Surgical hemorrhage, damage control, and the abdominal compartment syndrome

Iatrogenic haemoperitoneum requiring transfusion after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: case report

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion for hydrocephalus via ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting is one of the most commonly performed neurosurgical procedures. Unfortunately, VP shunting also carries a high complication rate. While long-term complications of VP shunting are generally well-described, the literature on more acute, iatrogenic injury during shunt placement is essentially limited to easily identifiable intracranial bleeds. Herein is presented the first reported case of iatrogenic abdominal wall vessel injury as a consequence of blind distal VP shunt catheter placement causing a critical haemoperitoneum that necessitated multiple transfusions. Presentation and recognition of this bleed was delayed as it occurred over a number of days. Injury to the inferior epigastric artery, or potentially a distal branch of the superficial epigastric artery, is suspected to have occurred during either blind subcutaneous tunnelling of the shunt catheter passage or during penetration of the peritoneum. Haemoperitoneum as a potential complication of procedures involving manipulation or penetration of the abdominal wall (i.e. paracentesis) is well-described in the medical and general surgical literature, and ultrasound-guidance has been widely adopted to mitigate bleeding in these cases. Familiarity with intra-abdominal haemorrhage as a potential complication of VP shunting and an understanding of its presentation is critical for timely identification of this phenomenon. Furthermore, the use of real-time ultrasound-guidance for tunnelling and distal shunt catheter placement may decrease the incidence of intrabdominal complications after shunt placement more generally and should be considered an area of future study.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Hemorrhage in the Postoperative Kidney Transplant Patient

BACKGROUND

Postoperative hemorrhage has been described at rates of 14% in kidney transplant (KT) literature. The preferred management of postoperative hemorrhage in this population is not well described. We hypothesized a difference in outcomes with operative versus nonoperative management of hemorrhage after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive KTs from 2012 to 2019 (living and deceased donors). We defined hemorrhage based on the objective finding of hematoma on either ultrasound or CT scan. Management was defined as operative (surgical intervention with or without transfusion) or nonoperative (with or without transfusion).

RESULTS

We performed 1758 KTs of which 135 (8%) demonstrated hematoma on ultrasound or CT scan (66 operative vs 69 nonoperative management). The clinical signs and symptoms of low urine output (P = .044), drop in hemoglobin (P < .001), abdominal pain (P = .005), and MAP < 70 mm Hg (P = .034) were 92.5% predictive of postoperative hemorrhage in our KT patients. There were no differences between groups based on medical history, preop anticoagulation, anastomosis type, cold ischemic time, lowest hemoglobin, delayed graft function, or complications. Patients with nonoperative treatment of postoperative hemorrhage had shorter lengths of stay (P = .003), better graft survival (P = .01), and better patient survival (P = .01).

DISCUSSION

We found better outcomes of graft and patient survival with shorter lengths of stay when we utilized nonoperative management of postoperative hemorrhage in KT patients. Our findings suggest a role for conservative nonoperative management in select patients. Ultimately, it is the surgeon's choice on how best to manage postoperative hemorrhage.

Internal Iliac Artery Embolization versus Silastic Loop Ligation for Control of Traumatic Pelvic Hemorrhage

Angioembolization versus open control of traumatic pelvic hemorrhage is debated. We sought to compare outcomes between angioembolization and open internal iliac artery occlusion. A 14-year retrospective review (2004–2017) was performed at our academic Level I trauma center. All pelvic hemorrhage patients who underwent internal iliac artery angioembolization or silastic loop ligation via laparotomy were compared for outcomes. Patient demographics included vital signs, mechanism, and injury severity score (ISS). Outcomes included mortality (%), operating room visits, reoperation for hemorrhage (%), transfusion burden (units), and infection (%). A total of 163 trauma patients matched for age, ISS, mechanism, and cavitary involvement were included for analysis. Compared with silastic loop ligation (n = 51, mean ISS = 32 ± 14), patients who underwent angioembolization (n = 112, mean ISS = 30 ± 8.9) demonstrated decreased mortality (23% vs 57%, P < 0.01), made fewer operating room trips (mean = 2.2 vs 3.6 trips, P < 0.01), made fewer trips for pelvic (2.8 vs 11%, P = 0.05) and nonpelvic-related bleeding (3.6 vs 22%, P < 0.01), used fewer blood products [packed red blood cells, fresh-frozen plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate] ( P < 0.01 for all), and indicated a trend toward fewer infections (5.7% vs 14%, P = 0.07). Internal iliac artery angioembolization demonstrates lower mortality, lower reoperation rates, decreased transfusion burden, and a trend toward fewer infections compared with silastic loop ligation.

Evaluation of renal injury caused by acute volume replacement with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or Ringer's lactate solution in pigs

This work aimed to evaluate the effects on renal tissue integrity after hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 and Ringer's lactate (RL) administration in pigs under general anesthesia after acute bleeding. A total of 30 mL/kg of blood were passively removed from the femoral artery in two groups of Large White pigs, under total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. After bleeding, Group 1 (n = 11) received RL solution (25 mL/kg) and Group 2 (n = 11) received HES 130/0.4 solution (20 mL/kg). Additionally, Group 3 (n = 6) was not submitted to bleeding or volume replacement. Pigs were euthanized and kidneys were processed for histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses. Minimal to moderate glomerular, tubular, and interstitial changes, as well as papillary necrosis, were observed in all experimental groups. Pre-apoptosis and apoptosis indicators were higher in pigs that received HES 130/0.4, indicating a higher renal insult. Both HES 130/0.4 and RL administration may cause renal injury, although renal injury may be more significant in pigs receiving HES 13/0.4. Results also suggest that total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil may cause renal injury, and this effect can be dose related.