Endoscopic ultrasonography versus probe for diagnosis of depth of infiltration of colorectal cancer

High-frequency ultrasound probe sonography staging for colorectal neoplasia with superficial morphology: its utility and impact on patient management

BACKGROUND

This prospective study aimed to evaluate the impact of high-frequency ultrasound probe sonography (HFUPS) staging on the management of patients with superficial colorectal neoplasia (SCN) as determined by the endoscopic characteristics of lesions.

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred for endoscopic treatment of nonpedunculated SCN were enrolled in this study. A lesion was considered high risk if a depressed area or invasive pit pattern was present. The gold standard for final staging included histology from endoscopic or surgical resection. The impact on treatment was defined as any modification of the therapeutic algorithm based on the result of the HFUPS examination compared with that based on endoscopy alone.

RESULTS

In this study, 48 lesions in 48 patients were evaluated. Of these, 28 (58%) were considered high risk, and the remaining 20 (42%) were regarded as low risk. A total of seven lesions (15%) that could not be examined with HFUPS and another non-neoplastic lesion were excluded from final analysis. For the remaining 40 lesions, the overall accuracy of the HFUPS examination to predict the correct T-stage was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77-96%). The HFUPS examination had a positive impact on the treatment of 0 low-risk and 11 high-risk (42%) lesions.

CONCLUSION

The impact of HFUPS on the treatment of SCN depends on their endoscopic characteristics. It is negligible for low-risk SCNs, and these lesions can be treated on the basis of their endoscopic appearance alone. Nevertheless, compared with endoscopy alone, HFUPS changed the subsequent therapeutic approach in a positive way for up to 42% of high-risk lesions, including those with a depressed component and an invasive pit pattern. These endoscopic features can therefore be recommended as the entry criteria for an HFUPS examination.

Comparison of EUS and magnifying colonoscopy for assessment of small colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND

Prediction of invasion depth and lymph node metastasis is mandatory when local treatment is considered for small colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of EUS with a catheter probe (probe-EUS) and magnifying colonoscopy for prediction of invasion depth and lymph node metastasis for small colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Small colorectal cancers were imaged by both probe-EUS and magnifying colonoscopy. Invasion depth by probe-EUS was determined by the presence or absence of distortion of the third sonographic layer. Findings by magnifying colonoscopy were divided into regular, distorted, and amorphous patterns. Histopathologically, depth of invasion was classified as intramucosa/slight or deep invasion. Findings by probe-EUS and magnifying colonoscopy were compared with respect to deep invasion and lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

There were 22 small colorectal cancers with intramucosa/slight invasion and 28 with deep invasion. Four of 30 cancers had associated lymph node metastasis. Accuracy for depth of invasion was 91.8% for probe-EUS and 63.3% in magnifying colonoscopy, the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.0013). Negative predictive value of probe-EUS for deep invasion was higher than that for magnifying colonoscopy (respectively, 90.9% vs. 54.1%) in the population studied (prevalence deep invasion 56%). The accuracy for lymph node metastasis was 24.1% for probe-EUS and 72.4% for magnifying colonoscopy, the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.001). Positive predictive value for lymph node metastasis was higher when the amorphous pattern was noted by magnifying colonoscopy compared with the positive predictive value for deep invasion by probe-EUS (respectively, 33.3% vs. 8.7%) in the population studied (prevalence lymph node metastasis 13.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Probe-EUS is superior to magnifying colonoscopy for determination of invasion depth in small colorectal cancer. Magnifying colonoscopy may be predictive of lymph node metastasis, thereby suggesting that the procedures provide complementary information with respect to the decision for local versus surgical therapy.

Prospective comparison of catheter-based endoscopic sonography versus standard endoscopic sonography: evaluation of gastrointestinal-wall abnormalities and staging of gastrointestinal malignancies

PURPOSE

Endoscopic sonography (EUS) is an important imaging modality for evaluating benign and malignant luminal gastrointestinal-tract abnormalities. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of catheter-based EUS (C-EUS) during standard upper and lower endoscopy in patients with malignancies and other abnormalities of the gastrointestinal-tract lumen, to assess the image quality obtained with the 12.5-MHz catheter-based ultrasound transducer, and to prospectively compare the interpretations of C-EUS images with those of the standard EUS (S-EUS) images.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-seven consecutive patients referred for EUS were evaluated with C-EUS followed by S-EUS. The patients were assigned to 1 of 2 groups: group A, patients with intramural masses or intestinal wall thickening, with biopsies negative for malignancy; and group B, patients with esophageal, gastric, duodenal, or rectal cancer referred for staging. The results of C-EUS and S-EUS were compared for each group.

RESULTS

C-EUS was completed in 134 patients: 81 patients with 83 lesions in group A and 53 patients in group B. For group A, C-EUS image interpretation concurred with that of S-EUS in 74 (89%) of 83 lesions. For group B, C-EUS concurred with S-EUS for tumor depth (T) and nodal (N) classifications in 19 cases (36%) and 26 cases (49%), respectively. The depth of invasion was underestimated by C-EUS in all 34 cases in which the T classifications by C-EUS and S-EUS were discordant. In 1 of 6 patients with stenotic cancer that was nontraversable by S-EUS, C-EUS identified lymphadenopathy (incorrectly classified as N0 by S-EUS).

CONCLUSIONS

C-EUS was easily performed, and the C-EUS images were comparable to the S-EUS images in assessing mucosal and intramural lesions. The limited depth of penetration of the catheter-based transducer resulted in understaging the extent of tumor invasion and underestimating the nodal spread.

Gastrointestinal miniprobe sonography: the current status

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) represents a major advance in endoscopic imaging. The usefulness and effectiveness of EUS have been established during the past few years. However, endosonography using dedicated echoendoscopes (7.5/12 MHz) has some serious drawbacks, as follows: 1) Combining endoscopy and ultrasonography in one instrument increases the diameter of such echoendoscopes (12-13 mm); 2) Because of the large diameter, complete passage of severe strictures is often not possible and, for examination of the pancreatobiliary duct system, is not feasible at all; 3) Image quality and resolution for small lesions is not always satisfactory; and 4) Conventional endosonography requires a second examination separate from the previous routine endoscopy. Recently developed ultrasonographic miniprobes (diameters about 2 mm; frequencies 12-20 MHz) can be passed through the working channel of standard endoscopes to provide high frequency ultrasound images. These miniprobes might overcome some of the above-mentioned drawbacks and contribute to patients' security and convenience. Moreover, in various diseases of the GI tract and the pancreatobiliary duct system, diagnostic accuracy of miniprobe ultrasonography has been shown to be even superior to that of EUS. In summary, miniprobe ultrasonography seems to be a promising tool in the armamentarium of gastroenterological diagnostics.