Improved endoscopic management of severe upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage using a new wide-channel endoscope

A randomized controlled trial of gastric lavage prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

GOALS

We hypothesized that large volume gastric lavage prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding would improve the quality of endoscopic examination.

BACKGROUND

Blood retained in the stomach can impair visualization during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and a retained gastric fundic pool during endoscopy may have worse outcomes than patients without a retained fundic pool. No trials to date have evaluated if large volume gastric lavage prior to endoscopy improves visualization during acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

STUDY METHODS

Patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding were randomized to esophagogastroduodenoscopy alone or large volume tap water gastric lavage prior to esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The quality of endoscopic visualization was assessed using a 5-point scale. Clinical outcomes were compared for lavaged and nonlavaged patients.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients were randomized. In 1 patient, lavage was unsuccessful. The quality of visualization was not significantly different between groups for the esophagus, gastric antrum, or duodenum but was significantly better for the gastric fundus for patients randomized to lavage (P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between groups for ability to define a bleeding source, achieve hemostasis, recurrent bleeding, need for repeat endoscopy, and length of stay or death. There were no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Large volume gastric lavage prior to esophagogastroduodenoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is safe and provides better visualization of the gastric fundus.

A novel endoscopic device for retrieval of polyps resected from the colon and rectum

BACKGROUND

Retrieval of polyps resected from the colorectum is time consuming, despite the availability of various devices, such as grasping forceps, nets, and suction traps, for this purpose. A novel device for retrieval of polyps was developed and tested.

METHODS

Patients with polyp(s) less than or equal to 6 mm in diameter were included in this study. The effectiveness of the device for polyp retrieval was evaluated.

OBSERVATIONS

In total, 180 of 184 polyps were retrieved from 100 patients. Four polyp specimens (2.2%) were lost after polypectomy. None of the retrieved specimens were damaged. All retrieved polyps could be assessed histopathologically, and a definitive diagnosis was made.

CONCLUSIONS

The newly developed device proved to be reliable when used in clinical practice.

Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Nonvariceal UGI bleeding is one of the most common emergencies that gastroenterologists encounter, and continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The keys to management are rapid resuscitation and stabilization; appropriate triage based on pre-endoscopic risk factors; early endoscopy to achieve prompt diagnosis and implement hemostatic therapy to high-risk lesions; and aggressive antisecretory therapy (in the case of peptic ulcer bleeding) to reduce the risk of continued or recurrent bleeding.

Erythromycin improves the quality of EGD in patients with acute upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic and therapeutic value of EGD in patients with upper GI bleeding is often limited by the presence of residual blood or clots. When infused before EGD, erythromycin, a potent gastrokinetic drug, might improve the quality of EGD in patients with upper GI bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of erythromycin on the quality of the EGD in patients with acute upper GI bleeding.

METHODS

Forty-one patients admitted to the intensive care unit because of acute upper GI bleeding were included in a randomized, endoscopist-blinded, controlled trial, comparing erythromycin (3 mg/kg intravenously over 30 minutes) to no treatment (control patients). EGD was performed 30 to 90 minutes after the end of the infusion. The primary study outcome was quality of EGD examination, as evaluated on a scale of 0 to 3, and the need to perform a second diagnostic EGD within the next 8 days. Secondary outcomes were efficiency of the endoscopic hemostatic therapy and intensity of esophagogastroduodenal contractions, as evaluated on a scale of 0-3.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the patients and lesions found by EGD were similar in both groups. Quality of the EGD examination was significantly better in the erythromycin group (n = 19) compared with the control group (n = 22) (2.5 [0.8] vs. 1.5 [1.3]; p = 0.02). Three patients receiving erythromycin required a second EGD compared with 10 control patients (p = 0.089). Erythromycin did not interfere with the performance of EGD or the efficiency of hemostatic procedures. The intensity of gastroduodenal contractions was similar in both groups. No adverse event was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute upper GI bleeding, infusion of erythromycin before endoscopy significantly improved the quality of EGD and tended to reduce the need for second-look endoscopy.

The role of endoscopic therapy in the treatment of bleeding varices

The role of endoscopy in bleeding varices is both diagnostic and therapeutic. While sclerotherapy of oesophageal varices remains an established modality, ligation has, in view of its higher safety margin, turned out to be superior in recent years. The excellent initial results of ligation are, however, tainted by a higher recurrence rate in the long term. Since the end-point of treatment is the achievement and maintenance of variceal eradication, the addition of low-dose sclerotherapy following initial eradication by ligation seems to be the optimal method to combine the best of both techniques. In the management of life-threatening bleeding from oesophageal varices and gastric varices, cyanoacrylate remains the only promising non-surgical option. Primary endoscopic prophylaxis is still under evaluation. It is only justified in high-risk patients with large varices bearing red colour signs and in the presence of an intolerance of or contra-indication to propranolol. When indicated, ligation seems to be preferable, and the addition of low-dose sclerotherapy after initial variceal eradication may maintain the benefits accrued in such high-risk patients. The present review examines the available evidence regarding the above issues in the recent literature.

Therapeutic endoscopy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding

This article reviews the role of therapeutic endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of nonvariceal upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage. The initial approach to patients with GI bleeding is reviewed. Endoscopic treatment of various stigmata of recent peptic ulcer hemorrhage is discussed in detail. Management of less common causes of nonvariceal bleeding, such as Dieulafoy's lesions, Mallory-Weiss tears, angiomas, and bleeding colonic diverticula is described. Recommendations for endoscopic techniques are based on the results of UCLA-CURE hemostasis studies.