[Serum lipids in treatment with transdermal estradiol and oral norethisterone acetate]

[Hormone replacement therapy for internal risk patients]

Using hormone replacement therapy (HRT), absolute and relative contradictions have to be considered, which are primarily classified according to a "worst case" scenario on the assumption of group effects, in order to satisfy forensic demands. However, in patients with severe complaints it make sense to apply HRT even at increased risk. To minimize the risk, a differentiated choice of the preparation especially in terms of progestin component and application mode is feasible apart from a general dose reduction. For internal risk patients, transdermal estradiol in a patch or gel and neutral progestins like progesterone and dydrogesterone or combination patches for a completely transdermal HRT are to be preferred. In the Women's Health Initiative, a study investigating a population strongly burdened with cardiovascular risks, the most important risks were venous thromboses and strokes, in old age also myocardial infarctions. In this context, the risk groups with diabetes, hypertension and dyslipoproteinemia as well as smokers in general are of particular importance. Other common internal risk groups comprise women with thyroid and hepatobiliary diseases. Rare but prognostically important diseases such as porphyria and lupus erythematosus are considered as relative contraindications. The available data on these risk groups are described and practical recommendations are given.

Efficacy of a new 7-day transdermal sequential estradiol/levonorgestrel patch in women

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of a new 7-day transdermal sequential estradiol/levonorgestrel patch (Fem7 Combi; Merck KGaA; Germany), versus placebo, as hormone replacement therapy in menopausal women.

METHODS

A multicentre, randomized, clinical study consisting of a 3-week screening phase, a 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase, and a 12-week open, follow-up phase. Women aged 40-65 years with an intact uterus and menopausal complaints were randomized to either 2 weeks of an estradiol mono patch (50 microg per 24 h) followed by 2 weeks of an estradiol/levonorgestrel combination patch (50 microg/10 microg per 24 h), or a placebo patch, for three 28-day cycles. Changes in the Kupperman Index and the frequency of hot flushes were assessed.

RESULTS

The sequential use of a 7-day estradiol patch and a 7-day estradiol/levonorgestrel patch was superior to placebo in reducing menopausal symptoms, and was well tolerated. At the end of the treatment phase, there was a statistically significant reduction in the Kupperman Index score versus placebo (P<0.0001), and a statistically significant difference between groups in the proportion of patients with a reduction in the number of hot flushes (at least 50% versus baseline). During the open follow-up phase, there was a marked reduction in the Kupperman Index score and the number of hot flushes for patients switched from placebo to active study medication. The active medication was effective throughout the 1-week application period.

CONCLUSIONS

The new 7-day transdermal sequential estradiol/levonorgestrel patch was well tolerated, providing rapid and effective relief of menopausal symptoms. The addition of low-dose levonorgestrel did not influence the beneficial effects of estradiol.

Efficacy and tolerability of a new 7-day transdermal estradiol patch versus placebo in hysterectomized women with postmenopausal complaints

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of a continuously applied 7-day-Estradiol patch (Fem7, Merck KGaA, Germany) delivering 50 microg estradiol per day in the treatment of hysterectomized women with postmenopausal complaints compared with placebo.

DESIGN

A multicentre, randomized, double-blind study with an initial screening phase (phase I), a 3-month double-blind placebo-controlled phase (phase II) and a 3-month open follow-up phase (phase III).

METHODS

186 patients were randomized for a 3-cycle placebo-controlled study followed by a 3-cycle open follow-up (total duration; 6 months). The changes in Kupperman Index (primary efficacy variable), hot flushes and urogenital symptom score were studied from baseline to the end of the study. In addition, skin tolerability was assessed and patients were also asked to grade the subjective acceptance of therapy.

RESULTS

A reduction in Kupperman Index was observed in both groups, and at each cycle of the placebo-controlled treatment phase the 7-day-Estradiol patch was superior compared with placebo (last value vs. baseline P = 0.0006). From the second treatment week onwards a distinct difference was noted in the reduction of hot flushes from baseline between the 7-day-Estradiol patch group and the placebo group. The difference between the groups was statistically significant for each cycle and at the end of the controlled treatment phase (mean weekly hot flush reduction at the end of the placebo-controlled treatment phase: -32.5 for the 7-day-Estradiol patch vs. -22.0 for placebo, P = 0.0025). The efficacy of the 7-day-Estradiol patch within the application period did not show any difference between days 1-3 and 4-7. Subjective acceptance of the 7-day-Estradiol patch was good and 72.4% of patients who took active medication throughout the study were willing to consider continuing its use.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7-day-Estradiol patch is well tolerated and provides effective relief of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in hysterectomized women, with a rapid onset of action and 7-day duration of therapeutic effect. Although a placebo effect was observed, the 7-day-Estradiol patch significantly reduced hot flushes and other menopausal symptoms throughout the application period.