Percutaneous interventions in the coagulopathic patient

Prophylactic platelet transfusion and risk of bleeding associated with ultrasound-guided central venous access in patients with severe thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Reported risk of bleeding complications after central catheter access in patients with thrombocytopenia is highly variable. Current guidelines recommend routine prophylactic platelet (PLT) transfusion before central venous catheter placement in patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Nevertheless, the strength of such recommendations is weak and supported by observational studies including few patients with very low PLT counts (<20 × 109 /L). This study aims to assess the risk of bleeding complications related to using or not using prophylactic PLT transfusion before ultrasound-guided central venous access in patients with very low PLT counts.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with very low PLT counts (<20 × 109 /L) subjected to ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization between January 2011 and November 2019 in a university hospital. Bleeding complications were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess the risk of major and minor bleeding complications comparing patients who did or did not receive prophylactic PLT transfusion for the procedure. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to handle missing data. A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Among 221 patients with very low PLT counts, 72 received prophylactic PLT transfusions while 149 did not. Baseline characteristics were similar between transfused and nontransfused patients. No major bleeding events were identified, while minor bleeding events were recognized in 35.7% of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant differences in bleeding complications between patients who received prophylactic PLT transfusions and those who did not (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.45-1.55, p = 0.567). Additional complete case and sensitivity analyses yielded results similar to those of the main analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center retrospective cohort study of ultrasound-guided central venous access in patients with very low PLT counts, no major bleeding was identified, and prophylactic PLT transfusions did not significantly decrease minor bleeding events.

Current practice of periprocedural haematological management for patients undergoing image-guided procedures

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate current UK practice of periprocedural haematological management for image-guided procedures in relation to Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society guidelines, which provide recommendations according to bleeding risk of procedures from Category 1 (lowest) to 3 (highest).

METHODS

Survey of practice in UK radiology departments conducted over a 1-year period

RESULTS

48 radiology departments responded. The percentage of departments that stop antithrombotics pre-procedurally are as follows (for Category 1, 2 and 3, respectively): aspirin (31.3%, 43.8%, 54.2%); clopidogrel (54.2%, 68.8%, 72.9%); therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin (56.3%, 77.1%, 75.0%). The percentage of departments that perform pre-procedural laboratory testing are as follows (for Category 1, 2 and 3, respectively): international normalized ratio (INR; 81.3%, 95.8%, 93.8%); activated partial thrombin time ratio (APTTR; 60.4%, 75.0%, 93.8%); platelet (77.1%, 91.7%, 95.7%); haemoglobin (70.8%, 85.4%, 87.5%). Mean threshold (standard deviation) of laboratory results for conducting procedures (Level 1, 2 and 3, respectively) are as follows: INR [1.53 (0.197), 1.47 (0.186), 1.47 (0.188)]; APTTR [1.50 (0.392), 1.50 (0.339), 1.48 (0.344)]; platelet count (x10(3) cells per microlitre) [74.4 (28.7), 79.9 (29.1), 80.5 (29.3)]; haemoglobin (grams per decilitre) [9.05 (1.40), 9.00 (1.33), 8.92 (1.21)]. No department practices conformed to current recommendations for (1) pre-procedural cessation of antithrombotics and (2) pre-procedural laboratory testing. Two (4.2%) department practices conformed to recommendations for thresholds of haematological parameters.

CONCLUSION

Current peri-procedural haematological management is variable and often does not conform to existing recommendations. Further research into the impact of this variation in practice on patient outcome is required.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study demonstrates wide variation in practice in haematological management for image-guided procedures.

Reprint of "Decline in platelet count and long-term post-PCI ischemic events: implication of the intra-aortic balloon pump"

AIMS

Thrombocytopenia (TC) following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated not only with hemorrhagic, but also with ischemic outcomes. The purpose of this study was to re-examine the relationship of TC with ischemic events at a 1-year follow-up, and investigate the possible associations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied a real-world, unselected population of ischemic patients undergoing PCI, totaling 861 patients-year, and divided into two groups: with TC (delta platelet count ≥25% from baseline to post-PCI during the hospital admission) and without TC. Compared with patients without TC, patients with TC had a higher and earlier incidence of both hemorrhagic and ischemic events. In them, the use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was ten-fold higher. In Kaplan-Meier curves assessing the contribution of both TC and IABP to outcome, IABP was a univariate detrimental factor additive to the role of TC. In a forced Cox model, the relative decline (delta) in platelet count (p=0.05) and the use of IABP (p=0.0001) were both associated with ischemic outcomes. After excluding all patients with IABP, the delta platelet count was no longer significantly associated with ischemic outcomes (p=0.66). After excluding all patients with shock and all those who undergone thrombolysis, there was still a relationship (p=0.0042) between the delta platelet count and ischemic events.

CONCLUSIONS

In this patient population the use of IABP, but not thrombocytopenia per se, is a possible primary cause of worse ischemic outcomes.

Decline in platelet count and long-term post-PCI ischemic events: implication of the intra-aortic balloon pump

AIMS

Thrombocytopenia (TC) following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated not only with hemorrhagic, but also with ischemic outcomes. The purpose of this study was to re-examine the relationship of TC with ischemic events at a 1-year follow-up, and investigate the possible associations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied a real-world, unselected population of ischemic patients undergoing PCI, totaling 861 patients-year, and divided into two groups: with TC (delta platelet count ≥25% from baseline to post-PCI during the hospital admission) and without TC. Compared with patients without TC, patients with TC had a higher and earlier incidence of both hemorrhagic and ischemic events. In them, the use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was ten-fold higher. In Kaplan-Meier curves assessing the contribution of both TC and IABP to outcome, IABP was a univariate detrimental factor additive to the role of TC. In a forced Cox model, the relative decline (delta) in platelet count (p=0.05) and the use of IABP (p=0.0001) were both associated with ischemic outcomes. After excluding all patients with IABP, the delta platelet count was no longer significantly associated with ischemic outcomes (p=0.66). After excluding all patients with shock and all those who undergone thrombolysis, there was still a relationship (p=0.0042) between the delta platelet count and ischemic events.

CONCLUSIONS

In this patient population the use of IABP, but not thrombocytopenia per se, is a possible primary cause of worse ischemic outcomes.

[Periprocedural management of hemostasis risk in interventional radiology]

Given the increasing demand for interventional image-guided procedures, radiologists are increasingly sollicited by clinicians to participate in the management of patients prior to and after the interventional procedure, especially with regards to hemostasis. Therefore, radiologists should be familiar with the risk of procedure related hemorrhage. Based on consensus guidelines published by the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), the risk of hemorrhage for each interventional procedure will be classified. Recommendations for preprocedure testing based on the type of procedure planned will be reviewed. Finally, limitations of hemostasis parameters will be discussed along with management of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents before the procedure.