posing much restrictions on the procedure, and quick patients recovery afterwards. The procedure has hence become one of the minimally-invasive procedures commonly performed with gastrointestinal endoscope. However, due to the influence of various factors, complications such as intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, perforation, electrocoagulation syndrome and lumen stenosis may occur. Delayed postoperative bleeding, in particular, may induce cardiovascular and other related diseases due to the insidious nature of its onset, resulting in serious consequences. It is critically important for the further development of ESD that we should acquire thorough understanding and mastery of the relevant influencing factors and preventive measures of delayed bleeding after ESD of early-stage gastrointestinal cancer. We herein summarized and discussed the latest research findings in the preventative and treatment measures.

Colon Polypectomy with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection

Endoscopic resection has become the gold standard for the management of most of the large colorectal polyps. Various endoscopic resection techniques include endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). ESD is a minimally invasive method for the resection of advanced lesions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to achieve en-bloc resection. While, EFTR is more commonly used in lesions with suspected deeper submucosal invasion, lesions originating from muscularis propria, or those with advanced fibrosis. This article reviews the indications, technique, and adverse events for use of ESD and EFTR in the colon.

Performance of perioperative antibiotics against post-endoscopic submucosal dissection coagulation syndrome: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative antibiotics against post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome (PECS) in patients undergoing colorectal ESD.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, parallel, superiority trial was conducted at 21 Japanese tertiary institutions. Patients with superficial colorectal lesions ≥20 mm and those undergoing ESD management for a single lesion were eligible. Patients with perforation during and after ESD were withdrawn. Before the ESD procedure, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either undergo conventional treatment (nonantibiotic group) or investigational treatment (antibiotic group). In the antibiotic group, 3 g of ampicillin-sulbactam was administered just before, 8 hours after, and the morning after ESD. The primary endpoint was the incidence of PECS. The onset of PECS was defined as localized abdominal pain (both spontaneous pain and tenderness) and fever (≥37.6°C) or inflammatory response (leukocytosis [≥10,000 cells/μL] or elevated C-reactive protein level [≥.5 mg/dL]).

RESULTS

From February 5, 2019 to September 7, 2020, 432 patients were enrolled and assigned to the antibiotic group (n = 216) or nonantibiotic group (n = 216). After withdrawal of 52 patients, 192 in the antibiotic group and 188 in the nonantibiotic group were analyzed. PECS occurred in 9 of 192 patients (4.7%) in the antibiotic group and 14 of 188 patients (7.5%) in the nonantibiotic group, with an odds ratio of .61 (95% confidence interval, .23-1.56; P = .29).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative use of antibiotics was not effective in reducing the incidence of PECS in patients undergoing colorectal ESD. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000035178.).

Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends

Most colorectal cancers arise from adenomatous polyps and sessile serrated lesions. Screening colonoscopy and therapeutic polypectomy can potentially reduce colorectal cancer burden by early detection and removal of these polyps, thus decreasing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Most endoscopists are skilled in detecting and removing the vast majority of polyps endoscopically during a routine colonoscopy. Polyps can be considered “complex” based on size, location, morphology, underlying scar tissue, which are not amenable to removal by conventional endoscopic polypectomy techniques. They are technically more challenging to resect and carry an increased risk of complications. Most of these polyps were used to be managed by surgical intervention in the past. Rapid advancement in endoscopic resection techniques has led to a decreasing role of surgery in managing these complex polyps. These endoscopic resection techniques do require an expert in the field and advanced equipment to perform the procedure. In this review, we discuss various advanced endoscopic techniques for the management of complex polyps.

Features of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome for early gastric neoplasm

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS) has become a common adverse event after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and esophageal ESD. However, little is known about PECS after gastric ESD. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical features of PECS after gastric ESD.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ESD for gastric cancer or adenoma between January 2016 and December 2017 were retrospectively investigated. PECS was clinically diagnosed based on the presence of upper abdominal pain and localized abdominal tenderness with a temperature of >37.5°C, without perforation. We analyzed the clinical features of PECS.

RESULTS

A total of 637 ESD cases were enrolled; PECS occurred in 32 patients (5.0%), all of whom were diagnosed on postoperative Day 1. Among PECS cases, unplanned prolongation of hospitalization or fasting period was observed in 15 patients (47%). As a result, the median durations of hospitalization and fasting period were significantly longer in PECS cases (P = 0.008 and P < 0.001, respectively); however, the mean differences were less than a day. Additionally, all PECS cases recovered with conservative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

PECS is considered a common adverse event after gastric ESD. More than half of patients with PECS could start diets and be discharged as well as those without PECS.

High total Joule heat increases the risk of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that thermal damage accumulation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) causes the pathogenesis of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS).

AIM

To determine the association between Joule heat and the onset of PECS.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients who underwent colorectal ESD from May 2013 to March 2021 in Japan. We developed a novel device that measures swift coagulation time with a sensor adjacent to the electrosurgical coagulation unit foot switch, which enabled us to calculate total Joule heat. PECS was defined as localized abdominal pain (visual analogue scale ≥ 30 mm during hospitalization or increased by ≥ 20 mm from the baseline) and fever (temperature ≥ 37.5 degrees or white blood cell count ≥ 10000 µ/L). Patients exposed to more or less than the median Joule heat value were assigned to the high and low Joule heat groups, respectively. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests and logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses.

RESULTS

We evaluated 151 patients. The PECS incidence was 10.6% (16/151 cases), and all patients were followed conservatively and discharged without severe complications. In multivariate analysis, high Joule heat was an independent PECS risk factor. The area under the ROC curve showing the correlation between PECS and total Joule heat was high [0.788 (95% confidence interval: 0.666-0.909)].

CONCLUSION

Joule heat accumulation in the gastrointestinal wall is involved in the onset of PECS. ESD-related thermal damage to the peeled mucosal surface is probably a major component of the mechanism underlying PECS.

Factors influencing development of non-cardiac chest pain after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal neoplasms: a retrospective case-control study of 309 patients from a single center

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used for early stage esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions. Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is a frequent complication of ESD. However, little is known about its incidence and associated factors. This study investigated the pain incidence and predictive factors for pain development after ESD for esophageal neoplasms. We enrolled a total of 309 patients with esophageal neoplasms, who underwent ESD in our center from January 2018 to June 2019. Sociodemographic and clinicopathological information for all patients was collected, and patients were divided into either a pain-free group (n = 156) or a pain group (n = 153) according to whether there was onset of NCCP 24-48 hours after surgery. We made comparisons between groups using Student's t test or the χ2 test. Logistic-regression analysis was used to screen for risk factors. There were statistically significant differences in histories of previous surgery (P = 0.039), lesion size (P = 0.026), operation time (P = 0.009), and postoperative fever (P = 0.001). History of previous surgery (P = 0.043) and postoperative fever (P = 0.007) were independent risk factors for chest pain after esophageal ESD treatment. Chest pain and fever prolonged postoperative hospitalization time (P = 0.005, P = 0.001) and increased hospitalization cost (P = 0.034, P < 0.001). A history of previous surgery and postoperative fever was associated with the occurrence of NCCP after ESD in patients with esophageal neoplasms. NCCP and fever after esophageal ESD increased both hospitalization time and cost.

Optimal definition of coagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Endoscopic clipping closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) did not reduce the incidence of post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS) in our recent randomized controlled trial (RCT); however, the definition of PECS is still controversial. The aim of this study is to establish optimal definition of PECS with additional analysis of RCT based on another definition.

METHODS

In this multicenter, single-blind RCT, individuals were randomly assigned to colorectal ESD followed by endoscopic clipping closure or non-closure. In this post hoc analysis, the definition of PECS was modified as both localized abdominal pain on visual analogue scale and inflammatory response (fever or leukocytosis), from either localized abdominal pain or inflammatory response in the original study. All participants underwent a computed tomography after ESD, and PECS was classified into type I, conventional PECS without extra-luminal air, and type II, PECS with peri-luminal air.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients (84 in the non-closure group and 71 in the closure group) were analyzed. As a result of criteria modification, 21 type I PECS and four type II PECS cases in the original study, which included patients with clear pain and inflammatory response, were downgraded to no adverse event and simple peri-luminal air, respectively. The frequency of PECS showed no significant difference between non-closure and closure groups.

CONCLUSION

Clipping closure after colorectal ESD does not reduce the incidence of PECS regardless of the diagnostic criteria. Either localized abdominal pain or inflammatory response might be optimal criteria of PECS (UMIN000027031).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000027031 DATE OF REGISTRATION: April 18, 2017.

Outcomes of 601 Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissections in a Single Western Center: Is Right Colon Location Still a Major Concern?

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), as a minimally invasive procedure for removal of early gastrointestinal neoplasms, is a standard approach in Asian countries. Outcomes of ESD in Western European countries significantly differ, which makes it more difficult to apply this procedure to daily-basis clinical routine. The aim of this study is to analyze the safety and efficiency of colorectal ESD based on a large series of cases performed by a single operator after finishing the learning curve period in a western referral center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 601 patients who underwent ESD procedure for colorectal neoplasm from January 2016 to December 2019 in a tertiary colorectal ESD center in Poland.

RESULTS

The overall en bloc resection was achieved in 88.02%. Complete histologic resection rate (R0) was reported at a level of 86.36%. Lesions located in the right colon were characterized by statistically lower en bloc, R0 resection, and success rate (73.95%, 71.43%, 69.75%, respectively). In 9.82% (n=59) of cases, the ESD procedure-related complications have been observed. Post-ESD bleeding occurred in 23 patients (3.83%) and perforation in 32 patients (5.32%). Twenty-seven patients were treated endoscopically (4.49%) and 5 required surgery (0.83%). Analysis of complications showed that tumors located within the right colon were characterized by the highest perforation rate at 10.92%. Within the rectum there were minimal number of perforations (2.69%), whereas the bleeding rate was 4.48%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results represent the largest material concerning ESD of colorectal lesions in the West and show that ESD is characterized by a high rate of successful resections with a low risk of complications. Thus, confirming that it is possible to obtain results similar to Asian centers and that colorectal ESD procedures can be implemented in clinical routine in western countries. Nevertheless, ESD in the right colon is still related with high rate of complications, so qualification for the ESD procedure should be very careful and discussed with the patient and should be performed by an experienced endoscopist after the learning curve.

Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is used for treating early luminal GI cancers. ESD is the standard of care in Asia, where it results in multiday admissions for observation. The goal of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) after ESD.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent similar esophageal ESD with a Clutch Cutter device (DP2618DT; Fujifilm) at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minn, USA) from 2017 to 2019 with a single endoscopist. The primary end point was postprocedural adverse events within 7 days of ESD.

RESULTS

Of 96 patients (75% male, mean age, 70 ± 10.3 years) undergoing a total of 140 ESDs, 85 were SDD versus 55 admissions. Of the 55 admits, 53 were discharged within 24 hours, whereas 2 were admitted for 2 to 3 days for reasons unrelated to the ESD procedure. Admissions were more likely to have a history of antiplatelet/anticoagulant use (56.4% vs 34.1%; P = .01) and higher mean American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (3.2 vs 2.9; P = .007). Admissions had larger resections (28.6 vs 20.1 mm; P < .0001) with longer procedural durations (103.4 vs 62 minutes; P < .0001). Among SDDs, no intraprocedural or postprocedural adverse events were seen. Among admissions, 1 (1.8% vs 0%; P = .39) experienced intraprocedural bleeding requiring endoscopic intervention, 1 required transfusion before discharge within 24 hours of ESD (1.8% vs 0%; P = .39), and 1 required rehospitalization and endoscopic intervention within 7 days to address an active bleed along the resection margin (1.8% vs 0%; P = .39).

CONCLUSIONS

SDD after esophageal ESD is safe and feasible. An experienced endoscopist can determine if SDD can be considered in patients with ASA physical classification status ≤2 who undergo resections off antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy and do not experience intraprocedural adverse events.

Evaluation of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using a multifunctional snare: a prospective clinical feasibility study (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The number of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (ESDs) for early colorectal cancer is expected to increase in the future; therefore, cost reduction is a clinically important issue. The SOUTEN snare (Kaneka Medics, Tokyo, Japan) is a novel multifunctional snare developed for hybrid ESD at a low price. If ESD can be performed safely using the SOUTEN snare, the same therapeutic effect can be obtained as with conventional ESD at a lower cost. The aim of this prospective, pilot, clinical feasibility study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESD using the SOUTEN snare (SOUTEN-ESD).

METHODS

From October 2018 to January 2019, 119 consecutive patients (121 ESD procedures, 137 colorectal neoplasms) were prospectively enrolled and treated by SOUTEN-ESD at NTT Medical Center Tokyo and Omori Red Cross Hospital. The outcomes of SOUTEN-ESD were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 137 neoplasms, SOUTEN-ESD was completed in all cases. No cases required conversion to hybrid ESD or to a dedicated ESD device. The mean procedure time was 26.1 ± 14.3 minutes. Both the en-bloc resection rate and R0 resection rate were 100%. The rate of perforation was 0%, the rate of delayed bleeding was 2.2%, and the rate of post-ESD coagulation syndrome was 2.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

SOUTEN-ESD was safe and had good outcomes. Although further studies are required to examine indications for SOUTEN-ESD and confirm the results of this study, effective ESD with this novel knife is feasible. The SOUTEN snare is a realistic option for colorectal ESD. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN 000034299.).

Impact of obesity in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: single-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

When performing colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in obese patients, technically difficult cases are sometimes experienced because of difficulty with the insertion of the colonoscope, poor scope maneuverability, or an abundance of fat tissue in the submucosal layer. Since the association between obesity and colorectal ESD has not been investigated, we evaluated the clinical impact of obesity in patients who underwent colorectal ESD.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 535 patients who underwent colorectal ESD between April 2012 and February 2019. Patients were divided into three groups based on their body mass index (BMI): a control group (BMI < 25 kg/m²), an overweight group (25 kg/m² ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m²), and an obese group (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²), and the short-term clinical outcomes were analyzed to assess the safety and difficulty of colorectal ESD.

RESULTS

No significant difference in the procedure times, en bloc resection rates, pathological diagnoses, or complications were seen among the groups. While the amount of sedative per body weight was significantly lower in the group with a higher BMI (flunitrazepam: 1.75 × 10^-2 [1.27 × 10^-2-2.34 × 10^-2] mg/kg vs. 1.48 × 10^-2 [1.08 × 10^-2-2.03 × 10^-2] mg/kg vs. 1.16 × 10^-2 [0.98 × 10^-2-1.54 × 10^-2] mg/kg, P < 0.001; pethidine: 0.63 [0.55-0.72] mg/kg vs. 0.50 [0.46-0.56] mg/kg vs. 0.39 [0.32-0.45] mg/kg, P < 0.001), a reduction in percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation occurred significantly more frequently in the group with a higher BMI (123 [30.2%] vs. 43 [43.9%] vs. 10 [55.6%], P = 0.005). When the procedures were performed by trainees, the number of cases that required a procedure time of longer than 90 min was significantly larger in the group with a higher BMI (27 [10.8%] vs. 14 [21.9%] vs. 3 [25.0%], P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that colorectal ESD could be performed safely and effectively in obese patients. However, ESD in obese patients requires attention, particularly to changes in respiratory conditions.

Palisade technique as an effective endoscopic submucosal dissection tool for large colorectal tumors

Background and study aims  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the standard treatment for colorectal ESD, but large colorectal tumors remain difficult to remove. We developed a new method, called the palisade technique, by modifying the multiple tunneling technique. In this method, a palisade of submucosal tissue is left beneath the tumor to anchor a dissected specimen, maintaining effective submucosal traction. Patients and methods  The study included 11 patients with large colorectal tumors that were over half the circumference of the colorectal lumen which were treated using the palisade technique from August 2017 to October 2019. Overall resection outcomes were assessed. Results  All 11 lesions were removed en bloc. The R0 resection rate was 45.6 % because of marginal burning of the specimen, but no local recurrence was found after a median observation period of 31 months. The median submucosal dissection time (SDT) and submucosal dissection speed (SDS) were 170 minutes and 23.1 mm ² /min, respectively. One case of post-ESD hemorrhage was successfully managed endoscopically, and two cases of post-colorectal ESD coagulation syndrome were managed conservatively. Conclusion  The palisade technique can be an effective and safe technique for treating large colorectal tumors that extend over half the luminal circumference.

Effects of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection on postoperative abdominal symptoms: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective procedure to resect large superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. In gastric ESD, several studies showed the relationship between postoperative abdominal symptoms and endoscopic treatment. However, the influence of colorectal ESD on abdominal symptoms after treatment is still unknown. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective multicenter study performed to investigate the impact of colorectal ESD on postoperative abdominal symptoms. This study aimed to clarify the association between change of abdominal symptoms and ESD.

METHODS

This study was a prospective multicenter observational trial that enrolled 141 out of 171 patients who underwent colorectal ESD and answered the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire from March 2015 to August 2019. We evaluated abdominal symptoms in the patients using the GSRS questionnaire before ESD and a few weeks after ESD.

RESULTS

Comparing the GSRS before and after ESD, overall scores changed from 1.58 ± 0.58 to 1.48 ± 0.48, and the five subscales (reflux syndrome, abdominal pain, indigestion syndrome, diarrhea syndrome, and constipation syndrome) were slightly improved. Overall scores, indigestion syndrome, and constipation syndrome were statistically significantly different before and after ESD (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In GSRS, a score of ≥ 3 is often treated as a clinically significant symptom. Therefore, our findings indicated that there was no clinically significant difference. For this reason, colorectal ESD does not affect postoperative abdominal symptoms and is considered a minimally invasive treatment. The analysis of the impact of colon ESD on gastrointestinal symptoms UMIN000016914.

Effect of prophylactic closure on adverse events after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has a high en bloc resection rate and is widely performed for large colorectal lesions. However, colorectal ESD is associated with a high frequency of adverse events (AEs), and the efficacy of prophylactic endoscopic closure after ESD for preventing AEs is still controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of closure on AEs following colorectal ESD.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies. The chi-square-based Q statistics and the I² test were used to test for heterogeneity. Pooling was conducted using a fixed or random effects model.

RESULTS

We identified eight eligible studies that compared the effects of closure vs non-closure with respect to delayed bleeding, delayed perforation, and post-ESD coagulation syndrome. Compared with non-closure (5.2%), closure was associated with a lower incidence (0.9%) of delayed bleeding (pooled odd ratios [ORs]:0.19, 95% CI: 0.08-0.49) following ESD. The pooled ORs showed no significant differences in incidence of delayed perforation (pooled OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.05-1.03) or post-ESD coagulation syndrome (pooled OR:0.75; 95% CI: 0.26-2.18) between the closure and non-closure groups.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic endoscopic closure may reduce the incidence of delayed bleeding following ESD of colorectal lesions. Future studies are needed to further illuminate risk factors and stratify high risk subjects for a cost-effective preventive strategy.

The Endoscopy Patient as a Vector and Victim

Patient and procedural factors can increase the risk of infectious adverse events during endoscopy. Prophylactic antibiotic use must be judicious and individualized in the era of antibiotic resistance. New and emerging procedures require high-quality studies to elucidate appropriate risk profiles.

Efficacy and safety of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with sarcopenia

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) has become a common and useful treatment. Although sarcopenia has been identified as an independent risk factor for complications after surgery for CRC, whether sarcopenia is also an independent risk factor for complications after colorectal ESD remains to be clarified. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of colorectal ESD in patients with and those without sarcopenia.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. A total of 334 patients underwent colorectal ESD for 361 neoplasms at Hiratsuka City Hospital from March 2012 to October 2018. The neoplasms were divided into two groups depending on the presence or absence of sarcopenia in the patients.

RESULTS

Overall, 334 patients underwent colorectal ESD for 361 neoplasms during the study period. We excluded 90 patients (90 neoplasms), and 244 patients (277 neoplasms) were included in the final analysis (134 from the sarcopenia group, 137 from the non-sarcopenia group). The en-bloc resection rate was high and was not significantly different between the sarcopenia group [126/134 (94.1%)] and the non-sarcopenia group [133/137 (97.1%)], P = 0.1778). The rate of perforation and the rate of delayed bleeding were not significantly different between the sarcopenia group and the non-sarcopenia group [6/134 (4.5%) vs. 9/137 (6.6%), P = 0.314, 4/134 (3%) vs. 6/137 (4.4%), P = 0.3885, respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of sarcopenia did not influence the rate of complications after ESD. Colorectal ESD is safe and effective even in patients with sarcopenia. Prospective multicenter studies are necessary to confirm our results.

Review on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection focusing on the technical aspect

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables removal of broad-based colorectal polyps or lateral spreading tumors with a higher rate of en bloc resection and a lower risk of local recurrence. However, it is technically demanding. Over the past 20 years, various equipment and innovative techniques have been developed to reduce the difficulty of ESD. The information in the literature is scattered. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive review on the setup and technical aspects of colorectal ESD.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database and systemically reviewed all original and review articles related to colorectal ESD. Further manual search according to reference lists of identified articles were done. The selected articles were categorized and reviewed. Original figures were created to help readers understand some of the ESD techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 216 articles were identified, in which 25 of them were review articles and 191 of them were original articles. They were categorized and reviewed. An in-depth appraisal of the setting, equipment, and technical aspects of colorectal ESD was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ESD is a technically demanding procedure that requires expert endoscopic skills, it can be mastered. With good peri-procedural preparation, sufficient knowledge of the equipment, and thorough understanding of the useful endoscopic tricks and maneuvers, colorectal ESD can be performed smoothly and safely.

A multicenter, single-blind randomized controlled trial of endoscopic clipping closure for preventing coagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Post endoscopic submucosal dissection coagulation syndrome (PECS) occasionally occurs after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), presenting with localized abdominal pain and inflammation. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the usefulness of endoscopic clipping closure to prevent PECS and delayed perforation (DP).

METHODS

This is a multicenter, single-blind RCT. Prospectively enrolled patients undergoing colorectal ESD were randomly allocated to endoscopic clipping closure and nonclosure after ESD, stratifying by institution and tumor size. All participants underwent a computed tomography scan after ESD. PECS was defined as visual analog scale (VAS) ≥30 mm, an increase in VAS ≥20 mm from baseline, body temperature ≥37.5°C or white blood cells ≥10,000/μL after colorectal ESD. DP was defined as PECS accompanied by extraluminal air. The preplanned sample size was 320 patients, and the primary endpoint was the rate of PECS/DP.

RESULTS

At the planned interim analysis, this trial was terminated by recommendation of the independent data and safety monitoring committee because conditional power with superiority was lower than the preplanned futility limit. Finally, 155 patients were analyzed. The rate of PECS/DP was 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-23%) in the nonclosure group and 24% (95% CI, 14%-34%) in the closure group (P = .184). All cases of DP were within minor criteria, and all PECS/DP patients were managed conservatively without surgical treatment. Simple periluminal air without PECS was observed in 16% (95% CI, 8%-23%) in the nonclosure group and 10% (95% CI, 3%-17%) in the closure group.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic clipping closure could not reduce the high incidence of PECS/DP after colorectal ESD. (University Hospital Medical Network Clinical Trials Registry number: UMIN000027031.).

Predictive Factors of Mild and Severe Fibrosis in Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Varying degrees of fibrosis in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) make the procedure difficult. Consensus on the predictive factors of fibrosis degree (mild or severe) has not been established. We conducted a study to identify the predictive factors and to examine the feasibility of ESD for fibrotic lesions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 518 patients who had undergone ESD for 558 lesions from April 2012-September 2018. Patients were classified into fibrosis or no-fibrosis groups, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors of fibrosis. Subgroup analyses were performed for fibrosis degree.

RESULTS

The total incidence of fibrosis was 21.1% (mild: 14.1%; severe: 7.1%). Although the curative resection rate (free margin: invasion depth less than 1000 μm: no lymphatic invasion, vascular involvement) was lower in the fibrosis group compared with the control (80.7% vs. 97.6%), neither the en bloc resection rate (99.1% vs. 100%) nor incidence of perforation (0.9% vs. 0.2%) differed between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that a cecal location, preoperative biopsy, straddling fold, laterally spreading tumor-non-granular-pseudo-depressed (LST-NG-PD) type were predictive of mild fibrosis. The presence of a straddling fold and a protruded lesion were independent predictive factors of severe fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified the predictive factors of mild and severe fibrosis. It is preferable that a more experienced physician performs ESD for the lesions with F2 fibrosis.

Effect of prophylactic endoscopic closure for an artificial ulceration after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial

Objective: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now commonly performed as a treatment for not only gastric tumor but also colorectal tumor. However, colorectal ESD has a substantial risk of complications, including post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome, bowel perforation and bleeding. This study aimed to investigate whether prophylactic endoscopic closure can reduce the occurrence of complications after colorectal ESD.Materials and methods: Patients who underwent colorectal ESD in our unit were randomly assigned to either of two groups. Prophylactic endoscopic closure for an artificial ulceration after ESD was performed in group I but not in group II. After the procedure, the incidence of complications, visual analog scale (VAS) score for abdominal pain, and laboratory findings were investigated.Results: Of the 220 patients (110 per group) enrolled in this study, 137 were men. No significant differences were found in age, sex, comorbidity, medication history, tumor location, size of resected specimen, and pathologic result between the two groups. No significant difference was found in ESD outcomes, including hospitalization period, laboratory findings, VAS score for abdominal pain, incidence of surgical operation, and incidence of post-ESD complications, between the two groups.Conclusions: Contrary to popular belief, prophylactic endoscopic closure after colorectal ESD does not decrease the incidence of complications, and it does not ameliorate inflammatory response and abdominal pain.Clinical trial registration number: KCT0001666.

Management of Complications of Colorectal Submucosal Dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a useful procedure for the treatment of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasm. Compared with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), ESD has several benefits, which include resectability of various difficult lesion, accurate histologic assessment of specimen, and lower recurrence rate. However, the risk of procedure- related complications is higher with ESD than with EMR. Moreover, because the colon has a thin wall and limited endoscopic maneuverability, ESD is considered a more challenging and risky procedure when performed in the colon than in the stomach. ESD-related complications are more likely to occur. The significant complications associated with ESD are bleeding, perforation, coagulation syndrome and stenosis, most of which can be treated and prevented by endoscopic intervention and preparation. Therefore, it is important to know how to occur and manage the ESD related complication.

Delayed Bleeding After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: When Is Emergency Colonoscopy Needed?

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early-colorectal cancer. Although delayed bleeding is a serious potential complication, there is no consensus on the optimal protocol to determine which cases require emergency colonoscopy.

AIMS

This study aimed to assess the risk factors for delayed bleeding after ESD and evaluate the "watch and wait" strategy for delayed bleeding. The "watch and wait" strategy was used for delayed bleeding, unless the shock index was ≥ 1 and/or a moderate amount of hematochezia occurred more than five occurrences.

METHODS

This study included 404 patients who had undergone endoscopic resection for 439 lesions between April 2012 and February 2018. Patients were classified into the bleeding group or the no-bleeding group to investigate the risk factors for delayed bleeding, and to assess the necessity of emergency colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients into the bleeding group and 412 into the no-bleeding group were classified. However, no case required emergency colonoscopy for hemostasis under "watch and wait strategy." Multivariate analysis revealed the risk factors for bleeding were rectal lesion (OR 5.547, 95% CI 1.456-21.130; P = 0.012) and lesion size ≥ 40 mm (OR 3.967, 95% CI 1.003-15.696; P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for delayed bleeding are rectal lesions and lesion size ≥ 40 mm. This watch and wait strategy resulted in no requirements for emergency colonoscopy or blood transfusion, and no serious conditions caused by delayed bleeding.