Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of refractory ascites

Monitoring haemodynamic changes during transjugular portosystemic shunt insertion with electric cardiometry in sedated and spontaneous breathing patients. A diagnostic test accuracy study

Background and Aims

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) allows a high blood volume into systemic circulation abruptly. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the effect of TIPS on systemic, portal hemodynamics, and electric cardiometry (EC) parameters in sedated and spontaneous breathing patients. Secondary aims??

Material and Methods

Adult consecutive hepatic patients scheduled for elective TIPS were included. Patients were sedated with bispectral index-guided propofol infusion + fentanyl boluses. EC parameters, i.e., cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were noted. Noninvasive blood pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure (CVP, cmH2O), and portal venous pressure (PVP, cmH2O) were measured pre- and post-TIPS.

Results

Thirty-six people were enrolled (n = 25 included) from Aug 2018 to Dec 2019. Data (expressed in median (IQ)) were: age 33 (27-40) years, body mass index 24 (22.0-27) kg/m2, child A 60%, B 36%, and C 4%. Post-TIPS, PVP decreased (from 40 [37-45] to 34 [27-37] mmHg, P < 0.001), whereas CVP increased (from 7 [4-10] to 16 [10.0-19.0] mmHg, P < 0.001). The CO increased (P = 0.03) and SVR reduced (P = 0.012).

Conclusion

The reduction in PVP following successful TIPS insertion elevated the CVP abruptly. EC was able to monitor an immediate increase in the CO and a reduction in SVR in association with the above PVP and CVP changes. The results of this unique study indicate that EC monitoring is promising; however, further evaluation in a larger population and in correlation with other gold-standard CO monitors is still indicated.

Noninvasive imaging assessment of portal hypertension

Portal hypertension (PH) is a spectrum of complications of chronic liver disease (CLD) and cirrhosis, with manifestations including ascites, gastroesophageal varices, splenomegaly, hypersplenism, hepatic hydrothorax, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension. PH can vary in severity and is diagnosed via invasive hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement (HVPG), which is considered the reference standard. Accurate diagnosis of PH and assessment of severity are highly relevant as patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) are at higher risk for developing acute variceal bleeding and mortality. In this review, we discuss current and upcoming noninvasive imaging methods for diagnosis and assessment of severity of PH.

Refractory ascites-the contemporary view on pathogenesis and therapy

Refractory ascites (RA) refers to ascites that cannot be mobilized or that has an early recurrence that cannot be prevented by medical therapy. Every year, 5-10% of patients with liver cirrhosis and with an accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity develop RA while undergoing standard treatment (low sodium diet and diuretic dose up to 400 mg/day of spironolactone and 160 mg/day of furosemide). Liver cirrhosis accounts for marked alterations in the splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics, causing hypovolemia and arterial hypotension. The consequent activation of renin-angiotensin and sympathetic systems and increased renal sodium re-absorption occurs during the course of the disease. Cirrhotic patients with RA have poor prognoses and are at risk of developing serious complications. Different treatment options are available, but only liver transplantation may improve the survival of such patients.

Treatment of refractory ascites with an automated low-flow ascites pump in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Refractory ascites (RA) is a frequent complication of cirrhosis, requiring large volume paracentesis or placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPSS). The automated low-flow ascites pump (alfapump, Sequana Medical AG, Zurich, Switzerland) is an innovative treatment option for patients with RA.

AIM

To assess safety and efficacy of this treatment in patients with a contraindication to TIPSS.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients (43 males; mean age 62 years) from centres in Germany, Switzerland, UK and Spain were included and followed for up to 24 months. Complications, device deficiencies, paracentesis frequency and patient survival were recorded.

RESULTS

At the time of this analysis, 3 patients completed the 24-month observation period, monitoring of 3 was ongoing, 9 underwent liver transplantation, 17 patients were withdrawn due to serious adverse events and 23 patients died. Most frequently observed technical complication was blocking of the peritoneal catheter. Twenty-three pump-related reinterventions (17 patients) and 12 pump exchanges (11 patients) were required during follow-up. The pump system was explanted in 48% of patients (in 17 patients due to serious adverse events, in 9 at the time of liver transplantation and in 1 due to recovery from RA). Median frequency of paracentesis dropped from 2.17 to 0.17 per month.

CONCLUSIONS

The alfapump can expand therapeutic options for cirrhotic patients with RA. Continuous drainage of ascites in a closed loop automated system led to significant reduction in paracentesis frequency. Technical and procedural improvements are required to reduce the rate of adverse events and reinterventions. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01532427.

Multicenter analysis of the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for management of MPN-associated portal hypertension

BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal stem cell disorders defined by proliferation of one or more myeloid lineages, and carry an increased risk of vascular events and progression to myelofibrosis and leukemia. Portal hypertension (pHTN) occurs in 7-18% of MPN patients via both thrombotic and nonthrombotic mechanisms and portends a poor prognosis. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been used in the management of MPN-associated pHTN; however, data on long-term outcomes of TIPS in this setting is limited and the optimal management of medically refractory MPN-associated pHTN is not known. In order to assess the efficacy and long-term outcomes of TIPS in MPN-associated pHTN, we performed a retrospective analysis of 29 MPN patients who underwent TIPS at three academic medical centers between 1997 and 2016. The majority of patients experienced complete clinical resolution of pHTN and its clinical sequelae following TIPS. One, two, three, and four-year overall survival post-TIPS was 96.4%, 92.3%, 84.6%, and 71.4%, respectively. However, despite therapeutic anticoagulation, in-stent thrombosis occurred in 31.0% of patients after TIPS, necessitating additional interventions. In conclusion, TIPS can be an effective intervention for MPN-associated pHTN regardless of etiology. However, TIPS thrombosis is a frequent complication in the MPN population and indefinite anticoagulation post-TIPS should be considered.

Invasive and non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension

Portal hypertension is the central driver of complications in patients with chronic liver diseases and cirrhosis. The diagnosis of portal hypertension has important prognostic and clinical implications. In particular, screening for varices in patients with portal hypertension can effectively reduce the morbidity and mortality of variceal bleeding. In this article, we review the invasive and non-invasive methods to assess portal hypertension. Hepatic venous pressure gradient remains the gold standard to measure portal pressure but is invasive and seldom performed outside expert centers and research settings. In recent years, a number of non-invasive tests of fibrosis have shown good correlation with liver histology. They also show promise in identifying patients with portal hypertension and large varices. As a result, the latest Baveno VI consensus guidelines endorse the use of liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography and platelet count as initial assessment to select patients for varices screening. On the other hand, the performance of non-invasive tests in assessing the response to non-selective beta-blockers or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting is either suboptimal or unclear.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Porto-Systemic Shunt in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease ≥15

BACKGROUND

It is not known whether transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS) is safe in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of TIPS on transplant-free survival in patients with liver cirrhosis and MELD score ≥15.

METHODS

All adult patients who underwent TIPS at our institution between 2004 and 2011 were identified (N = 470). A total of 144 patients had MELD ≥15 at the time of TIPS. These patients were matched 1:1 to patients with liver cirrhosis who did not undergo TIPS based on age and MELD score using the greedy algorithm. Patients were followed up until time of death or liver transplantation. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to test for differences in survival outcome between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 288 patients with liver cirrhosis were included, of whom 144 underwent TIPS and 144 did not. The two groups were matched based on age and MELD score and were comparable with regard to gender and ethnicity. Mean MELD and Child-Pugh scores in the study population were 20.9 ± 6.5 and 10.5 ± 1.8, respectively. The most common indication for TIPS was varices (49 %), followed by refractory ascites (42 %). In the first 2 months post-TIPS, there was increased mortality or liver transplantation in patients who had TIPS compared to those who did not, but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). However, after 2 months, TIPS is associated with 56 % lower risk of dying or needing liver transplantation (p < 0.01) than cirrhotic patients who did not undergo TIPS.

CONCLUSION

In patients with liver cirrhosis and MELD ≥15, TIPS might improve transplant-free survival for patients who live for at least 2 months after the procedure.

Long-term Outcome and Analysis of Dysfunction of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement in Chronic Primary Budd-Chiari Syndrome

Purpose To evaluate the long-term safety, technical success, and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in a series of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), and to determine the predictors of shunt dysfunction. Materials and Methods From 2004 to 2013, all patients with primary BCS referred for TIPS placement were included in the study. The primary and secondary technical success rates and the number and types of early (ie, before day 7) complications were noted. Factors associated with dysfunction were analyzed with uni- and multivariate analyses. Survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Results Fifty-four patients (34 women [63%]; mean age, 36 years ± 12 [standard deviation]) were included. Twenty-eight patients (52%) had myeloproliferative neoplasms. The mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 14.5 ± 4. The most frequent indication for TIPS was refractory ascites (50 of 54; 93%). Primary and secondary technical success rates were 93% and 98%, respectively. Early complications occurred in 17 patients (32%). After a mean follow-up of 56 months ± 41 (interquartile range, 22-92), 22 patients (42%) experienced at least one episode of TIPS dysfunction (median delay between administration of TIPS and first episode of dysfunction, 10.8 months). Cumulative 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year primary patency rates were 64%, 59%, 54%, 45%, and 45%, respectively. Dysfunction was associated with a myeloproliferative neoplasm (hazard ratio, 8.18; 95% confidence interval: 1.45, 46.18; P = .017), more than two initial stents (hazard ratio, 3.90; 95% confidence interval:1.16, 13.10; P = .027), and the occurrence of early complications (hazard ratio, 11.34; 95% confidence interval: 1.82, 70.69; P = .009). The 10-year survival rate was 76%. Conclusion TIPS placement in patients with chronic primary BCS was associated with a nonnegligible rate of early complications and required endovascular revision or revisions in 42% of patients. Nevertheless, secondary patency was close to 100%, and long-term survival was good. ^© RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

TIPS for refractory ascites: a 6-year single-center experience with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-grafts

OBJECTIVE. This single-center study evaluated the use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stent-grafts for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement to manage portal hypertension-related refractory ascites. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred patients at a single tertiary care center in a major metropolitan hospital underwent TIPS placement with an ePTFE-covered stent-graft (Viatorr TIPS Endoprosthesis). Patients with portal hypertension-related ascites and preexisting hepatocellular carcinoma or liver transplant were excluded from the analysis. Records were reviewed for demographic characteristics, technical success of the TIPS procedures, and stent follow-up findings. Clinical results were assessed at 90- and 180-day intervals. RESULTS. Immediate technical success of the TIPS procedure was 100%. Of the 61 patients with documented follow-up, 55 (90.2%) had a partial or complete ascites response to TIPS creation. Of these 55 patients, nine experienced severe encephalopathy. Six of 61 patients (9.8%) did not experience a significant ascites response. Overall survival was 78.7% at 365-day follow-up. The 365-day survival was 84.2% for patients with a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of less than 15, 67.0% for those with a score of 15-18, and 53.8% for those with a score of greater than 18 (p = 0.01). For patients with a MELD score of less than 18, the 365-day survival was 88.0% for those with an albumin value of 3 mg/dL or greater and 72.8% for those with an albumin value of less than 3 mg/dL (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION. TIPS placement using an ePTFE-covered stent-graft is an efficacious therapy for refractory ascites. Patients with preserved liver function-characterized by a MELD score of less than 15 or a MELD score of less than 18 and an albumin value of 3 mg/dL or greater-experience the greatest survival benefit.

Outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for ascites

Refractory ascites represents a devastating complication of portal hypertension. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an efficacious option for patients for whom transplant is not an immediate option. Techniques to optimize the hepatic venous pressure gradient and the use of covered stents have reduced rates of hepatic encephalopathy and stent occlusion, respectively. Patients with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score less than 15, serum creatinine less than 2 mg/dL, and serum bilirubin less than 2 mg/dL are particularly suited for TIPS placement. TIPS is also effective for hepatic hydrothorax and for massive ascites in the posttransplant setting, although future investigations are necessary to elucidate risk factors and establish the effect on transplant-free survival.

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for the management of cirrhotic refractory ascites

Cirrhotic ascites results from sinusoidal hypertension and sodium retention, which is secondary to a decreased effective arterial blood volume. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement is currently indicated in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites who require large-volume paracentesis (LVP) more than two or three times per month. TIPS placement is associated with normalization of sinusoidal pressure and a significant improvement in urinary sodium excretion that correlates with suppression of plasma renin activity, which is, itself, indicative of an improvement in effective arterial blood volume. Compared with serial LVP, placement of an uncovered TIPS stent is more effective at preventing ascites from recurring; however, increased incidence of hepatic encephalopathy and shunt dysfunction rates after TIPS placement are important issues that increase its cost. Although evidence suggests that TIPS placement might result in better patient survival, this needs to be confirmed, particularly in light of the development of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents. Favorable results apply to centers experienced in placing the TIPS, with the aim being to decrease the portosystemic gradient to <12 mmHg but >5 mmHg. This article reviews the pathophysiologic basis for the use of a TIPS in patients with refractory ascites, the results of controlled trials comparing TIPS placement (using uncovered stents) versus LVP, and a systematic review of predictors of death after TIPS placement for refractory ascites.