Esophageal atresia with double tracheoesophageal fistula--a case report and review of the literature

Flexible bronchoscopy in diagnosis and management of dual tracheoesophageal fistula: A case series

Dual and H-type tracheoesophageal fistulae can present major diagnostic and management difficulties. A methodological approach with flexible bronchoscopy and a guide wire cannulation technique was used to diagnose, localize, and aid operative surgical management in five children with dual and H-type tracheoesophageal fistulae. All children had successful outcomes.

Esophageal atresia without distal tracheoesophageal fistula: high incidence of proximal fistula

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study was performed to test our suspicion that the incidence of esophageal atresia with proximal fistula in our institution is much higher than is generally reported.

METHODS

The charts of all patients with esophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula admitted in the period 1982 to 2000 were analyzed. The type of atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula was noted, and the relative incidence was calculated and compared with the relative incidence in a cumulative series of 3492 patients taken from 9 published studies.

RESULTS

In the period under study, 123 patients with esophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula were identified. The relative incidence of esophageal atresia without distal fistula was statistically not different (10.6% in the present series against 8.49% in the reference group). A statistically significant difference in the relative incidence of esophageal atresia with proximal fistula, however, was found: 5.69% in the present series against 1.05% in the reference group (P < .0001). Looking at the subgroup of patients without a distal fistula, more than half of the patients did have a proximal fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative incidence of esophageal atresia with proximal fistula in this series of children with esophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula is significantly higher than reported in the literature. This is on the account of the subgroup of patients without a distal fistula in which the incidence of a proximal fistula is more than 50%. Especially in this subgroup, the existence of a proximal fistula should be ruled out preoperatively.