Should stent-grafts replace bare stents for primary transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts?

Shunt dysfunction patterns after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation using a combination of a generic stent-graft and bare-stents

PURPOSE

Even though transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using Fluency Stent-grafts provides good shunt patency rates, shunt dysfunction is a great concern after TIPS creation, occurring in up to 20% of cases within one year. The objective of this study was to describe shunt dysfunction patterns after TIPS creation using a combination of generic stent-grafts/bare-stents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective study of all TIPS revisions between January 2005 and December 2020. TIPS revision angiograms were analyzed for stents' positions, stenoses' diameters, and stenoses' locations.

RESULTS

Out of 99 TIPS, a total of 33 TIPS revisions were included. The median time to TIPS revision was 10.4 months. Angiograms showed four patterns of TIPS dysfunction-associated features (DAF), defined as follows: Type 1 was defined as stenosis located after the stent end in the hepatic vein (HV), type 2 as intra-stent stenosis located in the hepatic vein, type 3 as intra-stent stenosis or a kink in the parenchymal tract or the portal vein end of the TIPS, and type 4 as a complete TIPS occlusion. Types 1, 2, 3, and 4 were seen in 23 (69.7%), 5 (15.2%), 2 (6.1%), and 3 (9.1%) TIPS respectively. TIPS revision was successful in 30 (90.1%) patients with median pre- and post-TIPS revision PSG of 18.5 mmHg and 8 mmHg respectively (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Our results illustrate the four angiographic patterns of TIPS DAF after TIPS creation using a combination of generic stent-grafts/bare-stents and emphasize the need for appropriate stent length extending to the HV/inferior vena cava junction.

Prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study comparing a self-expanding covered stent to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for treatment of upper extremity hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula stenosis

Use of a covered stent after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was compared to PTA alone for treatment of upper extremity hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenoses. Patients with AVF stenosis of 50% or more and evidence of AVF dysfunction underwent treatment with PTA followed by randomization of 142 patients to include a covered stent or 138 patients with PTA alone. Primary outcomes were 30-day safety, powered for noninferiority, and six-month target lesion primary patency (TLPP), powered to test whether TLPP after covered-stent placement was superior to PTA alone. Twelve-month TLPP and six-month access circuit primary patency (ACPP) were also hypothesis tested while additional clinical outcomes were observed through two years. Safety was significantly non-inferior while six- and 12-month TLPP were each superior for the covered stent group compared to PTA alone (six months: 78.7% versus 55.8%; 12 months: 47.9% versus 21.2%, respectively). ACPP was not statistically different between groups at six-months. Observed differences at 24 months favored the covered-stent group: 28.4% better TLPP, fewer target-lesion reinterventions (1.6 ± 1.6 versus 2.8 ± 2.0), and a longer mean time between target-lesion reinterventions (380.4 ± 249.5 versus 217.6 ± 158.4 days). Thus, our multicenter, prospective, randomized study of a covered stent used to treat AVF stenosis demonstrated noninferior safety with better TLPP and fewer target-lesion reinterventions than PTA alone through 24 months.

Clinical Outcomes of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (Tips) Creation Using Fluency Versus Viatorr Stent-Grafts: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation using Fluency versus Viatorr stent-grafts on the long-term clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study from January 2010 to October 2021 in 213 patients receiving TIPS with Fluency (Fluency group, n = 154) versus Viatorr (Viatorr group, n = 59) stent-grafts. Inclusion criteria were: age > 18 years old and TIPS creation for variceal hemorrhage. Exclusion criteria were: age > 80 years old, concomitant chronic heart or lung disease, active tuberculosis or human immunodeficiency virus infection, extrahepatic malignancy, alcohol dependence, TIPS created outside of our hospital, without any follow-up data, or decline to participate. The primary outcome was primary patency rate and its associated risk factors.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative primary patency rate was significantly higher in Viatorr group than in Fluency group (89.0% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001), whereas the 5-year cumulative transplant-free survival rate (62.3% vs. 62.2%, p = 0.636) was comparable between two groups. Cox-regression models revealed that group (hazard ratio [HR]4.029, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.486-10.927, p = 0.006), use of bare stents (HR 3.307, 95% CI 1.903-5.747, p < 0.001), and baseline portal vein thrombosis (HR 0.248, 95% CI 0.149-0.412, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with shunt patency. Incidences of adverse events were not significantly different between two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS creation using Viatorr stent-grafts is superior to using Fluency stent-grafts in terms of higher long-term primary patency rate but similar transplant-free survival rate.

A new choice of stent for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: Viabahn ePTFE covered stent/bare metal stent combination

Objectives

To compare the clinical outcomes in terms of structure and function between the insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) created with the Viabahn ePTFE covered stent/bare metal stent (BMS) combination and the Fluency ePTFE covered stent/BMS combination.

Methods

A total of 101 consecutive patients who received a TIPS from February 2016 to August 2018 in our center were retrospectively analyzed. Sixty-four subjects were enrolled in the Viabahn group and 37 were enrolled in the Fluency group. The geometry characteristics of the TIPS were calculated, and the associated occurrence of shunt dysfunction, survival, overt hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal rebleeding were evaluated.

Results

The technical success rate was 100%. After the insertion of the TIPS, the rate of shunt dysfunction during the first 3 months was significantly different between the Viabahn and Fluency groups (1.6% and 13.5%, respectively; p ​= ​0.024). Multivariate analysis indicated that the angle of portal venous inflow (α) was the only independent risk factor for shunt dysfunction (hazard ratio ​= ​1.060, 95% confidence interval ​= ​1.009–1.112, p ​= ​0.020). In addition, 3 months after the TIPS insertion, the α angle distinctly increased from 20.9° ​± ​14.3°–26.9° ​± ​20.1° (p ​= ​0.005) in the Fluency group but did not change significantly in the Viabahn group (from 21.9° ​± ​15.1°–22.9° ​± ​17.6°, p ​= ​0.798).

Conclusions

Shunt dysfunction was related to the α angle owing to the slight effect on the α angle after the implantation of the TIPS. The Viabahn ePTFE covered stent/BMS combination was more stable in structure and promised higher short-term stent patency compared with the Fluency ePTFE covered stent/BMS combination.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt treatment of variceal bleeding in an unselected patient population

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in variceal bleeding in a clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of 131 patients (116 with liver cirrhosis) treated with TIPS with covered stent grafts in a single centre from 2002 to 2016.

RESULTS

Survival at 1 and 2 years was 70% and 57% in patents with, and 100% at 2 years in patients without liver cirrhosis, respectively. A high Child-Pugh score and severe hepatic encephalopathy (HE) within 12 months post-TIPS were related to increased mortality. Re-bleeding occurred in 8% within 12 months and was related to TIPS dysfunction and a post-TIPS portosystemic gradient (PSG) of ≥5 mmHg. The main cause of TIPS dysfunction was that the stent did not fully reach the inferior vena cava. There was no correlation between the PSG and the occurrence of HE.

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS was safe and prevented re-bleeding in patients with variceal bleeding, with or without liver cirrhosis, regardless of Child-Pugh class and of how soon after bleeding onset, the TIPS procedure was performed. A post-TIPS PSG of ≥5 mmHg was associated with an increased risk for re-bleeding and there was no correlation between the post-TIPS PSG and the occurrence of HE.

Risk factors for stent graft thrombosis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation

Background

To identify risk factors of stent graft thrombosis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation.

Methods

Patients who underwent TIPS creation between June 2003 and January 2016 and with follow-up assessing stent graft patency were included (n=174). Baseline comorbidities, liver function, procedural details and follow-up liver function tests were analyzed in association with hazards of thrombosis on follow-up. Competing risk cox regression models were used considering liver transplant after TIPS creation as the competing risk variable.

Results

One-, 2- and 5-year primary patency rates were 94.1%, 91.7% and 78.2%, respectively. Patient age [sub-hazard ratio (sHR): 1.13; P=0.001], body mass index (BMI) <30 (sHR: 33.08; P=0.008) and a higher post-TIPS portosystemic pressure gradient (sHR: 1.14; P=0.023) were significantly associated with TIPS thrombosis in multivariate analysis. A higher rate of TIPS thrombosis was observed in those for whom the procedure was clinically unsuccessful (P=0.014). A significant increase in incidence of thrombosis was noted with increasing tertiles of post-TIPS portosystemic gradients (P value for trend=0.017).

Conclusions

Older age, lower BMI and higher post-TIPS portosystemic gradients were associated with higher hazards of shunt thrombosis after TIPS creation using stent grafts. Higher rates of shunt thrombosis were seen in patients for whom TIPS creation was clinically unsuccessful. The association between TIPS thrombosis and higher post-TIPS portosystemic gradients may indicate impaired flow through the shunt, a finding which may be technical or anatomic in nature and should be assessed before procedure completion.

Post-Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Follow-Up and Management in the VIATORR Era

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a non-selective portosystemic shunt created using endovascular techniques. The first TIPS was performed in Germany in 1988. The VIATORR self-expandable PTFE covered stent-graft (WL Gore, Flagstaff AZ) was approved by the FDA for a TIPS application in December of 2004. This stent-graft offers excellent shunt patency rates and it is possible that it has a beneficial effect on patient survival. Patient surveillance and post-procedural management have changed after the introduction of this stent-graft. This article presents the current management strategies that are followed at our Institution for patients who have undergone a TIPS procedure with a VIATORR stent graft including imaging follow-up, management of encephalopathy, medical management and nutritional aspects.

TIPS for refractory ascites: a 6-year single-center experience with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-grafts

OBJECTIVE. This single-center study evaluated the use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stent-grafts for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement to manage portal hypertension-related refractory ascites. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred patients at a single tertiary care center in a major metropolitan hospital underwent TIPS placement with an ePTFE-covered stent-graft (Viatorr TIPS Endoprosthesis). Patients with portal hypertension-related ascites and preexisting hepatocellular carcinoma or liver transplant were excluded from the analysis. Records were reviewed for demographic characteristics, technical success of the TIPS procedures, and stent follow-up findings. Clinical results were assessed at 90- and 180-day intervals. RESULTS. Immediate technical success of the TIPS procedure was 100%. Of the 61 patients with documented follow-up, 55 (90.2%) had a partial or complete ascites response to TIPS creation. Of these 55 patients, nine experienced severe encephalopathy. Six of 61 patients (9.8%) did not experience a significant ascites response. Overall survival was 78.7% at 365-day follow-up. The 365-day survival was 84.2% for patients with a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of less than 15, 67.0% for those with a score of 15-18, and 53.8% for those with a score of greater than 18 (p = 0.01). For patients with a MELD score of less than 18, the 365-day survival was 88.0% for those with an albumin value of 3 mg/dL or greater and 72.8% for those with an albumin value of less than 3 mg/dL (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION. TIPS placement using an ePTFE-covered stent-graft is an efficacious therapy for refractory ascites. Patients with preserved liver function-characterized by a MELD score of less than 15 or a MELD score of less than 18 and an albumin value of 3 mg/dL or greater-experience the greatest survival benefit.

Postinterventional passive expansion of partially dilated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt stents

PURPOSE

To investigate passive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) stent expansion in patients with intentional "underdilation" (eg, 10-mm stent, 8-mm balloon) during TIPS creation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Custom in-house software was developed for objective quantification of cross-sectional stent area from computed tomography (CT) data. The technique was validated by in vitro experiments. The study included 39 patients (22 men; mean age, 59.2 y) who underwent TIPS creation (VIATORR stent graft [W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Arizona]; n = 29; WALLSTENT endoprosthesis [Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts], n = 10) with stent underdilation. Follow-up CT data of the patients were used to quantify in vivo stent area changes. Data were analyzed by variance analysis and entered into a general linear model to test for interrelations between stent area changes and clinical (eg, cirrhosis grade) and procedural parameters.

RESULTS

In vitro validation of the in-house software showed good agreement and reproducibility without overestimation of stent area. Mean clinical follow-up time in patients was 787 days (range, 7-2,450 d). At the time of intervention, VIATORR stent grafts and WALLSTENT endoprostheses were dilated to an average of 64.4% ± 2.3% and 65.63% ± 8.52% of nominal area, respectively. At the last imaging follow-up evaluation, this value had increased in all stents to a mean of 87.8% ± 7.9% (VIATORR) and 82.34% ± 19.6% (WALLSTENT) in the TIPS tract (P < .05). Multivariate analysis revealed the time after intervention to be the only predictor of stent area in the TIPS tract. There was no significant association between stent expansion and clinical or procedure-related parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The area of self-expanding stents implanted in the liver for TIPS creation with dilation to less than nominal diameter significantly increases over time. This increase has to be considered as an additional factor influencing the long-term portosystemic gradient.

Budd-Chiari syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is an uncommon condition characterized by obstruction of the hepatic venous outflow tract. Presentation may vary from a completely asymptomatic condition to fulminant liver failure. BCS is an example of postsinusoidal portal hypertension. The management can be divided into three main categories: medical, surgical, and endovascular. The purpose of this article is to present an overall perspective of the problem, diagnosis, and management.

CONCLUSION

BCS requires accurate, prompt diagnosis and aggressive therapy. Treatment will vary depending on the clinical presentation, cause, and anatomic location of the problem. Patients with BCS are probably best treated in tertiary care centers where liver transplantation is available.