[Prospective Epidemiologic Study of Epigastric Discomfort (PRESTO). Ground work and preliminary results]

Functional dyspepsia--a multicausal disease and its therapy

Functional dyspepsia is a common chronic disorder with non-specific upper abdominal symptoms which can not be explained by organic or biochemical abnormalities. The dyspeptic symptoms are very compromising and bothersome and result in a substantial reduction of quality of life. The substantial direct and indirect medical and economical costs induce a high socioeconomic interest in the pathogenesis and the treatment options of this disease. Over the past 30 years several theories about the etiology of the symptoms in functional dyspepsia patients have been put forward. These include disorders of gastrointestinal motility, acid secretion, visceral hypersensitivity, adaptation and accommodation, Hp-infection, mucosal inflammation and finally genetic predisposition. There is increasing evidence that functional dyspepsia is a multi-causal disorder, which leads to altered processing of afferent information from the gastrointestinal tract to the CNS. Autonomic hypersensitivity and altered central processing could be a common phenomenon whereas motility changes, inflammation or altered secretion could increase neural afferent inputs. Treatment of this complex disorder could and should involve these different levels of symptom generation. Thus different approaches with anti-secretory, spasmolytic, prokinetic and anti-inflammatory effects and most preferably reduction of visceral hypersensitivity seem logical. This could explain the variety of drugs which show a positive symptomatic response. This could also offer the conclusion, whether a combination of these drugs could be clinically superior which remains to be proven. And this could offer a logical approach for the use of substances with a multi-target action, e.g. STW 5.

Low yield of endoscopy in patients with persistent dyspepsia taking proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Options for the evaluation of dyspepsia include a Helicobacter pylori test-and-treat strategy, empiric acid suppression, and initial endoscopy. The aim of this study was to determine the yield of endoscopy in patients in whom empiric therapy is unsuccessful compared with patients who received no empiric therapy and to identify factors associated with endoscopic findings.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with dyspepsia referred for endoscopy completed a questionnaire that included a query concerning response to therapy. EGD findings were compared in patients taking an H2-receptor antagonist, patients taking a proton pump inhibitor, and those not receiving empiric therapy.

RESULTS

There were fewer endoscopic findings in patients being treated with a proton pump inhibitor compared with those taking an H2-receptor antagonist or those not receiving therapy (p < 0.01). Fewer proton pump inhibitor recipients had esophagitis or ulcer compared with patients in the no therapy group. Lack of symptom relief (<20%) by acid suppression was highly associated with a normal endoscopy (17/17).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with persistent dyspepsia being treated with a proton pump inhibitor have fewer endoscopic abnormalities compared with patients with dyspepsia taking an H2-receptor antagonist and those receiving no therapy. For patients with partial symptom relief, proton pump inhibitor therapy may mask endoscopic findings, particularly esophagitis. Interruption of proton pump inhibitors before endoscopy may increase diagnostic yield. Endoscopy is unlikely to yield a positive finding in patients who experience no symptom relief while taking a proton pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist.