3
|
Martins BDC, Retes FA, Medrado BF, de Lima MS, Pennacchi CMPS, Kawaguti FS, Safatle-Ribeiro AV, Uemura RS, Maluf-Filho F. Endoscopic management and prevention of migrated esophageal stents. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014. [PMID: 24567792 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i2.49.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of self-expandable metallic stents has increased recently to palliate inoperable esophageal neoplasia and also in the management of benign strictures. Migration is one of the most common complications after stent placement and the endoscopist should be able to recognize and manage this situation. Several techniques for managing migrated stents have been described, as well as new techniques for preventing stent migration. Most stents have a "lasso" at the upper flange which facilitates stent repositioning or removal. An overtube, endoloop and large polypectomy snare may be useful for the retrieval of stents migrated into the stomach. External fixation of the stent with Shim's technique is efficient in preventing stent migration. Suturing the stent to the esophageal wall, new stent designs with larger flanges and double-layered stents are promising techniques to prevent stent migration but they warrant validation in a larger cohort of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno da Costa Martins
- Bruno da Costa Martins, Felipe Alves Retes, Bruno Frederico Medrado, Marcelo Simas de Lima, Caterina Maria Pia Simione Pennacchi, Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro, Ricardo Sato Uemura, Fauze Maluf-Filho, Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Division, Cancer Institute of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Felipe Alves Retes
- Bruno da Costa Martins, Felipe Alves Retes, Bruno Frederico Medrado, Marcelo Simas de Lima, Caterina Maria Pia Simione Pennacchi, Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro, Ricardo Sato Uemura, Fauze Maluf-Filho, Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Division, Cancer Institute of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Bruno Frederico Medrado
- Bruno da Costa Martins, Felipe Alves Retes, Bruno Frederico Medrado, Marcelo Simas de Lima, Caterina Maria Pia Simione Pennacchi, Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro, Ricardo Sato Uemura, Fauze Maluf-Filho, Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Division, Cancer Institute of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Simas de Lima
- Bruno da Costa Martins, Felipe Alves Retes, Bruno Frederico Medrado, Marcelo Simas de Lima, Caterina Maria Pia Simione Pennacchi, Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro, Ricardo Sato Uemura, Fauze Maluf-Filho, Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Division, Cancer Institute of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Caterina Maria Pia Simione Pennacchi
- Bruno da Costa Martins, Felipe Alves Retes, Bruno Frederico Medrado, Marcelo Simas de Lima, Caterina Maria Pia Simione Pennacchi, Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro, Ricardo Sato Uemura, Fauze Maluf-Filho, Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Division, Cancer Institute of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti
- Bruno da Costa Martins, Felipe Alves Retes, Bruno Frederico Medrado, Marcelo Simas de Lima, Caterina Maria Pia Simione Pennacchi, Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro, Ricardo Sato Uemura, Fauze Maluf-Filho, Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Division, Cancer Institute of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro
- Bruno da Costa Martins, Felipe Alves Retes, Bruno Frederico Medrado, Marcelo Simas de Lima, Caterina Maria Pia Simione Pennacchi, Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro, Ricardo Sato Uemura, Fauze Maluf-Filho, Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Division, Cancer Institute of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Sato Uemura
- Bruno da Costa Martins, Felipe Alves Retes, Bruno Frederico Medrado, Marcelo Simas de Lima, Caterina Maria Pia Simione Pennacchi, Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro, Ricardo Sato Uemura, Fauze Maluf-Filho, Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Division, Cancer Institute of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Fauze Maluf-Filho
- Bruno da Costa Martins, Felipe Alves Retes, Bruno Frederico Medrado, Marcelo Simas de Lima, Caterina Maria Pia Simione Pennacchi, Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro, Ricardo Sato Uemura, Fauze Maluf-Filho, Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Division, Cancer Institute of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paganin F, Schouler L, Cuissard L, Noel JB, Becquart JP, Besnard M, Verdier L, Rousseau D, Arvin-Berod C, Bourdin A. Airway and esophageal stenting in patients with advanced esophageal cancer and pulmonary involvement. PLoS One 2008; 3:e3101. [PMID: 18769726 PMCID: PMC2518104 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2008] [Accepted: 07/23/2008] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Most inoperable patients with esophageal-advanced cancer (EGC) have a poor prognosis. Esophageal stenting, as part of a palliative therapy management has dramatically improved the quality of live of EGC patients. Airway stenting is generally proposed in case of esophageal stent complication, with a high failure rate. The study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of scheduled and non-scheduled airway stenting in case of indicated esophageal stenting for EGC. Methods and Findings The study is an observational study conducted in pulmonary and gastroenterology endoscopy units. Consecutive patients with EGC were referred to endoscopy units. We analyzed the outcome of airway stenting in patients with esophageal stent indication admitted in emergency or with a scheduled intervention. Forty-four patients (58±\−8 years of age) with esophageal stenting indication were investigated. Seven patients (group 1) were admitted in emergency due to esophageal stent complication in the airway (4 fistulas, 3 cases with malignant infiltration and compression). Airway stenting failed for 5 patients. Thirty-seven remaining patients had a scheduled stenting procedure (group 2): stent was inserted for 13 patients with tracheal or bronchial malignant infiltration, 12 patients with fistulas, and 12 patients with airway extrinsic compression (preventive indication). Stenting the airway was well tolerated. Life-threatening complications were related to group 1. Overall mean survival was 26+/−10 weeks and was significantly shorter in group 1 (6+/−7.6 weeks) than in group 2 (28+/−11 weeks), p<0.001). Scheduled double stenting significantly improved symptoms (95% at day 7) with a low complication rate (13%), and achieved a specific cancer treatment (84%) in most cases. Conclusion Stenting the airway should always be considered in case of esophageal stent indication. A multidisciplinary approach with initial airway evaluation improved prognosis and decreased airways complications related to esophageal stent. Emergency procedures were rarely efficient in our experience.
Collapse
|
7
|
Solt J, Sarlós G, Tabár B, Bertalan A. Treatment of large, oesophageal perforations and mediastinitis with a covered, removable metallic endoprosthesis and mediastinal drainage. Orv Hetil 2007; 148:1601-7. [PMID: 17702689 DOI: 10.1556/oh.2007.28053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
A bevont fémstentek benignus nyelőcső-stenosisban és -perforatioban való alkalmazása, a stent okozta szöveti reakció és a stent eltávolítás nehézségei miatt, kezdeti stádiumban van. A szerzők nyelőcső-perforatioban egy újabb, bevont fémstent terápiás hatását és eltávolítására kidolgozott módszerük hatékonyságát vizsgálták 3 beteg kapcsán. Három beteg közül kettőnél corrosiv nyelőcsőstenosis tágításakor perforatio lépett fel. Emiatt az egyiknél mediastinalis drenázs és jejunostomia, másiknál primér sutura és drenázs történt. Ezt követően mindkettőben septicus állapot, mediastinitis alakult ki. Ennek hátterében egyiknél perforatio mellett mediastinalis drén okozta nyelőcsőfistula, a másiknál nyelőcsővarrat-elégtelenség állt. A nyelőcső falának defektusát 8, illetve 10 nappal a perforatio, műtét után bevont fémstenttel hidalták át. A harmadik beteg inoperabilis nyelőcsőtumora okozta stenosisának tágítása, stentelési kísérlete során nyelőcsőruptura lépett fel, melyet két órán belül bevont fémstenttel zárta. Parenteralis táplálást, széles spectrumú antibioticus kezelést alkalmaztak. Három nap múlva ellenőrizve mindhárom stent tölcsére tökéletesen zárt. Nasogastricus szonda-, majd per os táplálásra tértek át. Átmeneti mediastinalis drenázs után a stenteket 35, illetve 74 nappal a stentimplantatio után endoscoposan távolították el. Ez idő alatt a nyelőcsőfal-defectusok, a perforatios nyílások záródtak. A stent felső szélénél jelentkező stenosist mindkét betegnél tágították. A 3. betegnél a tumoros nyelőcsőruptura korai, végleges stentelése után szövődmény nem lépett fel. Itt drenázsra nem volt szükség. Nagy nyelőcső-perforatio – kísérő septicus állapot, mediastinitis esetén is – sikeresen gyógyítható bevont, eltávolítható fémstenttel és megfelelő mediastinalis drenázzsal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeno Solt
- Baranya Megyei Kórház Gasztroenterológiai Osztály, Pécs.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Verschuur EML, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD. Effect of stent size on complications and recurrent dysphagia in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65:592-601. [PMID: 17383456 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2006] [Accepted: 12/11/2006] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stents are commonly used for the palliation of dysphagia from esophageal or gastric cardia cancer. A major drawback of stents is the occurrence of recurrent dysphagia. Large-diameter stents were introduced for the prevention of migration but may be associated with more complications. OBJECTIVE To compare small- and large-diameter stents for improvement of dysphagia, complications, and recurrent dysphagia. DESIGN Evaluation of 338 prospectively followed patients with dysphagia from obstructing esophageal or gastric cardia cancer who were treated with an Ultraflex stent (n = 153), a Gianturco Z-stent (n = 89), or a Flamingo Wallstent (n = 96) of either a small diameter (n = 265) or a large diameter (n = 73) during the period 1996 to 2004. SETTING Single academic center. PATIENTS Patients with an inoperable malignant obstruction of the esophagus or the gastric cardia, or recurrent dysphagia after prior radiation, with curative or palliative intent for esophageal cancer. INTERVENTIONS Stent placement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Dysphagia score (on a scale from 0 [no dysphagia] to 4 [complete dysphagia]), complications, and recurrent dysphagia. Analysis was by chi2 test, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Improvement in dysphagia was similar between patients with a small- or a large-diameter stent (P = .35). The occurrence of major complications, such as hemorrhage, perforation, fistula, and fever, was increased in patients with a large-diameter Gianturco Z-stent compared with those treated with a small-diameter stent (4 [40%] vs 16 [20%]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-19.11) but not in patients with a large-diameter Ultraflex stent or a Flamingo Wallstent. Moreover, minor complications, particularly pain, were associated with prior radiation and/or chemotherapy in patients with a large- or a small-diameter Gianturco Z-stent (HR 4.27, 95% CI 1.44-12.71) but not in those with an Ultraflex stent or a Flamingo Wallstent. Dysphagia from stent migration, tissue overgrowth, and food bolus obstruction reoccurred more frequently in patients with a small-diameter stent than in those with a large-diameter stent (Ultraflex stent: 54 [42%] vs 3 [13%], adjusted HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.74; Gianturco Z-stent: 21 [27%] vs 1 [10%], adjusted HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.11-8.67; and Flamingo Wallstent: 21 [37%] vs 6 [15%], adjusted HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.03-4.79). LIMITATIONS Nonrandomized study design. CONCLUSIONS Large-diameter stents reduce the risk of recurrent dysphagia from stent migration, tissue overgrowth, or food obstruction. Increasing the diameter in some stent types may, however, increase the risk of stent-related complications to the esophagus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Els M L Verschuur
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ben Soussan E, Antonietti M, Lecleire S, Savoye G, Di Fiore F, Paillot B, Michel P, Ducrotté P, Lerebours E. Palliative esophageal stent placement using endoscopic guidance without fluoroscopy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005; 29:785-8. [PMID: 16294146 DOI: 10.1016/s0399-8320(05)86348-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Fluoroscopy is not available in every endoscopic unit. This situation leads to delays in treatment or to transfer of patients to other centres for stent insertion. We assessed safety and effectiveness of expandable esophageal metal stent placement under endoscopic control without fluoroscopy using a thin gastroscope. PATIENTS AND METHODS From October 2002 to June 2004, thirty-three consecutive patients have been included for esophageal stent placement under endoscopic control alone with a nasogastroscope (5.9 mm). A proximal release covered stent (Ultraflex; Boston Scientific Microvasive) was used. Indications were malignant esophageal stricture (N = 26), malignant extrinsic compression (N = 2 ) and esophago-respiratory neoplastic fistulae (N = 5). RESULTS Stent placement using endoscopic control alone was successful in 30/33 (90%) patients. Complications occurred in 11 patients. Early complications (<7 days) included one death from pulmonary embolism, severe retrosternal pain needing transient morphinic treatment (N = 2) and GERD despite antisecretory therapy (N = 1). Late complications included: food impaction (N = 1), tumour overgrowth-related obstruction of the stent (N = 5) and one late esophago-respiratory fistula at 4 months at the proximal end of the stent. Relief of dysphagia was obtained for all patients at 48 hours and dysphagia score decreased from 3.1 before stent to 1.2 at 1 month (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Expandable esophageal stents can be accurately and safely placed using endoscopy with a thin gastrosocope. This method obviates the requirement of fluoroscopic access, lacking in many centres, and avoids exposure to X-ray.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Ben Soussan
- Digestive Tract Research Group, Rouen University hospital Charles Nicolle, 76031 Rouen Cedex.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|