[Scapholunate ligament tears in MR arthrography compared with wrist arthroscopy]

Scapholunate Interosseous Ligament Tears: Diagnostic Performance of 1.5 T, 3 T MRI, and MR Arthrography-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis for evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA), in the detection of scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed (until July 2015) using the PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and conference proceedings. Original studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of MRI or MRA in the detection of SLIL injuries using arthroscopy or open surgery as the reference standard were included.

RESULTS

Of the initial 930 published records and 103 conference proceedings, 24 studies (1902 MRI examinations) were included (median SLIL injury prevalence: 33% [interquartile range: 25-42]). Heterogeneity was detected for 1.5 T MRI (chi-square: 47.93, P < 0.001) but not for 3.0 T MRI (chi-square: 8.00, P value: 0.09) and MRA (chi-square: 14.54, P value: 0.34) studies. The sensitivities of 1.5 T MRI, 3.0 T MRI, and MRA for detection of SLIL injury were 45.7% (95% confidence interval: 40.1-51.4), 75.7% (66.8-83.2), and 82.1% (76.1-87.2), respectively. The specificities of 1.5 T MRI, 3.0 T MRI, and MRA for detection of SLIL injury were 80.5% (77.3-83.4), 97.1% (89.8-99.6), and 92.8% (90.2-94.9), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratios of 1.5 T MRI, 3.0 T MRI, and MRA for detection of SLIL injury were 5.56 (2.71-11.39), 23.23 (3.16-171.00), and 65.04 (32.89-128.62) (P value < 0.001), respectively. The results were consistent after addressing publication bias and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

MRA is superior to 3.0 T MRI, and 3.0 T MRI is superior to 1.5 T MRI in terms of diagnostic performance. 3.0 T MRI has the highest specificity for the detection of SLIL injuries.

Comparison between high-resolution isotropic three-dimensional and high-resolution conventional two-dimensional FSE MR images of the wrist at 3 tesla: a pilot study

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the clinical feasibility of high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) isotropic FSE MRI of the wrist by comparing it to high-resolution conventional 2D FSE (2D) MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eleven healthy volunteers were enrolled. All images were obtained at 3 Tesla (T). Delineation of anatomic structures of the wrist, amount of artifact, quality of fat suppression, image blur, and overall quality were qualitatively evaluated. Relative signal intensity (SI) of each structure and relative signal contrast between structures of the wrist were quantitatively measured.

RESULTS

The 2D MRI demonstrated significantly higher scores than 3D in anatomic delineation of the SL ligament (P = 0.013), fat suppression (P = 0.013), and image blur (P = 0.003). The remaining quantitative analyses, including overall quality, revealed no statistical significances between 2D and 3D MRI. There were no statistical differences in relative SI of each structure between 2D and 3D imaging, except for bone marrow with fat suppression. There were no significant differences in relative fluid to TFCC and fluid to bone marrow contrast between 2D and 3D imaging, suggesting that both sequences have similar rates of detection for TFCC pathology and bone marrow lesions.

CONCLUSION

With regard to clinical applications, 3D MRI of the wrist has almost equal potential to 2D MRI.

[Radiological procedures in the traumatised wrist]

Injuries of the wrist are difficult to diagnose because of the complex and narrow anatomic structures. On the basis of precise clinical examination, X-rays, CT and MRI are valuable additional tools that can be used. In the case of bone injury, spiral computer tomography with multiplanar reformatting is currently the method of choice. MRI is indicated for the identification of soft tissue or ligamentous injury and avital fragments or necrosis. Other diagnostic tools for the wrist are currently of minor importance. Technical and methodological innovations allow ever better visualisation and classification of lesions, as well as their extent, thus enabling more targeted therapy. However, prerequisites of effective use include differential assessment and precise knowledge of the procedures.

[Radiological procedures in the traumatised wrist]

Injuries of the wrist are difficult to diagnose because of the complex and narrow anatomic structures. On the basis of precise clinical examination, X-rays, CT and MRI are valuable additional tools that can be used. In the case of bone injury, spiral computer tomography with multiplanar reformatting is currently the method of choice. MRI is indicated for the identification of soft tissue or ligamentous injury and avital fragments or necrosis. Other diagnostic tools for the wrist are currently of minor importance. Technical and methodological innovations allow ever better visualisation and classification of lesions, as well as their extent, thus enabling more targeted therapy. However, prerequisites of effective use include differential assessment and precise knowledge of the procedures.

Current concepts in wrist arthroscopy

The purpose of this article is to review the recent literature on arthroscopic treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs), triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries, intercarpal ligament injuries, and ganglion cysts, including the use of electrothermal devices. A major advantage of arthroscopy in the treatment of DRFs is the accurate assessment of the status of the articular surfaces and the detection of concomitant injuries. Nonrandomized studies of arthroscopically assisted reduction of DRFs show satisfactory results, but there is only 1 prospective randomized study showing the benefits of arthroscopy compared with open reduction-internal fixation. Wrist arthroscopy plays an important role as part of the treatment for DRFs; however, the treatment for each practitioner and each patient needs to be individualized. Wrist arthroscopy is the gold standard in the diagnosis and treatment of triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries. Type 1A injuries may be successfully treated with debridement, whereas the repair of type 1B, 1C, and 1D injuries gives satisfactory results. For type 2 injuries, the arthroscopic wafer procedure is equally effective as ulnar shortening osteotomy but is associated with fewer complications in the ulnar positive wrist. With interosseous ligament injuries, arthroscopic visualization provides critical diagnostic value. Debridement and pinning in the acute setting of complete ligament tears are promising and proven. In the chronic patient, arthroscopy can guide reconstructive options based on cartilage integrity. The preliminary results of wrist arthroscopy using electrothermal devices are encouraging; however, complications have been reported, and therefore, their use is controversial. In dorsal wrist ganglia, arthroscopy has shown excellent results, a lower rate of recurrence, and no incidence of scapholunate interosseous ligament instability compared with open ganglionectomy. Arthroscopy in the treatment of volar wrist ganglia has yielded encouraging preliminary results; however, further studies are warranted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of arthroscopy.

[Frequency of acute and chronic scapholunate dissociation in distal radius fractures. Different treatment plans]

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of acute scapholunate dissociation (SLD) is crucial for obtaining a favorable result in fractures of the distal radius. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of acute SLD in a prospective study and to differentiate this entity from chronic SLD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 120 patients with unilateral distal radius fractures were prospectively evaluated for SLD. Stress radiographs were obtained for all patients on the injured side after fixation of the distal radius fractures. In cases of SLD the unaffected side was examined to rule out chronic, bilateral SLD.

RESULTS

Acute SLD was detected in 13 patients (11%), 11 (9.1%) of whom had stage 3 injury. Chronic SLD with bilateral asymptomatic instability was seen in three patients (2.5%).

CONCLUSION

When treating fractures of the distal radius, acute SLD has to be ruled out and to be discriminated from chronic SLD. While acute SLD requires appropriate treatment, immediate treatment of chronic SLD is not indicated.

3T MR Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System (Part II): Clinical Applications

The gain in SNR that is afforded by 3T MR imaging systems has tremendous clinical applications in the musculoskeletal system. The potential for demonstrating and enhancing the visibility of normal osseous, tendinous, cartilaginous, and ligamentous structures is exciting. Furthermore, harnessing this added signal to increase spatial resolution may improve our diagnostic abilities in various joints dramatically. Radiologists have enjoyed great success in assessing joint disease with current MR imaging field strengths; however, many intrinsic joint structures remain poorly evaluated, which leads to a golden opportunity for 3T MR imaging. The articular cartilage of the knee, the glenoid labrum of the shoulder, the intrinsic ligaments and TFC of the wrist, the collateral ligaments of the elbow, the labrum and articular cartilage of the hip, and the collateral ligaments of the ankle have been evaluated suboptimally on 1 .5T systems using routine nonarthrographic MR images. Because of the enhanced SNR, the higher spatial resolution, and the greater CNR of intrinsic joint structures at higher field strengths, 3T MR imaging has the potential to improve diagnostic abilities in the musculoskeletal system vastly, which translates into better patient care and management. The author's 2 years of clinical experience with musculoskeletal MR imaging on 3T systems has met and exceeded his expectations, and has bolstered the confidence of his orthopedic surgeons in his diagnoses. As coil technology advances and as the use of parallel imaging becomes more available in the extremities, the author expects to see even more dramatic improvements in image quality.

Assessment of intra-articular volume of the wrist: a comparative study between CT-arthrography and dissection

The aim of this study was to compare the intra-articular volumes of the wrist's joint measured by CT-arthrography and by dissection on ten cadavers. A good correlation was found between CT-arthrography and dissection in the assessment of the intra-articular volume of both wrist joints. A volume of 1.34 (+/-0.46) milliliter and 0.97 (+/-0.32) milliliter were found by Ct-arthrography for the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints, respectively. Dissection of the same wrists gives a volume of 1.24 (+/-0.33) and 0.90 (+/-0.21) for the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints, respectively. The knowledge of normal wrist-joint volume is a major prerequisite to evaluate carpal instability without ligaments' tears. We believe that CT-arthrography could be helpful in evaluating patients with suspected carpal instability.