[Clinical management of polytraumatized patients in the emegergency room--duty and assignment of the trauma surgeon]

[The conservative emergency room - care of acutely critically ill non-trauma patients]

Treatment of critically ill non-trauma patients is challenging, due to the broad spectrum of underlying diseases in this clinical setting. It has been shown that outcome in these patients is poor due to high age, comorbidities and severeness of acute disease. In most cases it is crucial to establish diagnosis and start specific treatment immediately to improve patients' outcome. In contrast to the management of severely injured patients, general guidelines for the initial diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in these patients have been lacking until now. As a consequence, little is known about both: patients' characteristics and outcome. This article provides an overview of the current information available on this group of patients.All critically ill patients should first be managed in the resuscitation room, as it is necessary to provide the optimal infrastructure, including material and personal resources, to maintain high quality care. For non-trauma patients, indication can be defined using the ABCDE approach. Expertise in emergency ultrasound as a key diagnostic tool, profound knowledge of intensive care treatment and of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches according to current specific guidelines are required. These requirements can be implemented by assembling nursery and medical staff trained in emergency care, supported by accredited continued professional development and regular simulation trainings.The best transition from preclinical to in-hospital care is achieved through detailed preparation and the use of standardized handover tools. Subsequent patient management can be organized using the primary and secondary survey. These aim to detect and treat life threatening pathologies first and, within a second step, to expand the diagnosis and therapy according to the individual case. Special focus should be put on communication, using crew resource management training, and on the provision on an open and constructive approach to making mistakes.

[Polytrauma and concomitant traumatic brain injury : The role of the trauma surgeon]

BACKGROUND

Concomitant traumatic brain injury (TBI) increases mortality and reduces quality of life of polytrauma patients. These facts demand effective treatment strategies while the growing specialization of medicine is questioning the role of the trauma surgeon in the management of these patients.

OBJECTIVES

Which factors influence outcome of polytrauma with concomitant TBI? Who should be responsible for the management of these patients and what is the limit of management?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search using Medline via PubMed was performed with Medical Subject Headings and text word search.

RESULTS

The crucial factors for outcome are absence of hypotension, adherence to pre- and in-hospital standards like fast transportation to appropriate centers, priority-based diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and strict adherence to principles of damage control surgery. Patients with polytrauma and TBI are treated by different specialties around the world based on the trauma system, geographic circumstances and resources. Investigations of operative and conservative management by different medical specialties showed comparable outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In an age of standardization and a high degree of specialization in the field of medicine, the trauma surgeon still seems to be able to ensure an optimal treatment of polytrauma and concomitant TBI by focusing on priority-based diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and adhering to principles of damage control surgery.

[Current state of medical care of polytrauma and mass casualty incidents in Germany. Are we well-prepared?]

The white paper on the medical care of the severely injured published in 2006 is a collection of proposals and recommendations concerning structure, organization and equipment for the medical care of severely injured patients. Since its publication 50 networks ( http://www.dgu-traumanetzwerk.de/index ) have been established as part of the trauma network. This and the trauma register have helped to continuously improve the medical care of severely injured patients since 1993 [26]. Numerous studies have documented the progress made in measures required by the trauma network [4, 6]. For example, the mortality rate of severely injured patients has dropped from 25 % to approximately 10 % in the past 15 years. From the register and network data it is difficult to tell how each of these measures is implemented in the participating hospitals, who provides medical treatment to patients when, and how medical care is organized in detail. This is why a survey on medical care for polytrauma and in mass casualty situations was conducted among medical directors in German surgical hospitals who are members of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU). Thanks to the 211 participants (most of whom specialize in orthopedic and trauma surgery) a detailed description of how medical treatment is currently organized and performed could be acquired. The survey showed that care of patients with polytrauma (i.e. medical treatment and management) is important irrespective of the level of training of physicians and of the level of patient treatment in hospitals. The central role of traumatologists was emphasized not only in terms of actual treatment but also as an administrator for organizational and management matters. Almost all hospitals have plans for a mass casualty situation; however, the levels of preparedness show considerable variation. A highly critical view is taken of the new surgical specialists with respect to interdisciplinary and comprehensive emergency medical treatment and casualty care. The survey also revealed the continual conflict between managing costs and maintaining quality and resources. It gives an overview of patient treatment in the transition from preclinical to clinical care and provides insights into the targets achieved, current problems and conflicts.

[Emergency room management of multiple trauma : ATLS® and S3 guidelines]

Trauma management in the emergency room is an important part of the treatment chain of the severely injured. Important decisions with respect to diagnostics and treatment must be made under time pressure. Successful trauma management in the emergency room requires a hospital tailored treatment protocol. This written protocol needs consent from all participating disciplines and must be known by all members of the resuscitation team. The ATLS® and the recently published clinical practice guidelines on multiple trauma can be of help in order to establish or update such protocols. In order to continuously evaluate and improve performance in the emergency room local quality circles are needed that truly follow that aim. Important factors are reliability of agreement between the different disciplines and continuous communication of results to the team members. In order to be successful such quality circles need people that care.

The treatment of patients with severe and multiple traumatic injuries

BACKGROUND

The care of severely and multiply injured patients is an interdisciplinary challenge. The only existing German-language guideline up to now has been the S1-guideline issued in 2002 by the German Society for Trauma Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie, DGU). In this article, we present a new, comprehensive, evidence and consensus based S3-guideline for the treatment of severely and multiply injured patients in the pre-hospital and early in-hospital phases which has been developed with the aim of structural and procedural quality optimization. Its implementation should lower these patients' mortality and improve their quality of life.

METHODS

The guideline was developed by a panel consisting of 18 delegates from 11 specialty societies under the lead of the DGU, with designated coordinators for each of three phases of treatment: the pre-hospital phase, the emergency-room phase, and the emergency surgery phase. The key questions to be answered were determined by vote, and then the relevant literature (in English and German, 1995-2010) was systematically searched and evaluated. Key recommendations with explanatory texts were formulated and agreed upon in a nominal group process (NGP) with five consensus conferences and three further Delphi rounds.

RESULTS

264 recommendations were issued: 66 for the pre-hospital phase, 102 for the emergency-room phase, and 96 for the emergency surgery phase. The three phases were subcategorized according to organizational and anatomical considerations. Topics of major emphasis were, in the pre-hospital phase, the establishment and implementation of correct priorities for treatment; in the emergency-room phase, the creation of clear structures and processes; and, in the emergency surgery phase, the avoidance of secondary injury (i.e., the principle of damage control).

CONCLUSION

This guideline can only improve outcomes if it is implemented in routine practice. Aside from the guideline itself, the DGU trauma network (www.dgu-traumanetzwerk.de) has issued a set of directions as an aid to its implementation.

Challenges of surgical trauma emergency admission

INTRODUCTION

Trauma still remains as one of the leading causes for mortality in Western civilization. The early clinical management of severely injured patients leads to structural and organizational challenges involving different specialties.

EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

Trauma team leaders have to coordinate diagnostic and therapeutic steps in cooperation with different involved specialties. Furthermore, they have to make decisions based on contrary department-depending assessments. In addition, several special injuries commonly found in multiple traumatized patients require special attention.

RECENT DEVELOPMENT

Actually, structural changes in generating trauma networks are to be mentioned. Trauma networks suggest to improve patients survival in close cooperation between hospitals with different structural and personal capabilities. Close communication networks are required to guarantee transportation to an adequate trauma center.

Damage control orthopaedics: lessons learned

Damage control orthopaedics (DCO) is a staged approach for the management of multiply injured patients. It is ideal for trauma patients presenting in an unstable or extremis physiological state. It focuses on the rapid resuscitation of these patients by providing temporary stabilisation of fractures while at the same time reducing the biological load of surgery. Early findings support its usefulness in controlling the lethal triad of hypothermia, acidosis and coagulopathy. Furthermore, recent evidence indicates that it regulates the evolving systemic inflammatory response, reducing the detrimental complications of adult respiratory distress syndrome, multiple organ dysfunction and subsequent mortality. Although DCO has been proven a useful surgical strategy for efficiently managing patients with multiple trauma, further work is required to establish fully its indications, results and cost implications.

Effects of changing strategies of fracture fixation on immunologic changes and systemic complications after multiple trauma: damage control orthopedic surgery

In the treatment of polytrauma patients, multiple studies have shown how the timing and the type of the initial surgery of long bone fractures influence the incidence of systemic complications. Database analyses documented that unduly long surgical procedures undertaken early after trauma increase the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially when femoral shaft fractures are stabilized. Animal research and prospective clinical studies also support the fact that the type of stabilization of a femoral shaft fracture may influence the systemic response to trauma. Reamed intramedullary reaming and nailing for a femoral shaft fracture is associated with an increased risk of pulmonary fat embolization from the medullary canal. This can result in pulmonary compromise if certain cofactors are also present. Modified reamers have been developed to reduce this side effect. The mediating effects are immunologic changes, varying according to the magnitude of the surgical procedure. Pro-inflammatory markers (e.g., Interleukins) may be used to assess the inflammatory response to injury as well as the magnitude of surgery and the systemic impact induced by surgery. Serum levels of such markers can be used clinically to tailor the amount of surgery that is performed to the clinical condition of the patient. The potentially negative impact of excessive surgery in high-risk patients can be avoided by using a new grading system for the assessment of the clinical status of the injured patient. Most recently, a large prospective randomized multicenter study has documented that this grading system is effective for identifying these borderline patients, and that in the borderline patient a staged surgical approach, such as temporary femoral stabilization with an external fixator, reduces the incidence of systemic complications. This work has changed the surgical management of multiply injured patients toward an approach that is tailored to the clinical condition of the patient, as indicated by well-defined clinical parameters as well as objective measurements of serum cytokine levels.