[To resuscitate or not? The emergency physician's decision in the prehospital setting]

Determination of Death in Mountain Rescue: Recommendations of the International Commission for Mountain Emergency Medicine (ICAR MedCom)

Determination of death requires specific knowledge, training, and experience in most cases. It can be particularly difficult when external conditions, such as objective hazards in mountains, prevent close physical examination of an apparently lifeless person, or when examination cannot be accomplished by an authorized person. Guidelines exist, but proper use can be difficult. In addition to the absence of vital signs, definitive signs of death must be present. Recognition of definitive signs of death can be problematic due to the variability in time course and the possibility of mimics. Only clear criteria such as decapitation or detruncation should be used to determine death from a distance or by laypersons who are not medically trained. To present criteria that allow for accurate determination of death in mountain rescue situations, the International Commission for Mountain Emergency Medicine convened a panel of mountain rescue doctors and a forensic pathologist. These recommendations are based on a nonsystematic review of the literature including articles on determination of death and related topics.

Anesthesiologists on ambulances: where do we stand?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This manuscript provides a critical review of the literature regarding the staffing of emergency medical services, with particular emphasis on anesthesiologists.

RECENT FINDINGS

Significant anesthesiology contributions to prehospital care include introduction of new airway management tools and improved physiological monitoring. Contributions to quality of care include patient benefit in terms of life years gained and a specific reduction in mortality from acute myocardial infarction. Intuitive concepts regarding the advantage of anesthesiologists in intubation mishaps and management of the failed airway have yet to be proven. Personnel limitations may be regional, necessitating local evaluation of anesthesiologist availability to staff ambulances. Since a major part of cost-effectiveness research is performed in the US where only paramedics staff ambulances, insufficient data exist regarding the financial implications of such practice. Burnout may be an important factor for deciding whether anesthesiologists should work in the operating room or ambulances or on an alternate basis.

SUMMARY

Further research should be performed to evaluate the clinical and financial implications of staffing ambulances with anesthesiologists or other physicians. Randomized controlled studies using standardized intubation techniques are necessary to examine whether prehospital airway management is improved when delivered by anesthesiologists.