Intraoperative monitoring for hearing preservation and restoration in acoustic neuroma surgery

[Vestibular Schwannoma: Factors in Therapy Decision-Making]

The treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VS) has always posed a challenge for physicians. Three essential treatment principles are available: wait-and-scan, surgery, and stereotactic radiotherapy. In addition to the type of treatment, decisions must be made regarding the optimal timing of therapy, the combination of different treatment modalities, the potential surgical approach, and the type and intensity of radiation. Factors influencing the therapy decision include tumor location and size or stage, patient age, comorbidities, symptoms, postoperative hearing rehabilitation options, patient preferences, and, not least, the experience of the surgeons and the personnel and technical capabilities of the clinical site. This article begins with a brief overview of vestibular schwannomas, then outlines the fundamental interdisciplinary treatment options, and finally discusses the ENT (ear, nose, and throat)-relevant factors in the therapy decision.

Understanding the Molecular Mechanism of Vestibular Schwannoma for Hearing Preservation Surgery: Otologists’ Perspective from Bedside to Bench

Vestibular schwannoma is a clinically benign schwannoma that arises from the vestibulocochlear nerve that causes sensorineural hearing loss. This tumor is clinically and oncologically regarded as a benign tumor as it does not metastasize or invade surrounding tissues. Despite being a benign tumor, its management is difficult and controversial due to the potential serious complications, such as irreversible sensorineural hearing loss, of current interventions. Therefore, preventing hearing loss due to the natural course of the disease and complications of surgery is a challenging issue for an otologist. Improvements have been reported recently in the treatment of vestibular schwannomas. These include advances in intraoperative monitoring systems for vestibular schwannoma surgery where the risk of hearing loss as a complication is decreased. Precise genomic analysis of the tumor would be helpful in determining the characteristics of the tumor for each patient, leading to a better hearing prognosis. These procedures are expected to help improve the treatment of vestibular schwannomas. This review summarizes recent advances in vestibular schwannoma management and treatment, especially in hearing preservation. In addition, recent advances in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying vestibular schwannomas and how these advances can be applied in clinical practice are outlined and discussed, respectively. Moreover, the future directions from the bedside to the bench side are presented from the perspective of otologists.

Electrophysiological predictors of hearing deterioration based on AEP monitoring during petroclival meningioma resection

The objective of this study was to calculate the risk of postsurgical hearing deterioration as a function of changes in the amplitude and latency of the most stable components (waves III and V) of the auditory evoked potential (AEP) during petroclival meningioma resection surgery. We retrospectively analyzed intraoperative AEP monitoring results and pre- and postsurgical hearing status in 40 consecutive patients who were surgically treated for petroclival meningiomas. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify the most sensitive and specific way to predict hearing dysfunction after surgery. Patients' mean age was 59 ± 10 years, and 31 (77.5%) were women. Twelve (30%) patients presented with clinically detectable hearing impairment preoperatively. At the first postoperative assessment, four of those 12 patients reported subjective improvement, and eight reported hearing deterioration. Of those eight, four remained stable and four recovered hearing by the last assessment. Wave III latency reached its highest specificity (100%) and sensitivity (71.43%) at x = 143%. Wave V latency, on the other hand, reached its highest sensitivity (71%) and specificity (93%) at x = 124%. Finally, wave V amplitude reached its highest sensitivity (100%) and specificity (79%) at x = 74%. Intraoperative alterations of wave III latency and wave V amplitude seem to be highly sensitive and specific at predicting the risk of auditory dysfunction in patients undergoing petroclival meningioma resection and should be used to determine maximum resection with preservation of function.

Intraoperative Monitoring of the Cochlear Nerve during Neurofibromatosis Type-2 Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery and Description of a "Test Intracochlear Electrode"

Objectives  A decision on whether to insert a cochlear implant can be made in neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) if there is objective evidence of cochlear nerve (CN) function post vestibular schwannoma (VS) excision. We aimed to develop intraoperative CN monitoring to help in this decision. Design  We describe the intraoperative monitoring of a patient with NF2 and our stimulating and recording set up. A novel test electrode is used to stimulate the CN electrically. Setting  This study was set at a tertiary referral center for skull base pathology. Main outcome measure  Preserved auditory brainstem responses leading to cochlear implantation. Results  Electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR) waveforms will be displayed from different stages of the operation. A cochlear implant was inserted at the same sitting based on the EABR. Conclusion  Electrically evoked CN monitoring can provide objective evidence of CN function after VS excision and aid in the decision-making process of hearing rehabilitation in patients who will be rendered deaf.

Cochlear Nerve Action Potential Monitoring for Preserving Function of an Unseen Cochlear Nerve in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative monitoring of cochlear nerve action potential (CNAP) has been used in patients with small vestibular schwannoma (<15 mm) to preserve cochlear nerve function. We performed surgery for a larger vestibular schwannoma under CNAP monitoring with the aim of preserving cochlear nerve function, and compared the data with findings from 10 patients with hemifacial spasm who underwent microvascular decompression surgery.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report the case of a patient with a 26-mm vestibular schwannoma and normal hearing function who underwent neurosurgery under electrophysiological monitoring of the facial and cochlear nerves. Amplitudes of evoked facial muscle responses were maintained at approximately 70% during the operation. The latency of wave V on brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) increased by 0.5 ms, and amplitude was maintained at approximately 70% of the value at the beginning of the operation. Latencies of P1, N1, and P2 on CNAP did not change intraoperatively. These latencies were comparable to those of 10 normal patients with hemifacial spasm. CNAP monitoring proved very useful in confirming the location of the cochlear nerve in the operative field and preserving cochlear nerve function. Both facial nerve function and hearing acuity were completely preserved after tumor removal, and wave V latency on BAEP returned to normal and was maintained in the normal range for at least 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

CNAP monitoring is extremely useful for preserving the function of the unseen cochlear nerve during vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Insertion of intra-oral electrodes for cranial nerve monitoring using a Crowe-Davis retractor

Acoustic neuroma resection is an example of a neurosurgical procedure where the brainstem and multiple cranial nerves are at risk for injury. Electrode placement for monitoring of the glossopharyngeal and hypoglossal nerves during acoustic neuroma resection can be challenging. The purpose of this report is to illustrate the use of a device for intra-oral electrode placement for intraoperative monitoring of the glossopharyngeal and hypoglossal nerves. A 60-year-old male presented for acoustic neuroma resection. Under general anesthesia, a Crowe–Davis retractor was used to open the mouth, providing access to the posterior pharynx. For glossopharyngeal monitoring, two bent subdermal needle electrodes were inserted just lateral to the uvula. Two additional electrodes were inserted on the lateral tongue to monitor the hypoglossal nerve. Cranial nerves monitoring was conducted utilizing both free running and triggered electromyography of the trigeminal and facial nerves in addition to the lower cranial nerves. The tumor was resected successfully. Monitoring of the cranial nerves (including the glossopharyngeal and hypoglossal nerves) revealed no concerning responses. The Crowe–Davis retractor and the technique described allowed insertion of electrodes for neural monitoring, contributing to neural preservation.

Improved outcomes in auditory brainstem implantation with the use of near-field electrical compound action potentials

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes (auditory threshold and open-set speech perception at 48-month follow-up) of a new near-field monitoring procedure, electrical compound action potential, on positioning the auditory brainstem implant electrode array on the surface of the cochlear nuclei versus the traditional far-field electrical auditory brainstem response.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Among the 202 patients with auditory brainstem implants fitted and monitored with electrical auditory brainstem response during implant fitting, 9 also underwent electrical compound action potential recording. These subjects were matched retrospectively with a control group of 9 patients in whom only the electrical auditory brainstem response was recorded. Electrical compound action potentials were obtained using a cotton-wick recording electrode located near the surface of the cochlear nuclei and on several cranial nerves.

RESULTS

Significantly lower potential thresholds were observed with the recording electrode located on the cochlear nuclei surface compared with the electrical auditory brainstem response (104.4 ± 32.5 vs 158.9 ± 24.2, P = .0030). Electrical brainstem response and compound action potentials identified effects on the neighboring cranial nerves on 3.2 ± 2.4 and 7.8 ± 3.2 electrodes, respectively (P = .0034). Open-set speech perception outcomes at 48-month follow-up had improved significantly in the near- versus far-field recording groups (78.9% versus 56.7%; P = .0051).

CONCLUSIONS

Electrical compound action potentials during auditory brainstem implantation significantly improved the definition of the potential threshold and the number of auditory and extra-auditory waves generated. It led to the best coupling between the electrode array and cochlear nuclei, significantly improving the overall open-set speech perception.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques in the surgical management of acoustic neuromas

Unfavorable outcomes such as facial paralysis and deafness were once unfortunate probable complications following resection of acoustic neuromas. However, the implementation of intraoperative neuromonitoring during acoustic neuroma surgery has demonstrated placing more emphasis on quality of life and preserving neurological function. A modern review demonstrates a great degree of recent success in this regard. In facial nerve monitoring, the use of modern electromyography along with improvements in microneurosurgery has significantly improved preservation. Recent studies have evaluated the use of video monitoring as an adjunctive tool to further improve outcomes for patients undergoing surgery. Vestibulocochlear nerve monitoring has also been extensively studied, with the most popular techniques including brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring, electrocochleography, and direct compound nerve action potential monitoring. Among them, direct recording remains the most promising and preferred monitoring method for functional acoustic preservation. However, when compared with postoperative facial nerve function, the hearing preservation is only maintained at a lower rate. Here, the authors analyze the major intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques available for acoustic neuroma resection.

Advantages of the retrosigmoid approach in auditory brain stem implantation

From April 1997 to December 1999, six patients (five men and one woman), ranging in age from 22 to 37 years with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) were operated on via the classic retrosigmoid-transmental (RS-TM) approach for removal of a vestibular schwannoma (VS) (tumor size from 12 to 40 mm) and for auditory brain stem implantation (ABI). After tumor removal, the floor of the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle and the convolution of the dorsal cochlear nucleos were reached, and the ABI was inserted. More recently, an ABI was implanted via the retrosigmoid approach in a 4-year-old boy with a cochlear malformation (common cavity) associated with cochlear nerve aplasia. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABRs) and neural response telemetry (NRT) were performed to verify the correct positioning of the inserted electrodes. No major complications related to ABI were observed. ABI has been activated to date in five of the NF2 patients. Auditory sensations with various numbers of electrodes were evoked in all patients. We consider the RS-TM approach the route of choice for ABI insertion in patients with NF2 and good hearing, offering a chance of hearing preservation, and in patients with complete cochlear ossification, severe head trauma and cochlear fracture, or nerve disruption, or a combination of these. A new indication for ABI implantation via the RS approach is presented by patients with bilateral cochlear nerve aplasia.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in vestibular schwannoma surgery: advances and clinical implications

OBJECT

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring has become an integral part of vestibular schwannoma surgery. The aim of this article was to review the different techniques of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in vestibular schwannoma surgery, identify the clinical impact of certain pathognomonic patterns on postoperative outcomes of facial nerve function and hearing preservation, and highlight the role of postoperative medications in improving delayed cranial nerve dysfunction in the different reported series.

METHODS

The authors performed a review of the literature regarding intraoperative monitoring in acoustic/vestibular schwannoma surgery. The different clinical series representing different monitoring techniques were reviewed. All the data from clinical series were analyzed in a comprehensive and comparative model.

RESULTS

Intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring, direct cochlear nerve action potential monitoring, and facial nerve electromyography are the main tools used to assess the functional integrity of an anatomically intact cranial nerve. The identification of pathognomonic brainstem auditory evoked potential and electromyography patterns has been correlated with postoperative functional outcome. Recently, perioperative administration of intravenous hydroxyethyl starch and nimodipine as vasoactive and neuroprotective agents was shown to improve vestibular schwannoma functional outcome in few reported studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent advances in electrophysiological technology have considerably contributed to improvement in functional outcome of vestibular neuroma surgery in terms of hearing preservation and facial nerve paresis. Perioperative intravenous nimodipine and hydroxyethyl starch may be valuable additions to surgery.

Vestibular schwannoma: surgery or gamma knife radiosurgery? A prospective, nonrandomized study

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a prospective, open, nonrandomized study of treatment-associated morbidity in patients undergoing microsurgery or gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for vestibular schwannomas.

METHODS

Ninety-one patients with vestibular schwannomas with a maximum tumor diameter of 25 mm in the cerebellopontine angle were treated according to a prospective protocol either by GKRS (63 patients) or open microsurgery (28 patients) using the suboccipital approach. Primary end points included hearing function, according to the Gardner-Robertson scale, and facial nerve function, according to the House-Brackmann scale at 2 years. Clinical data included a balance platform test, score for tinnitus and vertigo using a visual analog scale, and working ability. Patients responded to the quality-of-life questionnaires Short-Form 36 and Glasgow Benefit Inventory.

RESULTS

Three elderly GKRS patients withdrew; all remaining patients were followed for 2 years. Both primary end points were highly significant in favor of GKRS (P < 0.001). Evidence of reduced facial nerve function (House-Brackmann grade 2 or poorer) at 2 years was found in 13 of 28 open microsurgery patients and 1 of 60 GKRS patients. Thirteen of 28 patients who underwent surgery had serviceable hearing (Gardner-Robertson grade A or B) preoperatively, but none had serviceable hearing postoperatively. Twenty-five of 60 GKRS patients had serviceable hearing before treatment, and 17 (68%) of them had serviceable hearing 2 years after treatment. The tinnitus and vertigo visual analog scale score, as well as balance platform tests, did not change significantly after treatment, and working status did not differ between the groups at 2 years. Quality of life was significantly better in the GKRS group at 2 years, based on the Glasgow Benefit Inventory questionnaire. One GKRS patient required operative treatment within the 2-year study period.

CONCLUSION

This is the second prospective study to demonstrate better facial nerve and hearing outcomes from GKRS than from open surgery for small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas.

Audiologic outcomes with the penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant

OBJECTIVE

The penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant (PABI) is an extension of auditory brainstem implant (ABI) technology originally developed for individuals deafened by neurofibromatosis type 2. Whereas the conventional ABI uses surface electrodes on the cochlear nuclei, the PABI uses 8 or 10 penetrating microelectrodes in conjunction with a separate array of 10 or 12 surface electrodes. The goals of the PABI were to use microstimulation to reduce threshold current levels, increase the range of pitch percepts, and improve electrode selectivity and speech recognition. PATIENTS AND PROTOCOL: In a prospective clinical trial, 10 individuals, all with neurofibromatosis type 2, received a PABI after vestibular schwannoma removal via a translabyrinthine approach. All study participants met strict requirements for informed consent as part of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Approximately 8 weeks after implantation, PABI devices were activated and tested at our tertiary clinical and research facility. Mean follow-up time was 33.8 months.

STUDY DESIGN

Using a single-subject design, we measured thresholds and dynamic ranges, electrode-specific pitch percepts, and speech perception performance at regular intervals.

RESULTS

Penetrating electrodes produced auditory thresholds at substantially lower charge levels than surface electrodes, a wide range of electrode-specific pitch sensations, and minimal cross-electrode interference and could be used in speech maps either alone or in combination with surface electrodes. However, less than 25% of penetrating electrodes resulted in auditory sensations, whereas more than 60% of surface electrodes were effective. Even after more than 3 years of experience, patients using penetrating electrodes did not achieve improved speech recognition compared with those using surface electrode ABIs. In patients with usable penetrating electrodes, City University of New York Sentence Test scores with sound and visual information were 61.6% in the PABI group and 64.7% in a surface ABI cohort (p = not significant).

CONCLUSION

The PABI met the goals of lower threshold, increased pitch range, and high selectivity, but these properties did not result in improved speech recognition.

Association between surgical steps and intraoperative auditory brainstem response and electrocochleography waveforms during hearing preservation vestibular schwannoma surgery

Intraoperative monitoring of the auditory pathway by means of either electrocochleography or auditory brainstem response audiometry is valuable during hearing preservation vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. A more than 75% intraoperative reduction of the amplitude of these evoked auditory potentials was thought to be related with clear hearing compromise of hearing. We identified 22 patients who satisfied this intraoperative criterion in a cohort of 86 consecutive patients who had attempted hearing preservation VS surgery. The surgical step that temporally coincided with the above event was considered to be the most critical step for hearing monitoring during this kind of surgery. Most frequently, drilling of the internal auditory canal and direct tumor resection were associated with the aforementioned changes, but also drilling of the cortical temporal bone at the very beginning of surgery or the opening of the dura could be implicated. This profound intraoperative amplitude decrease was associated with a profound postoperative hearing impairment in 84% of the cases.