Prospective screening of dyspeptic patients by Helicobacter pylori serology: a safe policy? The Italian Helicobacter pylori Study Group

Helicobacter Pylori "Test-and-Treat" Strategy for Management of Dyspepsia: A Comprehensive Review

OBJECTIVES:

Deciding on whether the Helicobacter pylori test-and-treat strategy is an appropriate diagnostic–therapeutic approach for patients with dyspepsia invites a series of questions. The aim present article addresses the test-and-treat strategy and attempts to provide practical conclusions for the clinician who diagnoses and treats patients with dyspepsia.

METHODS:

Bibliographical searches were performed in MEDLINE using the keywords Helicobacter pylori, test-and-treat, and dyspepsia. We focused mainly on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, cost-effectiveness analyses, and decision analyses.

RESULTS:

Several prospective studies and decision analyses support the use of the test-and-treat strategy, although we must be cautious when extrapolating the results from one geographical area to another. Many factors determine whether this strategy is appropriate in each particular area. The test-and-treat strategy will cure most cases of underlying peptic ulcer disease, prevent most potential cases of gastroduodenal disease, and yield symptomatic benefit in a minority of patients with functional dyspepsia. Future studies should be able to stratify dyspeptic patients according to their likelihood of improving after treatment of infection by H. pylori.

CONCLUSIONS:

The test-and-treat strategy will cure most cases of underlying peptic ulcer disease and prevent most potential cases of gastroduodenal disease. In addition, a minority of infected patients with functional dyspepsia will gain symptomatic benefit. Several prospective studies and decision analyses support the use of the test-and-treat strategy. The test-and-treat strategy is being reinforced by the accumulating data that support the increasingly accepted idea that “the only good H. pylori is a dead H. pylori”.

Does endoscopy diagnose early gastrointestinal cancer in patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia?

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines from NICE have proposed that open access gastroscopy is largely limited to patients with "alarm" symptoms.

AIMS AND METHODS

This study reviewed the outcome of all our patients with verified oesophageal or gastric carcinoma who presented with uncomplicated dyspepsia to see if endoscopic investigation is warranted in this group. All patients with histologically verified upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers who presented over a period from 1998 to 2002 were identified. Their presenting symptoms, treatment, and outcome were analysed.

RESULTS

228 upper GI cancers (119 oesophageal, 109 gastric; mean age 72 years (29-99 years); 130 male, 82 female) were identified in 11 145 endoscopies performed. Only 14 patients (6.2%) presented without alarm symptoms; three patients were under 55 years of age and all had gastric carcinoma-one of these had chronic diarrhoea only. Eleven had dyspepsia or reflux symptoms only, and two were under surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus. Only five patients had a curative surgical resection and are still alive two-six years from diagnosis. A sixth patient had a curative operation but died of a cerebrovascular accident one year later. The remaining eight patients unfortunately had either metastatic disease or comorbidity, which precluded surgery. All of these died within two years of diagnosis, mean survival 10 months.

CONCLUSION

Only five patients with dyspepsia and no alarm symptoms had resectable upper GI malignancies over a four year period. Limiting open access gastroscopy to those with alarm features only would "miss" a small number of patients who have curable upper GI malignancy.

"Test, score and scope": a selection strategy for safe reduction of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in young dyspeptic patients referred from primary care

OBJECTIVE

To test the ability of pre-endoscopic clinical evaluation to predict clinically relevant findings of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients (341) who had been referred to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for further evaluation of dyspeptic symptoms were included in this prospective, single-blinded study. Prior to endoscopy, the patients underwent a standardized clinical evaluation consisting of 1) a symptom questionnaire, 2) serological testing for Helicobacter pylori antibody and 3) determination of blood hemoglobin. Based upon this evaluation, patients were assigned to one of three defined risk groups. Group A comprised patients with known risk factors for diseases that would require further therapeutic or diagnostic management. Patients in groups B and C had no such risk factors. Patients in group C had heartburn or regurgitation as a predominant symptom, whereas patients in group B did not. The prevalence of clinically relevant findings upon upper endoscopy was then compared for these three groups.

RESULTS

The prevalence of clinically relevant endoscopic findings in risk groups A, B and C were 20.1, 2.4 and 1.6%, respectively (p<0.01 for both A versus B and A versus C). Furthermore, 89% of those with clinically relevant endoscopic findings belonged to group A, which comprised a total of 45% of the patients studied. In groups B and C, the prevalence of disease was similar to the area-specific prevalence in the general population without dyspeptic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

By using a simple standardized questionnaire, H. pylori serology and a hemoglobin reading in the evaluation of dyspeptic patients under 45 years of age, the need for endoscopy can be reduced by 55%.

The TETRA study: a prospective evaluation of Helicobacter pylori 'test-and-treat' strategy on 736 patients in clinical practice

AIMS

To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the test-and-treat strategy in a large group of dyspeptic patients in clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients with ulcer-like dyspepsia, < 45 years, without alarm symptoms, were prospectively studied. Helicobacter pylori infection was diagnosed with the 13C-urea-breath-test, and eradication or symptomatic treatment was prescribed accordingly. 'Symptomatic improvement' was defined as the percentage of patients with a decrease of > or = 2 levels in the dyspepsia-severity-score or with no symptoms after treatment. Health status and use of health resources were also assessed. Endoscopy was performed in therapeutic failures.

RESULTS

Out of 736 patients initially included, 422 received eradication, and 314 symptomatic therapy; 87% returned at 6 weeks and 67% at 6 months. At 6 months, 'symptomatic improvement' was achieved in 73% and 54% of the patients, in eradication and symptomatic groups, respectively (p < .001), and overall in 66%. A reduction of 78% in mean self-assessment visual analogical score was observed at 6 months. More than 50% of patients were 'much better' at control visits. Endoscopy (18%) and physician's visits (13%) were the main health resources used. No gastric or oesophageal cancer was diagnosed.

CONCLUSION

This large prospective study shows that the test-and-treat strategy is effective and safe for management of dyspeptic patients in clinical practice.

Evaluation of dyspeptic symptoms in patients with and without Helicobacter pylori infection and normal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

BACKGROUND

A relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and dyspeptic symptoms has not yet been demonstrated.

AIM

To evaluate any possible difference in symptom score between dyspeptic patients with and without H. pylori infection who have normal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and no other appreciable gastrointestinal or systemic disease.

PATIENTS

A series of consecutive patients affected by upper abdominal disturbances completed a symptoms questionnaire before undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with a rapid urease test to detect H. pylori infection. Patients with normal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and abdominal ultrasound were included in the study. The symptoms assessed were burping and belching, bloating, odynophagia, dysphagia, postprandial fullness, heartburn, early satiety, nausea, vomiting, regurgitation, sour taste in mouth, epigastric pain at fasting, epigastric pain postprandial, epigastric pain nocturnal, and pain in right hypocondrium and were scored in terms of intensity and frequency on a scale from 0 to 4.

RESULTS

The total number of patients who met the inclusion criteria was 263 out of 1187 examined. A total of 113 H. pylori-positive and 150 H. pylori-negative patients were compared. Among the symptoms evaluated, belching and bloating and heartburn were present in more than 50% of patients of both groups. No statistical difference was found in terms of presence or absence of each symptom, and intensity or frequency between H. pylori-positive and -negative patients.

CONCLUSION

H. pylori infection does not seem to be associated with a specific symptom in patients with upper abdominal complaints and normal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

A rational approach to uninvestigated dyspepsia in primary care: review of the literature

In this paper the rationale and limitations of the four most important approach strategies to dyspepsia in primary care (empiric treatment, prompt endoscopy, "test-and-scope", and "test-and-treat") are analysed. It is concluded that in the absence of alarm symptoms, a "test-and-treat" approach is currently the most rational approach provided that three conditions are met: (1) a highly accurate test should be used, (2) the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in the population should not be too low, and (3) an effective anti-H pylori regimen should be prescribed taking sufficient time to instruct and motivate the patient.

Helicobacter pylori infection, anti-cagA antibodies and peptic ulcer: a case-control study in Italy

AIM

To evaluate the association between infection with specific strains of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in patients referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

METHODS

One thousand, six hundred and twenty-six consecutive dyspeptic patients, referred to one Endoscopy Unit in Bologna, Italy, were enrolled. For each participant, a blood sample was obtained for the measurement of distinct immunoglobulin G antibodies against H. pylori lysate and cytotoxin associated gene A (cagA). A case-control study included the whole series: patients diagnosed with duodenal (n=275) or gastric (n=71) ulcer were identified and independently compared with controls with non-ulcer dyspepsia (n=1280).

RESULTS

H. pylori seroprevalence (at least one positive marker) was associated with increasing age, male sex and a diagnosis of peptic ulcer. This association was stronger with duodenal ulcer (multivariate odds ratio (OR), 5.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-7.9) than with gastric ulcer (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.4). Further analyses showed that H. pylori lysate+/cagA- subjects had a moderately increased risk of duodenal (OR, 3.2), but not gastric (OR, 1.1), ulcer. When cagA+ subjects were separately compared with seronegative patients, there was a six-fold increased risk for duodenal ulcer and a three-fold increased risk for gastric ulcer.

CONCLUSIONS

A strong positive association between infection with a cagA+ H. pylori strain and the presence of peptic disease was found. The seroprevalence of anti-cagA antibodies among patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia is so high (41%) to preclude its use as a pre-endoscopic screening test.

A test-and-treat policy does not save endoscopy workload in a non-referral hospital

AIM

To assess the impact that a test-and-treat policy with open-access urea breath testing (UBT) has had on the referral rates for endoscopy in a district hospital. Additionally, we examined for any change in the proportion of serious pathology detected endoscopically after adopting the policy.

METHODS

Analysis of data on all open-access endoscopy referrals in a 12-month period before (October 1994 to September 1995) and 2 years after (October 1997 to September 1998) the introduction of the UBT service. This was compared with the same service in our sister hospital, which had not provided a UBT service. Results of patients attending the UBT service during the period of study were also examined.

RESULTS

A total of 798 patients attended for endoscopy (18% aged < 40 years, 82% aged > 40 years) in the pre-UBT year compared with 1905 patients (16% aged < 40 years, 84% aged > 40 years) in the post-UBT year. The standardized referral ratios were significantly higher for both age groups in the post-UBT year: 210 in the < 40 years group (95% CI 187 to 235) and 244 in the > 40 years group (95% CI 233 to 257). Six per cent of the < 40 years group in the post-UBT year had serious pathology compared with 7% pre-UBT (P < 0.1). However, the proportion of serious pathology decreased from 37 to 27% in the > 40 years group (P < 0.01). The total number of open-access endoscopies had increased steadily over the 3 years, despite the introduction of the UBT service. This trend was mirrored in our sister hospital. A total of 457 patients attended the UBT service during the 12 months. Of these, 24.5% were Helicobacter pylori positive, with a 66.3% eradication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

A test-and-treat policy has not saved endoscopy workload in this non-referral hospital. We feel that results from centres with an H. pylori interest cannot be generalized for the vast majority.

Helicobacter pylori "test-and-scope" strategy for dyspeptic patients. Is it useful and safe?

AIM

To evaluate outcome of test-and-scope strategy using 13C-urea breath test, Helicobacter pylori IgG serology, and CagA serology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 100 dyspeptic patients were studied. Biopsies were obtained for histology and rapid urease test (gold standard). Serum samples were obtained for Helicobacter pylori IgG and CagA serology, and 13C-urea breath test was carried out.

RESULTS

If endoscopy had not been performed in Helicobacter pylori patients based on 13C-urea breath test, <45 years, without alarm symptoms, and without non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, 15% of endoscopies would have been saved, and one gastric ulcer and two oesophagitis would have been missed. Based on Helicobacter pylori IgG serology, 21% of endoscopies would have been saved. Finally, if endoscopy had been performed only in CagA+ patients, 31% of endoscopies would have been saved, missing one gastric ulcer and two cases of oesophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In our geographical area, the test-and-scope strategy based on 13C-urea breath test or Helicobacter pylori IgG serology would have saved only 15-20% of endoscopies. Although some relevant pathology would have been missed, it is not of a malignant type. 13C-urea breath test is the preferred non-invasive method to be used in this strategy, while Helicobacter pylori IgG serology is of limited value due to its low accuracy. With the use of CagA serology a larger number of unnecessary endoscopic examinations can be avoided.

Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Stool tests

From the limited data available, it seems that the H. pylori stool assay represents a highly accurate diagnostic tool to detect H. pylori infection before and shortly after therapy. As a test that is noninvasive, accurate, simple, and cost-effective, the H. pylori stool assay has the potential to become the preferred diagnostic tool in many different clinical settings from epidemiologic studies to pediatric investigations, from pre-endoscopic screening policies to posttherapy monitoring.

Review article:invasive and non-invasive tests for Helicobacter pylori infection

There are two general ways in which a diagnosis of infection by Helicobacter pylori can be made: by using either an invasive or non-invasive procedure. The invasive procedures involve an endoscopy and biopsy. A biopsy is essential because often the mucosa may appear macroscopically normal but nevertheless be inflamed. A biopsy is obtained by histological examination, culture, polymerase chain reaction or detection of the presence of urease activity in biopsy material. The non-invasive tests that can be used to diagnose the infection are serology, detection of labelled metabolic products of urea hydrolysis in the breath (13CO2, 14CO2), the urine or the blood, and detection of H, pylori antigen in a stool specimen. At present no single test can be relied upon to detect definitely colonization by H. pylori, and a combination of two is recommended if this is feasible. The choice of the test to be used is not straightforward and may vary according to the clinical condition and local expertise.

Noninvasive antigen-based assay for assessing Helicobacter pylori eradication: a European multicenter study. The European Helicobacter pylori HpSA Study Group

OBJECTIVE

In a recently published multicenter study involving 501 patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) throughout Europe, we showed the high accuracy of a recently developed simple test (HpSA) to detect Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) antigens in stools of untreated patients. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic usefulness of HpSA compared with 13C UBT shortly after H. pylori eradication treatment.

METHODS

Of the 501 patients enrolled in the validation study, 279 were found to be H. pylori-positive. These patients were given H. pylori eradicating regimen and asked to return for follow-up EGD with biopsies, 13C UBT and HpSA testing 4 wk after therapy. Follow-up results were available for 235 patients. Of these, 162 consented to all testing and 73 consented only to 13C UBT and HpSA testing. We assessed sensitivity and specificity of both HpSA and 13C UBT compared with biopsy-based methods in the 162 patients, who accepted follow-up EGD. We also assessed sensitivity and specificity of HpSA compared with 13C UBT, arbitrarily chosen as the gold standard, in the whole population of 235 patients.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity in 162 patients who consented to a second EGD were 93.8% (CI: 85.4-100%) and 96.9% (CI: 93.9-99.9%) for HpSA, and 90.6% (CI: 80.5-100%) and 99.2% (CI: 97.7-100%) for UBT. Using EGD-based methods as the gold standard, 130 of the 162 treated patients' H. pylori infection were eradicated (125 HpSA-negative, one borderline, and four false-positive; 129 13C UBT-negative, one false-positive), and 32 remained H. pylori-infected (30 HpSA-positive, two false-negative, 29 13C UBT-positive, three false negative). The overall eradication rate was 80.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of HpSA relative to UBT as the gold standard in the overall population (n = 235) were 95.6% (CI: 89.6-100%) and 94.7% (CI: 91.5-97.9%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HpSA has proven to be a useful method in posttreatment eradication testing for H. pylori. Its ease of use, speed, and noninvasive nature make HpSA testing an ideal method for post-treatment monitoring where a second EGD may not be justified.

Disease management in ulcer disease

BACKGROUND

Our knowledge of Helicobacter pylori infection indicates that it is possible to eliminate ulcer disease and improve quality of life for ulcer patients. Treatment is evidence-based and cost-effective. However, though we now have the tools, we have not yet been able to eliminate ulcer disease from society. Dissemination of knowledge and treatment implementation have been problematic. In primary care, there is diagnostic and therapeutic chaos regarding this infection. Disagreement exists on indications for treatment. Expenditure on acid-reducing drugs has greatly increased. Clearly we are not treating all ulcer patients properly (undertreatment); instead we have incorporated H. pylori therapy ('test and treat') into our approach to dyspepsia (overtreatment). Anti-H. pylori therapy in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia may increase costs because most patients still suffer from symptoms after antibiotic therapy, and therefore require further diagnostic procedures and prescription of new drugs. In order to redeem the great promise of H. pylori, we must focus less on new ulcer patients, because the incidence is rapidly decreasing in Western Europe. Prevalence of ulcer disease, however, is still high. Thus we need to focus more on prevalent cases. We ought to seek and treat those persons already known to have ulcer disease. Systematic 'case-finding' strategies must be performed using standard protocols. Only such 'disease management' programmes performed at the primary care level will suffice to eliminate ulcer disease while also being cost-effective.

Management of uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia: a Working Party report for the World Congresses of Gastroenterology 1998

BACKGROUND

The management of dyspepsia is controversial.

METHODS

An international Working Party was convened in 1998 to review management strategies for dyspepsia and functional dyspepsia, based on a review of the literature and best clinical practice.

RESULTS

Dyspepsia, defined as pain or discomfort centred in the upper abdomen, can be managed with reassurance and over-the-counter therapy if its duration is less than 4 weeks on initial presentation. For patients with chronic symptoms, clinical evaluation depends on alarm features including patient age. The age cut off selected should depend on the age specific incidence when gastric cancer begins to increase, but in Western nations 50 years is generally an acceptable age threshold. In younger patients without alarm features, Helicobacter pylori test and treatment is the approach recommended because of its value in eliminating the peptic ulcer disease diathesis. If, after eradication of H. pylori, symptoms either are not relieved or rapidly recur, then an empirical trial of therapy is recommended. Similarly, in H. pylori-negative patients without alarm features, an empirical trial (with antisecretory or prokinetic therapy depending on the predominant symptom) for up to 8 weeks is recommended. If drugs fail, endoscopy should be considered because of its reassurance value although the yield will be low. In older patients or those with alarm features, prompt endoscopy is recommended. If endoscopy is non-diagnostic, gastric biopsies are recommended to document H. pylori status unless already known. While treatment of H. pylori is unlikely to relieve the symptoms of functional dyspepsia, the long-term benefits probably outweigh the risks and treatment can be considered on a case-by-case basis. In H. pylori-negative patients with documented functional dyspepsia, antisecretory or prokinetic therapy, depending on the predominant symptom, is reasonable, assuming reassurance and explanation are insufficient, unless patients have already failed this approach. Other treatment options include antidepressants, antispasmodics, visceral analgesics such as serotonin type 3 receptor antagonists, and behavioural or psychotherapy although these are all of uncertain efficacy. Long-term drug treatment in functional dyspepsia should be avoided; intermittent short courses of treatment as needed is preferred.

CONCLUSION

The management of dyspepsia recommended is based on current best evidence but must be tailored to local factors such as practice setting, the background prevalence of H. pylori and structural disease, and costs.

Impact of ELISA and immunoblot as diagnostic tools one year after eradication of Helicobacter pylori in a multicentre treatment study

The performance of serological tests for Helicobacter pylori infections is hampered by the persistence of antibodies after eradication therapy or spontaneous healing. Detection of different antigens or immunoglobulin classes might have an impact on the validity of serodiagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the decrease in IgA and IgG antibody levels after eradication of H. pylori. Serum samples of 242 patients with active duodenal ulcer were tested with the ELISA and the immunoblot (IB) techniques for H. pylori-specific IgA and IgG antibodies before therapy and 1 year after successful eradication. From a total of 81 patients paired sera were available. At the end of the follow-up period ELISA antibody titres from the IgA class had decreased from a mean value of 6.69 to 4.26 units (P = 0.0001), and IgG class antibody titres from a mean value of 21.9 to 12.1 units (P = 0.0001). Regarding seroreversion, from 34 initially IgA positive sera 16 (47%), and from 74 IgG positive sera 18 (24%), had definitively reverted to 'negative'. One year after eradication, when tested with the immunoblot, the antibody responses against specific antigens of 37% IgA-positive sera (23/62) and 8% IgG-positive sera (6/78) reverted to 'negative', compared to a seroreversion rate of 27% of the anti-CagA IgA-positive sera (18/67) and of 9% of the anti-CagA IgG-positive sera (7/79). In conclusion, despite an overall significant decrease of H. pylori antibodies, both tests cannot be recommended for monitoring treatment success.

Validation and value of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Helicobacter pylori in primary care

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is related to gastric ulcer and carcinoma. In this study we validated the Pyloriset EIA-G New (a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) in a general practice population. The implications of eradication in case of a positive result were assessed.

METHODS

One hundred and fifteen subsequent patients, enrolled in a randomized clinical trial evaluating the optimal strategy for treatment of dyspeptic patients in primary care, were included. Using biopsy as gold standard, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the test.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of the test were 91% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 86% to 97%) and 78% (95% CI = 75% to 82%), respectively. Eradication of H. pylori would be indicated in 8 of 57 positive patients, since these actually had a peptic ulcer. In the other 49 patients eradication therapy would be unnecessary.

CONCLUSION

The Pyloriset EIA-G New is a reliable test in primary care. However, a serologic test-and-treat strategy in all dyspeptic patients cannot be recommended.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori

Overwhelming evidence implicates Helicobacter pylori as a significant causative factor in many gastroduodenal diseases. Effective multidrug antimicrobial regimens are available for cure of the infection, so investigative efforts are focusing on cost-effectiveness and treatment outcome in various populations. Potential associations between H. pylori and nongastric disorders are being examined. Recognition that infection is largely acquired during childhood has emphasized the need to study pediatric issues. Posttreatment studies confirm the importance of the bacterium in pathogenesis and relapse of peptic ulcer disease. Antimicrobial resistance has a negative impact on cure of the infection and healing of gastroduodenal lesions. Methodology to evaluate H. pylori antimicrobial susceptibility has been standardized by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, and minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints to standardize resistance assays are being established. Surveillance of H. pylori antimicrobial resistance is underway in a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multisite project in the United States.

How should new-onset dyspepsia be managed in general and specialist practice?

Managing patients with new-onset dyspeptic symptoms represents a real challenge in clinical decision-making. The major controversy has been over the optimal management strategy of patients with new-onset dyspeptic symptoms who do not present with alarm symptoms. Since unaided clinical diagnosis is unreliable, proposed management strategies have included empirical treatment algorithms, computer-assisted predictive score models and Helicobacter pylori-based strategies such as test-and-scope or test-and-treat algorithms. Endoscopy remains the diagnostic 'gold standard', and the management should ideally be based on endoscopic diagnosis. Because of economic constraints and increasing waiting lists, this is not possible. When precise and comprehensive guidelines have been formulated, future patients will probably be managed in primary care by a Helicobacter test-and-treat policy, leaving only empirical treatment failures for specialist evaluation.