[Counselling, genetic testing and prevention in women with hereditary breast- and ovarian cancer. Interdisciplinary recommendations of the consortium "Hereditary Breast- and Ovarian Cancer" of the German Cancer AiD]

Psychological Distress and Coping Ability of Women at High Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer before Undergoing Genetic Counseling-An Exploratory Study from Germany

Carriers of pathogenic variants causing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) are confronted with a high risk to develop malignancies early in life. The present study aimed to determine the type of psychological distress and coping ability in women with a suspicion of HBOC. In particular, we were interested if the self-assessed genetic risk had an influence on health concerns and coping ability. Using a questionnaire established by the German HBOC Consortium, we investigated 255 women with breast cancer and 161 healthy women before they were seen for genetic counseling. The group of healthy women was divided into groups of high and low self-assessed risk. In our study, healthy women with a high self-assessed risk stated the highest stress level and worries about their health and future. A quarter of the women requested psychological support. Overall, only few women (4–11%) stated that they did not feel able to cope with the genetic test result. More women (11–23%, highest values in the low-risk group) worried about the coping ability of relatives. The results of our exploratory study demonstrate that the women, who presented at the Department of Human Genetics, Hanover Medical School, Germany were aware of their genetic risk and had severe concerns about their future health, but still felt able to cope with the genetic test result.

Detected, yet not Diagnosed - Breast Cancer Screening with MRI Mammography in High-Risk Women

BACKGROUND: MRI has been demonstrated to be the most sensitive imaging method for detecting breast cancer in women at high risk, allowing depiction of cancers that are occult on mammography, ultrasound and clinical breast examination. This high sensitivity is tempered by imperfect specificity due to overlap in the features of benign and malignant lesions. CASE: We present the case of a young BRCA2 mutation carrier whose breast cancer could have been diagnosed 2 years earlier; this is a rare case of a false-negative finding in MRI. DISCUSSION: We discuss morphological, physiological and psychological reasons for underestimation of MRI sets, especially in young women. CONCLUSION: We conclude that double reading in MR screening for breast cancer in high-risk women, as conducted for mammography screening, could be considered.

Genetic testing for familial/hereditary breast cancer-comparison of guidelines and recommendations from the UK, France, the Netherlands and Germany

In this review, the national guidelines and recommendations for genetic testing for familial/hereditary breast cancer from the UK, France, the Netherlands and Germany were evaluated as to the inclusion criteria for genetic testing. In all four countries, access to genetic testing relies basically on the family history of breast and ovarian cancer. Similarities are obvious for most selection criteria. All four guidelines recommend embedding genetic testing within a framework of genetic counselling, and all agree to perform genetic testing first in an affected person. However, there are differences regarding the thresholds based on certain familial constellations, detailed description of selection criteria, the degree of relatedness between affected individuals and the counsellee, the age of diagnosis, the individual history of early onset breast cancer, bilateral breast cancer, the tumour morphology or the access to intensified surveillance. These differences and open questions not covered by the guidelines, e.g. on how to deal with phenocopies, unclassified variants, genetic variants in newly identified breast cancer susceptibility genes or with family constellations not fitting the criteria, are discussed. New evidence is usually slowly integrated into the guidelines. An exchange process towards the harmonization of the guidelines will ensure high quality health care across Europe.

Histopathological criteria and selection algorithms for BRCA1 genetic testing

To ensure targeted treatment, it would be useful to know at the time of diagnosis whether a BRCA mutation is causally related to an individual breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate in an unselected series of breast cancer patients the value of incorporating morphological and immunohistochemical features for the selection of patients who may benefit from BRCA1 genetic testing. In a retrospective approach, histopathological results of tumors from 897 women were reevaluated regarding age at diagnosis, subtype of cancer, tumor grade, and estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and Her2/neu receptor status, as well as p53 and Ki67 status. In all, 142 tumors fulfilled morphological criteria indicative of a BRCA1 mutation. Of the 59 women willing to participate, 26 women concomitantly showed a positive family history. Pathogenic BRCA1 germline mutations were detected in 7 of 18 women (39%) (95% confidence interval = 0.17-0.64). All BRCA1-associated tumors were of high grade, invasive-ductal subtype, and PR and Her2/neu negative, and 91% of the tumors were negative for ER; 60% of the tumors showed a high expression of p53 and 60% a high expression of Ki67. There was a significant difference with respect to grading (P = 0.001 for G3), ER negativity (P = 0.0075), Ki67 > or = 65% (P = 0.0039), and triple negativity (i.e., ER(-), PR(-), Her2/neu(-)) (P = 0.0019) between tumors of mutation carriers and noncarriers.

Identification of Novel Susceptibility Genes for Breast Cancer - Genome-Wide Association Studies or Evaluation of Candidate Genes?

To determine the genetic components that constitute polygenic traits in familial or sporadic breast cancer, low-risk variants on the one hand and mutations conferring moderate penetrance on the other hand have to be identified. While members of the latter group were found by comprehensive screening of candidate genes which are, like the 2 highly penetrant genes BRCA1/BRCA2, located in the DNA repair pathway, the development of novel techniques was urgently needed to identify low-risk variants. The hybridization of chips which contain several hundred thousand single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with several thousand DNAs from either sporadic breast cancer cases or healthy controls (genome-wide association study, GWAS) has already led to the detection of at least 8 low-risk variants, conferring odds ratios of 1.06-1.64. As they are common in the population, it is likely that extended GWAS will develop a genetic pattern that is able to discriminate women suitable or not for population screening programs.

Breast cancer susceptibility: current knowledge and implications for genetic counselling

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women in the Western world. Except for the high breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers as well as the risk for breast cancer in certain rare syndromes caused by mutations in TP53, STK11, PTEN, CDH1, NF1 or NBN, familial clustering of breast cancer remains largely unexplained. Despite significant efforts, BRCA3 could not be identified, but several reports have recently been published on genes involved in DNA repair and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with an increased breast cancer risk. Although candidate gene approaches demonstrated moderately increased breast cancer risks for rare mutations in genes involved in DNA repair (ATM, CHEK2, BRIP1, PALB2 and RAD50), genome-wide association studies identified several SNPs as low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility polymorphisms within genes as well as in chromosomal loci with no known genes (FGFR2, TOX3, LSP1, MAP3K1, TGFB1, 2q35 and 8q). Some of these low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility polymorphisms also act as modifier genes in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers. This review not only outlines the recent key developments and potential clinical benefit for preventive management and therapy but also discusses the current limitations of genetic testing of variants associated with intermediate and low breast cancer risk.

Gross rearrangements in BRCA1 but not BRCA2 play a notable role in predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer in high-risk families of German origin

A total of 226 index cases from high-risk hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families of German origin who had tested negative for small nucleotide alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were analyzed for gross genomic rearrangements at the two gene loci by the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technique. Six large genomic alterations were identified in BRCA1, while no gross rearrangements were found in BRCA2. The six BRCA1 mutations included two novel mutations including a deletion of exon 5, and a deletion comprising exons 5-7, as well as three distinct gross alterations previously reported, including a deletion of exons 1A, 1B, and 2, two duplications of exon 13, and a deletion of exon 17. To understand the mechanisms underlying the genomic rearrangements within the BRCA1 gene and to provide a simple PCR-based assay for further diagnostic applications, we have defined the molecular breakpoints of the deletion/insertion mutations. In all cases, our data point to a mechanism by which illegitimate crossing over between stretches of direct repeat sequences as small as 9 base pairs (bp) and up to 188 bp may have occurred. Overall, we provide evidence that gross rearrangements within the BRCA1 gene locus may be as frequent as 3% in primarily mutation-negative tested high-risk familial breast and ovarian cancer of German ancestry, while large alterations involving the BRCA2 locus do not appear to play a significant role in disease etiology. These findings have important implications for genetic counseling and testing of high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families.