Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care: results of a survey in 2 areas in Germany

Physicians' adherence to management guidelines for H. pylori infection and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a pivotal role in the management of illnesses of the digestive tract. The study aim was to assess the adherence of PCPs to the guidelines on the management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in adults.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study during March-July 2017 using the survey platform of Maccabi Healthcare Services in Israel. The study questionnaire assessed adherence to the Maastricht/Florence guidelines on H. pylori infection and the American College of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of GERD. We sent the study questionnaires to a random sample of 610 PCPs via electronic mails. We contacted those who did not respond by telephone; eventually 180 physicians completed the survey.

RESULTS

Ninety (50%) and 60 (36%) of the responders reported using professional guidelines for the diagnosis and management of H. pylori infection and GERD, respectively. Of the 180 participants, 153 (85%) reported referring patients with suspected peptic ulcer disease to H. pylori testing, 109 (61%) reported referring patients with unexplained iron deficiency anemia and 83 (46%) refer relatives of gastric cancer patients. In caring for young patients who have dyspepsia without alarm symptoms, 127 (74%) reported referral to a urea breath test for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection, and 136 (81%) referral to a specialist in gastroenterology if alarm symptoms present. Triple therapy with proton pump inhibitors/clarithromycin/amoxicillin or metronidazole was reported as first-line therapy by 141 (83%) participants. For GERD, 94-98% of the participants followed the appropriate recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified gaps between the practices of PCPs and the guidelines on H. pylori infection management, while guidelines on GERD management are well adopted. Simplification of the guidelines and exploring barriers towards their implementation by PCPs is warranted.

Barriers for the implementation of guidelines in palliative care-results from a national survey of professionals

BACKGROUND

In 2015, an evidence- and consensus-based palliative care guideline in adults with incurable cancer was published by the German Guideline Program. Barriers and enablers for the guideline implementation of members of the German Association for Palliative Medicine (DGP) were unknown. Therefore, the aims of this study were (1) to evaluate professionals' knowledge, motivation, and outcome expectancy towards already existing recommendations for palliative care and (2) to evaluate the self-experienced competence in five medical key topics presented in the new guideline.

METHODS

A web-based online survey with all DGP members in 2014 using a specifically designed questionnaire including 62 questions was used. Independent predictors for identified barriers were analysed using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

All 4786 members with known email address were invited, 1181 followed the link, 1138 began to answer, and 1031 completed the questionnaire. Fifty-four percent know already existing recommendations concerning palliative care, 8.4% know and use these recommendations; of the latter group, 44.2% do not notice any improvement of their treatment when applying them. Of key symptoms addressed in the guideline, depression was the symptom with lowest perceived competence (63.7 vs. > 90% for other symptoms). Non-physicians and those working in settings with little contact to seriously ill or dying patients feel less competent in almost all symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Emphasis on the high-quality and evidence- and consensus-based character of the guideline should be underlined in future implementation processes. Implementation strategies should focus on depression and non-physicians and those professionals working in settings with little contact to seriously ill patients.

Critical attitudes and beliefs towards guidelines amongst palliative care professionals - results from a national survey

BACKGROUND

Little is known about palliative care professionals' attitudes towards guidelines. In 2015, the German Association for Palliative Medicine (DGP) published an evidence based guideline for palliative care in adults with incurable cancer. Before publication we conducted a national survey among members of the DGP to detect possible barriers and facilitators for its implementation. The aim of the present publication was to evaluate critical attitudes and beliefs which could hinder the effective implementation of the new guideline and to evaluate differences within professional groups and medical specialisations.

METHODS

This web-based online survey was addressed to all members of the DGP in summer 2014. Twenty-one questions concerning attitudes and beliefs towards guidelines were a priori developed to represent the following topics: scepticism regarding the quality of guidelines, doubts about the implementation of guidelines, restrictions in treatment options through guidelines, discrepancy between palliative care values and guidelines. Differences within professions and specialisations were tested using Kruskal-Wallis tests.

RESULTS

All 4.786 members with known email address were invited, 1.181 followed the link, 1.138 began to answer the questionnaire and 1.031 completed the questionnaire. More than half of participating members were physicians and one third nurses. Scepticism regarding the quality of existing guidelines was high (range 12.8-73.2%). Doubts regarding practical aspects of guidelines were less prevalent but still high (range 21.8-57.6%). About one third (range 5.4-31.4%) think that guidelines restrict their treatment options. In addition, 38.8% believed that guidelines are a kind of cookbook and restrict the flexibility of individual patient care. The majority saw no or little discrepancy between palliative care values and guidelines (range 68.4-82.6%). There were relatively small but significant differences between professions and specialisations.

CONCLUSION

The person-centred and individual approach of palliative care does not seem to contradict the acceptance of guidelines. Main barriers were related to scepticism regarding the quality of guidelines and the implementation of guidelines in general.

Effectiveness of lifestyle measures in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease - a case series

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of lifestyle measures in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) among adults attending a dietetic practice.

METHODS

A retrospective case series of adult patients presenting with GERD to a dietetic practice over a three year period. The routine lifestyle counselling for treatment of symptoms of GERD included: not reclining within two to three hours of eating; a diet low in fat; small frequent meals; avoiding dietary components considered to relax the lower esophageal sphincter; and avoiding local irritants.

RESULTS

Twenty three cases were included (12 male). Eighteen, (9 female) were referred by their doctor, 7 (6 female) presented for GERD alone, 7 (4 female) presented for GERD together with comorbidities, and 9 (1 female) incidentally mentioned GERD during a dietary consultation for another disorder. Thirteen participants (9 female) had previously undergone endoscopies, 18 (11 female) were taking medication for GERD, and 19 (7 female) had comorbidities. Twenty two (10 female) reported an improvement in symptoms with 11/18 taking GERD medication at presentation reducing their medication following treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that a more thorough investigation of lifestyle modification in the treatment of GERD is warranted.

[Study of the clinical profile and management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care in Spain]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical profile and management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in primary care.

METHODS

A multinational, multicenter study was performed comprising a 4-month retrospective phase for the screening, selection and assessment of patients who had consulted for any GERD-related cause (index visit), and a cross-sectional phase in which clinical data were recorded and the following questionnaires were administered: the Reflux Disease Questionnaire and the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Impact Scale (GIS).

RESULTS

Among the 24 participating Spanish centers, 2.7% of the patients (95% CI: 2.6-2.9) had consulted at least once because of GERD. Approximately 50% of the patients showed frequent (2 or more days a week) or moderate to severe symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation or chest pain. Although the patients received effective pharmacological treatment at the index visit, clinically relevant GERD symptoms persisted in 16% after a median follow-up of 5 months. These symptoms were associated with a strong disease impact as evaluated with the GIS.

CONCLUSION

GERD represents a substantial burden for primary care physicians. Although effective drugs are used for the treatment of this condition, clinically relevant symptoms persist in a substantial proportion of patients.

Impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on work productivity despite therapy with proton pump inhibitors in Germany

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder with consequences for the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In Germany, few data are available on the impact of GERD on work-related productivity.

AIM

To study the impact of GERD on work productivity despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and the association between productivity and symptom duration, severity, and HRQoL.

METHODS

Retrospective data from randomly selected patients with chronic GERD symptoms, treated by office-based general practitioners or general internists with routine clinical care, were analyzed together with information from self-administered instruments assessing work productivity (WPAI-GERD), symptoms (RDQ), and HRQoL (QOLRAD).

RESULTS

Reduced productivity was reported by 152 of 249 patients (61.0%), although 89.5% of them were treated with PPI. The reduction in work productivity was 18.5% in all patients and 30.3% in those with reduced productivity. Patients with impaired productivity showed a significantly lower HRQoL and more-severe symptoms of reflux disease. In all patients, the mean sick leave attributable to reflux symptoms was 0.6 hours in the previous seven days and 1.4 work days in the previous three months.

CONCLUSION

GERD has a substantial impact on work productivity in Germany, even in patients receiving routine clinical care and PPI therapy.

GERD-related health care utilization, therapy, and reasons for transfer of GERD patients between primary care providers and gastroenterologists in a US managed care setting

PURPOSE

Patient flow between primary care physicians and gastroenterologists in the continuum of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) care is poorly understood. Using administrative claims data from a large US health plan linked with data abstracted from medical records, we examined: health care resource utilization for GERD subjects treated by primary care physicians (PCPs) and gastroenterologists (GEs), determinants of GERD subject transfer between these physician types, and reasons for GERD therapy change.

RESULTS

Within a sample of 169,884 patients, 211,043 PCP-based episodes of care and 40,304 GE-based episodes of care were developed. In unadjusted comparisons, GE episodes were characterized by more endoscopic procedures, on average (50.5/100 episodes), compared with PCP episodes (6.3/100, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with esophagitis had 57.3% higher odds (P < 0.01) of transfer from PCP to GE compared with patients without esophagitis; patients with esophageal stricture had 98.6% higher odds (P < 0.01) of PCP-GE transfer. Patients with endoscopy during a first GE episode had 32.2% higher odds of transfer to a PCP (P < 0.01). The principal reasons for change in GERD therapy were no change or worsening of symptoms (51.7% of PCP charts; 9.5% of GE charts) and lack of response to therapy (51.7% of PCP charts, 26.2% of GE charts).

CONCLUSION

Resource utilization varies greatly based on the physician's specialty. We infer that timely transfer of GERD patients to gastroenterologists when empiric treatment is insufficient may lead to more efficient clinical management.

Attitudes and barriers to clinical practice guidelines in general and to the guideline on Parkinson's disease. A National Survey of German neurologists in private practice

Although much progress has been made in the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), there are few strategies for dissemination and implementation of these guidelines. This study examines the attitudes of neurologists to CPGs and barriers to CPG implementation, with a particular focus on the Parkinson's disease CPG (PD-CPG). A cross-sectional survey was performed in 2007 with a representative sample of 213 neurologists in private practice in Germany. The main outcome measures were the Tunis Attitudinal Scale and barrier assessment of CPGs. In addition, the awareness, applicability, and usefulness of the PD-CPG were assessed. Most of the neurologists agreed that CPGs are intended to improve the quality of care (82.2%; n = 171), are good educational tools (59.4%; n = 120), and are an unbiased synthesis of expert opinion (58.9%; n = 119). The main barriers to guideline implementation were lack of time (39.3%; n = 81), inability to reconcile patient preferences with guideline recommendations (34.3%; n = 71), and lack of awareness (32.5%; n = 67). A total of 187 (88.2%) of the neurologists were aware of the PD-CPG, of whom 163 (92.6%) found it "beneficial" and 173 (94.6%) applied it in daily practice. Nevertheless, only 51 (28.8%) of neurologists considered that the guidelines led to an improvement in the quality of care. However, 63 (32%) favored a special guideline for patients. Qualitative data analysis revealed more positive than negative aspects of the PD-CPG; positive comments included "treatment facilitation", "a stepped therapy schema" and "increasing self-efficacy". Criticism mostly concerned the lack of relevance to everyday practice and the rigidity of the guidelines. Neurologists in private practice have a generally positive attitude to guidelines. The PD-CPG is well-known and often used, but its impact on quality of care is considered to be only modest. Thus, further research is needed to address issues of daily practice in future versions of the PD-CPG and to investigate the effects of implementation at the physician and patient levels.

Advances in roles of prokinetic agents in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is characterized by the reflux of gastric content into esophagus with or without histological changes. Pathogenesis of GERD is lower esophageal sphincter (LES) dysfunction, abnormal clearing capacity of refluxed materials, delayed gastric emptying and abnormal resistance of esophageal mucosa to gastric acid, but the primary upper gastrointestinal motility dysfunction is regarded as the most important factor in general. Therefore, prokinetic agents which can restore gastric motility with increasing of LES and esophageal motility have been developed and used frequently in the treatment of GERD. There are several prokinetic agents such as metoclopramide, domperidone, cisapride and mosapride that facilitate acetylcholine release from the enteric cholinergic neurons through a selective 5-HT₄ receptor agonistic action. It is considered that prokinetic agents have the same effect as H2 blocker in the treatment of patients with mild GERD. Additionally, it was reported that a combination therapy with prokinetic agents and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) is more effective than monotherapy in patients with severe GERD. This article reviews the recent advances in the role of prokinetic agents in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Perceptions and practices on the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: results of a national survey comparing primary care physicians and gastroenterologists

BACKGROUND

Literature comparing generalist and specialist care is accumulating in many disease areas, but very few studies focussed on gastrointestinal diseases and little is known about gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

AIM

To compare the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by French primary care physicians and gastroenterologists.

METHODS

A postal survey was conducted in a representative sample of French physicians who were asked to complete a questionnaire that consisted of 44 questions relating to their usual medical practice for the diagnostic and therapeutic management of frequent GERD.

RESULTS

136 primary care physicians and 91 gastroenterologists participated in the survey (54%). Alarm symptoms were identified more frequently by primary care physicians than gastroenterologists, but the appraisal of their seriousness was less acute by primary care physicians than gastroenterologists. Upper endoscopy was prescribed more frequently by gastroenterologists (64% vs. 38%, P < 0.01). Physicians in both groups mainly recommended lifestyle modification. For GERD treatment, most respondents declared using a 'step-down' strategy with proton pump inhibitors, and only slight differences in drug prescription were identified between primary care physicians and gastroenterologists. Both groups of physicians also have similar perception of symptom persistence after treatment, but satisfaction with treatments was slightly higher for gastroenterologists than primary care physicians (7.6 vs. 7.1 on a scale from 0 to 10, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall patterns of GERD diagnosis and management are comparable between primary care physicians and gastroenterologists. Both groups perceive that GERD therapy can still be improved.

International validation of ReQuest in patients with endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Reflux Questionnaire (ReQuest), a newly developed gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-sensitive scale, can be used to reliably evaluate the effect of treatment on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms.

AIM

International validation of this scale, in patients suffering from endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

In this open, multicentre and multinational clinical trial 840 endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients received pantoprazole 20 mg daily for 28 days. The long and short versions of ReQuest were completed both in the pre-treatment and treatment phases. For scale development an item reduction analysis was performed. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and responsiveness were calculated for psychometric analysis. Construct validity was evaluated by comparison with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and the Psychological General Well-being questionnaire by means of correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Factor analyses confirmed the content validity of both long and short version of ReQuest. Psychometric calculations proved high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.9), test-retest reliability [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient: 0.9 (long vs. long) and 0.8 (short vs. short)], and responsiveness (Responsiveness Index 320.3) of the scale, for which also good construct validity was achieved (correlation coefficient: Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale -0.6; Psychological General Well-being -0.4).

CONCLUSION

ReQuest proved valid, reliable, and responsive in this multinational clinical trial to evaluate treatment response in endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.