[Studies on significance of sentinel lymphadenectomy in pharyngeal and laryngeal carcinoma]

The Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Oral Cavity Cancers

Objective

The aim of this study was to establish the effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the detection of metastasis in N0 necks of T1-T2 early-stage oral cavity cancers.

Materials and Methods

Twenty neck dissections were performed in 18 patients diagnosed with T1 and T2 oral cavity cancer, with an indication for elective neck dissection between November 2007 and January 2011. The male to female ratio was 12:8, with a mean age of 54.5 years (range 28-76). Eight of the dissections were performed for lower lip cancer, 7 for tongue cancer, and 5 for floor of the mouth cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was used to detect metastatic lymph nodes. Tc99m radionuclide injection was administered to the periphery of the tumor 24 h before the operation, and a lymphoscintigraphy image was obtained 30 min after the injection. Sentinel lymph nodes were localized and excised on the day of surgery using static lymphoscintigraphy images and a gamma probe. Sentinel lymph nodes were sent for a frozen section examination, and either a selective or a comprehensive neck dissection was performed for each neck according to the results.

Results

After the final histopathological examination of the specimens, the negative predictive value, the positive predictive value, the accuracy of the sentinel lymph node biopsy, and frozen section accuracy were found to be 100%.

Conclusion

Sentinel lymph node biopsy was found to be an efficient method in the pathological staging and management of the N0 neck in early T-stage oral cavity cancers.

Current advances in diagnosis and surgical treatment of lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer

Still today, the status of the cervical lymph nodes is the most important prognostic factor for head and neck cancer. So the individual treatment concept of the lymphatic drainage depends on the treatment of the primary tumor as well as on the presence or absence of suspect lymph nodes in the imaging diagnosis. Neck dissection may have either a therapeutic objective or a diagnostic one. The selective neck dissection is currently the method of choice for the treatment of patients with advanced head and neck cancers and clinical N0 neck. For oncologic reasons, this procedure is generally recommended with acceptable functional and aesthetic results, especially under the aspect of the mentioned staging procedure. In this review article, current aspects on pre- and posttherapeutic staging of the cervical lymph nodes are described and the indication and the necessary extent of neck dissection for head and neck cancer is discussed. Additionally the critical question is discussed if the lymph node metastasis bears an intrinsic risk of metastatic development and thus its removal in a most possible early stage plays an important role.

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Sentinel Node or Selective Neck Dissection

Improved knowledge about the metastatic behavior of mucosal squamous cell cancer of the head and neck made it possible to reduce the extension of elective and even therapeutic neck dissections by sparing selected levels, thereby reducing morbidity. The diagnostic question of when to treat a clinically negative neck to avoid unnecessary overtreatment, even through selective neck dissections, might be answered with sentinel lymph node biopsy. A thorough and sophisticated evaluation of this technique is necessary when defining suited patients.

Clinical patterns of metastasis

In human solid cancer, lymph node status is the most important indicator for clinical outcome. Recent developments in the sentinel lymph node concept and technology have resulted in a more precise way of examining micrometastasis in the sentinel lymph node and the role of lymphovascular system in the facilitation of cancer metastasis. Different patterns of metastasis are described with respect to different types of solid cancer. Expect perhaps for papillary carcinoma and sarcoma, the overwhelming evidence is that solid cancer progresses in an orderly progression from the primary site to the regional lymph node or the sentinel lymph node in the majority of cases with subsequent dissemination to the systemic sites. The basic mechanisms of cancer metastasis through the lymphovascular system form the basis of rational therapy against cancer. Beyond the clinical patterns of metastasis, it is imperative to understand the biology of metastasis and to characterize patterns of metastasis perhaps due to heterogeneous clones based on their molecular signatures.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Parotid Gland Carcinoma

Indications for elective neck dissection (ELND) and its extent in N0-staged patients with parotid gland carcinoma are inconsistent. Therefore, a pilot study was performed to test the feasibility and efficacy of radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in these tumors. A total of 6 patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy, SLNB, and level II-IV ELND. In 2 patients, the latter was extended to level V because the scans had revealed an additional sentinel lymph node (SLN) in this atypical nodal region. In all cases, the SLNs were detected intraoperatively. The SLNB exactly reflected the positive and negative histopathologic status of the remaining lymphatic basin in patients 1 and 4, respectively. One case of false negativity of SLNB could be explained by distortion of the lymphatic outflow resulting from intraparotid localization of lymphatic metastasis. The authors believe that the SLNB could provide reliable information on the status of regional lymph nodes, making it possible to base the neck dissection on the actual presence of the micrometastases and to detect metastatic tumors at unusual nodal levels.

Sentinel node biopsy and head and neck tumors—Where do we stand today?

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node sampling may be studied profitably in series of patients with 1 tumor type, such as breast carcinoma, in 1 anatomic locale. The present work analyzes the efficacy of sentinel node sampling in a pathologically diverse group of lesions from an anatomically diverse region such as the head and neck; however, there are risks conflating the findings in different tumors with radically different behaviors, in the process producing muddled data. This report reviews the head and neck experience with sentinel sampling and concludes that certain tumor types that have a known propensity for aggressive behavior are the best candidates for trials employing sentinel node sampling; candidates include many cutaneous melanomas of the head and neck, oropharyngeal squamous carcinomas, and selected thyroid carcinomas. Despite the growing popularity of sentinel node sampling in a variety of regions of the body, however, at this juncture this technique remains an investigational procedure, pending demonstration of a tangible improvement in patient outcome through its use. It is recommended that studies of the efficacy of this technique strive, whenever possible, to segregate results of different tumor types in different head and neck locales from one another so as to produce more focused findings for discrete types of malignancies, and not group together tumor types that may in reality exhibit different biological behaviors.

Role of sentinel node biopsy in the management and staging of the N0 neck

Sentinel node biopsy is being increasingly used as a staging tool for mucosal head and neck cancer. This review of the literature summarizes the results of research into the procedure when it has been performed in three main contexts: as part of an ipsilateral neck dissection, as a stand-alone procedure to stage the neck for positive or negative disease, and as a means of investigating the non-involved or contralateral neck in tumors close to or crossing the midline. The role of the procedure is discussed and the difficulties encountered are expanded, with a particular emphasis on pitfalls of the technique, caveats, and its potential role for the future.

Sentinel-Lymphonodektomie als Staging-Methode bei Kopf-Hals-Karzinomen

BACKGROUND

The excision of sentinel lymph nodes has a growing relevance in the diagnosis of oral and oropharyngeal cancer in cases of N0 necks. The validity of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) was examined as a single surgical staging tool.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Within the framework of a multi-modal treatment scheme, SNB without elective neck dissection was carried out on 70 previously untreated patients in the same session as the surgery for the primary cancer. Control of accuracy was via observation of the manifestation of neck node metastases in 45 patients who were postoperatively irradiated.

RESULTS

A total of 94% of sentinel nodes could be excised; 9 patients (13%) had positive nodes and were treated with a therapeutic neck dissection (ND). There were 2 neck node metastases as second primaries, all other patients remained regionally inconspicuous (median observation time 26 months).

CONCLUSION

As a staging tool for N0 necks and T1-3 tumors, SNB could lead to a considerable reduction in the number of elective NDs. It could be well integrated into a multi-modal treatment scheme.

Intraoperative lymphatic mapping in cases of midline squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the value of intraoperative lymphatic mapping in cases of midline primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in clinically staged N0 necks.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eleven patients with HNSCC of the epiglottis (2 T1, 6 T2, 3 T3), all of whom were staged with a neck status of N0 using sonography and CT, underwent intraoperative peritumoral (99m)Tc-nanocoll injection (4 sites; 45 MBq), radiolabeled detection and analysis of up to 3 hot sentinel nodes (SNs) during elective neck dissection.

RESULTS

Gamma probe use revealed bi- and unilateral intranodal tracer uptake in 6/11 and 5/11 patients, respectively. In 2/6 patients with bilateral intranodal tracer uptake an SN with an isolated metastasis was found at one neck site while the other four patients were tumor-free in the SNs. Of the five patients with unilateral intranodal tracer uptake, three had radiolabeled SNs containing isolated metastases whereas two had no cancer detected, giving a total occult cancer rate of 45% (5/11). No cancer was found in non-labeled nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative lymphatic mapping correctly identified the stage of metastatic disease. Unilateral tracer uptake represented the pathway of occult metastatic spread in 3/5 patients and the disease-free neck status of both neck sites in 2/5 patients. No patient had occult bilateral cancer. Future investigations should be done to determine whether intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy can guide the indication for unilateral only or bilateral neck dissection in these patients.

Pattern of drainage in sentinel lymph nodes after intra-arterial chemotherapy for oral and oropharyngeal cancer

PURPOSE

Prerequisite for lymphoscintigraphy-guided sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in head and neck cancer patients has been a previously untreated primary tumor to avoid disturbance of the lymphatic flow. We evaluated the feasibility in a multimodality treatment approach to oral and oropharyngeal cancer comprising presurgical intra-arterial chemotherapy of the primary tumor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective study of 35 consecutive patients with primary oral and anterior oropharyngeal cancer T1-4N0 treated with superselective intra-arterial chemotherapy with high-dose cisplatin, SLN scintigraphy was performed on the day of surgery, including gamma camera imaging before and hand-held gamma probe identification of the SLN during surgery. SLN biopsy was performed in 50 neck sides, followed by radical resection of the primary in the same session. Elective neck dissection was not carried out. The pattern of lymphatic drainage was recorded and compared with the literature on well-known patterns found in lymphographic studies and metastatic disease in neck dissection specimens of patients without presurgical treatment.

RESULTS

Drainage patterns of SLN related to different primary locations mapped the mentioned comparison patterns. SLN drainage patterns gave strong evidence that there are SLN in levels 3 and 4 with direct drainage from the primary. After a median observation time of 24 months, no patients had a neck relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that intra-arterial chemotherapy of the primary tumor does not significantly alter lymphatic drainage and that SLN biopsy following intra-arterial chemotherapy is feasible and offers valid results comparable to those obtained from patients without presurgical treatment.

Sentinel node biopsy in squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity and oral pharynx: A diagnostic meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The sentinel node biopsy concept has been gaining support in the head and neck cancer literature during only the last few years, and several pilot studies have been published. This procedure aims to avoid unnecessary treatment to the clinically negative neck by identifying the patients with occult neck disease.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and a diagnostic meta-analysis of all published literature regarding sentinel node biopsies in head and neck cancer until December 2003 using established guidelines. Using the pooled sensitivity rates obtained from the meta-analysis and treatment outcomes from published literature, we created a decision analysis model to identify the treatment arm with better payoffs.

RESULTS

A total of 301 patients with oral cavity primary tumors and 46 patients with oropharyngeal primary tumors from 19 articles were included for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity result using the random effects model was 0.926 (95% confidence interval, 0.852-0.964). The cumulative payoff for the sentinel node biopsy arm was lower than that for the elective node dissection arm by about 1%. The payoffs were assigned for the recurrence and mortality rates only and did not take into account the morbidity caused by the procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The sentinel node biopsy procedure has shown high sensitivity rates in pilot studies for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer across the globe and is reliable and reproducible. This study provides a firm evidence base for forthcoming trials on the role of sentinel node biopsy in head and neck cancer.

Sentinel Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Cancer: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Trial

BACKGROUND

The aim was to determine the reliability and reproducibility of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) as a staging tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) for T1/2 clinically N0 patients by means of a standardized technique.

METHODS

Between June 1998 and June 2002, 227 SNB procedures have been performed in HNSCC cases at six centers. One hundred thirty-four T1/2 tumors of the oral cavity/oropharynx in clinically N0 patients were investigated with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (LSG), intraoperative use of blue dye/gamma probe, and pathological evaluation with step serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry, with a follow-up of at least 12 months. In 79 cases SNB alone was used to stage the neck carcinoma, and in 55 cases SNB was used in combination with an elective neck dissection (END).

RESULTS

In 125/134 cases (93%) a sentinel node was identified. Of 59 positive nodes, 57 were identified with the intraoperative gamma probe and 44 with blue dye. Upstaging of disease occurred in 42/125 cases (34%): with hematoxylin-eosin in 32/125 (26%) and with additional pathological staging in 10/93 (11%). The sensitivity of the technique with a mean follow-up of 24 months was 42/45 (93%). The identification of SNB for floor of mouth (FOM) tumors was 37/43 (86%), compared with 88/91 (97%) for other tumors. The sensitivity for FOM tumors was 12/15 (80%), compared with 30/30 (100%) for other tumor groups.

CONCLUSION

SNB can be successfully applied to early T1/2 tumors of the oral cavity/oropharynx in a standardized fashion by centers worldwide. For the majority of these tumors the SNB technique can be used alone as a staging tool.

Value of sentinel lymphadenectomy in head and neck cancer

The increasing interest in the so-called sentinel node concept, which has recently been adapted to squamous cell carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract, can be explained by encouraging results in other tumor entities. Although the publications on this topic do not yet allow a final judgment on the significance of sentinel lymphadenectomy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, early results emphasize the importance of this new diagnostic and therapeutic concept. The basic prerequisite is a detailed knowledge of the existing method-specific limitations in this anatomic region. Critical and careful evaluation of the sentinel node concept is mandatory prior to its application to other tumor entities. Sentinel lymphadenectomy for head and neck cancer may prove helpful if the indications for its use are clearly defined.

Rationale for Sentinel Node Biopsy to Stage N0 Head and Neck Squamous-Cell Carcinoma

Sentinel node biopsy is an evolving staging tool in the management of patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. This tool provides a more detailed understanding of the lymphatic pathways within the head and neck and the role of these pathways regarding tumor spreading. By targeting nodes that are most likely to harbor disease, a more detailed pathological evaluation of sentinel nodes is possible-thus improving staging by the identification of micrometastases. The rationale behind the use of sentinel node biopsy to stage the N0 neck are discussed within this paper.

The sentinel node concept in head and neck cancer: solution for the controversies in the n0 neck?

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who have a clinical N0 neck undergo neck dissection (ND) even though no lymph node metastases may be detected. With this background, our investigation critically analyzes the value of sentinel lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

Ninety patients with HNSCC, all staged with an N0 neck, underwent intraoperative 99mTc-radiolabeled detection of up to three hot nodes (SN1-3) during elective ND and primary site resection.

RESULTS

Sentinel lymphadenectomy (SN1-3) detected occult metastatic spread in 20 (22%) of 90 patients, whereas failure occurred in three of 90 patients. Metastatic spread was directed to level II in the majority (66.7%) of cases. If only the SN1 had been examined, the procedure would have failed in nine (39%) of 23 patients.

CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymphadenectomy correctly identified the stage of metastatic disease in 97% of patients in cases in which up to three sentinel nodes were identified. If only the lymph node with the highest tracer activity had been excised, 39% of cancer-positive necks would have been missed. Selective ND identified metastatic disease in the additional 3% of patients.

Neck dissection: current concepts and future directions

For individuals diagnosed with head and neck cancer, neck dissection may be performed for therapy or disease staging. The classification of neck dissection and the definition of precise anatomic landmarks have allowed for this operation, and its many variations, to become standardized world-wide. SLNBX shows promise in its ability to accurately stage NO head and neck cancer and may allow patients with no micro metastatic disease to avoid neck dissection. Before this technique becomes adopted into routine clinical practice, however, it must first be prospectively scrutinized in large patient populations. Regardless of the future role of SLNBX in the management of head and neck cancer, currently it is only through a complete understanding of the clinical, theoretic, and technical aspects of neck dis-section that surgeons may benefit individual patients and the head and neck cancer patient population as a whole.

A new approach to pre-treatment assessment of the N0 neck in oral squamous cell carcinoma: the role of sentinel node biopsy and positron emission tomography

OBJECTIVES

Pre-operative staging of the clinically N(0) neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma is hindered by the relatively high false negative/positive rates of conventional imaging techniques. The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of (18)F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and sentinel lymph node (SLN) imaging and biopsy to determine the true disease status of the loco-regional lymphatics.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with biopsy proven disease without palpable or radiological evidence of neck metastases underwent pre-operative (18)F-FDG PET and SLN imaging. All patients underwent whole-body FDG PET and a single view of the head and neck. SLN technique was performed using four peri-tumoural injections of (99m)Tc labeled albumin colloid each of 10 MBq. Dynamic and static imaging followed in the antero-posterior and lateral projections. At operation 1 ml of 2.5% Patent Blue Dye and a hand held gamma probe (Neoprobe 1500) were used in combination to identify and remove the SLN. Surgery then continued along conventional lines including a neck dissection. Histology of the resultant specimen was correlated with that of the SLN and pre-operative imaging.

RESULTS

In all patients SLN harvesting was feasible. In 15/19 patients the SLN(s) and the residual neck dissection were -ve for tumour. In 3/19 patients the SLN(s) were +ve for tumour as were other neck nodes. In 1/19 patients the SLN was -ve but another single tumour +ve node was identified in the neck. This patient occurred early in our series with a SLN close to the primary tumour. (18)F-FDG PET failed to identify nodal disease in all four patients with histologically proven lymph node metastases. The size of these nodes ranged from 12 mm x 10 mm x 3 mm to 25 mm x 15 mm x 10 mm.

CONCLUSION

SLN imaging and biopsy with probe and Patent Blue Dye guided harvest is feasible in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and can predict cervical nodal status. (18)F-FDG PET may be less useful.

The ability of lymphoscintigraphy to direct sentinel node biopsy in the clinically N0 neck for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

This study aimed to evaluate the ability of lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) to direct sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in the identification of occult metastases in the clinically N0 neck for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). 57 clinically N0 neck sides in 48 patients were assessed using the triple diagnostic approach of pre-operative LSG, intra-operative use of a gamma probe and blue dye. SNB was performed after radiocolloid and blue dye injection. Pre-operative LSG and the intra-operative use of a gamma probe identified radioactive sentinel nodes, and visualization of blue stained lymphatics identified blue sentinel nodes. 104 sentinel nodes were harvested from 43 patients. The identification rate was 90% (43 of 48). Of the 104 nodes harvested, 17 of 62 (27%) nodes identified as both radioactive and blue were positive for occult metastases compared with 5 of 42 (12%) nodes identified as hot or blue only (p<0.05). Sentinel nodes were identified in 39 of 48 (81%) patients using LSG. Of 39 patients in whom sentinel nodes were identified using LSG, 37 of 39 (95%) had radioactive sentinel nodes harvested intra-operatively. In patients who had no sentinel nodes identified on LSG, 4 of 9 (44%) had radioactive sentinel nodes harvested intra-operatively. This difference was statistically significant using the t-test (p<0.05). LSG directs SNB and is essential in the identification of occult metastases within the clinically N0 neck for patients with HNSCC.

A needle free system for cervical lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in oral squamous cell carcinoma

The techniques of lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy are finding increasing utility in the management of the loco-regional lymphatics in many areas of oncology. Our unit is currently investigating their feasibility in relation to the management of the clinically node negative neck in oral squamous cell carcinoma. In order to reduce patient discomfort, and to remove the possibility of sharps injury, particularly in the high-risk patient, we report the use of a needle free device for the intra-oral delivery of the radiopharmaceutical. We believe that this is the first report using such a device in the oral cavity for the purpose of lymphoscintigraphy, and that it has significant advantages over the conventional hypodermic needle in certain patient groups.

Sentinel node detection in N0 cancer of the pharynx and larynx

Neck lymph node status is the most important factor for prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Sentinel node detection reliably predicts the lymph node status in melanoma and breast cancer patients. This study evaluates the predictive value of sentinel node detection in 50 patients suffering from pharyngeal and laryngeal carcinomas with a N0 neck as assessed by ultrasound imaging. Following 99m-Technetium nanocolloid injection in the perimeter of the tumour intraoperative sentinel node detection was performed during lymph node dissection. Postoperatively the histological results of the sentinel nodes were compared with the excised neck dissection specimen. Identification of sentinel nodes was successful in all 50 patients with a sensitivity of 89%. In eight cases the sentinel node showed nodal disease (pN1). In 41 patients the sentinel node was tumour negative reflecting the correct neck lymph node status (pN0). We observed one false-negative result. In this case the sentinel node was free of tumour, whereas a neighbouring lymph node contained a lymph node metastasis (pN1). Although we have shown, that skipping of nodal basins can occur, this technique still reliably identifies the sentinel nodes of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx and larynx. Future studies must show, if sentinel node detection is suitable to limit the extent of lymph node dissection in clinically N0 necks of patients suffering from pharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Sentinel node biopsy: the technique and the feasibility in head and neck cancer

Management of the clinically N(0) neck in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is still under debate. Tumour spread to the neck is the most important prognostic factor in head and neck cancer patients. The sentinel node technique comprises the identification of the sentinel node by means of dye or isotope or a combination, and surgical removal followed by histological examination. We have reviewed the preliminary reports indicating that sentinel node identification is technically feasible in head and neck cancer surgery, i.e. in solitary and unilaterally oral and pharyngeal cancer stages T1 and T2 with clinical N(0). However, the existing reports enrole observational studies, thus randomised trials should be considered to gain maximum valid data to prove that sentinel node biopsy has an effect on parameters such as loco-regional control and survival.

The First International Conference on Sentinel Node Biopsy in Mucosal Head and Neck Cancer and adoption of a multicenter trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is a new technique in staging the clinically N0 neck. On June 25 and 26, 2001, the First International Conference on Sentinel Node Biopsy in Mucosal Head and Neck Cancer took place in Glasgow, United Kingdom.

METHODS

Twenty-two centers contributed results on the use of SNB as a staging tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The pathology of the sentinel node was compared with that of the pathologic neck specimen.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixteen clinically N0 necks were included. Sentinel nodes were identified in 301 necks (95%). Of these 301 necks, 76 necks were staged positive with SNB, and 225 were staged negative. The overall sensitivity of the procedure was 90%. Centers who had performed < or = 10 cases had a lower sensitivity (57%), discovering only 4 of 7 metastatic nodes, in comparison with 72 of 77 metastatic nodes discovered for centers that had performed >10 cases (sensitivity, 94%).

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative results of all those who contributed to the first international conference confirm that there is a role for SNB for staging the clinically N0 neck, and it has a similar sensitivity to that of a staging neck dissection.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in SCC of the Head and Neck: A Major Advance in Staging the NO Neck

The management of the NO neck in patients with head and neck cancer is controversial. Neck dissection provides important staging information that guides patient treatment. We examined the feasibility of using a dye technique for staging patients by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBX). We studied seven patients with previously untreated early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and NO necks. Each patient underwent SLNBX guided by an intraoperative injection of 1% isosulfan blue dye. An open biopsy of the sentinel node was followed by neck dissection. We identified the sentinel node in four of the seven patients (57%). The sentinel node accurately predicted the pathologic status of the neck in three of these four patients (75%). In one of the three patients, the sentinel node was one of four histopathologically positive nodes, whereas in two others, the neck was free of disease. One patient had a histopathologically negative sentinel node and tumor metastasis present in the neck. Of the four patients in whom a sentinel node was identified, the negative predictive value for the absence of cervical metastases was 67%. Based on our findings and those of other authors, we conclude that the use of blue dye in lymphatic mapping for SLNBX in head and neck cancer patients is technically feasible but of limited clinical utility. Our literature review also suggests that performing SLNBX with a radiotracer technique or a combination of a radiotracer and blue dye is a promising method of staging the NO neck in head and neck cancer patients and warrants further clinical study.

Considerations in the treatment of the node-negative (N0) neck in glottic carcinomas

Treatment of lymph node negative (N0) glottic carcinoma has raised numerous controversy for decades. Prevention is one of the oldest axioms in medicine. On the other hand, overtreatment can cause unnecessary harm to patients. This retrospective study was performed in 206 patients having glottic cancers with clinically node-negative (N0) necks. The aim of this assessment is to deal with the diagnosis, predictive factors and surgical therapy of occult metastases of squamous cell cancers originating from the glottic region. The examinations were performed in three phases. Preoperative clinical, histological - and in selective cases - imaging were carried out to separate high-risk patients. Intraoperative cases of open surgery after U-shaped skin preparation up to the hyoid bone with direct inspection of jugular lymph node chain (JLNCh) where the neck was staged. The enlarged suspicious nodes were submitted for immediate frozen section. The types of neck dissection were based on the size, shape, number and histological diagnosis of regional nodes. The postoperative additional management was decided according to the results of definitive pathological findings from serial sections of the dissected specimen. Endolaryngeal LASER surgery was carried out in 87 patients based on clinical, histological and imaging criteria. In the course of two years follow-up 2 occult metastases became clinically apparent. At 119 cases open surgery were performed. In 51 patients we could not see enlarged lymph nodes (N< 2 mm) with direct examination, and thus the JLNCh remained intact. In 68 patients elective neck dissections (END) were carried out. In cases of extracapsular spread (ECS) and/or multiple nodal involvements additional radiotherapy was given.

Value of sentinel lymphonodectomy in head and neck cancer patients without evidence of lymphogenic metastatic disease

OBJECTIVE

Only few communications deal with the value of sentinel node (SN) biopsy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Based on the results of 38 investigated patients with clinically N0-neck the feasibility of SN biopsy in HNSCC is critically discussed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight previously untreated patients with clinically N0-neck were staged by intraoperative SN biopsy. After intraoperative identification of the hottest node (SN(1)) and further less tracer accumulating lymph nodes (SN(2), SN(3)), patients were treated by different types of neck dissection (ND), adjusted to the location and extent of the primary tumour. Postoperatively the histologic results of the SN(1-3) and the entire ND specimen were compared.

RESULTS

The stage of cervical metastatic disease was demonstrated by a disease-free SN(1) in 32 patients. In five patients an isolated metastasis could be proven in the intraoperatively identified SN(1), while in the remaining patient an isolated metastasis was found in the SN(2).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative SN biopsy seems to be valuable for the detection of occult lymph node metastases in HNSCC. This method might help to limit the extent of ipsilateral ND, if used as an intraoperative staging procedure to investigate the first draining tracer accumulating lymph nodes (SN(1-3)).

The accuracy of head and neck carcinoma sentinel lymph node biopsy in the clinically N0 neck

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy originally was described as a means of identifying lymph node metastases in malignant melanoma and breast carcinoma. The use of SLN biopsy in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and clinically N0 necks was investigated to determine whether the pathology of the SLN reflected that of the neck.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective neck dissections for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma accessible to injection were enrolled into our study. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed after blue dye and radiocolloid injection. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and the perioperative use of a gamma probe identified radioactive SLNs; visualization of blue stained lymphatics identified blue SLNs. A neck dissection completed the surgical procedure, and the pathology of the SLN was compared with that of the remaining neck dissection.

RESULTS

Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed on 40 cases with clinically N0 necks. Twenty were pathologically clear of tumor and 20 contained subclinical metastases. SLNs were found in 17 necks with pathologic disease and contained metastases in 16. The sentinel lymph node was the only lymph node containing tumor in 12 of 16.

CONCLUSIONS

The SLN, in head and neck carcinomas accessible to injection without anesthesia, is an accurate reflector of the status of the regional lymph nodes, when found in patients with early tumors. Sentinel lymph nodes may be found in clinically unpredictable sites, and SLN biopsy may aid in identifying the clinically N0 patient with early lymph node disease. If SLNs cannot be located in the neck, an elective lymph node dissection should be considered.